Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Theories of criminology
The role of criminological research in theory building
How stereotypes affect people
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Theories of criminology
Does criminal labelling encourage criminal behaviour?
Stereotyping a person or action is human nature, but criminal labelling can negatively influence the behaviours of people who have or are expected by society to commit crimes. The theory of criminal labelling is also referred to as the theory of social reaction, as society picks up on them and can add negative responses such as fear or resent. These stereotypes or labels used to tag negative emotions to certain ideals, focus on certain groups, such as; disadvantaged youth, people who have been convicted, the poor/homeless, Religions, etc. By labelling a behaviour as criminal or deviant, a stigma is attached. This stigma can have damaging consequences on an individual, who is linked via
…show more content…
By using the labelling theory, criminal behaviour can be more easily explain and explored, as it can give insight into how and why individuals chose crime over morality. This insight “ is very important for criminologists, law enforcement bodies and health care professionals who try to rehabilitate criminals” (UKessays 2015), as they can assess the very beginning point of the crime, and attempt to help, not only the individual in question, but other children and people, who can be seen going down the same path of crime from the labels and the stereotypes projected upon …show more content…
Within the video, eight young people who have been in the system explain how they were labelled, treated differently, and judged harshly from their experiences as foster children. The Create Foundations director of research, Dr Joseph McDowall stated, "Once they're in care, there seems to be a pretty negative perception of the care system and people in care” (2017), from this statement, the statistics below can be understood, as this negative perception can affect the children’s sense of self. For children in out-of-home care, 70% re-offended, compared to the 59% of children who were not in out-of-home care (Legal Aid NSW, 2011,
Summarise labelling theory and then consider its effectiveness in considering youth crime and anti-social behaviour in contemporary British society
Labelling theory: The theory that the terms crime, deviance, or punishment are labels, variously applied by act of power and not some natural reflection of events – American criminologist Howard Becker
Bernburg, J., Krohn, M. D., & Rivera, C. J. (2006). Official Labeling, Criminal Embeddedness, and Subsequent Delinquency: A Longitudinal Test of Labeling Theory. Journal Of Research In Crime & Delinquency, 43(1), 67-88. doi:10.1177/0022427805280068
Labeling theory of deviance suggests that when one is labeled constantly on the basis of any minority it gives rise to deviant behavior in order to prove the strength of the minority. The minority has been labeled so by people for a long time. They have been labeled because of their race. The gang is labeled anti-social because of their criminal behavior which turns them further to deviance. The use of the labeling theory can be seen being implemented very judiciously
As mentioned in lecture, labeling theory asks two critical questions: what is crime, and who is criminal? This is the central tenet of labeling theory because the focus is on what activities constitute criminal behaviour within the context. This means that over time, the general perspective changes in regards to what can be labeled 'crime.' For instance, society is known to react negatively towards prostitution in the past; whereas the contemporary reaction is primarily to legalize it.
their acts as criminal and extending this judgement to them as people. Having been labelled, there is an expectation that this criminality must be expressed. With this attached stereotype, the general population will perceive them to be criminal and treat them accordingly. This produces unanticipated effects: the label of criminal is intended to prevent individuals from participating in criminal activities but it actually creates the very thing it intended to stop. It produces a self-fulfilling prophecy which is defined as a false definition of a situation, evoking a new behaviour that makes the original false assumption come true (Burke, 2005).
What are theories of crime? Why are they important? In this paper, will discuss two crime theories. Social learning theory and the labeling theory. We will compare both crime theories. It will also explain how these theories are related to specific crimes. The two theories discussed will also explain the policy implications. Finally, we will address what types of programs can be created to mitigate specific crimes related to the causation theories.
Labelling theory was suggested by Edwin Lemert (1912- 1996) in 1951 and it was then developed by Howard Becker (b.1928) in 1963. This theory is related to the Social Action perspective. The labelling procedure includes deviancy and crime, certain acts are criminal because they have been labelled in that way, these labels are created by the powerful in society, such as the government. Frank Tannenbaum (1893- 1969) stated the self-fulfilling prophecy could occur when somebody is labelled as a 'criminal'. Self-fulfilling prophecy is when a prediction of something which then becomes a fact. If you have the label of 'delinquency' or 'crime' then the individual may find it difficult to get a job therefore earning less money which could result in them returning to crime. People in society will expect 'criminals' to behave in a certain way. The people with this label may find it challenging to fit into society. Moral panics is a definition which is given when a group of people become known as a threat to societies beliefs.
