Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Sociology crime and deviance
Sociology crime and deviance
Sociology crime and deviance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Various Definitions of Crime: 1. Labelling theory: The theory that the terms crime, deviance, or punishment are labels, variously applied by act of power and not some natural reflection of events – American criminologist Howard Becker 2. Social construction: Our concepts and the practical consequences that flow from using them are the products (constructions) of social interaction and only make sense within the communities in which that interaction takes place. Crime is a label created in social interaction, but once created it has both a symbolic and practical reality. 5 Assumptions/claims → complicate/differentiate out understanding of what crime is: 1. Crime is some action/omission that causes harm in a situation that the person/group responsible ‘ought’ to be held accountable and punished irrespective of what the law book of state say. 2. A crime is an action against the law of God, regardless of its existence/non-existence in the State law books 3. Only an act that is defined by the validly passed laws of the nation state in which it occurred so that punishment should follow from the behaviour 4. Crimes and criminals only exist when a public body has judged the such according to accepted procedures; no public authority → no crime 5. Crime is an irrelevant concept as it is tied to the formal social control mechanism of the State; deviance is a concept that is owned by sociology thus our study should be the sociology of deviance, rather than criminology Argue for the abolition of crime: Nils Christie: Crimes do not exist. Only acts exist, acts given particular meanings within various social conditions. Crime as a socially constructed process Factors that distort the relationship between the actual and recorded crime rate: 1. ... ... middle of paper ... ...ings. London Christie, N. (1986) ‘The ideal victim’, in E. Fattah, (Ed.), From Crime Policy to Victim Policy: Reorienting the Justice System New York: St Matins Press Elias, R. (1993) Victims Still: The Political Manipulation of Victims. Newbery Park: Sage [Chapter 2] Morrison, W. (2009) 'What is crime? Contrasting definitions and perspectives', in C. Hale, K. Hayward, A. Wahadin and E. Wincup, (eds), Criminology. Oxford: Oxford University Press Weatherburn, D., and Indermaur, D. (2004) ‘Public perceptions of crime trends in New South Wales and Western Australia’, Contemporary Issues in Crime and Justice, 80: 1-8 Weatherburn, D. (2011) ‘Uses and abuses of crime statistics’, Contemporary Issues in Crime and Justice, 153: 1-16 White, R., and Perrone, S. (2009) Crime, Criminality and Criminal Justice. Melbourne: Oxford University [Chapter 2 ‘Crime and the Media’]
Stephan Pfohl, Images of Deviance and Social Control: A Sociological History, 2nd ed. , McGraw-Hill, 1994. Edwin Pfuhl and Stuart Henry, The Deviance Process, 3rd ed., Aldine de Gruyter, 1993. Larry Siegel, Criminology, 4th ed., West publishing, 1992.
Within this essay there will be a clear understanding of the contrast and comparison between left and right realism, supported by accurate evidence that will support and differentiate the two wings of realism.
The general public of Australia has a common aspect when associated with their sources of knowledge of crime. Many would agree the media, especially newspapers and television, are their most frequent and well known source of crime activity. The media updates society with data about the extent, frequency and types of crimes committed (Moston and Coventry, 2011, p.53). Studies highlight our grasp of crime is majorly derived from the media, with a lack of exposure to police statistics or victimisation surveys. There is a concern in correlation to this fact since the media has inconsistency and inaccuracy in reporting crime. Due to this, the media can misrepresent victims and perpetrators, downsizing them to recognisable stereotypes (Moston and
.When it comes to defining crime, criminal law has 7 basic principles to do so, which are, legality, human conduct, harm, causation, mens rea, concurrence and punishment requirement. Legality: "principle that every crime must be clearly defined by common law or legislation prior to its commission." (Alder et al, 2012, p.109) In other words, an individual cannot be held guilty for conduct that has not been legislated before the act was committed. Human conduct
Media's Representation of the Nature and Extent of Crime in Britain There is continuous debate on the effectiveness of media reporting with regards to informing the public about crime. The media have motive, methods by, which they distort information, and evidence of the affects of their misinforming the public. However the media do inform the public with regards to problems in our society, without the media we would know nothing. The public also need to be thought of when trying to decipher whether the media does in fact misinform them. There are certain motives, which may suggest that the media do in fact misinform the public with regards to the nature and extent of crime.
