Assignment 1.1 By Asmita Neupane University Of the Potomac HLTH110: Online Introduction to Health Services Administration Prof. Dr. Charm Tims 03/07/2024 Abstract The role of healthcare services in a nation's success and survival as a coherent democracy is paramount. A robust healthcare system not only ensures the well-being of its citizens, but also plays a crucial role in fostering social cohesion and stability. This essay explores the multifaceted impact of healthcare on a nation's democratic fabric, emphasizing its role in promoting equality, social justice, and civic engagement. By analyzing the interconnectedness of healthcare and democracy, we can appreciate the significance of investing in a comprehensive and accessible healthcare system …show more content…
A population in high general health is better able to resist external shocks and adjust to changing conditions, which contributes to the nation's resilience. A strong healthcare system is an essential element for democratic governance's survival and continuation during difficult times. Promoting Social Equity: Healthcare services have a significant influence on public health, but they also promote social justice, which is another important factor that keeps a democratic society stable. When healthcare is available to all citizens of a country, regardless of their financial situation, there is a leveling of the playing field, which lowers inequities and promotes a more inclusive society (Maizland, 2022). Social equality in healthcare removes obstacles that might otherwise prevent some groups from fully engaging in the democratic process and guarantees that every citizen has an equal chance to live a healthy life. Prioritizing social equality in healthcare services leads to physical well-being as well as a sense of empowerment and inclusion for underprivileged …show more content…
Countries that prioritize universal access to high-quality healthcare protect their citizens' health and strengthen the strong foundations of a democracy that can face the challenges of the modern world (Jones & Hilborne, 2021). This commitment guarantees that the values of fairness, equality of opportunity, and communal well-being will always be at the center of a dynamic, democratic society. In conclusion, the role of healthcare services in a nation's success and survival as a coherent democracy is integral and far-reaching. A commitment to public health, the preservation of individual freedoms, and the promotion of economic productivity are essential components of a thriving democratic society. As we navigate the complexities of the modern world, understanding and prioritizing the intersection of healthcare and democracy becomes paramount. By investing in accessible, high-quality healthcare services, nations can not only safeguard the well-being of their citizens, but also fortify the foundations of a resilient, democratic society poised for long-term
In conclusion, the ultimate significance to this type of work is to improve the quality of healthcare in these extremely impoverished nations. This argument is represented in Tracy Kidder’s Mountains Beyond Mountains, Monte Leach’s “Ensuring Health Care as a Global Human Right”, and Darshark Sanghavi’s “Is it Cost Effective to Treat the World’s Poor.” The idea that universal healthcare is a human right is argued against in Michael F. Cannon’s “A “Right” to health care?” Cannon claims that it would not work, and fills the holes that the other authors leave in their arguments. All of these articles share the same ultimate goal, and that is to provide every individual with adequate health care, and to not let so many people die from things that could easily have been prevented or treated.
In Michael Moore’s documentary, the issues of America’s healthcare system are examined. According to Michael Moore, America’s healthcare system is inefficient compared to other advanced nations. Even though Moore’s documentary is quite informative and can in many ways set the stage for a policy analysis, it does lack in certain areas that overstates the negatives of the healthcare system while under-emphasizing the positive qualities of America’s healthcare system. While for the most part, Moore’s documentary hits all major areas that are needed to write a policy analysis, he does so in a way that holds much bias. In fact, Moore attempts to show the audience that universal healthcare is sound, but due to him leaving out equal representation
Despite the established health care facilities in the United States, most citizens do not have access to proper medical care. We must appreciate from the very onset that a healthy and strong nation must have a proper health care system. Such a health system should be available and affordable to all. The cost of health services is high. In fact, the ...
National health systems are assessed by the extent to which expenditure and actions in public health and medical care contributes to the crucial social goals of improving health, increasing access to quality healthcare, reducing health disparities, protecting citizens from penury due to medical e...
Discussion surrounding the role of the government in health care has become an American past time. The government is responsible for improving health care quality and safety in the United States which should enhance access to care. Many goals have been sought after since the enactment of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). Little achievement has been made in regards to which level of government is ultimately responsible for the continued support of health care. This essay will discuss both the state and federal level of government in health care, along with insight into the current happenings of both levels.
James Madison once said, “Ambition must be made to counteract ambition”. In creating a new form of government, Madison tried to effectively plan for a Constitution that would account for the fact that human beings by nature are self-interested. The United States has witnessed tremendous growth within its people since Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia. Not only has rapid political and technological advances unified American into a supreme power, but triumphs like the Civil Rights Movement have also helped to promote equality. Yet, from 2009 to 2010, the number of people without health insurance increased from 49.0 million to 49.9 million. Analyzing James Madison’s ideology in The Federalist 10 and 51 suggests that a correlation exists between factionalism and the failure of the United States to universalize healthcare. In order to understand the connection of factionalism and national healthcare this paper will first explain Madison’s notion of factionalism by referencing key components and commentary from his argument in The Federalist 10 and 51. The second part of this paper will discuss the history of American healthcare as a means to explain the many factions that have hindered the success of nationalizing health insurance. Furthermore, referencing the emergence of factions within the healthcare debate, like the AMA (American Medical Association), will highlight the stigma surrounding national healthcare. The last part of this paper will put forward the question of whether America will ever see complete universal health insurance.
