Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ottoman empire rise and fall
Topics n the fall of the ottoman empire
Rise and fall of the Ottoman empire
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ottoman empire rise and fall
Due to the slow decline of the empire, Ottoman leaders wanted to create a place of peace, security, and tolerance for Muslims as well as non- Muslims like Christians and Jews (Barkey). Moreover, reasons like ascent of mercantilism, riches and politicization of society, distinguishing proof with the nation of origin, making worldwide system, and changing part of state prompted the people towards nationalism, which eventually led the Empire to take actions in the form of Tanzimat reform during 1839-1876 (Celik). Sultan Mahmud II, inspired by his uncle Selim, wanted to incorporate European laws rather than the traditional laws (Kanun-I Osmani) so he tried to combine eastern and western cultures to create a versatile imperial identity within the …show more content…
empire. However, the Tanzimat reforms were unsuccessful in reaching its highest potential of what the Sultan had imagined; nevertheless, it improved the social and political system, particularly the status of non-Muslims who were previously held as dhimmis (Hussain). They brought reforms in other areas as well including military and economy of the Empire. Thus, the reforms played a key role in the economic growth and diplomacy within the empire. Through these reforms, the leaders attempted to create a new identity of “Ottomanism” for its dwellers, which placed all the citizens of the empire equal according to the law in spite of their differences in faith and religion. A portion of the new standards included Non-Muslims could be considered in civil service, the foundation of higher legal court with two representatives, the rights to property and business to minorities and outsiders. Similarly, the reconsideration of religious privileges to make them equal for Muslims and non-Muslims, the cancelation of discretionary expenses that were demanded by priests, the foundation fixed salary for spiritual leaders like priest also took place. This paper examines few of the reforms that played key role during the period. Gulhanee Decree and Bedel- I Askeri were introduced to create an equal treatment to all Ottoman subjects.
One of the first changes, the Gulhane Decree (Hatt-i Sharif) of 1839 turned out to be a standout amongst all in the Ottoman history since it led to the introduction of new laws. It included three important reforms: security, respect and honor to all subjects, a new system of regulating taxes fairly by abolishing iltizam and an equal framework for enlisting troops and their term of service. According to the laws, each subject of the empire was taxed according to his fortune. In addition, the Empire promised to alter and limit the expenditure in land and sea forces. Thus, it gave an equal status to Muslims and non-Muslims like Christians and Jews, by developing fair method of enlisting Ottoman subjects into army and navy and abolishing tax farming (Hussain). Next, Bedel-I Askeri (Military Exemption Tax) replaced the cizye tax. Under this, Muslim and non-Muslim Ottomans who were liable for military service but chose otherwise had to pay 8000 kurus and 25000 kurus per year per person respectively (Celik). In addition, Sultan Mahmud II attempted to modernize the army by eliminating Janissaries and spent a decade creating a well-trained army …show more content…
(Hussain). Similarly, in November 3, 1839 Tanzimat-ı Hayriye (Auspicious re-ordering) of the political system was introduced (Celik). The system guaranteed “the life, honor and property of the sultan’s subjects” (Celik). Similalry, Ottoman had their first democratic experience with drafting of legislative, executive and judicial units: The General Assembly (Meclis-i Umumi-i Vilayet), The Council of Provincial Administration (Meclis-i Idare-i Vilayet), The Appeal Court and The Criminal Court (Meclis-i Temyiz-i Hukuk and Meclis-i Cinayet ve De’vâi) , The Court of Commerce (Meclis-i Ticaret) and The Municipal Councils (Belediye Meclisleri). Similarly, reforms were made in elections. The empire granted right to vote to those above 18 and paying 50 kurus tax to the state per year, run for offices to those above 30 and paying at least 100 kuruş tax to the state per year, and declared that imams, priests, officials were ineligible to run for administrative councils (Celik). In addition, various social and economic reforms paved way during the Tanzimat period.
