Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of propaganda on society
Effect of propaganda
Impact of propaganda on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of propaganda on society
The Giver, by Lois Lowry portrays the discovery that a controlled society doesn’t constitute a content society; The novel portrays the life of an adolescent boy named Jonas who is given a glimpse into the downfalls of his utopian society. Seeing that with pain and loss come great joy, Jonas breaks away from the rules as he tries to find a greater good. I too find that the restraints of our society limit our ability to reach fulfillment. In the words of Lois Lowry, “We gained control of some things. But we had to let go of others”. In the modern day a rebel is often needed to break the rules and find a greater existence. I would rebel for one of three main areas that the government controls: our money, our mind, and our protection. If someone took away control of my money, I would most definitely rebel. When someone works and receives money, they have the right to the money they worked for. In Cuba, a socialist society, assets are split equally between the population. Cuba has free education, but it comes at the cost of low wages (Sobhit Seth). This system separates the amount of work done by a person and the portion of wealth they acquire. Cuba’s economy closes …show more content…
the wealth gap so that the individuals are influenced by the work of every other individual. Some claim that rebellion should never be an option but in the case of big economic systems there is not always another way to get your point across. As put by Nelson Mandela, “When a man is denied the right to live the life he believes in, he has no choice but to become an outlaw.”. The next belief I would defend is my freedom of thought.
Many frightening works of literature have been written about the possibilities of controlled thinking. Through the years, systems of government have arisen that parallel those written about in a frightening way. Dating back to the Nazi rule in Europe, people have been using propaganda to control people’s thought. Such propaganda is dangerous because nothing in society can function properly. An example on the subject of education by James Baldwin, “It is very nearly impossible to become an educated person in a country so distrustful of the independent mind”. Without free thought, there would be no original art, poetry, or music. It’s very apparent that the freedom of the human mind is not to be taken lightly, and It’s a liberty I’d gladly
defend. Finally, I would rebel for the right to defend myself. Oftentimes with moral degradation, comes physical attack. Imagine if a corrupt government managed to rid the entire population of personal firearms. Officials could squander riots within minutes, and rebelling would be a near impossibility. Historically, Governments like Libya, China, and the USSR have turned on their own people with violence. From the gas chambers in the days of the holocaust, to the chemicals used by Libya against its own people, the right to defend yourself is as important as ever. Some may suggest tighter gun laws in the United States; however, I argue that a government stockpiling guns and ammo, is far more dangerous than a lone gunman. The freedom of your own money, thought, and protection are quintessential to a free society, and are worthy of rebellion. Take a look at the final scene of The Giver, Jonas stands looking at lights in the distance. What he gazes upon is a society that is far better than the one he left behind. Thinking that all the cold and pain was worth it, Jonas is filled with joy. Rebellion is no different than this optimistic picture. There are great rewards of rebelling for something that you believe in, and often times it leaves society better off. I believe that the risks and rewards of rebelling are completely worth it.
Bang! Bang! Bang! Jonas knocked on the door. A tall shadowed figure came to the door, it was the giver. He let them in and put them on a bed. Jonas started to ask questions to the giver, “Where are we.”
...take away the freedom of thought. It will stay with us until the end of time. Viktor E. Frankl illustrated this in his essay “An Inner Freedom” from the book Man’s Search for Meaning. He stated, “The sort of person the prisoner became was the result of an inner decision and not the result of amp influences alone.”
The essential thing to overcoming adversity is the ability to cause change in yourself and others. In the book, The Giver, by Lois Lowry, Jonas is singled out after he isn’t chosen during the Ceremony of Twelve. He has to learn to overcome the pain of being The Receiver of Memory. He also has to face the truth and discover who his real allies are. This helps him to become a changemaker because he grows. He grows by using the pain to become stronger mentally and physically. Ultimately, Lowry teaches us that to make a change, you must display curiosity and determination.
Totalitarian rulers often control the thoughts and beliefs of people as well. The citizens of the community are forbidden to question or explore things that are unknown to other citizens. By doing this, the government emphasizes that they know everything and have ...
Imagine living in world where there are no feelings, color, or pain, and everyone is the same besides you. Jonas realized he was living in a world without color, pain, or feelings. Without color, pain, and feeling Jonas wasn’t able to express true happiness, and he therefore left the community. “Lois Lowry’s childhood escapades inspired her books,”(Dellinger). Also Lois loved photography and it resulted in the cover of The Giver, which is a photo of a blind painter. This connects to the book because no one can see in color besides the giver and the receiver, which is Jonas. Lois Lowry uses the literary elements foreshadowing, symbolism, and imagery to express the theme that one cannot have happiness without pain, in the book The Giver.
This community is not a usual everyday community. Here people don’t have to worry about poverty, crime, starvation and basically any typical world problems. Although, this community still has many problems. People still think this is a wonderful place to live but this community is a dystopia. In Mrs. Lowry’s book “The Giver” she explains how families function here as well as the both negative and positive point of views for family.
