Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The Effect of Toxic Leadership
The Effect of Toxic Leadership
The Effect of Toxic Leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The Effect of Toxic Leadership
Yes, several negative characteristics of leaders, as researched in various empirical studies, are evident in the organization as perceived by followers. The study or survey of the corporate level, business level as well as the operational level followers of the organisation revealed a common hate for the same types of leadership. These negative, destructive or toxic leadership characteristics that were reported by followers in all three levels of the surveyed organisation are as discussed below,
Einarsen (2007) defines destructive leadership as a systematic and repeated set of behaviours by a leader that have significant negative impact in the organization or employee outcome as perceived by subordinates. This represents the dark side of leadership as researched by Hogan and Hogan (2001). The taxonomy of destructive leadership represents toxic leadership (Lipman-Blumen, 2006), abusive supervision (Tepper, Carr, Breaux, Geider, Hu &
…show more content…
This characteristic makes the leader to be impulsive, irresponsible, and extraordinarily (House and Howell, 1992). This leader characteristic is also defined or explained as Self-protective. Self-protective leaders are defined in the journal of leadership as "leaders who ensure the safety of themselves and the group, through status enhancement and face saving endeavors”. This self-protective trait is attributable to narcissism, which is also a toxic triangle factor. The Narcissistic leaders are self-absorbed, attention-seeking, and ignore other's viewpoints or welfare (Conger and Kanungo, 1998) and their leadership style is typically autocratic (Rosenthal and Pittinskya, 2006). “Leaders are not always interested in effecting change for the purpose of benefiting the organization and its members as a whole rather, the leader may be more interested in personal outcomes” (O'Conner, Mumford, Clifton, Gessner & Connelly ,
1. Merriam-Webster dictionary defines leadership as the office or position of a leader; capacity to lead; the act or an instance of leading, and it defines a leader as a person who has commanding authority or influence; a first or principal performer of a group. In the 1965 movie “In Harm’s Way”, Rear Admiral Torrey displayed the traits of a leader throughout the movie. He took care of his SAILORS, when the widower XO onboard his command was having drinking problems because of the manner and circumstances in which his wife died, RADM Torrey took the time to talk to him and gave him advice on doing the right thing, to quit drinking, let go of the past, and move on with his life. Instead of punishing him, RAMD Torrey tried to help him. During battle, RAMD Torrey was a leader by letting his friend CDR Powell know that it was fine to be afraid, that battles are fought by scared men who find the courage and commitment to fight and carryout the mission. RAMD Torrey surrounded himself with SAILORS he could trust, men who would carry out plans in the face of danger and adversity. I was fond of the scene where the Command Duty Officer onboard the cruiser did not slow down to wait for the ship’s CO to catch-up and board, he made a decision to continue at full speed, leaving the harbor during the December 7, 1941, Japanese attack, and thus saving the ship.
Inside us all there is a deep dark fear this is what grabs us by the thresh hold of life. It controls the most important aspects of our lives. This is found within the deepest and darkest chasms of our souls. The very creature that wreaks havoc in our minds we cage and never confront we lock this beast away to afraid to overcome it. If the beast is not confronted it begins to contort and change who we are as a person and how we interact with others. Even the very decisions we make as a person to affect those around us and are loved ones to also suffer the consequences of our actions. Such as the crucible and how each person was warped into their own monster by greed.
Kellerman, B. (2004). Bad Leadership: What it is, How it Happens, Why it Matters. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business Press.
