Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Role of religion in english literature
Religion influence on literature
The impact of religion on American literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Role of religion in english literature
In Choderlos de Laclos epistolary novel, Dangerous Liaisons, there are several prominent themes that reoccur throughout the novel, two being seduction and manipulation. While those themes play a large role, one theme that has significant influence in character development is religion. The relationship between the Vicomte de Valmont and the Présidente de Tourvel develops throughout the novel based upon the evolving importance that religion and faith have in the decision making of the two characters.
One of the main plot lines in this novel is based upon a bet between the Vicomte de Valmont and the Marquise de Merteuil; in short, Valmont wagers that if he is able to seduce the very religious woman, Tourvel, Merteuil will agree to be with him again when he visits Paris. Valmont being both a womanizer and promiscuous takes on this bet and begins his manipulation of Tourvel. At this initial stage, it is important to take into account the values of both
…show more content…
Valmont and Tourvel. Valmont can be seen as one who does not truly believe in love and is in it for that game, as well as having no religious convictions at all. On the other hand, Tourvel is a very conservative and religious woman whose sole focus is on her faith and duty to God. She is often praying and her own letters are full of religious imagery. In the first exchange of letters between the two (22-26), Valmont frightens Tourvel with his sudden expression of “love” for her. She immediately goes to pray, “[…] and I beheld this adorable woman bathed in tears, on her knees, praying most fervently. What deity dared she invoke? Is there one so powerful as the god of love?” (Letter XXIII). Valmont highlights the fact that he does not believe in either God or love; this makes him seem pretentious because he thinks that there is nothing that can stop him from his ultimate goal of seducing Tourvel. Later, he goes on to apologize to her for his sudden and inappropriate proclamation of love for her. Valmont is a very intelligent and manipulative man though, so when he writes to Tourvel, he states exactly what she would want to hear if she were to forgive him: “I will not deceive you; it will be impossible for you to conquer my love, but you may teach me how to regulate it: by guiding my steps, by prescribing to me my conversation […]” (Letter XXIV). This implies that he is willing to take a step back and respect her wishes and even be willing to learn more about her faith, which Valmont realizes is the only way that he may have any chance to win her heart. He uses a religious tone of argument to convince Tourvel that she should not brush him off to the side, and this is enough to let herself continue to be seduced by him. In letters forty-one and forty-two, the reader can detect an important tone that is being set by Valmont in his pursuit to seduce Tourvel. The voice that he portrays when writing her in this letter will cause her to be convicted by how she responds to him. Again, Valmont is only writing exactly what she wants to hear from him, so this far, Tourvel is the only one who has begun to have any change in character because she is the one being manipulated. In this particular exchange of letters, Valmont plays the victim by accusing Tourvel of not listening to his prayers or dismissing him because of his wrongdoings: “You banish me on the same principle that people turn their eyes from the miserable wretches they do not choose to relieve” (Letter XLII). By doing this, Tourvel may begin to think of herself as a less Godly woman, which is exactly what Valmont is aiming to do in order to get inside of her head. In response to Valmont’s guilt filled letter, Tourvel does exactly as he predicted: she tries to disprove the accusations thus making them valid to begin with, thus falling into his trap. The next series of letters show to be a lull in Valmont’s advances as Tourvel promised that she would no longer respond to his letters.
