Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of leadership in the educational system
Importance of leadership in educational organization
Function Of Assessment In Education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
“This authority-dependence of students is matched by the authority-dependence of many teachers, who follow the traditional syllabus and resist democratic transformation” (Shor, 1993, p. 28)
This quote taken from the book Paulo Freire: A Critical Encounter, resonated with me because I believe I am a student dependent on the authority and I am observing the authority-dependence of my teachers. To put this into context I am a student enrolled in the UBC teacher education program, specifically the social emotional learning cohort for elementary teachers. From day one we have been advised of the pitfalls of the education system. We have been guided to examine the system, the purpose of school and the hidden curriculum with a critical eye. We have
…show more content…
Most of the courses have us sitting and listening to instructors in traditional classrooms or uncomfortable auditoriums. Classes are typically in session for three hours and only a few utilize the brain break activities they recommend we use when we become teachers. It is a case of do as I say, not as I do. All of the courses have a syllabus that dictates what is due and when it is due. While this demonstrates organization it denies democratic flexibility. I encountered an apparent example of an authority-dependent teacher blindly following the traditional syllabus. My group is assigned to do a presentation on a paper in the syllabus. The article contains a significant amount of academic language and it was incredibly difficult to read. The entire time I was reading it I kept asking how this is relevant to becoming an elementary teacher? When we brought our concerns to the instructor we learned that the instructor had not read the article and indicated no involvement in designing the syllabus. Do not misunderstand me, this instructor knows the subject and is attempting to have us inquire, reflect and collect practical information. It is just ironic that the instructor had no involvement in the information being taught. This did not send the right
Kozol perceives a war waging between teachers and the public school system (Kozol, 3). Teachers are trapped victims confined to the two purposes public school is attempting to accomplish. Those two goals include “class stratification and political indoctrination” (Kozol, 7). He believes that students should be aware of what is really being taught so they can react accordingly (Kozol, 9).
Students are more willing to learn if the relationships between the students and the teachers are on the same level. This type of teaching helps the students learn how to be respectful, understanding and being able to compromise outside of the college campus. It also teaches students self-motivation and time management. When teacher are extremely aggressive on their class requirement students tend to confine and hold back and do just what they were required to. Students don’t go fair and beyond what they are able to achieve. According to author, Mano Singham, in his essay “Moving Away From the Authoritarian Classroom” he states “I could not make students care about the work, be creative and original, be considerate of others, or write and speak well. All I could do was force them to do was very specific things” (450), Singham is referring to the strict and legalistic syllabus he used to provide his students. This type of authoritarian teaching is extremely difficult on students. It restrains the student’s possibilities and outcomes. When teaches share responsibilities and authorities with the students it prepares the students to be part of a community and a work
By having a standardized curriculum schools are not challenging students. They are creating students that do not challenge what they are learning. Holt (2013) thought that standardized curriculum destroyed student’s freedom of thought, right to question, and the freedom to spread ideas. Every student is the same in a way. Every student is tested the same. The problem is that every student is not the same and every studen...
...cilitator’ or ‘leader’ is not to eliminate authority but rather to, for want of a better word, authorise it. Authoritarian approaches in the end are not ‘authorities’ as such at all. Rather they are better associated with raw irrational power and dictatorships. Alternatively, an authority is authorised for the freedom of the subjects under the authority of the teacher. (What precisely shapes this freedom is another question.) A teacher who rigidly and harmfully oppresses students may be powerful, but not an authority. This means that as a teacher, I remain inevitably an authority, yet I exist as an authority for the freedom or ‘humanising’ (Freire, 1996) or ‘growth’ (Dewey) of my students.
Teachers who lack passion and desire to teach what they are given can translate and manifest its way to students as they also lose aspirations to come to school and learn only what will be on exams they are supposed to take to show that they are “learning.” Students come to school to learn things they did not know prior and with the acquisition of knowledge it can many a times create a drive for students to expand upon a particular subject, which can ultimately determine their careers and goals, but this whole process is shutdown with standardized tests, as many topics and subjects are limited to a few basic ones that put out the fire students are expected to have.