Daly, Kathleen, Goldsmith, Andrew, and Israel, Mark. 2006, Crime and Justice: A guide to criminology, third addition, Thomson, Lawbook Co.
"And Punishment: Crime." The Economist US 27 January 1996, v338 n7950. : 25. Online. Expanded Academic Index. 16 October 1999.
Conscious efforts to critique existing approaches to questions of crime and justice, demystify concepts and issues that are laden with political and ideological baggage, situate debates about crime control within a socio-historical context, and facilitate the imagination and exploration of alternative ways of thinking and acting in relation to crime and justice. (p. 3).
There are both strengths and weakness of the two statistical approaches of crime. The FBI’s UCR complied data from monthly law enforcement reports or individual criminal records transferred to the FBI or to centralized agencies that then sent to the FBI. The crimes were divided into two categories, Part I offenses and Part II offenses. Part I reported data about property and violent crimes such as burglary, forcible rape, and robbery. Part II reported on crimes like simple assault, disorderly conduct, liquor offenses, and vandalism. It was more accurate than other crime statistic reports because the data was collected and reported monthly by law enforcement agencies. However, it also had some weakness. Some crimes may not be reported because
Criminology is the study of crime and criminals; a branch of sociology. More accurately, it is the study of crime as a social trend, and its overall origins, its many manifestations and its impact upon society as a whole. That makes it more a form of sociology than a law enforcement tool. But the trends it studies have a huge impact on the way the police do their jobs, the way society treats its criminals, and the way a given community goes about maintaining law and order. The writer will describe and give examples of the three perspectives of viewing crimes. The perspectives that will be highlighted are the consensus view, the conflict view or the interactionist view. Each perspective maintain its own interpretation of what constitutes criminal activities and what causes people to engage in criminal behaviors (Siegel, p.12).
Reports on crimes usually follow certain patterns or trends relating to specific crimes deemed ‘newsworthy’ (AIC, 2017). Thus, it is evident that there are many statistical reasons for why the perceptions of crime can influence society’s beliefs on the nature of crime in Australia. Public anxiety about crime can be escalated to such an extent which leads to a moral panic based on a crime, specifically violent crime. “There is a widespread concern that the level and type of crime reported in the media present a distorted view of the real level of crime in the community” (Media portrayals of crime, 2000).
Criminological theories are theories about the nature, extent, cause and control of criminal behaviour, of which the main types are biological, psychological, and sociological theories, and certain individual theories like rational choice theory (Akers, 1999). As governments use criminological theories to formulate crime prevention policies, epistemologically unsound criminological theories can lead to wide-ranging ramifications. Thus, it is important that they are epistemologically sound.
Hickey, T. J. (2010). Taking Sides: Clashing Views in Crime and Criminology, 9th Edition. New York, NY: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
There is more than one way to collect statistics on crime. Morgan and Clare (2012) highlight a range of other sources for collecting crime data, one of which includes crime victim surveys. A survey is given to a sample population asking questions in relation to their recent experiences with crime in the last year (Morgan & Clare, 2012, p. 33). As highlighted by both Warren and Clare (2012) and Bishop (2004), crime victim surveys allow the collection of information straight from the victims, generating some variance in information, than that collected by the police. They are also able to reach into the previously mentioned dark figure of crime, by being able to include crimes that may not have been reported to the police. Bishop (2004, p. 69) suggests that because of this “these surveys tend to point to greater rates of crime and victimisation than are indicated by police data.” For example, the Australian Bureau of Statistics (2016) state, “in the 12 months prior to interview in 2014-15, 97,800 persons in Victoria (2.1%) experienced physical assault. Of these, 51,300 (52%) reported the most recent incident to police.” Showing that 46,500 (48%) of people experienced physical assault and didn’t report it. So not all statistics are completely inaccurate and unrepresentative of
Hickey, T. J. (2010). Taking Sides: Clashing Views in Crime and Criminology, 9th Edition. New York, NY: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.