She emphasizes her happiness in her current life and she does not want to mess it up for an uncertain love-affair. Tourvel writes, “Beloved and esteemed by a husband, who I love and respect, my duty and pleasure are united in the same object; I am happy; I ought be so. If there are more lively pleasures existing, I wish them not; I will not be acquainted with them” (Letter LVI). In this letter, Tourvel seems to have realized Valmont’s true intentions, and chooses her faith and husband at this specific time over Valmont. It seems that Tourvel has not strayed as far from her religion as Valmont had wished and Valmont has not yet proven his change of heart and commitment to religion in a manner that Tourvel believes that he is truly trying to grow in his “faith.” Valmont responds to her silence by stating that he cannot transfer his love for her to friendship as she implied in her
letter. Though not directed at each other, the reader learns that Valmont’s persistence in writing Tourvel has not been in vain, she writes to another character that she needed to leave the house she was staying at because she was falling in love with Valmont and it wasn’t fair for her husband for her to stay and either emotionally or physically be unfaithful to him. She states, “[…] I was flattered with the hope that absence would increase my strength and resolution. How fatally am I deceived! […] I am ashamed of my sentiments, but not of him who caused them” (Letter CVIII). This confirms two things: one being that she has begun to stray from her faith and devotion to both God and her husband to the point where she questions her own ability to resist Valmont’s charm, and two, Valmont has somehow made Tourvel believe that he has been changing his heart and trying to become religious for her and that he is not in it just because he sees love as being a game to be won. With the pressure rising from Merteuil to seduce Tourvel, Valmont reaches out to Father Anselme in a last ditch effort to win over Tourvel by asking the priest to tell Tourvel that he has recently confessed and renounced all of his sins. His letter states, “Therefore I request, Sir, you will be so good to inform her of my new resolves, and ask in my name, a particular interview, where I may in some measure repair the injuries I have been guilty of by my apologies […]” (Letter CXX). Along with this letter, and the ones included in it for Tourvel, Valmont comes up with a plan to make her consent to his “love” or she will be convicted of condemning him to either death or eternal damnation. This is the ultimate trail of her faith, in which high stakes are on the line. She must decide whether it is more important to save herself from the sinful act of adultery or sacrifice her beliefs to save Valmont from suicide. In this confusing time for Tourvel, she too easily confuses her Christian virtues and duties to God with what she owes the man who as been perusing her so diligently. These letters provide some of the pivotal moments where the importance of religious conviction switches from Tourvel to Valmont. Valmont is drawn towards religion in order to pursue her while Tourvel strays from religion as Valmont leads her closer to a sinful act. Valmont finally gets what he was so determined to gain: the right of entry into Tourvel house through the use of the priest, which is ironic in its own way, and seducing her. Even after convincing her that he is a changed man by confessing to the priest, it is evident that that is entirely false when he goes on to express his victory to Merteuil shortly after it occurred, “At last this haughty woman is conquered, who dared think she could resist me. –She is mine–totally mine. –She has nothing left to grant since yesterday” (Letter CXXV). The importance of religion to Tourvel has evolved much more drastically than with Valmont, in which she went from being a strictly religious woman to falling into temptation and committing adultery. She is now entirely at the will of Valmont and expresses that he now rules her life because of her love for him and his ability to play her like a puppet. Her acceptance of no longer being a Godly woman and she is both disappointed in her own behavior but also utterly happy because she is in love with the man who led her to sin. The importance that these two character place on religion changes throughout the novel and is most significantly seen in Tourvel. Valmont only placed importance on religion and confessed to the priest on the surface, while deep down he was just being the same manipulative womanizer that he was at the beginning of the novel and his success with seducing Tourvel was seen as another trophy to stash away in his collection. Tourvel, on the other hand, was manipulated and blindly led into Valmont’s trap. She is seen as being a highly religious and faithful woman to attempting to separate herself from the situation to finally completely straying away from everything that she believed in and placing more emphasis on her duty to Valmont than her duty to God. She expresses her grief in a letter to a close friend after she realizes that she was played by Valmont and that he was never truly in love with her, “I am dying because I did not believe you” (Letter CXLVII). In the end, Valmont was hardly affected by the fact that destroyed a woman’s life with his lies and deception. Tourvel’s complete loss of faith and religion and the weight of her sins makes her no longer want to live.
The “beautiful young woman” began to show her stubborn ways early. According to the reading, Bertrande was concerned more about putting aside her wifely duties than to ruin her reputation and independence (27-28). When Martin abandoned Bertrande, she was left without a defined position in the village social structure. Being the honest women that Coras said she was, Bertrande would not separate from Martin, and under Catholic law she could not remarry unless there was strong proof of death. The values that Bertrande grew up with showed that she never saw herself leaving village customs (32). Though the devastating experience of Martin leaving left her weak and yearning for a husband, she lived “virtuously and honorably” through her “stiff-necked sense of herself and her reputation” (34).