If the agents of social control define youngsters as delinquents for breaking the law, those youngsters become deviant. They have been labelled as such by those who have the power to make labels stick. However Becker argued ‘deviance is not a quality that lies in behaviour itself but in the interaction between the person who commits an act and those who respond to it’. From this point of view, deviance is produced by a process of interaction between the potential deviant and the agents of control. Becker then examined the possible effects on an individual being labelled as deviant and that a deviant label can lead to further deviance.
The theoretical study of societal reaction to deviance has been carried out under different names, such as, labelling theory, interactionist perspective, and the social constructionist perspective. In the sociology of deviance, the labelling theory of deviant behaviour is often used interchangeably with the societal reaction theory of deviancy. As a matter of fact, both phrases point equally to the fact that sociological explanations of deviance function as a product of social control rather than a product of psychology or genetic inheritance. Some sociologists would explain deviance by accepting without question definitions of deviance and concerning themselves with primary aetiology. However, labelling theorists stress the point of seeing deviance from the viewpoint of the deviant individual. They claim that when a person becomes known as a deviant, and is ascribed deviant behaviour patterns, it is as much, if not more, to do with the way they have been stigmatized, then the deviant act they are said to have committed. In addition, Howard S. Becker (1963), one of the earlier interaction theorists, claimed that, "social groups create deviance by making the rules whose infraction constitute deviance, and by applying those rules to particular people and labelling them as outsiders". Furthermore, the labelling theoretical approach to deviance concentrates on the social reaction to deviance committed by individuals, as well as, the interaction processes leading up to the labelling.
By listening to what families, children and young people perceive their needs to be and working to adapt their services in order to cater or counteract some of the problems that arise when the wellbeing of the individual is being affected is what practitioners aim to achieve. Several agencies in UK worked together to improve children and young adults welfare such as Teachers, Social workers, Foster carers, Children safeguarding team, etc…Using Activity 2.9 ( Open University 2014 ) as an illustration, the narrator explained about Connors story, a young boy who has been place into foster caring. As a young child, Connor had probably experienced ambivalent, avoidant and disorganised patterns of attachments before his current placement which might have an impact on his behaviour. The foster family had concern that if Connor had to leave them, this could lead to further problems. Agencies working within Connors welfare such as Children social workers should adapt the fact of Connors relationship with the foster family does not impact on his wellbeing. Practitioners need to work in accordance of children and youth people diversity as well. Diversity can help to begin to overcome inequalities in society, which be might be a positive outcome or a negative outcome. Practitioners must firstly identify the assumptions they make about people so that they can make sure that they treat everyone with respect.
Labelling theory outlines the sociological approach towards labelling within societies and in the development of crime and deviance (Gunnar Bernburg, and D. Krohn et al., 2014, pp. 69-71). The theory purposes that, when an individual is given a negative label (that is deviant), then the individual pursues their new (deviant) label / identity and acts in a manner that is expected from him/her with his/ her new label (Asencio and Burke, 2011, pp. 163-182).
The world’s outlook is evolving; in different parts of the world deviance is defined differently. Society uses social control as an attempt to regulate people’s thoughts and behaviors. In the process, they create stigmas that negatively affect a person’s self-concept and social identity. An example of a stigma would be a person with some form of a disability being labeled as incompetent and unfit to care for oneself. This has personally affected me on many levels and it gives me peace of mind knowing that society is wired to behave this way.
How do we deal with people who have committed crimes? Should everyone just be locked up and we throw away the key or should we try and rehabilitate the offenders to put them back into society? Should all offenders be considered in a category together or should we categorize them based on their past and the offense for which they are incarcerated. This paper will cover the types of offenders and their problems and the possible causes as to why they commit the crimes for which they are incarcerated and how they are dealt with when incarcerated. Types of offenders included will be the situational offender, the career criminal, the sex offender (rapists, child molesters, prostitutes,), the substance abuser (drug and alcohol), the mentally ill offender,
I now know that criminology prefer to highlight the correlations between crimes’ social climates and criminals’ psychological states of mind. While some argues that criminal behavior is a result of individuals’ association with criminal peers, other claims that crime is a reflection of an individual’s genetic disadvantages. I have come to learn that there are no universally agreed formulas on decoding crimes and criminal behaviors. What we have, however, is a manual full of academic opinions and subjective views that have emerged alongside of the development of criminology. At the same time, the volume of conflicting perspectives that I have stumble upon in studying criminology reminded me again that the success of our current assessment models has yet to be determined. Thus, the study of criminology is an appropriate practice that will further prepare me to conduct meaningful research on legal studies and to provide accurate and in-depth findings in the near