Communication is a huge asset in a marriage or any relationship. Men and women have different means of communication. Deborah Tannen, the author of “Sex, Lies and Conversation: Why Is It So Hard for Men and Women to Talk to Each Other?,” has a PhD in linguistics. She is known for her research on how people of different genders communicate. Tannen’s essay appeared in the Washington Post in 1990. Tannen discusses the communication battle, listening to body language, and the sounds of silence. Tannen states that men speak more in a public setting than they do at home. Her research shows that a lack of communication is causing problems in many marriages. Without a doubt, communication and understanding can be a positive factor in a relationship. …show more content…
Tannen discusses the communication battle between the sexes. She discovered that the main influence for communication patterns among men and women closely resembled the research of Stanford University’s Eleanor Maccoby‘s report on child development. Both researchers found that the patterns are influenced by peer interaction. Maccoby discovered that boys and girls will interact with the same gender and that they have different organizational structures and interactive norms. Tannen writes that what is important is not the individual subjects, but “the sense of closeness, of a life shared, that emerges when people tell their thoughts, feelings, and impressions” (406). This is true because women desire a sense of closeness. Women accustomed to a sense of closeness with their best friends as they grow up and after they grow apart and begin lives of their own, they long for a companion to fill that void. Tannen also writes that men do not have a strong need for conversation, so when it is not an integral part of their lives, they do not miss it. This difference between men and women tends to cause problems with communication because they have contrasting expectations for conversation. Tannen supports Maccoby’s claim that men and women are having trouble communicating by saying that the divorce rate is at nearly fifty percent and that it is an “epidemic of failed conversation” (405). Tannen also discusses the topic of listening to body language. She states that communication is tough to understand between the sexes. She claims that women like listener noise and to share experiences with others. When witnessing a conversation between women, it may be observed that women empathize through these sounds. Women see these noises as a way of connecting on a deeper level. Men see the noises as excessive and a sign of impatience. Another disconnect in communication between men and women occurs when men offer a suggestion to women. Women see the suggestion as an attack and an act of disloyalty though the man is merely trying to help. Women see this as disloyalty because they are used to a sense of agreement from their friends. This disconnect causes both men and women to become frustrated because women want to establish “rapport” with their husband, but the men do not see why it is so important. This lack of understanding can cause problems because women need rapport, but men do not understand why women want to talk about their feelings. Lastly, Tannen discusses the sounds of silence.
She writes that “the communication problems that endanger marriage cannot be fixed by mechanical engineering” (409). Tannen believes that a communication problem cannot be fixed by someone else. She is saying that the problem must be fixed by the people involved. Men and women must understand that their communicating habits can be difficult to understand by the other sex. Both men and women fear being pushed away or being put down or pushed around. Men commonly speak more in public because they are trying to prove to others that they are intelligent and understand what is being discussed. They do not talk as much at home because they have nothing to prove. Women, on the other hand, are typically more quiet in public, unless they are with friends, because they are in fear of offending someone. As a result, they communicate more at home because they do not have that fear in this setting. This is where a problem arises. Women want to talk but their husband thinks of it as mindless chatter. This problem can only be fixed when both parties realize and understand the problem. If one party can change and try to communicate like the other wants, then the communication barrier will fall and the relationship will
flourish. Tannen discussed three things that all lead to the lack of communication. Regardless if the problem is caused by women saying “he won’t tell me how he feels,” or the silent moments in the relationship, men and women find each other’s conversational habits frustrating. More and more men and women are having trouble communicating. This lack of communication can and will ruin more relationships, but Tannen writes that “in these times of resurgent ethnic conflicts, the world desperately needs cross-cultural understanding. Like charity, successful cross-cultural communication should begin at home” (410). She believes that if things are to be better in the future, then men and women need to learn how to communicate effectively. Communication and understanding can be the determining factor in a strong relationship.
Deborah Tannen’s essay, “There Is No Unmarked Woman”, explores the idea of “marked” and “unmarked” words, styles, titles, and how females have no ability to choose an unmarked position. She also posits that “The unmarked forms of most English words also convey ‘male’” (88). Tannen is incorrect in her premise because females are able to choose unmarked hair and clothing styles, many unmarked forms of words no longer convey “male,” and men are marked just as often as women.
In the Article “marked women”, Deborah Tannen explains the social manner of judging women by their appearance or other factors, but not judging men for the same reasons. Tannen uses her observation during a conference meeting of four women and eight men to analyze how each woman in the meeting was marked while men were not. Again Deborah points out the issue of how one gender writing about the other is either portrayed as prejudiced or sexist.
Deborah Tannen wrote “ Talk in the Intimate Relationship” to help people learn something about how men and women's interactions differ. She is a language scholar and has past experience of failed relationships and she feels as though this was because of lack of communication. Her main focus is on metamessages, these are messages that go beyond what we say. She states that the people that are literal minded, miss out on the context of what communication is. What this essay will consist of being what Tannen calls metamessages, summarizing her article on how men and woman talk, deciding whether Tannen is favorable to both genders and last but not least if I agree to an extent with Tannen says in her article.
