Cultural Differences In A Merger Case Study

2401 Words5 Pages

Cultural differences in a merger

We live in a world full of differences. Differences in gender, age, ethnicity, religion, education, culture and many more other aspects of life. For example, in the Netherlands, 16.9 million people live on 33.8 m2 with 190 different nationalities, 189 different cultures and 7 different generations (CBS, 2014). This diversity logically is also apparent in today’s business life and provides unique challenges and opportunities in the workplace (Kappoor & Solomon, 2011).

The intensifying globalization and its consequentially increasing ethnical-, cultural- and gender diversity turn scholars’ attention to the management of cultural differences (Cox & Blake, 1991; Fullerton, 1987; Johnston, 1991). Cox & Blake (1991) …show more content…

Defendants of the theory suggest that these differences have to be taken into account at an early stage in the merger process to tackle possible barriers right away. This model believes that the level of cultural compatibility between the units to be merged determines the success of the integration process (David & Singh, 1994; Morosini & Singh, 1994; Cartwright & Cooper, 1996; Javidan & House, 2002). It derives its conclusions from the development of the cultural differences which are apparent at the pre-merger stage, into the post-merger integration results. Scholars Cartwright and Cooper, significant defendants of the cultural fit perspective, argue that the cultures of the merging parties should be similar or adjoining in order to integrate them successfully. The authors explain that if there is an equal deviation of power, the units involved in a merger should adapt to each other’s culture and ultimately create a coherent third culture to overcome the differences. However, since organizations inherently strive to retain their own culture, mergers between culturally divergent units are argued to result in major integration …show more content…

The trustees have reduced the organization to the extent necessary for the settlement of the bankruptcy. The loan portfolio in the Netherlands is not sold and therefore, all services of the bank have continued since the bankruptcy, except that the bank does not advise, close new contracts or initiate new loans, nor offer pay services. Company A currently loans more than €5 billion, of which €2 billion is securitized, to over 100.000 customers. There are still approximately 100 employees active for the bank. The interest repayments which Company A receives on the loan portfolio are used to pay costs and remittances to organizations who manages the securitizations and pledgees. What remains is be paid to creditors. To date, the trustees have paid out 74% to creditors. No additional distributors are expected for the coming five years. Each quarter, the trustees report on their activities. The trustees also publish an annual financial report each subsequent

Open Document