Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
My cultural artefacts essay
Impact of tourism on the local community
Should cultural artifacts be returned to their regions of origin
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: My cultural artefacts essay
Cultural Artifacts
When your go to a museum, you look at all the amazing artifacts and wonder, do the artifacts in the museum really come from my state/country? Do the Artifact belong to my state/country? Cultural artifacts contain a presence of ones culture. The culture is in the artifact in every way and form. People are taking away the cultural side of the artifact by taking away the artifact from the place of origin. Cultural artifacts should be returned to their regions of origin. So the region can look at the artifacts and see themselves in the culture.
Culture is a very big part in countries. People take away the culture by taking away the artifacts. From passage 1 "Returning Antiquities To Their Countries Of Origin" explains "Many Native American tribes antiquities are on display in museums. The museums may have acquired them at a time when Native American sites were often denigrated" (Mortimer 4). The native Americans as said the artifacts weren't meant to be put on display. The artifacts were used for private terms only as in religious ceremonies etc. Our people took away the meaning and culture from the Native
…show more content…
Americans by putting the artifacts in the museums. Also in Passage 2 "A Case in Antiquities for 'Finders Keepers" implies "Restricting the exports of artifacts hasn't ended their theft and looting any more than the war on drugs has ended narcotics smuggling (Tierney 17). The artifacts are being stolen and taken away form the rightful owner. People take the artifacts, then looses the artifacts to which the artifacts are now being sold on the black market. However, people imply cultural artifacts shouldn't be put back to their place of origin.
People acknowledge for the artifacts to stay in the museums and as well as for the artifacts to stay in the country where the artifacts weren't originally from. People who agree with this statement aren't looking at what culture does to countries. In Passage 3 "Vision of a home: Repatriated Works Back in Their Countries of Origin" the author states "Across-the-board public budget cuts have left the museum with few resources for maintenance, guards and publicity, said Laura Maisxalco, an archaeologist who has been director of the Aidone museum since fall" (Donadio 25). Countries need to step in and help the country with the financial issues. People need to take cultural artifacts seriously so the artifacts aren't sold on the black
market. Overall, the cultural artifacts should be returned to their regions of origin. That is because people deserve to know there own culture as well as experience the culture with the artifacts. Native Americans tells stories with their artifacts that are important to them. People need to give the artifacts back to their region of origin.
Imagine that one piece of history that is taken from a town. This piece of history tells l people how this town was built and all the important people that were apart of the community. “Returning Antiquities to Their Countries of Origin” by Joyce Mortimer can many people about how objects are getting taken from Museums. They should be returned immediately. There are so many artifacts out there that could be so important to people, and if someone can just imagine what it would feel to have one of the most important object taken from a museum and to be never returned again. Many people enjoy seeing these objects so why are they being taken?
Transition: Just as the music score has many meanings as there symbols and markings on the sheet, I will talked about how I see myself in the classical music culture.
Culture, a significant aspect of an individual identity, tending to be defined from your birth, woven by the gods: however, I defy the hand of fate by picking my own cultural identity... For why should I be forced into the culture that was imposed upon me, just because of my heritage, religion, beliefs, and customs; instead of discovering my own and being myself. I am to tell you the culture I subjugate myself into; a sub-genre of gaming and anime culture, collectively called otaku, and help broaden your mind to the new phenomenon of a different type of pop culture.
For years on end, countries have been fighting with big museums from other countries for ancient artifacts that belong to the original countries. The argument of whether or not the museums should be able to keep them still remains. It is the right of the country to have their own artifacts. It is imperative for countries to be able showcase their historical artifacts, therefor museums should return them to their rightful owners.
Education is why people attend college, hundreds of thousands of students are thrown onto campuses across the world and get involved in various campus clubs; however, despite their vast amount of differences, these kids share one similarity, they all brought their video game console. On move-in day almost every dormitory has some kind of gaming console. It is a common denominator that students share, that they can bond over. The PlayStation 4 is of the latest generation of consoles and by some considered the premiere gaming console. The Sony PlayStation plays all the latest games in stunning quality, run apps seamlessly, and can play almost any media, it is the perfect media device for college.
