Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Culture of fear essay
Book Review:
“The Culture of Fear: Why Americans are Afraid of the Wrong Things”
The Culture of Fear originally published in 1999 by Basic Books in New York, but was updated and enlarged for its tenth anniversary edition in 2010 which features new topics such as the terrorist attacks of September 11,2001, school shootings, and vaccines scares. The author is Barry Glassner a former sociology professor and executive vice provost at the University of Southern California. He claims that many Americans’ concerns and fears are largely unfounded; therefore, his book is focused on the question of why America happens to be a nation where fear is highly captivated in most of our social media and he seeks to find how and why people become fearful to
…show more content…
certain aspects of society. In his book Glassner also examines and exposes how the people who run these organizations of social media tend to manipulate American’s perceptions and how they end up making profit from the resulting fear and anxiety of the population.
Within the introduction Glassner points out that “Politicians, journalists, advocacy groups, and marketers continue to blow dangers out of proportion for votes, ratings, donations, and prof- its.” (Glassner, xxxiii) According to Glassner these organizations are advocates of fear who worry society with unnecessary and exaggerated stories in the media and waste billions of dollars in the process.
Chapter one is composed of fear that is found on danger roadways and campuses. For the most part Glassner argues about the strategy that the media use to influence fear on to its viewers, he gives an example of an ABC’s newsmagazine where the program’s co-anchor advocates fear by questioning the viewers about how often they have been bullied on the road either by a simply hunk or a cruse and how this can possibly lead to an aggression but Glassner counter argues by stating that “people honk their horns all the time
…show more content…
without getting socked or shot,” (Glassner, 3) Through this counterargument Gladdner is able to proof how media try to advocate fear into the public. The book The Culture of Fear: Why Americans are Afraid of the Wrong Things can be related to chapter of communicating: the media on the book Being Sociological where it talks about how media influence our society in different forms such as: economy, culture, and politics. These two books can be related because they both talk about how the media have learned to manipulate the society based on their needs. Reporting news that creates fear and awareness guarantee viewers, which is mostly the way of income for televised news. Media sources always manage to alter news to interest viewer’s attention to achieve higher ratings, which leads us to crime in the news, chapter two. In this Chapter Glassner emphasizes on the strategies the media use to advocate fear, he mainly gives different examples from different years where journalist tried creating a summery of a crime scene and failed to give proper information while trying to escalate the crime to obtain a better rating. Through the chapter you find different examples where media sources have alter their news reports to gain attention and increase fear into the viewers whether it is about crime, gang violence, car accidents, bank robbery, shootings, the media infiltrates their strategy in any way possible. Glassner then proceeds to discuss the danger that youth are exposed to in the third chapter of his book. In this chapter he claims “suicide is the third leading cause of death for teens,” (Glassner, 54) due to bulling, school, violence, and other factors that can lead them to making such decision. Glassner also argues about other factors that put youth in danger such as drug consumption, kidnapping to make money off them, and illness. Similarly, in chapter five Glassner discusses the topic teen motherhood. According to Glassner teen pregnancy is a result of the nations educational and economic decline. The media always tend to give absurd statistics to influence awareness and fear to the viewers about this issue, but Glassner claims, “Early motherhood in itself does not condemn a girl to failure and dependency.” Once again Glassner shows how the media exaggerate to give a damaging image to these young mothers. In chapter six, Glassner talks about how politicians and advocacy groups advocate fear. For example, politicians know they can receive more votes and win their re-elections if they can fund their program to benefit teen moms, the military system and the war on drugs. Glassner argues, “For three decades U.S. presidents and media organizations have worked in unison to promote fears of drug abuse.” (Glassner, 131) Moreover, president Nixon in 1971 started a campaign on the so-called war on drugs; he used this as a political strategy to get reelected. He made this issue the main public enemy that needed to be vanished before it kept spreading and this caused fear in the nation, this increased his followers rates that eventually led to his reelection. The Culture of Fear is composed with examples and explanations of when and how these advocates of fear have successfully operated by spreading fear to the individuals.
