Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Strengths of the dsm5
Strengths of the dsm5
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-I) was published in 1952 by the American Psychiatric Association to define and classify mental disorders. It did not have much influence in classifying mental disorders during that time. Up until the late 1960s, when the system of nosology starts to have some real influence on mental health professionals, the American Psychiatric Association published DSM-II in 1968. DSM-I and DSM-II system lacked precise descriptions of the disorders and relied heavily on unproven and unpopular theories. Therefore, the third edition of the DSM was published in 1980 to make new reforms to its predecessors. One of the changes was more specific classification of the disorders and being more precise. For example, phobia …show more content…
would be classified under the category “anxiety disorders” rather than “neurosis” (Durand, p. 85). The second change in DSM-III was adding more details to the criteria for identifying the disorders. However, not all categories were completely reliable and valid. DSM-III R was revised in 1987 achieving good reliability and validity. The third change is rating the individual psychological disorders into five axis, which is called multiaxial. Mood disorder is listed on Axis I and chronic of personality is listed on Axis II. Axis III consists of any physical disorders and the amount of psychosocial stress is listed on Axis IV. Finally, adaptive functioning was listed on Axis V. This allows the clinicians to gather the information and have an idea of what each individual’s problem lie in. The International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) consist of diagnosis code that relates to health matter was published in 1993.
Then DSM-IV was published a year later in 1994 to make DSM and ICD more compatible. DSM-IV reanalyzes previous diagnostic system to find which one is useful to be used in DSM-IV. In addition, in DSM-IV, the multiaxial system of the previous edition was changed. Learning disorder, communication disorder and persuasive disorder used to be part of Axis II, but the fourth edition moved them to Axis I. The amount of psychosocial stress listed on Axis IV, was not useful therefore, reporting psychosocial and environmental problems replaced it. In 2000, the text revision of DSM-IV (DSM-IV-TR) helped clarify any issues related to the diagnosis of psychological disorders for readers. DSM-IV-TR used a categorical classification system that divides the mental disorders into types based on the …show more content…
criteria. After 10 years of effort by hundreds of international experts, DSM-5 was published in the spring of 2013.
Their dedication and hard work have been combined together in the new edition DSM-5 that defines and classifies mental disorder in order to improve treatment, diagnoses and research. DSM-5 has no greater changes from DSM-IV-TR. However, there are some new disorders introduced and reclassified. The multiaxial system has been removed in DSM-5 because Axis I, II and II have been combined into the descriptions of the disorders. DSM-5 approved the posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), which is a self-report scale develop based on data. DSM-5 focuses to make better characterize symptoms for groups of people who are seeking for clinical help. These symptoms were not defined well in DSM-IV and are less likely to have access to the
treatments. DSM-5 introduces cross cutting dimensional symptoms because the categories are failing to identify the symptom and not fitting into diagnostic criteria sets. Cross cutting dimensional symptoms are supposed to improve the categorical classification system.
Considering the information provided in the case of Mr. Jock, and after aligning all symptoms and signs to the DSM-5 criteria, the patient should receive the diagnosis of Bipolar I, current episode manic, severe severity, with mood congruent psychotic features, with catatonia.
Antwone Fisher presents characteristics consistent with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (American Psychiatric Association, 2013, p. 271). The American Psychiatric Association described the characteristics of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, or PTSD, as “the development of characteristic symptoms following exposure to one or more traumatic events” (American Psychiatric Association, 2013, p. 271). The American Psychological Association (2013) outlines the criterion for diagnosis outlined in eight diagnostic criterion sublevels (American Psychiatric Association, 2013, pp. 271-272). Criterion A is measured by “exposure to actual or threatened” serious trauma or injury based upon one or more factors (American Psychiatric Association, 2013, p.
The investigators sought out potential subjects through referrals from psychiatric hospitals, counseling centers, and psychotherapists. All potential subjects were screened with a scripted interview and if they met all the inclusion criteria they met with an investigator who administered the Clinical-Administered PTSD Scale(CAPS) to provide an accurate diagnosis. In the end the study ended up with 12 subject, 10 females and 2 males with a mean age of 41.4, that met the criteria for PTSD with treatment resistant symptoms, which were shown with a CAPS score of greater than or equal to 50.
Frances, A., & Ross, R. (1996). DSM-IV case studies a clinical guide to differential diagnosis. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, Inc.
Identification of any psychosocial or contextual factors to be considered, as outlined in the DSM-5
Recently, controversial changes to the Diagnostics and Statistics Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM V) have been the topics of heated discussions in the psychiatric world. The more recent Fifth Edition (DSM V) has been released with changes that now group all of the sub- categories of Autism in to one. Some of the community views this change as a personal attack on their identity while others are welcoming the change.