In this manner, western cultures command great power by being able to represent their own heritage as a higher ranking than the “primitive” art of Third World nations that is often exhibited: “It also means the power to define and rank people, to declare some as having a greater share than others in the community’s common heritage—in its very identity” (Duncan 102). These are the important findings of Duncan’s (1991) analysis of cultural imperialism, which I agree with in terms of the greater influence of American and European museums to ritualize their status as a first world modern nation. More so, American/European museums get greater funding to superimpose their culture over museums in third world countries, which defines the overt power of the museum as a “temple” for first world art. These are important aspects of Duncan’s view that the disproportionate presence of western art throughout the world is based on a primarily imperialistic notion of cultural superiority in the presentation of American and European heritage on a global scale. In my opinion, I feel that western museums deliberately impose their cultural values in terms of “modernity” as a means of ranking themselves above lesser nations. Certainly, the increasing popularity of “primitive”
In “Whose Culture Is It, Anyway? ”, Kwame Anthony Appiah begins by pointing out that some of the museums of the world, particularly in the West, have large collections of artefacts and objects which were robbed from developing and poor countries. He then raises a question: who owns these cultural patrimony and properties? Our first answer may be that since they make up the cultural heritage of a people, they belong to the people and culture from whom they were taken. Appiah has doubt about this and argues that if some cultural artefacts are potentially valuable to all human beings, they should belong to all of humanity. He thinks that when they make contribution to world culture, they should be protected by being made available to those who would benefit from experiencing them and put into trusteeship of humanity.
The introduction of of European materials, tools, and techniques transformed Native American art aesthetically as well as it’s role within Native culture. European technology produced goods that made Native American art easier to create and allowed Native American art to become more elaborate and detailed. However, the distinctive styles of each unique tribes’ art was diluted as the tribes obtained the same European materials rather than what was native to the land they lived on. in many cases European encounter caused Native American artwork to become less culturally significant; For instance, many crafts that held religious ceremonial roles, or served spiritual symbolism, became available to anyone, as a greater emphasis on its economic
Although history may often show that First Americans were forced to assimilate at many points, the museum shows how these nations were able to keep their traditions and culture alive. Although many of the artifacts in the exhibit were from the early 1900s, there were some that were more recent. Additionally, in each of the alcoves, a family from that nation who helped
The museum I attended was “National Museum of the American Indian” (The George Gustav Heye Center.) This historical center offered a superlative perspective of the social legacy of the Native Americas. There were displays that present famous items chose for their aesthetic quality and power as emblems of Native beliefs. My experience in this museum was very quiet and lonely, but I made the best out of it. When first entering the museum, I was lost as to how I would be able to connect any of the information to this class. It took me a while to get an understanding of how the information I collected could be relevant to this class. The concepts and theories I will be using to analyze my museum visit is race and ethnicity, commodification, theory of domination, and hegemony. The authors I will be using are Stephen Steinberg, Vine Deloria, Jr., Charles Fruehling Springwood, C Richard King, Harry Kitano, Nathan Glazer and Ronald Takaki.
...due to the external forces such as other settlers e.g. the Navajos, new settlers along with the Spanish conquerors entered their world. As a result the Pueblo Indians were imposed by these external forces especially through military power that changed their ways completely; having minimal cultural practices of their ancestors before them. The museum may seem like it’s very limited to what’s on exhibit mostly because not all of the building is in use. However the few exhibits they have is substantial in sparking an interest or even beginning to understand the cultures of Native Americans.
This also brings up the questions of: Can cultural appropriation be defined and can it be avoided? With the new fads of Chinese character tattoo's, Hindu god t-shirts, and the selling of such things as Native sweat lodge kits and ceremonies, does this not show that North Americans can appreciate other cultures and that western culture has become a product of a multicultural society.1 Through examples of film and art, sports, and religion, I will answer the following questions and specifically how cultural appropriation has affected North American First Nation peoples. There is much confusion when it comes to the meaning of cultural appropriation. The literal meaning begins with Culture-Anthropological: the sum total of the attainments and learned behaviour patterns of any specific period, race or people; Appropriation's meaning is to take for one's own use.[2] Most people today then know cultural appropriation then as "to take someone else's culture to use for your own purpose".2 I believe that the argument is not that appropriation is "stealing", as some people claim, but that it does matter how a person goes about putting to use the knowledge
The people’s culture is what represents who they are as a whole. There were multiple Native American tribes and each tribe had their own culture and traditions. When the colonists came and slayed many of the tribes, many of the tribes’ population lost their culture. According to Running Strong for American Indian Youth, children from Native American families were taken away to Christian boarding schools and were often disciplined for doing anything related to their tribes’ traditions and culture. These children, who were supposed to be the next generation of the Native Americans, were taught to forget their origin. Without the support of what was supposedly the next generation of Natives, the culture and traditions that were passed down were now long gone and forgotten. Since there is not much we can gather about the Natives tribes back then, all we can learn about them are the objects they left behind or, at least, not lost and
When a dominating or ‘more powerful’ culture steals elements from a minority, they have the ability to manipulate and mistreat it. By manifesting it as their own ideas about that culture, it can ‘erase’ and warp the originality of the minority or ‘less powerful’ culture.[3]
.... As every era, every civilization leaves behind monuments and artistic culture in the form of cities and works of art, all this forms the basis for the nation’s memory of its historical heritage.