More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of advocacy in patient care
Importance of advocacy in patient care
Importance of advocacy in patient care
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In Michael Moore’s documentary, the issues of America’s healthcare system are examined. According to Michael Moore, America’s healthcare system is inefficient compared to other advanced nations. Even though Moore’s documentary is quite informative and can in many ways set the stage for a policy analysis, it does lack in certain areas that overstates the negatives of the healthcare system while under-emphasizing the positive qualities of America’s healthcare system. While for the most part, Moore’s documentary hits all major areas that are needed to write a policy analysis, he does so in a way that holds much bias. In fact, Moore attempts to show the audience that universal healthcare is sound, but due to him leaving out equal representation
He compares the healthcare programs of the U.S. with Canada, Cuba, and France and Moore makes it very clear that the United States is the only modern nation without some version of universal access to healthcare services. Where all other industrialized countries have addressed the issue and the financial challenges associated with it, the United States healthcare system has yet to iron out such problems because of the corrupt health care system itself. To support his claim, he paints the picture of greedy insurance companies denying experimental care to the patients and HMO’s not accepting new patients due to pre-existing conditions (these represent the stakeholders). Incidentally, Moore does rely on anecdotal evidence to prove that emergency waiting rooms in other countries are particularly efficient, and both doctors and patients alike are satisfied with socialized medicine. However, Michael Moore skips over other issues or does not even address issues at all. From what is documented in the film, it is hard to prove such theories that other country’s health care systems are more advanced than America. It is impossible to make sound conclusions about the true running of their systems. In a sense, Moore does not pleasure the actual health care system in those countries but
Even though it does miss some of the aspects that are required to obtain a detailed policy analysis, what he does document is along the lines of what is needed. For instance, Moore gives the audience a brief background of his topic. He does a thorough job detailing stories from people, insurance company employees, and doctors. Moore even plays back tapes of when Nixon was in office. In that tape we learn that Nixon strongly approved of a new 1970’s health care concept called HMO, where the more patients are denied health care services, the more money the hospitals and health insurance companies profit. Moore’s introduction sets the stage and therefore could be the background/landscape of a policy analysis. However, what is missing in his background is more factual information about the whole history of America’s healthcare system including the history of health insurance itself. Also, Moore’s tone in discussing his topic is rather sarcastic and unprofessional, which also undermines the quality of his work. From there, Moore introduces his stakeholders. He uses real life stories of (emotionally charged) people who have private insurance but still do not receive adequate care. He touches on HMO’s, pre-existing conditions, denied care, drug companies and their need for profit to finance research and development. Moore’s representation for stakeholders also include people like Hillary Clinton,
The Frontline documentary, Obama’s Deal, tracks the course of Obama’s healthcare reform and the steps taken by the administration to get the bill passed. Healthcare was, and remains, one of the biggest platforms of the Obama administration and one of our nation’s greatest challenges. The film starts with Obama’s election into the White House in 2009. Rahm Emanuel, who had worked for the Clinton administration, was brought in to advise Obama on the reform. To win, Emanuel knew that Obama would have to move quickly as his campaign would be strongest at the beginning. But his crucial flaw was having Obama take a back seat on his own political agenda. Emanuel tried to change his mistakes from the Clinton administration’s healthcare failure, and
Sicko provides a good understanding of health care system in the United States. In my opinion, Michael Moore has done a great job in delivering his message. Though, some issues were not picked up in the film such as the amount of taxes people pay in these countries and waiting lists for certain medical treatments like cancer or heart transplant. It is also true that from many other countries people come to America for medical treatments, and this is because they are not being provided proper health care in their home country. However, the film provides a good understanding of the health care concept, and it makes me worried because I don’t have any health insurance.
In the modern day, health care can be a sensitive subject. Politically, health care in America changes depending on whom is President. Obamacare and Trumpcare are different policies regarding health care, which many people have passionate feelings towards. However, not many Americans are informed about Norman Daniels’ view on health care. Throughout this paper I will be outlining Norman Daniels’ claims on the right to health care, and the fundamental principles in which he derives to construct his argument. By means of evaluating Daniels’ argument, I will then state my beliefs regarding the distributive justice of health care.
During the study of various reforms that were proposed and denied, both the GOP and Democrats attempted to find a balance that would guarantee the success of their proposals. Years of research, growing ideologies, political views and disregard for the country's constitution sparked an array of alternatives to solve the country's healthcare spending. The expenditure of US healthcare dollars was mostly due to hospital reimbursements, which constitute to 30% (Longest & Darr, 2008). During the research for alternatives, the gr...
One of the most controversial topics in the United States in recent years has been the route which should be undertaken in overhauling the healthcare system for the millions of Americans who are currently uninsured. It is important to note that the goal of the Affordable Care Act is to make healthcare affordable; it provides low-cost, government-subsidized insurance options through the State Health Insurance Marketplace (Amadeo 1). Our current president, Barack Obama, made it one of his goals to bring healthcare to all Americans through the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010. This plan, which has been termed “Obamacare”, has come under scrutiny from many Americans, but has also received a large amount of support in turn for a variety of reasons. Some of these reasons include a decrease in insurance discrimination on the basis of health or gender and affordable healthcare coverage for the millions of uninsured. The opposition to this act has cited increased costs and debt accumulation, a reduction in employer healthcare coverage options, as well as a penalization of those already using private healthcare insurance.