In the article “His Politeness Is Her Powerlessness” by Deborah Tannen, she informs gender norms about talking in a direct or indirect way. Tannen claims that different cultures view indirectness different from western culture. She also informs her audience that being indirect does not mean you are powerless. In paragraph 8, Tannen explains that only modern Western societies place a priority on direct communication. She goes on to say that “Account of mutual indirectness in a lunch invitation may strike Americans as excessive. But far more cultures in the world use elaborate systems of indirectness than value directness. (8)” This is true for the Japanese culture. They will talk indirectly rather talk directly to you. For example, it is considered
Communications generally occur in body languages: how the individuals interpret each other. Her essay is an event that is reoccurring more and more lately. The event results in a failure in marriage. In today’s society more and more people are splitting up or having divorces due to miscommunications. The essay, “Sex, Lies and Conversation,” that Deborah Tannen wrote is much use of today because it explains where miscommunications happen and she has her own studies and research to back it up. The essay goes into depth about her ideologies that cause miscommunications. Look at a miscommunication twice and do not be quick to judge because it will save plenty of
In the introduction of Deborah Tannen’s “Conversation Style: Talking on the Job”, she compares and contrasts the ways men and women communicate. This reminds me of what I tell people that are struggling in their relationships. Women and men express themselves differently. Women think, but men act. If you can’t wrap your head around this, being in a relationship with anyone is going to be hard. Yet, this is such a basic way of looking at this issue. Not only are the genders vastly different, but each person relates to the world around them in a certain way. He or she also needs to be related to in a specific way. Looking at personalities and personal histories can give a better look at the way we communicate with each other. Tannen examines
Deborah Sampson was declared in 1837 by congress that the history of the Revolution “furnished no other similar example of female heroism, fidelity, and courage”. Deborah was the real life Mulan. She disguised herself as a male soldier named Robert Shurtleff and joined the Fourth Massachusetts Regiment in 1782. Under the command of Captain George Webb, she was assigned the dangerous task of finding neutral territory to spy on the British regarding their quantity of soldier and supplies in Manhattan. Gathering this information was helpful for General Washington’s battle plans. Despite close calls on other soldier finding her true sex identity, she was discovered in 1783, a year and a half into her service. She had received a contusion on her
Have people ever wondered what it would be like to find out they have a long lost twin sister? In this novel, The Lying Game by Sara Shepard, Emma is thrust into a world where she is not just a lonely orphan living in a foster home, but a twin to a girl she has never met before. Emma and Sutton live in a very different world from each other. Sara Shepard published The Lying Game in 2010, with the help of Alloy Entertainment. The Lying Game is a novel for young adults ages 14 and up with a sense of mystery, thrill, and drama. Sara Shepard has also written six other books in the series, The Lying Game, being the first. The Lying Game is an intense novel with mystery lurking around every corner, thrill of suspense, and drama, engaging the readers.
Do men and women effectively communicate in the same way, or is it just a conversation of misunderstanding? There is constantly a new interest in whether men and women converse successfully. Professor and journalist, Deborah Tannen writes, “Sex, Lies, and Conversation: Why Is It So Hard for Men and Women to Talk to Each Other?” Tannen compares and contrasts all conversational styles, and explains how the expectation of dialogue affects how men and women converse. Tannen focuses on the subject of marriage and the imbalance of interest between male and female couples. The contrasting perspective however comes from, Deborah Cameron, author of, “What Language Barrier”. Cameron conveys that the stereotypes left upon male and female communication
Deborah Tannen is the author of the book You Just Don't Understand where she analyzes the different meanings of communication between men and women. Her research shows that women and men use the same words and phrases and yet can interpret and react to those same words and phrases differently. Tannen compares the two sexes to find men use their conversation as a type of competition or to preserve their independence. For example, men talk about their knowledge regarding sports, cars, women, exc. Meanwhile, women try to foster intimacy through communication. For instance, women often talk and relate on a personal level. Throughout Tannen's book she uses "cross-cultural communication" to describe the differences between the language of men and women. Tannen observed that, "For males, conversation is the way you negotiate your status in the group and keep people from pushing you around; you use talk to preserve your independence. Females, on the other hand, use conversation to negotiate closeness and intimacy; talk is the essence of intimacy, so being best friends means sitting and talking. For boys, activities, doing things together, are central. Just sitting and talking is not an essential part of friendship. They're friends with the boys they do things with" (Tannen 95).
In chapter two of Trust Me I’m Lying, Ryan Holiday talks about a scam called “trading up the chain,” which consists of posting ‘news’ on a small blog, so that larger blogs talk about being written on a small blog, and it leads to the story spreading to huge storylines. Holiday then explains how this chain is broke up into three levels: the entry point, the legacy media, and national. Each of the three chains explains the idea of starting in small local news leading to the national press. Holiday explains how he used “trading up the chain” in his career. He started by vandalizing billboards and sending pictures and information to local Los Angeles blogs to the Huffington Post writing about it, and finally, it being announced on the Washington
The person I chose to interview was my friend Deborah Hodges (Debbie). One of the reasons for interviewing her was that we had not been in contact for several months and I saw this as a great opportunity to talk to her once again. We both live a very busy life and find it difficult to meet up like we used to do since I started school in 2012. Debbie and I met 17 years ago at the church that I had been attending since 1994. Shortly after meeting, we became the best of friends and we were inseparable until she had to move away to the far end of Portland, Oregon. I consider her more like a sister rather than a friend. Debbie enjoys spending as much time as she can with her family and friends when she is not working. She has such a gentle spirit
In the article "Sex, Lies and Conversation," Deborah Tannen discusses the differences in the ways men and women communicate. These differences seem to make it more difficult for men and women to fully understand each other. Communication tendencies are developed throughout a persons life. As young children, boys and girls tend to play with kids of their own age and gender. These children carry these communication habits into adulthood, sometimes making it hard to communicate with the opposite sex.
...a meaningful communication to take place. In conclusion, there are differences between men and women that go beyond social nurture. These differences have their origin in their genes. The differences evident in men and women are translated in their behavior and communication. There are possibilities of these differences in their turn raising the problem of failing to understand one another because in a communication men and women have a different set of expectations from each other. It is essential to understand and appreciate these differences for a meaningful communication to take place.
Human institution are not perfect, so is married couples. Effective interpersonal communication is essential in resolving frequent problem that arise from every human marriage.