In a classroom that is non-authoritarian, the teacher serves as a facilitator, or supervisor of learning. By assuming this role, the teacher provides access to information rather than being the primary source of information. In this aspect, the students will be able to discover knowledge through problem-solving, cooperative learning activities, and decision making. I believe it is important for a teacher to provide students a sense of freedom so that they may choose what they want to learn according to their interests. By making a child feel as though they have a choice, rather than an obligation to learn information, it will help them constructively build their knowledge.
What is a teacher? A teacher is someone who students rely on for further knowledge and comprehension. Often, a teacher is viewed as a role model towards their students. In many times, teachers can help guide students into a better future. Characteristics like preparation, compassion, having and showing respect to students can make a teacher more effective.
In order to see what it’s like to teach in a school setting, the proficient way of doing that is to go observe a teacher with students in a classroom. In my case, I‘ve spent twenty-five hours throughout this semester observing three math teachers at Bayside High School located in Queens, New York. To be considerate of each teacher’s identity, I’ll be referring to their names as Teacher A who teaches geometry, Teacher B who teaches algebra, and Teacher C who teaches pre-calculus. I’ve taken extensive notes on the diversity of students, the issues of poverty, the methods of how teachers present information along with managing classrooms, and their expectations of their pupils.
This cycle of obedience and passive acceptance can spill over into other aspects of life where learners conform to beliefs and values without critically evaluating them. Brian Crittenden (1972: 146) speaks about “mis-education” which occurs when the content the teacher presents is a “violation of a ‘critical inquiry”. In other words the teacher presents information is such a way as to exclude any opportunity for enquiry.
Becoming a teacher has been the ultimate aspiration for myself since the first day I walked into kindergarten. As a very timid student, it was a difficult task transitioning from being with my mother everyday, to being part of a classroom environment full of strangers. However, my kindergarten teacher helped me through this transition smoothly, and adequately. I very quickly learned to love school. Soon after, I knew I would aspire to become a teacher. I would spend countless hours at home with a blackboard, acting as a teacher to my imaginary students throughout my elementary school years.
The teacher that I observed was Mrs. Cynthia Carney. She is the kindergarten teacher at Greystone Elementary school. As my first time in the classroom, I tried to observe as much as possible. I had a great first impression of the classroom, it is a very positive environment, and the teacher has definitely established a clear routine and rules that the students follow. The teacher did a very brief (5-10 minute) science lesson/introduction to the unit on weather. Although the teacher did not inform my partner and I about the exact objectives for the lesson, it was clear that she wanted the students to learn about making observations about weather. Her objective
Yet, the damage doesn’t stop there, in classrooms where the students haven’t fallen asleep the students usually develop a dispirited, and less engaging nature towards learning. The students are convinced that the suitable mode of learning is through the utterances of a teacher which, undoubtedly, leads to an excessive reliance on professors. Reliance on professors is not necessarily a detriment, but when it prevents students from seeking knowledge independently it transforms them into superficial learners who lack depth of understanding.
Education institutions were eager to adapt to pedagogical approach; it was is teacher-centered. The teacher determined what will be taught, when will it be taught, how it will be taught, and if it was learned the way he/she taught the lesson. (Ozuah) As I reflect back at the time I started teaching, this is how I taught. I was the only resource that my students had. I am happy to say that I have changed. I’m not the only resource at my students’ fingertips anymore. However, I do have to teach them the correct ways to use resources via the
There are many benefits to teachings having a good relationship with the student’s family, guardian, or parents. Teachers should begin the school year with building positive relationships with the student’s families. In the book it mentions that there is ongoing research that indicates the benefits of family involvement in children’s education. Some of these benefits mentioned were children earning higher grades, tend to have better attendance, have higher rates of homework completion, and are more motivated and have positive attitudes towards school. Through the reading it also emphasizes on the increase in family involvement in children’s education will result in a decrease in students participating in substance abuse and violence. Students
One good quality a teacher should have is, respect for the students. Each person’s ideas and opinions should be valued and not judged. They should be able to express themselves without feeling insecure. Another good quality is, having high expectations for your students. Each student should be encouraged to do their best and achieve goals that they may have never met before. Another good quality is, I believe a teacher should have is good communication skills. They should keep not only the students informed on what is going on in the class, they should definitely keep the parents informed as well. Teachers need to know how to communicate with all their students because some are at different levels than others.