Criticism Of Children's Literature

2267 Words5 Pages

Jacqueline Rose defines children’s literature as a “seduction” or a “colonization” of the child in an imposition of the adult ideal of childhood (qtd. in Redcay). Criticism of children’s literature and all research about children is developed by adults who speak of the children on the basis of the assumption that children are inherently weaker and cannot speak for themselves, much like how colonizers speak for the colonized. There is a distortion in the way childhood is perceived and represented, as it is presented as an adult would remember it, and also the ideal that an adult held about childhood.
On the basis of this premise it is easy to assume that all the stories that children are told, and the stories that they themselves begin to narrate are manipulative in the sense where they inculcate the adult’s worldview into the child. Early storytelling transfers language, and the wealth of cultural context and modes it carries to the child. These then become part of their own memories and collective consciousness and children begin to then look towards stories to help them understand adult behaviour.
“For children, stories are metaphors, especially in the realm of feelings, for which they have, as yet, no single words” (Meek Introduction 2). The attitudes of the older generation therefore inevitably influence those that a child might develop simply by exposure to these attitudes through stories that the adults choose to tell the children. To borrow Althusser’s concept, the collective of the “Ideological State Apparatuses” contribute towards the ideology that future adults ought to follow. This is of course, keeping in mind that the ISAs include narratives for children.
Stereotypical representations of characters lead to childre...

... middle of paper ...

...as children grow up, the stereotyping becomes internalized and leads to the continuation of prejudices held and propagated by the majority about the minority.
A postcolonial reading of texts such as Kipling’s The Jungle Book is necessary in order to clarify how Eurocentric biases factor into the stories they are told and in the processes of cultural identity construction. No representation will ever be completely accurate, and Kipling’s own love for India mixed up with his imperialistic approach distinctly colours what could otherwise be passed off as an innocent tales of growing up. The colonial mindset needs to be made familiar so children may accommodate for them and dismantle imperialistic structures. This can be made possible through their understanding of the world as fostered through books that allow for representation of cultures by those who belong to them.

Open Document