Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Cultural differences communication importance
Cultural difference in interpersonal communication conclusion
Cultural differences and communication
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the article “His Politeness Is Her Powerlessness” by Deborah Tannen, she informs gender norms about talking in a direct or indirect way. Tannen claims that different cultures view indirectness different from western culture. She also informs her audience that being indirect does not mean you are powerless. In paragraph 8, Tannen explains that only modern Western societies place a priority on direct communication. She goes on to say that “Account of mutual indirectness in a lunch invitation may strike Americans as excessive. But far more cultures in the world use elaborate systems of indirectness than value directness. (8)” This is true for the Japanese culture. They will talk indirectly rather talk directly to you. For example, it is considered
John Knowles wrote a fantastic novel entitled A Separate Peace. Some important character in the novel were Gene, Finny, Leper, and Brinker. Gene and Finny were best friends; Leper was the outcast; Brinker was the “hub of the class” This was a novel about friendship, betrayal, war, peace, and jealousy. Although Gene and Finny were similar in many ways, they also had numerous differences.
In Deborah Tannen’s “Marked Woman, Unmarked Men” she illustrates how she believes the way women carry themselves are more looked upon then the way a man does. When it comes to women they had to take what they look like into consideration and each decision that the woman has made, carried a meaning. Men have to make decisions as well, however their decisions are not as notable as woman. I support Tannen’s argument about women being marked. Woman are marked by what they wear to who they marry. Nonetheless, I do believe both genders are marked in some kind of way. Men are marked, just not to the extent as woman are. And when they are marked it is not as open and discussed. When Tannen did include men into her argument she made her observation
The Power of an Author Authors have the ability justify the worst actions. Authors have a way of romanticizing certain situations in order to convey a specific message. A good author has power to influence the reader into believing whatever it is the author wants. When it comes to the story of Hannah Dustan, authors such as John Greenleaf Whittier have romanticized her captivity story along with the actions she took throughout her journey. Introducing a character that will be seen in the story is one of the most vital parts when creating a piece of literature.
In her article “But What Do You Mean” Deborah Tannen, claims that there is a huge difference in the style of communicating between men and women. Tannen breaks these down into seven different categories; apologies, criticism, thank-yous, fighting, praise, complaints, and jokes. With each of these she compares men to women by explaining the common misconceptions that each of the genders do. The different style of communication can cause some problems at the workplace and even affect the environment. The different styles of communication has been around forever and almost becomes a “ritual”(299). Tannen is effective with mainly women and not men. She is primarily successful with women due to the fact that her tone targets women, also the organization
“Men are from Mars, women are from Venus” as the famous saying of John Gray goes. It is believed men and women are nothing alike in almost every aspect. In Deborah Tannen’s essay “Gender in the classroom: Teacher’s Classroom Strategies Should Recognize that Men and Women Use Language Differently” she focused on how men and women differ when it comes to communicating, with emphasis on how it effects to how men and women behave in the classroom.
Deborah Tannen wrote “ Talk in the Intimate Relationship” to help people learn something about how men and women's interactions differ. She is a language scholar and has past experience of failed relationships and she feels as though this was because of lack of communication. Her main focus is on metamessages, these are messages that go beyond what we say. She states that the people that are literal minded, miss out on the context of what communication is. What this essay will consist of being what Tannen calls metamessages, summarizing her article on how men and woman talk, deciding whether Tannen is favorable to both genders and last but not least if I agree to an extent with Tannen says in her article.
In the featured article, “Beside Oneself: On the Limits of Sexual Autonomy,” the author, Judith Butler, writes about her views on what it means to be considered human in society. Butler describes to us the importance of connecting with others helps us obtain the faculties to feel, and become intimate through our will to become vulnerable. Butler contends that with the power of vulnerability, the rolls pertaining to humanity, grief, and violence, are what allows us to be acknowledged as worthy.
Being called by certain words just because of your gender and race is something us in our society have always done to discriminate against each other. Nowadays many have of us are discriminated for who we are but African Americans and women tend to suffer more from it. I believe that both do not receive the same amount of respect as men and other races do, and it is something that society should change because we all are equal as any other in this world. I recently read two texts from two authors who are Deborah Tannen who says women should not be called “bossy” and earn the same amount of respect when giving authority, and Langston Hughes who says that “black” is a discriminating word for the African American people. I agree to their argument
Steven Pinker distinguishes the difference between talking to man and women. Pinker showed a lady that was comfortable talking to another lady and the lady became angry when her talking to a man, not women (Pinker 2007 .p112, 113). People used intricacies method to achieve their needs and emotion instead of saying what they need to say directly. (Pinker 2007 .p113) Furthermore, even in a sexual situation, people twist and turn around and turn around their words. For example, “would you like to come up and see my etching?” (Pinker 2007.p113) Moreover, people use a kind word to order something from someone else without making a demand to the receiver or using indirect speeches to avoid a problem that may happen by mistake. (Pinker, 2007
In this passage, Nancy Mairs makes it clear that she cares about the names people give her. She prefers the word “cripple,” to describe herself, rather that “handicapped,” and this is show to be true because of the sheer amount that Mairs repeats it. To emphasize this, Mairs uses rhetorical devices, like tone, word choice and comparisons.
In a society where there is gender disparity and equality seemingly discarded, a status quo between men and women is very crucial. Therefore, the respect to woman by the society can only be earned upon adopting some masculine techniques of doing things. Communication is one such technique that various authors have proposed as a distinct method of ensuring gender equality. For example, Deborah Tannen is one such author who has made contributions this discussion and holds a point of convergence male and female gender applies different communication styles. In addition, the author is of the opinion that women can only gain an equal status to their male peers only if they adopt direct communication styles, which include giving orders and exercising authority. This is one of the strongest
In Deborah Tannen’s writing, You Just Don’t Understand, she argues and presents different gender differences between males and females. Tannen shows that the root of all of these differences is that most of the time males value independence and females value the intimacy of a relationship. These traits hidden in the male and female psychology affect their decisions and actions. Through my own observations and experiences I have confirmed her beliefs and agree with her arguments.
Our future is greatly affected by our present actions. “A Jury of Her Peers” by Susan Glaspell casts a situation identical to this one present in Mrs. Hale’s life. Mrs. Hale, now a grown woman, struggles with regret triggered by the past decisions made over the course of twenty years. Throughout the short story, we observe Mrs. Hale as she realizes her regret and distinguish what thoughts and actions are a result of her feelings.
Mrs. Baroda tries so hard to live up to her expectations of being a respectable woman. Unfortunately, in the end of the story her words and actions leave us only to believe she was going to go against her beliefs. Does she let herself down? Can she stand up on her own and hold her ground? If there was another page to this short story, I strongly believe she'd be letting herself down.
The form of this text is a poem. The visual appearance of the text on the page indicates to us that it is a poem: it is positioned in the center of the page and it is made up of uniform sections, or stanzas. The form is more constrained than that of a novel, which runs freely across the page from left to right. The text also utilizes formal poetic features, such as: multiple stanzas containing equal numbers of lines; line breaks between stanzas; and a regular number of beats per line. The knowledge that Judith Wright is a well-known poet adds to the evidence that this is a poem.