Lope de Vega’s play touches upon several key components and ideas that were brought up in many of the other stories read throughout the semester. This included the role of gender and how men and women are viewed differently in the Spaniard town of Fuenteovejuna. Another topic included the importance of family, love, and relationships and their connection on loyalty, trust, and personal beliefs. The last major influence found in other literature and in Fuenteovejuna, were the political and religious references made throughout the play. Even though Lope de Vega didn’t make these views obvious, the reader could still pick up on their connotation and the references made towards these specific ideas. With all of this in mind, each of these components played an important role in each civilization read, and even over 1,000 years later it continues to be a social topic as well as a large part of the culture. The only difference a reader or scholar could make for this particular piece of literature is its authenticity and how it was based on a true event. Regardless, new views on power and how one obtain it become apparent through the dialogue between characters like Laurencia and the Commander.
Gallant’s use of “The Other Paris” as the title sets the tone for the short story. It is a commonly told tale of the romance
With the love of Lanval's mistress, Marie puts forward to her readers the prospect of love freely given, as part ...
In The Lais of Marie de France, the theme of love is conceivably of the utmost importance. Particularly in the story of Guigemar, the love between a knight and a queen brings them seemingly true happiness. The lovers commit to each other an endless devotion and timeless affection. They are tested by distance and are in turn utterly depressed set apart from their better halves. Prior to their coupling the knight established a belief to never have interest in romantic love while the queen was set in a marriage that left her trapped and unhappy. Guigemar is cursed to have a wound only cured by a woman’s love; he is then sent by an apparent fate to the queen of a city across the shores. The attraction between them sparks quickly and is purely based on desire, but desire within romantic love is the selfishness of it. True love rests on a foundation that is above mere desire for another person. In truth, the selfishness of desire is the
Rather than only with a man, Emma has illicit relationships with several men. When Rodolphe, one of her sweethearts, first begins the affair with her, Emma is filled with contentment and satisfaction, and “at last she was going to know the joys of love, the fever of the happiness she had desperate of” (Flaubert 190). For Emma, the romance is a break from the miserable marriage life. Before the appearing of Rodolphe, she can only swallow her dissatisfaction while still acting as a dutiful wife taking cares the household. The amorous connection between the lovers ignites her heart to reveal the enduring desire and hope for dramatic love; because Rodolphe’s flamboyance disparages Monsieur Bovary’s seriousness and reticence, Emma is blind with the superficial pleasant, does not penetrate one’s true character, and fools with the novelty. She has been tired of herself as a mother and wife, sacrificing all the time and energy to the family; inside of her, she always wish to be a free woman who can experience different kinds of men and love stories, but the cultural conventions bury her unorthodox wishes. Emma chooses commit adultery for the sake of declaring she hates to be the “perfect” housewife and craves to be
Hence, the woman gets the final say in the matter, forcing her lover to stay constant so she can be At first, Beauplaisir has to use his own stratagem to ‘persuade’ the Widow: “He did not, however, offer, as he had done to Fantomina and Celia, to urge his passion directly to her, but by a thousand little softning artifices, which he well knew how to use, gave her leave to guess he was enamour'd.” That is, she creates a fake chase by pretending to be disinterested in order to give him a sense of agency as he actively ‘chose’ to pursue her. Conversely, the heroine really controls the narrative- he is attracted to the same woman again, albeit unknowingly thanks to her acting. In fact, the heroine directly acknowledges the acting she is doing as Bloomer to keep her control hidden.
...s a lesson to be learned from the poem and the characters at the end: love is between a man and a woman; anything else and be damned by God. As the Pope was not swayed by Damian’s book, neither would most of those who read or heard this tale. Helen’s argument, although compelling and logical, supported by Reason, is in place to persuade and convince the Ganymedes of the medieval world to marry a woman they do not love, or fear God’s wrath.