There has been a lot of talk and debate lately over Health Care Reform, as people are trying to answer the question – Should a universally accessible health care system be implemented in the United States (US)? This ongoing highly debatable issue remains a hot topic among US citizens from all walks of life, from the very poor to the very wealthy. Health Care Reform affects everyone. The vast majority of the US population is very dissatisfied with the current state of health care. According to the ABC News and Washington Post cooperative poll, 57 percent of Americans aren’t satisfied with the overall system of health care (Langer, 2009). Consequently, the issue of the Health Care Reform was born, but before analyzing the actual aspects of this reform it will be wise to brush up on those major attitudes and concerns which occupy ordinary people and how they respond to the unfolding changes in the area of health care and social security.
The campaign for some form of universal health care has spanned nearly a century in the USA and has been the subject of political debate since the early part of the 20th century. Recent reforms remain an active and urgent political issue. Universal Health Care has been one of the leading public issues in America and in recent times this issue has risen to the fore, because of its increasing prevalence in the government, market, and civil sectors. In this essay, I will be looking at why this issue can and does affect everyone, no matter which sectors we look at. I will be taking an in-depth look at the many reasons why this public issue is worth caring about and why it is such a hotly contested subject in today’s politics, jobs, and even our
A country’s health care system refers to all the institutions, programs, personnel, procedures, and the resources that are used to meet the health needs of its population. Health care systems vary from one country to another, depending on government policies and the health needs of the population. Besides, health care programs are flexible in the sense that they are tailored to meet health needs as they arise. Among the stakeholders in the formulation of a country’s health care system are governments, religious groups, non-governmental organizations, charity organizations, trade/labor unions, and interested individuals (Duckett, 2008). These entities formulate, implement, evaluate, and reform health services according to the needs of the sections of the population they target.
The United States is considered by many to be the greatest country ever. It has one of the largest military bases, you have freedom of speech and religion, and the one thing people who migrate to this country chase, the American dream. However, what is the one thing that most people seem to forget? That the greatest country ever, the most prevailing power in the world, is also the only westernized developed country without a successful health care system. Health care is a heated topic that carries a strong dispute set apart by people and politicians who argue that the country requires a kind of socialized system that will permit increased government contribution.
...on, race, and political belief, economic or social condition. Improving the poor health of disadvantaged individuals and reducing health gaps is important but not enough to level up health through socioeconomic groups. The objective of tackling health inequalities can be changed to local needs and priorities of a community allowing wide-ranging partnerships of support to be organised. However it needs to be made clear that what can be done to help improve the life chances and health prospects of individuals living in poverty may not come close to bringing their health prospects closer to the average of the rest of the population or prevent the gap living on throughout the generations. Being clear about what is trying to be overcome and achieved needs upmost importance in the development and delivery of policies that will promote health equality across the population.
Universal healthcare is one of the most divisive political topics in America today. It has been a topic which many people have sought to find a easy solution too. Healthcare in general is a large part of the American economy, and having the government take over it would affect the capitalistic nation’s structure. There are three main problems when it comes to universal healthcare: the cost of care, the range of care, and the quality of the care being provided. These three categories are what universal healthcare would need to succeed in to be able to be a beneficial program in the United States.
RESPONSE 1 Amongst some of the best healthcare systems in the world, are the healthcare systems of Australia and England. According to The World Health Organisation, a health system is “all the activities whose primary purpose is to promote, restore and/or maintain health” (World Health Organisation, 2000). The WHO also states that a good health system is one that “delivers quality services to all people, when and where they need them” (World Health Organisation, 2000). Both Australia and England operate with universal healthcare. This means that everyone has access to appropriate health services without enduring financial hardship, irrespective of socio-economic status (World Health Organisation, 2017).
As a culture that expects quality care, we need to as a whole, create a basic healthcare system that will provide the highest standard of care and wellbeing of our upcoming generations. Our health is central to our quality of life, our independence, and even in the “pursuit of happiness” that our United States Constitution guarantees’ its citizens, many who have given their lives to protect that right. Providing a uniform basic health system is a “human right” that will serve as a resource that will enrich all of society and the common good. Health is our true wealth and it is best when it is shared.
In the majority of advanced societies, access to basic and emergency health care is considered a moral right, regardless of gender, age or belief. However, with government intervention there begins to have certain regulations upon who will receive affordable health care, since the us government, in addition to tax payers are paying for it. The role of government throughout healthcare is to” balance the demand and supply of the services; as well as prevent market failures in the form of monopoly, price fixing, and exploitation”. The efficiency of a healthcare system of a country represents the future of its society and whether or not people will receive affordable health care. Although Health care might seem irrelevant, 29 million people as