Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Concerning the art of persuasion
Concerning the art of persuasion
Art of persuasion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Imagine two people are arguing; one person is clearly right, but the other person is obviously winning. Why is this? People that make convincing arguments are usually the ones who can vouch for their character and make the audience think that they should believe them. Along with making people think they are trustworthy they must also appeal to human emotion. Change the way they feel and it will change the way they think. Finally, the argument must be reasonable and logical to the people who need convincing. The person who wins the argument isn’t always right, but they were able to convince an audience that they were by vouching for their character, appealing to human emotion, and by creating a reasonable and logical justification. In the essay, …show more content…
A means of convincing people of such is known as Ethos. Turkle expresses ethos initially by stating, “I’ve been studying psychology of online connectivity for more than 30 years. For the past five, I’ve had a special focus: What has happened to face-to-face conversation in a world where so many people say they would rather test than talk” (Turkle Par. 3)? Even without reading the article or knowing what her opinion is, readers now know that Turkle has spent years studying in this field along with half a decade studying face-to-face conversations. Sherry Turkle has passed the first step to winning an argument by proving that she is a trustworthy source of information, but she has not won the entire argument …show more content…
Observational learning is described as learning behaviors through watching others. Turkle shares a story based on this learning style. She says, "A 15-year-old boy told me that someday he wanted to raise a family, not the way his parents are raising him (with phones out during meals...) but the way his parents think they are raising him – with no phones at meals and plentiful family conversation" (Turkle Par. 5). The boy observed his family interactions around their phones and learned how it affected them, so he decided that he did not want to raise his family the same way. While appealing to readers’ emotions, Turkle uses the concept of observational learning to strengthen her stance on technology 's effect on a family. Along with appealing to pathos, the author suggests a that it is completely reasonable to assume we are missing aspects of communication when we allow other things to preoccupy our
Thesis statement: I agree with Turkle. There has been a negative shift in the way we communicate, we document when inappropriate times, Interpersonal communications have suffered and are too obsessive with their devices.
In “Connectivity and its Discontents,” Sherry Turkle discusses how often we are found on our technology. Turkle states in her thesis “Technology makes it easy to communicate when we wish and to disengage at will.” In the essay are interviews on several different people, of all ages to get their view on the 21st century. Teens are starting to rely on “robot friendships,” the most communication teens get are from their phones. Are we so busy trying to connect to the media that we are often forgetting what is happening around us?
People have the fundamental desire to maintain strong connections with others. Through logic and reasoning, Sherry states, “But what do we have, now that we have what we say we want, now that we have what technology makes easy?”(Turkle). Face to face conversations are now mundane because of the accessibility to interact at our fingertips, at free will through text, phone calls and social media. Belonging, the very essence of a relationship has now become trivial.
Crusius, Timothy W., and Carolyn E. Channell. The Aims of Argument: A Text and Reader. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 2003. Print.
Making a good and persuasive argument is very much an acquired skill. It requires much practice and perfecting. It takes more than just having passion and making good points. Just because a person is passionate about the topic or has supporting details does not mean they can make a successful argument. Much more thought and skill is required. Gordon Adams, in his letter to the Arizona State University standards committee, demonstrates this quite well. Gordon Adams writes a passionate argument, yet his argument lacks several critical aspects.
In the world today, people are constantly surrounded by technology. At any given moment, we can connect to others around the world through our phones, computers, tablets, and even our watches. With so many connections to the outside world, one would think we have gained more insight into having better relationships with the people that matter the most. Despite these connections, people are more distant to one another than ever. In the article, “Stop Googling. Let’s Talk," author Sherry Turkle details her findings on how people have stopped having real conversations and argues the loss of empathy and solitude are due to today’s technology. Turkle details compelling discoveries on how technology has changed relationships in “Stop Googling. Let’s Talk,” and her credibility is apparent through years of research and the persuasive evidence that supports her claims.