Each chapter of the book is focused on a different subject, for example: chapter seven is focused on metaphoric illness; moreover, chapter eight is about plane wrecks and the fear many humans face towards it, not to mention chapter nine is based on his final thoughts where he analyses in detail how professionals user their strategies to “transform something implausible into something believable.” (Glassner, 207) Lastly, chapter ten is about the new fears expected to happen in the upcoming century, which are the same fear he had already touched based on but most recently arising will be terrorism, and war.
In summation, Glassner also talks about how we tend to shake our head and worry about the latest mass shooting while we fail to limit the access to guns to people who shouldn’t have them because they are a danger to society. We also fret over the latest kidnaping of a single toddler while millions of children live in poverty and attend schools were they are not given a good education yet we do nothing to help them. Glassner points out how we pay attention to any atypical tragedy while widespread problems go unaddressed because they catch no
attention.
emotions and subtle nuances provided by the author in the book, and many of the deeper feelings and emotions therein are missed entirely, or touched on much too briefly
"Culture of Fear" is a book that describes that it is our perceptions that dangers have increased, and so much the actual level of risk. Glassner explains in all of his chapters how people and organizations use our fears as a way to increase their profit. Glassner also states about the prices we pay for our panics and all the time and energy we spend worrying. Americans are afraid because of the media's broadband expose of crime, violence, drugs and diseases.
The addition of fear is sometimes too much for people to handle. As if they didn’t have enough already” (Baker 1).
In today’s society the word “terrorism” has gone global. We see this term on television, in magazines and even from other people speaking of it. In their essay “Controlling Irrational Fears After 9/11”, published in 2002, Clark R. Chapman and Alan W. Harris argue that the reaction of the American officials, people and the media after the attacks of 9/11 was completely irrational due to the simple fact of fear. Chapman and Harris jump right into dismembering the irrational argument, often experienced with relationships and our personal analysis. They express how this argument came about from the terrorist being able to succeed in “achieving one major goal, which was spreading fear” among the American people (Chapman & Harris, para.1). The supporters of the irrational reaction argument state that because “Americans unwittingly cooperated with the terrorist in achieving the major goal”, the result was a widespread of disrupted lives of the Americans and if this reaction had been more rational then there would have been “less disruption in the lives of our citizens” (Chapman & Harris, para. 1).
Times change and people come and go, but fear is a constant, and in “The Great Fear” by J. Ronald Oakley, he describes the wave of fear that occurred in the 1950s. In 1692, the townspeople of Salem were scared into believing that they were among witches, and in 1950’s the “Red” Scare destroyed thousands of peoples lives that were accused of being Communists. Those accused in both witch hunts were put on trial, and while many were killed in Salem, the Red Scare had blacklisted those persecuted.
Fear is an emotion brought on by danger, evil, or pain. Sometimes the threat is real and sometimes it can be imagined. A person who is walking through a dark alley in the middle of the night may experience fear because they do not know whether or not it is safe to continue on. The fear of the unknown is also expressed in 1984, The Lottery, and Harrison Bergeron. The government in 1984 uses fear to control the masses. They set strict rules but leave a level of life completely unknown. The Party uses the people’s easygoing, trusting personalities to their advantages. In Shirley Jackson’s The Lottery, the government holds an annual meeting where names are drawn and someone is toned to death. Not knowing through the whole process who will be chosen is a way for the government to instill fear in the people. Shirley Jackson used the fear of the unknown just as George Orwell did. In Harrison Bergeron people are afraid of what will happen if they disobey when putting Harrison’s case into consideration. They also do not know what the government does not want them to know because of their handicap. Not being able to finish a complete thought may bring the fear of the unknown as well. The government controls the masses using fear to keep total control over everything in their society, and in each story, Orwell, Jackson, and Vonnegut all use the idea of fear of the unknown to further control the people.