Abelard risks his place in society as a well respected teacher and Heloise risks her image as a woman. When Heloise becomes pregnant, they decide to have a secret marriage arranged by Heloise’s Uncle Fulbert. However, Fulbert plots against them to expose their affair and ruin Abelard’s life. “But Fulbert and his household, seeking satisfaction for the dishonor done to him, began to spread the news of the and break the promise of secrecy they had given me.” This act of disloyalty ruins both Heloise and Abelard’s lives and forces them to join separate monasteries. Heloise becomes a nun and Abelard becomes a monk. Fulbert’s disloyalty even forces them to give up their child. However, even though they were separated, Heloise and Abelard remained loyal and faithful to each other by writing letters. They knew they could never see each other again, but they still loved each other. “No one, I think, could read or hear it dry-eyed; my own sorrows are renewed by the detail in which you have told it, and redoubled because you say your perils are still increasing.” While they did not believe that they would ever see each other again, Abelard and Heloise still expressed their love to one another. Their ability to remain loyal to allowed them to overcome all of the obstacles they face in their
If Geoffrey Chaucer for some unforeseen reason was unable to published The Canterbury Tales, then perhaps, his version of Troilus and Criseyde would be widely acknowledged as one of his most epic tragic poems. However, Chaucer’s poem, though adapted widely into various modern translations, for the sake of this paper the translation by Barry Windeatt will be used, the tale’s influential go-between is still a character trope used today. In fact, the romantic entanglements that the main characters find themselves in are the results of the power structure established by the go-between Pandarus. From the first instance where Pandarus witnesses his friend Troilus’s love-struck grief, the convincing speeches given to yield beneficial results for the Prince Troilus, and the letter trope established in Pandarus’s role as the go-between, which establishes the patriarchal power structure that Pandarus identifies with. Occupying the power structure as defined by theorist Michel Foucault, which upholds that power is the mechanism that establishes the autonomy or de-individualization of a person (Felluga). Therefore, Foucauldian discourse attributed to bodies and power is upheld by the mediator status of Pandarus as the go-between, manipulative rhetor, and plot device in the tale Troilus and Criseyde is used to establish the notions of courtly love.
I'm not a tremendously religious person. I don't attend religious services, I don't say prayers before bedtime (or much of any other time), I don't read a section of my holy book on a regular schedule... you get the picture. The closest I'd come to claiming a personal faith is to call myself a sort of armchair Daoist.
Toni Morrison’s novel, Beloved, explores the physical, emotional, and spiritual suffering that was brought on by slavery. Several critical works recognize that Morrison incorporates aspects of traditional African religions and to Christianity to depict the anguish slavery placed not only on her characters, but other enslaved African Americans. This review of literature will explore three different scholarly articles that exemplifies how Morrison successfully uses African religions and Christianity to depict the story of how slavery affected the characters’ lives in the novel, even after their emancipation from slavery.
Imagine the Paris home of Orgon, who meets Tartuffe at church and is completely taken in by him...so much so, that he foolishly not only invites this relative stranger, Tartuffe, to live in his home, but also promises his daughter (Mariane) in marriage to the man, though she has promised her heart to Valère.
Lantin was not only ubiquitous behavior among women of her time period, but it was also crucial to the stability of her home. “There were on two points upon which he ever found fault with her—her love of the theatre, and her passion for false jewelry”(P.90). It is interesting to see how the author wants the reader to focus on the details. M. Lantin put his wife on a very high pedestal and yet he was able to find fault in her. The author’s use of the words ‘love’ and ‘passion’ are a subtle way of implying that these gifts and performances meant more to her than she let on. They symbolized the existence of her extra-marital affairs. ‘’Secrecy was thus both deemed necessary to bourgeois notions of privacy and viewed as potentially dangerous to public order’’.(P. 47)
He explains this to his wife who feels so strongly for her husband that she demands to accompany him on his journey. Because of the inevitable devotion layered within her being, she tells him that his "gracious solicitude for [her] happiness only makes [her] love for [him] more ardent, and [her] determination to follow [him] more firm ' " (Valmiki 698). Similar to the scene of the reading, in the modern times of the world, a person will adhere to his or her partner because of the thick and unbreakable bond that has formed between the two beings. A wife could not fathom the thought of losing her husband, so she would most likely demand to join