Health care in America tends to be a gray area for citizens without prior experience with medical issues. Michael Moore an American filmmaker discusses in his documentary “Sicko” the unpleasant experience some Americans had to go through because of our health care system. Moore implements humor to his documentary by inserting comical music, images, and narration in spots that help his argument gain attention. He also travels abroad to places like Canada, France, and Cuba, where universal health care is supported. He does this in order to provide reason why universal health care is a good ideas by capturing the different emotions and opinions of individuals in those countries versus what people think in America. In addition, Moore provides evidence on why the United States should adopt a different health care system by providing facts like the life expectancy and cost of health care in America compared to other countries. Michael Moore’s main goal is to inform the audience as well as introduce his argument that our health care system is inadequate and that better solutions are out there like universal health care.
Agenda setting is the process that determines appropriate solutions to a certain problem of a given field (Kingdon, 3). The process itself consists of three streams: problems, policies, and politics (Kingdon, 16). These separate streams interact when windows of opportunity are open – solutions are fitted with problems, and the impetus for this relationship is amenable political forces (Kingdon, 20). Prominent agendas are determined by the problem or political streams, while solutions are crafted in in the policy stream (Kingdon, 20). In the field of health care, the agenda setting is based upon the high number of uninsured citizens, the rising cost of medical care, the development of Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) in response to this issue, and the key players that debate whether governmental involvement is the correct approach in the issue of universal healthcare.
What is this specific policy or general policy area to be analyzed? Warne, D. (2007) states that there are many injustices within the “system” ,but Health Care Policy; which determines who gets health services, what those services are and how those services are delivered and Education Policy which determines who gets educational programs, what those programs are and how those programs are administered are among the highest needed policies that need attending to.
Longest Jr., B.B (2009) Health Policy making in the United States (5th Edition). Chicago, IL: HAP/AUPHA.
Reese, Philip. Public Agenda Foundation. The Health Care Crisis: Containing Costs, Expanding Coverage. New York: McGraw, 2002.
In recent years, the number of Americans who are uninsured has reached over 45 million citizens, with millions more who only have the very basic of insurance, effectively under insured. With the growing budget cuts to medicaid and the decreasing amount of employers cutting back on their health insurance options, more and more americans are put into positions with poor health care or no access to it at all. At the heart of the issue stems two roots, one concerning the morality of universal health care and the other concerning the economic effects. Many believe that health care reform at a national level is impossible or impractical, and so for too long now our citizens have stood by as our flawed health-care system has transformed into an unfixable mess. The good that universal healthcare would bring to our nation far outweighs the bad, however, so, sooner rather than later, it is important for us to strive towards a society where all people have access to healthcare.
The U.S. healthcare system is very complex in structure hence it can be appraised with diverse perspectives. From one viewpoint it is described as the most unparalleled health care system in the world, what with the cutting-edge medical technology, the high quality human resources, and the constantly-modernized facilities that are symbolic of the system. This is in addition to the proliferation of innovations aimed at increasing life expectancy and enhancing the quality of life as well as diagnostic and treatment options. At the other extreme are the fair criticisms of the system as being fragmented, inefficient and costly. What are the problems with the U.S. healthcare system? These are the questions this opinion paper tries to propound.
The US health system has both considerable strengths and notable weaknesses. With a large and well-trained health workforce, access to a wide range of high-quality medical specialists as well as secondary and tertiary institutions, patient outcomes are among the best in the world. But the US also suffers from incomplete coverage of its population, and health expenditure levels per person far exceed all other countries. Poor measures on many objective and subjective indicators of quality and outcomes plague the US health care system. In addition, an unequal distribution of resources across the country and among different population groups results in poor access to care for many citizens. Efforts to provide comprehensive, national health insurance in the United States go back to the Great Depression, and nearly every president since Harry S. Truman has proposed some form of national health insurance.
Rising medical costs are a worldwide problem, but nowhere are they higher than in the U.S. Although Americans with good health insurance coverage may get the best medical treatment in the world, the health of the average American, as measured by life expectancy and infant mortality, is below the average of other major industrial countries. Inefficiency, fraud and the expense of malpractice suits are often blamed for high U.S. costs, but the major reason is overinvestment in technology and personnel.
Health care policies are plans that intended to determine or influence decisions or actions that will help to achieve specific health care goals. Most of these policies are actions taken by the government to improve the American health care system. The purpose of this essay is to describe the process of how a topic eventually becomes a policy and tie to how the Affordable Health Care Act (ACA) policy process. This essay will include the formulation stage, legislative stage, and implementation stage of a complete policy process.