...de Americans on September 11, 2001. Now we are being told this number is possibly three times higher than originally reported, adding to the horror in America’s citizens. Society has been indoctrinated in the belief that there is continuously a worldwide threat. Paranoia and anxiety has been the key focal point and the American way of life.
The essence of the book is about perspectives. one of the most common ideologies about perspective is how one views a glass of liquid is it half full or half empty. This is supposed to speak volumes about how one sees life. of course there is more to perspective than how one sees a glass of liquid but it is one of the easiest ways to put perspective into
In The Brothers Karamazov Fyodor Dostoevsky said, “…fear is simply the consequence of every lie.” Dostoevsky is stating how people are afraid of what will happen when their lie(s) is/are put out in the open. Fear is a distressing emotion aroused by impending danger, evil, pain, etc., whether the threat is real or imagined. This line suggests that people are afraid of the truth, which inevitably is the consequence of every lie. Even though this quote was written by a 19th century author it can still relate to texts that were made centuries prior. Both Sophocles and Shakespeare’s plays support Dostoevky because both plays deal with the act of lying and its consequences as a major motif.
The Dangers of Fear Irish Playwright, George Bernard Shaw, once said, “The worst sin toward our fellow creatures is not to hate them, but to be indifferent to them; that's the essence of inhumanity.” Inhumanity is mankind’s worst attribute. Every so often, ordinary humans are driven to the point where they have no choice but to think of themselves. One of the most famous examples used today is the Holocaust. Elie Wiesel’s memoir Night demonstrates how fear is a debilitating force that causes people to lose sight of who they once were.
But still, people fear things that would not even harm them, such as insects or heights. These fears just cause problems for people and can even cause harm in a person’s life. One way in which fear is harmful is that it clouds people’s judgement. Fear can influence a person’s judgement, causing them to not think clearly about certain things. In the article “Why Are Millennials Wary of Freedom” by Clay Routledge, the author explains why millennials are so willing to give up their freedom of speech. According to the article, the millennials’ “fear causes [them] to privilege psychological security over liberty” (Routledge). Their fear of getting offended by other people’s speech leads to their judgement being clouded. That is why they would rather have the government regulate what they say than keep their freedom of speech. For this reason, fear is a harmful emotion. The article also mentioned that many millennials “agreed it was acceptable for student groups to use violence to prevent a person from speaking” (Routledge). The millennials’ fear of getting offended by another person’s views is so great that they are willing to encroach on a person’s freedom of speech by
Herman, E. & Sullivan, G. O.1989. The Terrorism Industry: The Experts and Institutions That Shape Our View of Terror. New York: Pantheon.
This paper is focused on how fear as a subject is being perceived by many as a dominant and primitive human emotion. An uncontrollable energy that’s exists and created within every individual, which is directed towards an object or a given situation that does not present an actual danger. The individual then analyzes that the fear is contradictory and thus cannot help the reaction. Gradually, the phobia aims to build up and aggravate as the fear of fear response takes hold. Eventually they distinguish their fear responses as negative, and go out of their way to avoid those reactions. ‘Fear is derived as a basic feeling and therefore created by us – it is not something we have, but something we do. The principle of fear is to keep us safe.’
Mass media refers to media that are easily, inexpensively, and simultaneously accessible to large segments of a population (Surette, 10). Although the mass media are only one of the sources from which citizens attain knowledge of crime and justice, it is by far the most influential. According to one study, the mass media are credited with providing 95 percent of the information the public receives about crime (Surette, 10). With these statistics, it seems that the fear of crime is indeed constructed through the media. In March 1994, the Times Mirror Center for the people and the Press conducted a poll that measured the public’s fear of crime. Fifty percent of the respondents said they feared that they would be the victims of crime, up from 36 percent in 1988 (Krajicek, 23).
Gulli, C. (2009, 10 19). Fear Factor. Maclean's, 122(40), p. 100. Retrieved April 30, 2014