In any discussion of leadership, thoughts immediately begin to turn to examples of leadership gone wrong. These may include leaders who bully, threaten, or allow their mood to affect the environment of the agency (Reed, 2004, p. 67). The reason we focus upon these examples is the destructive impact they have upon the agency as a whole, as well as the individual officers unfortunate enough to serve under that type of leader. Leaders such as these foster an environment of backbiting and belittling as a method of control, resulting in an untenable environment for those officers who choose not to engage in such behavior and, as often as not, promotion of those that do. This kind of management gives way to:
Yukl, G. (2002). Leadership in organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. p. 1-19. Retrieved from http://www.blackdiamond.dk/HDO/Organisation_Gary_Yukl_Leadership_in_Organizations.pdf
Leadership is the action of leading a group of people or an organization. Leadership is leading a group of people or company to reach a result or further and the organization. A leader is supposed to be an example of how all employees are expected to act and what they should be striving for. Good leaders also don’t use their position within a company to take advantage of the company and its employees. A good leader is supposed to be able to perform their job with high standards, efficiency, and honor. However, for every good leader, there are bad leaders and the worse the leader the more detrimental he or she becomes to employees and the company they run. Poor leadership skills can ultimately ruin a company 's chance of success. The attitude
Finally, in spite of lack of agreement on a complete list of leadership traits, there is some agreement on a few: intelligence, social maturity and breadth, inner motivation and achievement drives, and human relations attitudes. These traits are in no sense “universal” traits. However, as Keith Davis notes in his discussion of these traits, “Studies show that there is a better than chance probability that a leader will have more of these traits than the general population and sometimes even more than the average of his followers”.
Leadership is that process in which one person sets the purpose or direction for one or more other persons and gets them to move along together with him or her and with each other in that direction with competence and full commitment (Elliott, 2009). Leadership is supposed to guide people to attain a particular set vision. Motivation is fundamental in the process of leadership as if there is no motivation there will be laxity among the people involved. It is also a critical scenario for leadership to have followers; this will infer a relationship between leaders and followers (Frank, 2003).
A leader sets the tone for those they supervise. Having a weak or ineffective leadership style turns what could be a productive organization into one that lacks direction, is chaotic, and fails to live up to its potential. Incompetent central leadership can also cause a power struggle amongst the other remaining team members. Groups seek leadership; when leaders fail to use their powers others will maneuver to use the power left in the void. This can lead to a power-struggle and backstabbing (Morgan, 2007).
The following review presents a discussion of five articles related to leadership. This discussion will identify themes shared by the five articles followed by a presentation of the author’s recommendations for applications of the concepts presented in the articles.
Narcissist tend to think that they are better leaders than what they actually are according to their peers and coworkers. Proverbs 29:2 says "When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice; but when the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn" (King James Bible Online, 2015). Robbins & Judge (2009) describe narcissism as an individual “who has a grandiose sense of self-importance, requires excessive admiration, has a sense of entitlement, and is arrogant.” Poet Tony Hoagland brought up a valid observation in the textbook about the American culture When there came time for a big project, I noticed that he was always the one to be congratulated and rewarded by the management team for the work that the members of his team actually did. He really believed that he had done all of the work and only he should be credited for it, just because he was the team lead and senior member of the team.
Has perception of charismatic leadership changed the playing field for the types of leaders that organizations are in search of? Many feel that the weight of the leader’s charisma as the focus of leadership needs to be re-examined. As a result, the charismatic leader may be viewed probably as one of the most contentious leadership styles because of the focus on the leader’s personal characteristics, often defining them as narcissists. Given the large number of narcissists at the helm or corporations today, the challenge facing organizations is to ensure that such leaders do not self-destruct or lead the company to disaster (Maccoby, 2000).
There are many examples of poor leadership behavior in today’s workplace. Inadequate leadership can be detrimental not only to a team within an organization, but also to the entire organization itself. I believe it is vital for upper management to ensure that their leaders are properly trained and aware of how to handle certain situations and employees. When a leader’s weaknesses are overlooked, large problems occur.
There has never been a situation where I experienced neutralizer variables which made it impossible for leaders to influence the outcome of principles. Neutralizers do not directly connect with principles, instead it serves to reduce, block or cancel the outcomes of leadership relationships, which in turn can hinder a leader’s ability to act in a specific way. The facet of a situation that calls for substitutes for leadership involves variables that make leadership impossible or unnecessary. In some instances, a situation will consist of both substitutes and neutralizers at the same time. According to Kerr and Jermier, substitute for leadership propose that under some situations situational factor may substitute for leadership (Nahavandi, 2015, p. 80).
Leader should have the shared responsibility and collaborative quality. For example, instead of making the strategy alone, he will gather the idea of all brilliant workers to increase the productivity of the organisation.