Various orders, and hierarchical and legitimate decrees were accordingly issued. One of the most eminent Hatt-I Humayun of 1856 concentrated on fairness between distinctive groups and classes. This was followed by Wilayat law in 1864 that announced regulatory councils had to be chosen from the local district. Furthermore, the judiciary was reorganized between Islamic, communitarian, and secular courts. Other laws were also enforced in regards to trade, official exchanges and registration of land. The nationality law of 1869 declared, “Every individual born from an Ottoman father and an Ottoman mother or only from an Ottoman father is an Ottoman subject” (Celik). Secular Ottomanism appealed to the concept of creating a uniform identity throughout the diverse population of the empire (Celik). The restrictions on clothing where non muslims were not allowed to wear bright colors was removed. Similarly, a new head gear called fez became popular and a symbol of the Ottomans. Furthermore, places that were previously segragated like school and libraries were now secular (Celik). Other reforms in areas like roads, railroad, telegraph, telephone, agriculture took place. Islahane (Reformatory) was created to elevate literacy rate, protect poor children, orphans and boom Ottoman industry. In the Balkans, especially Bulgarians benefitted from this since it created new job opportunities for them who were busy in farming and stop raising before. Around 150-250 students including
Muslim, Christian and Jews resided in Islahane where they were educated and trained as artisans (Celik). The Ruse reformaties included 85 Muslim, 51 Bulgarian and 1 Jewish male students and 30 Muslim, 21 Bulgarian female students (Celik). Similarly, the first printing house was established in Tuna (Danube) in 1865. It was called The First Provincial Newspaper and ran from March 8, 1865 - June 1, 1877 (Celik). Accordingly, by coordinating individuals of distinctive convictions and religion, the Ottomans endeavored to make an equivalent society. Diplomacy turned out to be critical in the Ottoman Empire amid the nineteenth century. In examination to the considerable forces of Europe, the shortcoming of the Empire meant that its territories and interests must be defended. This could be accomplished by utilizing strategy and negotiation instead of military. Following this, the Empire discarded of the customary Ottoman methods and decided on more western diplomatic framework. The office of re'is effendi was changed to foreign ministry and diplomats and ministers were sent to dwell in capitals of significant states. In this way, a European style of diplomacy was used. The first principle established by the Ottoman political representatives and diplomats was that Ottoman Empire had to be preserved no matter what move they made. They emphasized that all Ottoman representative abroad must " look to its own preservation ". Before the new changes Ottoman ambassadors alluded to Islamic law, however this sort of reference in regards to foreign policy vanished after the Tanzimat Fermani of Gulhanee. Rather there were more references to the fairness of all Ottoman subjects. Thus, the Ottoman reform was small but controlled by influential bureaucratic elites combined with “foreign diplomatic pressure” (Petrov). Thus the empire changed by answering on the augmentation of government foundations to incorporate the most officially smart and militarily adroit of both universes, the Ottoman and the Byzantine, in this way making a cross breed world in which institutional layering turned into the favored technique for magnificent development (Barkey).
World War I, also referred to as the Great War, was global conflict among the greatest Western powers and beyond. From 1914-1918, this turf war swept across rivaling nations, intensifying oppositions and battling until victory was declared. World War I was immediately triggered by the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand, however several long-term causes also contributed. The growing development of militarism, the eruption of powerful alliances, as well as the spread of imperialism, and a deepening sense of nationalism, significantly promoted to the outbreak of the Great War.
The failure of defensive development in Egypt, the Ottoman Empire, and Persia had a large and long-lasting effect on the Muslim world. The original goal of the reforms was to end European intervention, revive the weakening empires, and to be on equal standing with Europe. Yet, all three empires over-utilized the wealth and knowledge of Europe, leading to their ultimate demise. The empires wished to impose reforms in the military, economics, education, and law which the region had not experienced previously. This resulted in backlash, violence, and division within the empires eventually leading to bankruptcy, ironically, to those which they wished to separate themselves.
The Ottoman Empire was a large empire that lasted for several hundred years. They were primarily Sunni Muslims and they were led by the Sultan. Over time, they had a long decline, mostly because they hadn’t progressed with the times. France and Britain were getting very involved with their affairs in Egypt. By the late 1800’s most of the Ottoman Empire was gone. During World War One (WWI), in 1916, the Arabs helped Great Britain to defeat the Ottoman Empire. In 1918 the Ottomans surrendered and their empire was dissolved. When mandates were established it caused nationalist ro revolt. General Mustafa
Imperialism became a driving force among European nations in the growth of power and wealth. European countries placed large values on controlling colonies, similarly to how members of the aristocratic society today would put emphasis on owning an immaculate mansion or an expensive car. Colonies formed in Latin America, Africa, and Asia were seen as status symbols for the overarching European countries; colonies represented economic strength and political power, which was fueled by intense nationalistic spirits. Competition for colonies became the biggest aspect of imperialism, leading several European powers to bicker over controlling colonial trade. The voices of the Colonists were oppressed and ignored as their land and resources were
The Dark ages is the time between the 500’s and 1400’s. The Dark ages was a time of civil wars, Death, diseases, invasions and thief. There was a lot of invasions and to protect them self from that communities made a code call The code of Chivalry as (Doc 5) states “Europe in the Middle Ages was a dangerous place. Invasions from Muslims, Mongols, Vikings, and other tribal groups were common. War between lords was also common. The value of protection and warriors created a social code called Chivalry. Knights fought for lords and ladies, and lived by a gentleman- warrior code of Chivalry.” And other big thing in The Dark Ages was Diseases. Diseases in the dark ages was deadly because there was not antidote and even Doctors were scared of
The institution of slavery, from the year 1830 to 1860, created a divide between the northern and southern regions of the United States. Southerners, who relied on slaves to maintain their plantations, supported the institution, as it was a major part of their economy. Meanwhile, northerners, many of whom depended on slave produced cotton for textile mills and goods for the shipping industry, were divided on the slave issue, as some saw it as a blessing while the abolitionists saw it as a horrific institution. Overall, attitudes toward the institution of slavery, due to a variety of causes, differed in the varying regions in the United States from 1830 to 1860.
