Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Shakespeare literary analysis
Shakespeare literary analysis
Moral guilt according to Nietzsche
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Shakespeare literary analysis
Bonetto, Sandra. "Coward Conscience and Bad Conscience in Shakespeare and Nietzsche." Philosophy and Literature, vol. 30, no. 2, 2016, pp. 512-27. Project MUSE, doi: 10.1353/phl.2006.0024. Accessed 20 Sept 2016. “Coward Conscience and Bad Conscience in Shakespeare and Nietzsche," Sandra Bonetto maintains that Nietzsche’s "consciousness of guilt" associates ideas of debt, sin, punishment, and God that lead to moral hypocrisy. Bonetto structures her argument in five sections, much like a Shakespearean play: section one focuses on Nietzsche’s attribution of bad consciousness that is similar to guilt and sin, which manifests from suppressing impulses and causes people to wound others; section two centers on applying Nietzschean philosophy to Shakespeare’s …show more content…
To begin, Morgan identifies the apostolic calling in which men and women embraced life of voluntary poverty, rejecting urban trade practices and accepting Christian spiritual communities. He asserts that apostolic people believed that the slightest act toward God constitutes exalted moments of contemplation. According to Morgan, women especially were attracted to this monastic life for many reasons, one of which was socioeconomic. One key point he summarizes from I.M. Lewis is the higher prevalence of visions from powerless groups (particularly women). As a result, Morgan assesses that the medievalists believed women possessed a bodily inheritance to connect to God. Called beguines, these women broke traditional gender roles and preach. Moving from general information about beguines, Morgan explains the relationship between Margaretha Ebnor who experienced visions and screamed uncontrollably and Heinrich von Nordlingen shared a symbiotic relationship where Nordlingen turned to Ebner to embody the spiritual life. In turn, Ebner suffered psychosomatically for her visions. In the section titled, "Meister Eckhart's Daughters," Morgan reveals conflicting sexual impulses …show more content…
Moving into her argument, Newman explores various academic studies about Medieval asceticism. Focusing most of her article on an unnamed nun whom Bernard of Clairvaux addressed in a letter, Newman introduces this controversy by documenting Lease's view that Italian women loose [sic] their autonomy and authority by privileging others over themselves. The author claims that one way medieval women gained autonomy over their bodies is through anorexia. She recounts a conflicting view from Caroline Walker Bynum that rather than being a path to agency, this demonstrates dissolution of the self. At the same time, Newman equates medieval mysticism with freedom as bodily pains help form the individual. Upon contextualizing the conditions facing medieval women, Newman recounts Bernard's commentary about an unnamed nun's selfish motivations for wearing the habit, condemning her for having lived alone in the past and not conforming to community discipline. Through this anecdote, Newman explores whether the "death to life" philosophy annihilates the autonomous self, documenting the belief that internalizing the community discipline is liberating through honoring God and community. as the domain where specialists' behaviors, prayers, and disciplined will contrast with the general society's even
Sor Juana de la Cruz is born into a wealthy family in 1648 that lived near Mexico City, Mexico. After being a part of the Viceregal court and a lady in waiting, Cruz begins her spiritual journey and joins the convent. Here, Cruz explores both secular and non-secular studies. She is an exceptionally talented writer with a passion for reading, learning, and writing. She is scolded for the information she writes and is told to focus exclusively on religious dogma. Soon after the Bishop of Pubela reads one of her letters, he publishes it (without her knowing), and she responds with a respectful yet sarcastic letter (Lawall and Chinua 155-156). Cruz’s “Reply to Sor Filotea de la Cruz” was written during the period of Enlightenment of Europe (1660- 1770). This era in Europe casted an opaque shadow over women’s rights to educate themselves and self-expression. Sor Juana’s piece however is both inspirational and empoweri...
The women of the priory also live a highly ascetic life, believing that the hard work performed and simple living conditions in themselves alone can give rise to an experience that is greater than anything achievable through other worldly goals. Mariette herself writes prayerfully, “Were it necessary to give up all the worldly pleasures of my life to gain one instant of happiness for you, I would do it without hesitation.” (Page 135).
