More handpicked essays just for you.
Contrast and comparison about the giver by lois lowry
Critique of the giver by lois lowry
Analysis of themes of the novel the giver by lois lowry
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Giver Good but was the Community? The Give was a good book but was the community? The community was strict because they want to be a Utopian society. Like they want everyone to be the same no being smarter than the other. You are forced to take medicine, which is not right, and on the top of the list is they (the government) choose your wife/husband for you, your job, your kids which is crazy. First, is the sameness where everyone needs to be the same and you can’t be you. You can only what they (the government) want you to be it’s crazy and you can’t go anywhere no one will be creative and make cool things, there will be no future for them. Secondly, you are forced to take medicine which should not happen. This is not right people should
The Giver and Matched are both futuristic societies with a lot of rules. In The Giver the Elders choose their match as well as their children. Jonas starts loving Fiona but isn’t allowed and stops taking the pill. In Matched the officials choose their match but they can have their own children. Cassia is matched with Xander but also loves Ky and doesn't know what to do. In both story they all get jobs for the rest of their lives but in Matched they just call it vocations. Jonas gets the Receiver of memory and Cassia is supposed to be the sorter.
Throughout the history of the world, there has been many societies. All these societies had similar structures and ideas, but they all are different by their own special traditions and ways of life. Similarly, both our society and the society in The Giver share similar ideas, but they are different in certain areas. For example, they both celebrate birthdays and have family units, but they have their own way of doing so. Based on the celebration of birthdays and the formation of family units, our society is better than the society in The Giver by Lois Lowry.
“How could someone not fit in? The community was so meticulously ordered, the choices so carefully made.” (Lowry, 48) In Lowry’s novel, The Giver, eliminating choices and feelings caused their society to be worse than our society today because you don’t have any choices and you don’t get to experience the feeling of joy and happiness.
The Giver provides a chance that readers can compare the real world with the society described in this book through some words, such as release, Birthmothers, and so on. Therefore, readers could be able to see what is happening right now in the real society in which they live by reading her fiction. The author, Lowry, might build the real world in this fiction by her unique point of view.
Though these legislative guidelines deal with the rights of a patient to refuse current medical treatment, ...
Also on its way to becoming very stagnant and progressing at a very slow rate economically, was the community in 1984. With all of the power in the hands of one individual, Big Brother, there were constant wars, withholding the economy at its current position. In the novel, there is an evident amount of those who have lost their individual self. People are no longer allowed to maintain personal beliefs and must believe what the party tells them to. "And if the party says that it is not four but five- then how many?" "Four." (Orwell 273). By forcing the party members to say that two plus two equals five is an example of mental control.
society, everyone wears the same clothes, follows the same rules, and has a predetermined life. A community just like that lives inside of Lois Lowry’s The Giver and this lack of individuality shows throughout the whole book. This theme is demonstrated through the control of individual appearance, behavior, and ideas.
2. The patient has the right to settle on choices in regards to his own particular health awareness. The patient additionally has the right to deny any medicine;
Lowry writes The Giver in the dystopian genre to convey a worst-case scenario as to how modern society functions. A dystopia is an “illusion of a perfect society” under some form of control which makes criticism about a “societal norm” (Wright). Characteristics of a dystopian include restricted freedoms, society is under constant surveillance, and the citizens live in a dehumanized state and conform to uniform expectations (Wright). In The Giver, the community functions as a dystopian because everyone in the community conforms to the same rules and expectations. One would think that a community living with set rules and expectations would be better off, but in reality, it only limits what life has to offer. Instead, the community in the novel is a dystopian disguised as a utopian, and this is proven to the audience by the protagonist, Jonas. Jonas is just a norma...
The book The Giver is a dystopian book because you don’t get to make any of your own decisions. You would never know the truth about release. You would never experience life how you should experience it. The world may seem perfect from someone’s view inside the community, but from the outside it is harsh and horrible. Their world could be turned into a utopia eventually, but as of right know it is a
The Giver starts off as the ordinary story of an eleven-year-old boy named Jonas. When we meet the protagonist, he is apprehensive about the Ceremony of Twelve, at which he will be assigned his job. Although he has no clue as to what job he might be assigned, he is astonished when he is selected to be the Receiver of Memory. He learns that it is a job of the highest honor, one that requires him to bear physical pain of a magnitude beyond anyone’s experience.
We gained control of many things. But we had to let go of others” (97). In the book The Giver by Lois Lowry, no one has seen a rainbow after a storm, no one knew what colors were; what choosing was; what it meant to be an individual. Everyone lived in complete Sameness, and never learned what it meant to be an individual. By eliminating as much self expression as possible in Sameness and society, Jonas's community has rejected the individuality of a society where people are free to move society forward. In The Giver individuality is represented by colors, memories, and pale eyes.
People should not be required to take care of their health, as in doing so, many companies would lose money and could potentially go out of business by forcing people to look after themselves more. Although requiring a person to take medication is ideal for the greater good of the said person, by forcing/requiring someone to do something they may not want to do, the enforcer is infringing on the person’s right of choosing and deciding their own fate. Not everyone wants to live a long life; it is and should always be up to the individual as to whether or not the person wants to live a longer life without a chance of getting a disease by taking medication.
For legally competent adult patients, regarding medical care per se - according to Anglo-American law -- every competent adult has the freedom to seek or not to seek medical care and to refuse to consent to any specific treatment proposed, under the common law right of bodily integrity and intangibility:
In conclusion, patients have the right to refuse treatment. And health care providers must respect the patient decision to refuse treatment regardless if they believe it was not the best decision. Lack of financial resource can play a significant role in patients refusing treatments. This refusal is a direct form of both health care rationing and self-rationing. There is also a strong patient/provider influence on the decision to consent for