Spiegel, D., Loewenstein, R. J., Lewis-Fernández, R., Sar, V., Simeon, D., Vermetten, E., & ... Dell, P. F. (2011). Dissociative disorders in DSM-5. Depression & Anxiety (1091-4269), 28(9), 824-852. doi:10.1002/da.20874
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder is defined by our book, Abnormal Psychology, as “an extreme response to a severe stressor, including increased anxiety, avoidance of stimuli associated with the trauma, and symptoms of increased arousal.” In the diagnosis of PTSD, a person must have experienced an serious trauma; including “actual or threatened death, serious injury, or sexual violation.” In the DSM-5, symptoms for PTSD are grouped in four categories. First being intrusively reexperiencing the traumatic event. The person may have recurring memories of the event and may be intensely upset by reminders of the event. Secondly, avoidance of stimuli associated with the event, either internally or externally. Third, signs of mood and cognitive change after the trauma. This includes blaming the self or others for the event and feeling detached from others. The last category is symptoms of increased arousal and reactivity. The person may experience self-destructive behavior and sleep disturbance. The person must have 1 symptom from the first category, 1 from the second, at least 2 from the third, and at least 2 from the fourth. The symptoms began or worsened after the trauma(s) and continued for at least one
The current criteria for assessment of PTSD is only suitable if criterion A is met. Every symptom must be bound to the traumatic event through temporal and/or contextual evidence. The DSM-5 stipulates that to qualify, the symptoms must begin (criterion B or C) or worsen (symptom D and E) after the traumatic event. Even though symptoms must be linked to a traumatic event, this linking does not imply causality or etiology (Pai, 2017, p.4). The changes made with the DSM-5 included increasing the number of symptom groups from three to four and the number of symptoms from 17 to 20. The symptom groups are intrusion, avoidance, negative alterations in cognition and mood, and alterations in arousal and
Culture has a huge influence on how people view and deal with psychological disorders. Being able to successfully treat someone for a mental illness has largely to do with what they view as normal in their own culture. In Western cultures we think that going to a counselor to talk about our emotions or our individual problems and/or getting some type of drug to help with our mental illness is the best way to overcome and treat it, but in other cultures that may not be the case. In particular Western and Asian cultures vary in the way they deal with psychological disorders. In this paper I am going to discuss how Asian cultures and Western cultures are similar and different in the way they view psychological disorders, the treatments and likelihood of getting treatment, culture bound disorders, and how to overcome the differences in the cultures for optimal treatments.
In 1980, BPD had finally been recorded in the third edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Ogrodniczuk & Hernandez, 2010). Now in the fifth edition, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders lists BPD among the fifteen types of personality disorders (5th ed.; DSM–5; American Psychiatric Association, 2013).
Scott, W. J. (1990). PTSD in the DSM-III: A case in the politics of diagnosis and disease. Social Problems. Web may 11-2014
Classification refers to the procedure in which ideas or objects are recognized, distinguished and understood. Currently, two leading systems are used for grouping of mental disorder namely International Classification of Disease (ICD) by World Health Organization (WHO) and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental disorders (DSM) by the American Psychiatric Association (APA). Other classifications include Chinese classification of mental disorder, psycho-dynamic diagnostic manual, Latin American guide for psychiatric diagnosis etc. A survey of 205 psychiatrists, from 66 different countries across all continents, found that ICD-10 was more customarily used and more valued in clinical practice, while the DSM-IV was more valued for research [1].
In a country based around free will, the United States contains a vast variety of personalities and behaviors. Plenty of people, probably more than we know, exert abnormal behavior. Abnormal behavior is patterns of emotion, thought, and action that are considered pathological. Historically, people blame witchcraft for this eccentric type of behavior and tended to perform exorcisms in hopes of abolishing such actions. Anxiety disorders and personality disorders, two forms of abnormal behavior, can alter a person’s personality as a result of life experiences.
The variables used was a 1 Qualitative IV (Therapy), with 2 levels (yes/no), and a Quantitative DV (behavioral measures score). This particular test was done to analyze these variables because they are paired, and the patients used before, during, and after treatment were the same patients. The numerical results of the test for violent behavior was t(29)=3.69, p >0.001 we reject the null hypothesis. The numerical results of the test for drugs used was t(29)= 5.05, p>0.001 we reject the null hypothesis. The numerical results of the test for medical visits was t(29)= 6.16, p>0.001 we reject the null hypothesis. The numerical results of the test for self-harm was t(29)= 3.82, p>0.001 we reject the null hypothesis. The numerical results of the test for time away from work was t(29)= 4.90, p>0.001 we reject the null hypothesis. The numerical results of the test for hospital admissions was t(29)= 3.03, p>0.001 we reject the null hypothesis. The numerical results of the test for time as an inpatient was t(29)= 2.73, p>0.001 we reject the null hypothesis. The numerical results of the test for Index score was t(29)= 5.68, p>0.001 we reject the null hypothesis. The numerical results of the test for DSM-III score was t(29)= 7.48, p>0.001 we reject the null hypothesis. Yes, it was significant because the test statistic is larger than the t critical value, and in this study we reject the null for all measures, p>0.001. The