Turkle throughout her papers has a claim and reasons that support her claims, but her backing and warrants are non-existent, which leads to the emotional rants that make up the article. The audience in general isn’t moved to think her way when all they get from her paper is the rant with nothing to strengthen her points. She also doesn’t give the other side of the argument a chance and continues to bash it without letting it have its fair chance. One of the many examples of her rant structured arguments is “Texting and e-mail and posting let us present the self we want to be… not too little- just right.” (Turkle). This argument wants people to see how much we can change from who we really are in real life to how we perceive ourselves over the internet. It doesn’t have a backing or any other supporting methods just a claim and a lot of emotion that she hopes will convince you of her main argument. With this Turkle hopes that the audience will be swayed without any effort put into the argument. Instead of being moved to think the way Turkle does, the audience members question the validity of any of her claims due to the fact they are emotionally heavy and do not provide any substance to truly back up her main point in the
In this book Sherry Turkle studies something she thinks we as a people are losing sight of, which is face to face conversation. She explains in her book why she believes this is so important, and the consequences we will face if we continue to ignore this growing problem. Her argument about conversation stems from talking to people, face-to-face, In which she finds many of whom have difficulty doing so. Turkle Believes this is mainly because of digital technology. In today’s world people are so glued to their phones, that they loose grip on what it 's like to hold a conversation. Sherry understands this is to be because when we use digital technology as a form of communication, we only utilize one or two of our human senses.The
This made me enthralled with Jesse Barron’s article “The Babysitters Club” from Longform which states how technology applications not only talk to adults as if they are their very own children, but treat them like they are their own bred as well. Throughout of the article, Barron uses his own experience and expresses how he, himself relates to the issue. In the paragraphs following, I am going to describe how the article “The Babysitters Club” proves that technology is babysitting adults, as well as how in contrast, these apps bring benefits for some as
.... She says online identity is textual based but technology has furthered itself to make it visual and textual based. Turkle also says that cyberspace is a relatively consequence-free moratorium yet it seems to me that there is nothing relative at all about it. It has many consequences. She states that online identity expands and affects real identity but I disagree. I believe that online identity can not affect real identity because they should be the same. No one should play around with online identities because when returning to reality, a person will have a false sense of security and self. The world has moved on from Freudian ideas to new social practices of identity as multiplicity.
“Technology is supposed to make our lives easier, allowing us to do things more quickly and efficiently. But too often it seems to make things harder, leaving us with fifty-button remote controls, digital cameras with hundreds of mysterious features.” (James Surowiecki) Whether or not is known, technology has become too heavily relied on. It is replacing important social factors such as, life skills and communication skills. While technology is created to be beneficial, there must be a point in time where we draw the line. Once face-to-face conversations begin to extinguish, this means that there is too much focus on the “screen culture”. In her writing, “Alone Together”, Sherry Turkle talks
A persuasive essay takes a position on a topic and attempts to prove that position.
Rluebbert (2012). How Technology Affects Family Interaction. [Online]. Retrieved on 10th November 2013 from: http://www.studymode.com/essays/How-Technology-Affects-Family-Interaction-1319738.html
According to Turkle (2012), “We use technology to define ourselves by sharing our thoughts and feelings as we’re having them.” (Page 3). That’s an example of an over exaggeration. People are smart enough to know that expressing thoughts and feeling on the internet will not do you any good. People are willing to talk to someone when they’re going through something. They want to have face-to-face conversations to properly express their feelings and thoughts so that they can receive an immediate reaction. We don’t let technology define
Electronic devices shook the developed world with the development, expansion, and recent advancement of such devices. The use of electronic devices strengthens the most important aspects of our experiences and relationships. This idea is best supported by many uses of electronic devices, predominantly communication. The reason communication, the fundamental feature of electronic devices, is so beneficial to our most important aspects of our experiences and relationships is that communication is a central aspect to those same experiences and relationships. The benefits electronic devices provides, through communication, is greatly expanded when looking to the extremely wide numbers of users of these electronic devices. Electronic devices have become so easily accessible, it has become a part of many people’s identities and takes part in almost everybody’s life, so that the specific benefits of communication become exponentially strengthened by how much more communication can take place. Communication, along with the conventional use of the term, can mean the communication of information, and the use of electronic devices further allow individuals to attain information much easier and thus can make experiences much more ideal when there can be a clear understanding of what is truly going on in the world. This use of electronic devices to expand knowledge and education, coupled with the already prevailing understanding communication already is – and how electronic devices allow for communication to be strengthened that way – makes it clear that the use of electronic devices reinforce our most important aspects of our experiences and relationships.