The past is the most important thing now in the future. Memories of the past created the today’s future, which we now call the present. Modern times learned from the past and what memories has offered. In the novel, The Giver, written by Lois Lowry, it shows the most important theme developed throughout the novel. This theme shows and explains how important memory is and for it to not be forgotten to the reader and audience. Memory can be defined as something that someone remembers in the mind. This theme is important throughout the novel because if an individual makes a specific mistake and forgets it, that memory will be lost and they will never learn from what they have done wrong. People have to learn from what is wrong from right. If that so called mistake is repeated again, it could take an effect
Such actions make people think twice before questioning the state. Likewise, the police and Gestapo had the authority to remove people from their homes and send them, often without trial, to concentration camps” (Was Hitler’s Germany A Totalitarian State? 1). The adage of the adage. O’Brien’s way of thinking was also similar to Hitler’s in that they wanted to eliminate all freethinkers.
What would it be like to live in a world where love is a meaningless word, and people have no emotions? That’s exactly what life was like for Jonas, a boy who lived in a supposedly utopian society where everyone is the same. He is selected for a special job, and during his training he learns the importance of individuality and emotion. In the book and movie adaptations of The Giver, there are many similarities and differences.
Aldous Huxley’s novel, Brave New World, showcases a world alternate from ours, in a dystopian setting. Where human morals are drastically altered, families, love, history, and art are removed by the government. They used multiple methods to control the people, but no method in the world is more highly used and more effective than propaganda. The world state heavily implemented the use of propaganda to control, to set morals, and to condition the minds of every citizen in their world. However, such uses of propaganda have already been used in our world and even at this very moment.
“"Propaganda is as powerful as heroin, it surreptitiously dissolves all capacity to think” by Gil Courtemanche connects to the sad fact of using propaganda as a deadly weapon to feed people with false information and stop them from thinking. George Orwell’s novel, 1984, describes a totalitarian dystopian society where the Party is constantly brainwashing its citizens with information that is beneficial to its own rights. On the opposite side, people are working for the party just like dominated slaves for their masters without knowing what’s going on. But, in order for the party to achieve this goal, they have to use different techniques of propaganda in Oceania to create fear for people so that they can obey the rules. The use of propaganda in the society of 1984 takes away freedom from individuals because of the absence of privacy, thinking and making decisions.
Picture the world in black and white, not knowing what any of the colors are. Now limit the types of emotions you can feel and talk about. Next, try to imagine your life without any memories. There is no love, and you cannot be terrified, and most of all there is no pain. You only have a first name, so there is no advantage of your background. The world you live in had equality, meaning being rich or poor is not possible. Now my next question is, do you see a utopia or a dystopia?
The Giver by Lois Lowry describes a perfect world without suffering, war and caring prejudice. Jonas, the main character in The Giver, is selected to be a memory receiver and therefore awakens to the dreadful essence of his community. Though Jonas's community pursues a utopian society, it is actually a dystopian world which deprives villagers of human rights and obliterates their humanity, including sensibility and elaborative faculty. In order to create a harmonious community without hardship of lives, the government implements autocratic laws.
Louis Lowry’s The Giver uses a dystopian society as a metaphor to show how one lives without pain and lacks knowledge of other places in order to give the reader a warring that society will never be perfect. “The Giver offers experiences that enhance readers levels of inquiry and reflection.” (Friedman & Cataldo pp102-112) At First glance the novel's setting seems to be a utopia, where all possible steps are taken to eliminate pain and anguish. Often the difference between a Utopia and a Dystopia is the author’s point of view. The difference between dystopia society and a utopian society is that a “dystopia is a world that should be perfect but ends up being horrible. Imagine dystopia as a world where the government gives everything to everyone for free. You would think it would be perfect, but imagine if that government oppressed everyone. Essentially a Dystopia is a utopia that has been corrupted.” (Levitas p1) A dystopian society is “Any society considered to be a undesirable, for any number of reasons. The term was coined as a converse to a Utopia, and is most used to refer to a fictional (often near-future) society where social trends are taken to a nightmarish extreme. Dystopias are frequently frequently written as warnings, or satires, showing current trends extrapolated to a nightmarish conclusion. A dystopia is all too closely connected to current day society.” As defined in The Giver (Telgan pp162-182). This is why I believe that Lowery is giving the reader a warring about how our world is changing. We have the power to stop it before it happens if we listen to warring signs and act accordingly. If we don’t listen to those signs our society will become a nightmarish environment, to live in. “ The Giver demonstrates how conflict can force us to examine our most important beliefs about what is right and true. Conflicts can change our worldly view of thing.” (Freidmane & Catadlo pp102-112)
Rebellion usually starts when a community is against their leader or government. An example of this was in the American Revolution, when the patriots revolted against Britain because they disagreed again but then gained their independence. In the book Animal Farm, by George Orwell, “‘The rebellion starts when they are told how horrible it is from an experienced animal by how they barely even the pigs only food to survive and other problems’”(Orwell 6). This explains why they rebelled since they realized how horrible it was living under Mr. Jones. As a result, they rebelled against him where the animals succeeded. If other people were in the same situation as in Animal Farm, they should start a community rebellion against their leader when there are bad conditions, horrible treatment, and ideas.