Universal Healthcare In America

885 Words2 Pages

Universal healthcare is one of the most divisive political topics in America today. It has been a topic which many people have sought to find a easy solution too. Healthcare in general is a large part of the American economy, and having the government take over it would affect the capitalistic nation’s structure. There are three main problems when it comes to universal healthcare: the cost of care, the range of care, and the quality of the care being provided. These three categories are what universal healthcare would need to succeed in to be able to be a beneficial program in the United States. The cost of care includes the cost to the economy but also the cost of our freedom in exchange for need. The range of care is important because it …show more content…

These categories that make up the case for are the reason why it is not an achievable goal; although it works on paper, in the real world, universal healthcare does not work. Cost of healthcare in America has been an issue for many years. Many politicians have seen it as a huge problem because healthcare is generally expensive. This leads many people to favor universal healthcare because it would enable poor people, and those unable to pay for care, to get it. The problem is that there are a few reasons why healthcare is so expensive. Generally around one fourth of the healthcare costs in America goes towards administrative costs (Watson). This cost is generally attributed to the fact that hospitals essentially have to barter with insurance companies to get money for the medical service they provide. The cost of these hospitals having to deal with insurance companies are …show more content…

The only problem is that Senator Sanders did not reveal what the actual cost of a program like this would be. Since then Senator Sanders has proposed a plan for universal healthcare and estimated a cost of twenty-eight trillion dollars added to America's national budget (Roy). This price of twenty eight trillion may not even be correct and would most likely go up in the years after instituting this program because of problems Sanders did not account for. This extra weight on the American people to provide the taxes to be able to have this program would be tremendous. Even if however the plan stays at 28 trillion dollars added to the budget, Senator Sanders does not seem to care what the implications to our national debt, which is already extremely high would be. This program would almost assuredly add to the national debt by a huge amount, in a time when the government should be spending less money to bring down the debt, than more money. An article on National review shows this in an article talking about why single player healthcare won’t work when it says, “Two of the country’s most liberal states make for instructive cases. California’s legislature, where Democrats have supermajorities in both houses, recently considered a single-payer plan only to balk when the price tag was calculated

Open Document