Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The giver essay why is it a dystopia
An essay about the giver
An essay about the giver
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The giver essay why is it a dystopia
This community is not a usual everyday community. Here people don’t have to worry about poverty, crime, starvation and basically any typical world problems. Although, this community still has many problems. People still think this is a wonderful place to live but this community is a dystopia. In Mrs. Lowry’s book “The Giver” she explains how families function here as well as the both negative and positive point of views for family. The main character is Jonas. He is very special and different because he can see beyond. Jonas notices that his family is not emotionally attached to him. The families are not related and the kids are assigned to the parents. When the kids are assigned to family units, they are called by their number not names. In this passage they stands for the children. (50) “They were arranged by original numbers, the numbers they had been given at birth.” So in this community instead of calling a child just by their name, they can also get labeled by a number. Kids here cannot even have individuality because kids are just a number. Another reason Jonas can notice ...
The children in this book at times seem wise beyond their years. They are exposed to difficult issues that force them to grow up very quickly. Almost all of the struggles that the children face stem from the root problem of intense poverty. In Mott Haven, the typical family yearly income is about $10,000, "trying to sustain" is how the mothers generally express their situation. Kozol reports "All are very poor; statistics tell us that they are the poorest children in New York." (Kozol 4). The symptoms of the kind of poverty described are apparent in elevated crime rates, the absence of health care and the lack of funding for education.
Arlene Beale is a single mother of two whose eviction problems never seem to end. Arleen is under-employed, most likely from lack of education and does not receive any financial assistance from her children's father. Looking at Arleen’s case from a Liberation Health perspective, we must realize that the problems of individuals and their families cannot be understood in isolation from the economic, political, cultural, and historical conditions which give rise to them, as mentioned by Berklin-Martinez (2014). Family and individual crisis are the products of current social, economic, and political crisis and must be looked at from a lens of the world.
Family is one of those words that have a significant meaning to various individuals. Family may be viewed one way to an individual and another way to someone else. Family consists of those who have played a particular role in one’s life, whether it is positive or negative. In this paper, I will assess Reymundo’s family both nuclear and extended and speak of how his family has become significant in his life and how they have played a role in his decisions. I will also speak of my personal reactions to the story as well as address ways that as a social worker I could work to impact the gang problems in Orlando.
Starting off the discussion we will start with chapter one. Chapter one is about Decent and street families. Decent families are families who live by society’s norms and try to avoid violence, drugs, confrontation, whereas street families embrace violence and fear because it is a way to stay alive within their neighborhoods. In the chapter they discuss how many families in the inner city actually have the decent family values, but can also harbor the street values. For example in the chapter they actually discussed an instance where Marge a women they had interviewed had a problem with others in her neighborhood. Her story s...
It’s not easy to build an ideal family. In the article “The American Family” by Stephanie Coontz, she argued that during this century families succeed more when they discuss problems openly, and when social institutions are flexible in meeting families’ needs. When women have more choices to make their own decisions. She also argued that to have an ideal family women can expect a lot from men especially when it comes to his involvement in the house. Raymond Carver, the author of “Where He Was: Memories of My Father”, argued how his upbringing and lack of social institutions prevented him from building an ideal family. He showed the readers that his mother hide all the problems instead of solving them. She also didn’t have any choice but to stay with his drunk father, who was barely involved in the house. Carvers’ memoir is relevant to Coontz argument about what is needed to have an ideal family.
The story in The Giver by Lois Lowry takes place in a community that is not normal. People cannot see color, it is an offense for somebody to touch others, and the community assigns people jobs and children. This unnamed community shown through Jonas’ eye, the main character in this novel, is a perfect society. There is no war, crime, and hunger. Most readers might take it for granted that the community in The Giver differs from the real society. However, there are several affinities between the society in present day and that in this fiction: estrangement of elderly people, suffering of surrogate mothers, and wanting of euthanasia.
