Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Borderline personality disorder review of the literature
Dsm 5 borderline personality disorder study
Clinical case study borderline personality disorder
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The article I have chosen is, “An Outcome Study of Psychotherapy for Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder.” The study is about thirty patients who have intense personality disorder and experimenters wanted to evaluate the effectiveness of psychotherapy. By doing so experimenters would evaluate the patients before, during and after their treatments. Measures used in this study were violent behavior, drugs used per day, medical visits per month, self-harm, time spent off work, times admitted into the hospital, inpatient time, score on a self-report index and DSM-III scores. The population that is under investigation are the patients with borderline personality disorder according to the score DSM-III standards. The size of the sample …show more content…
The variables used was a 1 Qualitative IV (Therapy), with 2 levels (yes/no), and a Quantitative DV (behavioral measures score). This particular test was done to analyze these variables because they are paired, and the patients used before, during, and after treatment were the same patients. The numerical results of the test for violent behavior was t(29)=3.69, p >0.001 we reject the null hypothesis. The numerical results of the test for drugs used was t(29)= 5.05, p>0.001 we reject the null hypothesis. The numerical results of the test for medical visits was t(29)= 6.16, p>0.001 we reject the null hypothesis. The numerical results of the test for self-harm was t(29)= 3.82, p>0.001 we reject the null hypothesis. The numerical results of the test for time away from work was t(29)= 4.90, p>0.001 we reject the null hypothesis. The numerical results of the test for hospital admissions was t(29)= 3.03, p>0.001 we reject the null hypothesis. The numerical results of the test for time as an inpatient was t(29)= 2.73, p>0.001 we reject the null hypothesis. The numerical results of the test for Index score was t(29)= 5.68, p>0.001 we reject the null hypothesis. The numerical results of the test for DSM-III score was t(29)= 7.48, p>0.001 we reject the null hypothesis. Yes, it was significant because the test statistic is larger than the t critical value, and in this study we reject the null for all measures, p>0.001. The
Time constraints are common when contact with clients is limited because then there is no way to get repeated measures from them across a prolonged sequence of assessment sessions. Hence, the Brief Functional Analysis was developed for these kinds of situations. Pairwise Functional Analysis (also known as single function test) and trial based function analysis can be used in these time limited situations. Risky behaviors like severe self injury or aggression is hard to assess if they cannot occur frequently and are not very safe for the client. Hence, the challenge faced when conducting an FA is arranging conditions under which problem behaviors may increase while at the same time minimizing the risks. Clients can wear protective devices and equipment to avoid the risks. Therapists can engage in precursor FA or latency FA to reduce the risks of the problem behavior. Therapists can get medical clearance before starting the FA treatment and termination sessions when the behavior is extremely severe and risky for the
The PHQ-9 is a widely utilized tool in Primary Care to assist clinicians with the detection, diagnosing, monitoring, and measuring of severity of depression in adults (Kroenke, Spitzer, Williams 2001). It is a nine item self-administered questionnaire based on the Diagnostic Statistic Manual IV (DSM-IV) criteria for diagnosing depression in adults. There is a tenth question at the end regarding effect, if any, on functioning. It has also been used in many medical specialty populations for adults presenting with, or suspicion of depressive symptoms. It may be completed in clinic by the patient and takes two to five minutes (Nease et al. 2003). It is reviewed by the clinician and interpretation of the score is made using the algorithm that accompanies the questionnaire in 1-3 minutes. The expense of the paper is the only cost. The training is simply the clinician becoming familiar with the questions and the scoring.
The DSM-5 lists approximately 400 mental disorders, each one explains the criteria for diagnosing the disorder and key clinical features, and sometimes describes features that are often times not related to the disorder. The classification is further explained by the background information such as: research findings, age, culture, gender trends, and each disorder’s prevalence, risk, course, complications, predisposing factors, and family patterns (Comer, 2013, pp.100).... ... middle of paper ... ...
Frances, A., & Ross, R. (1996). DSM-IV case studies a clinical guide to differential diagnosis. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, Inc.
According to the BDI-II test review, norming of the BDI-II is neither impressive nor extensive including a clinical sample of 500 outpatients in therapy as well as a conve...
...hs in this article. Statistical findings are something that most people can easily read and understand. In addition another strength was in which the author went into such detail as to the methods, measures and clearly stated the variables within her study. On the other hand, a weakness of the article was the language used to explain the results could become confusing. Another weakness would have to be the over repetition of many of facts. As I read the article and summarized it I found many time the explanations of types of violence and commitments were re-addressed in depth over and over, which made for a longer reading and writing process.
The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1992. Print.
middle of paper ... ... Retrieved June 16, 2002, from http://nimh.nih.gov/publicat/numbers.cfm. National Mental Health Association. 2000 May 15.
reminders about common misconceptions regarding null hypothesis significance testing. Quality Of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation. Retrieved from http://ehis.ebscohost.com
As stated previously the name of the selected test is the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III. This test is authored by Theodore Millon, PhD, DsC, with Carrie Millon, PhD, Roger Davis, PhD, and Seth Grossman, PsyD (Millon, Millon, Davis & Grossman, 2006). This current edition has added the new Grossman facet Scales for the Clinical Personality Patterns and Severe Personality Pathology scales (Millon, et al., 2006). The copyright date is 1997, 2006 Dicandrien, INC All rights reserved. Published and distributed exclusively by NCS Pearson, INC (Pearson Assessments) (Millon, et al., 2006). The Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III or MCMI-III for short is a psychological assessment tool created to provide information on psychopathology, this includes specific disorders outlined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV...
The reliability and validity were researched by using three types of studies: mixed diagnostic group, certified patients diagnosed with DSM-III-R anxiety disorders and a non-clinical sample. It should be noted that the that was used population were psychiatric patients s...
The articles, published after 1996, contain varied methods of research attainment, but share similarities such as being a self-survey, having a small sample size, and being
Teplin, L. A., Abram, K. M., & McClelland, G. M. (1994). Does psychiatric disorder predict
The Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III had research done to test the convergent validity of the clinical syndrome scales. This was done by a cross-sectional survey and by using a sample of 186 substance abusers from one town that was referred. The Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory was tested against Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, and the Beck Anxiety Inventory. Past versions of the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory have had ambiguous findings when looking at validity, and there has not been much research on the clinical syndromes as opposed to the personality disorders. There have been three studies to look at the validity of this assessment. The first scale showed very low reliability but there were criticisms on how that research was conducted because of little contact and no structured assessments of the DSM Axis I disorders. The second analysis showed excellent validity but had criticisms as well saying that some of the diagnosis were known by clinicians before the actual assessment was given. The third was an independent research group that showed convergence between the MCMI-III and the Beck but also low discriminant between
Some clinical scales were used such as Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS). This scale was an objective rating scale from staff of inpatients that exhibited various kinds of aggression and encompassed both frequency and severity of aggressive episodes. However, the disadvantage of MOAS was that it did not provide a full picture of the cause of aggression as it did not address the events preceding or following the aggressive act.