Like previous American expansion, American imperialism in the late 19th and early 20th centuries was motivated by desire for new economic gains and improvements. However, the social justification, diplomatic and military approach and geographical aspect of imperialist expansionism varied greatly from previous American growth. Therefore, American expansionism underwent more change in this period than continuity.
They supported the idea that every person “is entitled to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” (Doc 7). This statement is relatable to what Senator Hoar expressed. The Anti- Imperialist League also compared the idea of imperialism to militarism, “an evil from which it has been our glory to be free” (Doc 7). This statement recognizes that the United States should not succumb to the evils that exist in a militaristic state. Despite this, many wars continued to break out between other countries with Latin America for the fight of ownership of another country.
With the Industrial Revolution in full swing, Europe was looking to bolster their trade markets abroad. Thinking of it this way: in order to sell more goods, you need more places to sell them. So, with this thinking in mind, the Europeans said to themselves, 'What better place than Africa and Asia?' Along the same lines, colonies on these continents were seen as great places to get cheap, raw materials for Europe's factories. Add to this that Europe needed a place to house and employ their surplus population, and you can see why New Imperialism held the promise of economic growth.
Jaber , Kamel S. Abu . "The Millet System in the Nineteenth-Century Ottoman Empire." The Muslim World 57, no. 3 (1967): 212-223. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.14781913.1967.tb01260.x/abstract?globalMessage=0 (accessed April 28, 2011).
The Ottoman Empire were Muslims and included Hungary, Syria, Egypt, Bulgaria, and Albania, and they marched on land. The Ottoman Empire is said to have first appeared somewhere around the 1300’s, and can be related to the decline of the Byzantine Empire. They began conquering Christian lands and by the late 1600’s all Christians were afraid of the “terrible Turk”. It is no wonder that many other people were afraid of the Ottoman Empire since they seem to be really rather powerful and they conquered a lot of land. It was in the 1330’s when the Morroccan Abu Abdallah Ibn Battuta passed through Constantinople and became impressed with the Ottomans who seemed to be gaining power rather quickly, he noticed that they had close to 100 forts and
A lot of people say that the southern part of the united states is what started the war. Their stubborn ways force the north to take action which lead to the civil war. In all reality there was more that came into play when the civil war was in the making. States rights was one of the problem that lead to the civil war, the constitution did not define who had what powers and what authority over one what. Also slavery played a part because the slaves were raising up and fighting for their rights in which the south did not like and and the north tried to help only making the problem worse. The differences between the free states and the slave states was the power of the national government to prohibit slavery in the territories that had not yet
Sultan Mahmud II, and various other Europeanized Ottoman bureaucrats initiated what is known today as the largest reform movement in the history of the Ottoman Empire. The Tanzimat changed life in the Ottoman Empire drastically, and completely revolutionized how the Ottomans lived. Previously, the empire was home to various different, nationalities, races, religions and cultures. During the Tanzimat, a major effort was made to unite these people, which is often referred to as the policy of Ottomanism. This resulted in the creation of a national anthem, and the establishment of a national flag. In the past, Islamic law was predominant, but was replaced by secular law, so no individual groups were left out. The Tanzimat’s main focus was to replace it’s old, outdated ways, with more of a westernized approach. The reforms varied greatly, but for the most part, they were all made to help modernize the empire.
The Ottomans did attempt to reform themselves on multiple occasions. The entire Tanzimat period from 1839-1876 was marked by extensive efforts to modernize and westernize the Ottoman government. Even before then, though, there were serious attempts to change society. Around the time of Napoleon's invasion of Egypt and Syria in 1798, Sultan Selim III sought to modernize the Ottoman Army after the model of the highly successful French army. The Nizam-i-Cedid would have been a modern military force capable of standing up to European armies, unlike the hopelessly antiquated and disorderly Janissaries. Despite his best efforts, though, the Janissaries overthrew him in 1807. His successor, Mahmud II did succeed in reviving the Nizam-i-Cedid after massacring the Janissaries in 1826 (Gelvin 80). At the same time, Mehmet Ali implemented similar, though more successful, reforms in Egypt, then under the at least *de jure* rule of the Sultan. Mehmet Ali's army was perhaps the strongest in the Middle East and his forces intervened on behalf of the Ottoman Empire to crush the revolt in Greece. Despite that strength, though, European militaries were more powerful and at the battle of Navarino, a joint Anglo-Franco-Russian navy defeat...
“History of the Ottoman Empire, an Islamic Nation where Jews Lived.” “History of the Ottoman Empire, an Islamic Nation… 1967-2004. 30 January, 2014 http://www.sephardicstudies.org/ottoemp.html