While family appears as an unpretentious concept, it rests undefinable; “it’s most basic terms, a family is a group of individuals who share a legal or genetic bond, but for many people, family means much more” (Mayntz, n.d.). With a foundation in this broad definition, half a million children remain without a family, residing in foster care. Although foster care offers temporary households to brokenhearted children, this video destroyed my faith for American society. Rather than provoking the appalling number of children in foster care, Americans disregard the issue, dreading the unforgiving reality of the dehumanization of their children. One remark that utterly traumatized me, stood that it takes one child, to make one accusation, and a
Having a harmonious family is a part of the American Dream. In The American Dream, written by Jim Cullen, a soldier wrote to the newspaper that he would “relate to” their “wives and children, parents and friends, what” they “have witnessed…” (Cullen, 114). Willa Cather introduces Rosicky’s family, which emphasizes on close relationships and positive community impacts in “Neighbor Rosicky”, and F. Scott Fitzgerald suggests that Charlie wants his role as a father back in “Babylon Revisited”. Even though both Cather and Fitzgerald value intimate families in integrity, they have different attitudes toward life.
And choose wrong?” (P.98). From reading this, I feel that the community was able to control problems such as divorce, rape, teen pregnancy, and AIDS. They all are given a life that is predictable, orderly and painless. Mostly, they have no memory or experience. In reality, we learn from our mistakes to be better each day. Experience is the best teacher in the world; unless one goes through sorrow, he or she will never know how it feels. “Warmth, Jonas replied and happiness. And let me think. Family, that it was a celebration of some sort, a holiday. And something else I can’t get the word for it. Jonas hesitated; I certainly liked the memory, though. I couldn’t quite get the word for the whole feeling of it, The Giver told him the feeling that was so strong in the room is love” (P.125). Family in the novel is described as a group of people that have a unit or bond that they share each day together.
Our societies are very different. Imagine a world without color, love, and no freedom of choice There are many differences between our society and the society Jonas lives in. While ours are both dystopian, we function differently in many ways. We have the freedom to choose. And many other freedoms.
Anderson lays a pretty solid foundation of the population control side of the giver and encourages young readers to question what society tells them. Anderson ststes that Lowery is questioning the politically correctness of children’s books, and redefining the industries skepticism of a government body being an all-powerful body in complete control. He states, the aspect that the book The Giver is a top seller ranking 63rd on the list of best child’s books of all time. He notes however her book is also one of the most challenged books as well.
The Give was a good book but was the community? The community was strict because they want to be a Utopian society. Like they want everyone to be the same no being smarter than the other. You are forced to take medicine, which is not right, and on the top of the list is they (the government) choose your wife/husband for you, your job, your kids which is crazy.
In The Giver, their community was created to make everyone and everything the same. Things such as color, music, memory of the history of the world, and feelings were taken away from the people living in the community. The community in The Giver tried to protect the people from making wrong choices by taking away choices. The citizens in the community did the have the freedom to choose where they wanted to do their volunteer hours. Their version of a perfect society and culture are very different to communities and cities like Chicago, IL and the Amish lifestyle,. There are many pro’s and con’s to each community that separate their differences.
The Giver a novel written by Lois Lowery, is a pessimistic novel. It’s pessimistic because everybody is forced to feel the exact same things and they don’t know it. The people are forced to talk in a certain way and everything is the same for them, and they call that sameness. No one can see colors nobody knows the truth about the world about war or how pain feels like, they don’t know what it’s like to be starving or cold and they have no say in anything, everything was chosen for them.
Has one ever wondered how extraordinary a perfect world would be, but did you stop and think what would happen if people were exposed to things without having experienced them before, nothing would be the same. In the novel The Giver by Lois Lowry there is a world that is a thought to be utopia by the people that watch over the community, but there is a boy by the name of Jonas that wants to show them that those who never take risk never grow, those who do not feel sorrow cannot know joy, and without memories, knowledge is useless.