Looking back through many historical time periods, people are able to observe the fact that women were generally discriminated against and oppressed in almost any society. However, these periods also came with women that defied the stereotype of their sex. They spoke out against this discrimination with a great amount of intelligence and strength with almost no fear of the harsh consequences that could be laid out by the men of their time. During the Medieval era, religion played a major role in the shaping of this pessimistic viewpoint about women. The common belief of the patriarchal-based society was that women were direct descendants of Eve from The Bible; therefore, they were responsible for the fall of mankind. All of Eve’s characteristics from the biblical story were believed to be the same traits of medieval women. Of course, this did not come without argument. Two medieval women worked to defy the female stereotype, the first being the fictional character called The Wife of Bath from Geoffrey Chaucer’s The Canterbury Tales. The second woman, named Margery Kempe, was a real human being with the first English autobiography written about her called The Book of Margery Kempe. In these two texts, The Wife of Bath and Margery Kempe choose to act uniquely compared to other Christians in the medieval time period because of the way religion is interpreted by them. As a result, the women view themselves as having power and qualities that normal women of their society did not.
Baron Richard Von Krafft-Ebing, a 19th century German psychiatrist, was quoted as having said, "We find that the sexual instinct, when disappointed and unappeased, frequently seeks and finds a substitute in religion." This may have been the condition of Margery Kempe when she desired to cease all sexual activity with her spouse because of her devotion to God. Instead of performing her duties as a wife, she chose instead to spread her knowledge of God to her community and did so not only in speech, but also in literature. Whatever her motivation for creating such descriptive language, it is evident that her faith in God conquered both her fear of public opinion and the constraints placed upon all women during the period. Living in the 1400s, she steps out of a woman's role and into the territory of a man by living her life publicly, abandoning her position of mother and wife, and recording her life in writing. Fortunately, because she was writing for religious reasons, her work was both permitted and accepted. In The Book of Margery Kempe, she describes her experiences with brilliant imagery, some of which is sexual, all of which is sensual. By using her own senses to portray her spiritual...
When we talked about Nietzsche in class we discussed how a lot about the second essay, which is about Guilt and Punishment. Here are two quick overviews of what Nietzsche describes punishment and guilt as. Guilt is being accountable and responsible for the action you have done. You have guilt because you could have done something in the right direction instead. Nietzsche says that if free will is attached to accountability and responsibility then it cannot be connect with guilt. It is based off a debt that you have acquired and needs to be paid back. Punishment is dependent on the offender’s decision to act the way that they do. The reason this person deserves a punishment is because they have the ability to act differently off the start, they chose to act in the wrong and they have to take the punishment they get. Nietzsche says that if someone is not acting freely (accident, insanity, etc.) then they are seen as being exempt from punishment.
Friedrich Nietzsche’s “On the Genealogy of Morality” includes his theory on man’s development of “bad conscience.” Nietzsche believes that when transitioning from a free-roaming individual to a member of a community, man had to suppress his “will to power,” his natural “instinct of freedom”(59). The governing community threatened its members with punishment for violation of its laws, its “morality of customs,” thereby creating a uniform and predictable man (36). With fear of punishment curtailing his behavior, man was no longer allowed the freedom to indulge his every instinct. He turned his aggressive focus inward, became ashamed of his natural animal instincts, judged himself as inherently evil, and developed a bad conscience (46). Throughout the work, Nietzsche uses decidedly negative terms to describe “bad conscience,” calling it ugly (59), a sickness (60), or an illness (56); leading some to assume that he views “bad conscience” as a bad thing. However, Nietzsche hints at a different view when calling bad conscience a “sickness rather like pregnancy” (60). This analogy equates the pain and suffering of a pregnant woman to the suffering of man when his instincts are repressed. Therefore, just as the pain of pregnancy gives birth to something joyful, Nietzsche’s analogy implies that the negative state of bad conscience may also “give birth” to something positive. Nietzsche hopes for the birth of the “sovereign individual” – a man who is autonomous, not indebted to the morality of custom, and who has regained his free will. An examination of Nietzsche’s theory on the evolution of man’s bad conscience will reveal: even though bad conscience has caused man to turn against himself and has resulted in the stagnation of his will, Ni...
Lugo, Michael. "Thus Conscience Does Make Cowards of Us All." Hamlet reaction papers. Wynnewood: FCS, 2000.
Watson, Curtis Brown. “Shakespeare’s Ambivalence in Regard to Christian and Pagan-Humanist Values.” Chapter Nine. Shakespeare and the Renaissance Concept of Honor. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1960.
Though written decades ago, William Shakespeare’s Hamlet is still read, studied, and enjoyed by readers everywhere simply because it is still relevant. The seven deadly sins played a role throughout this play, particularly excessive pride and a thirst for wrath. But, these sins exist in the very same world the reader lives in, as examples throughout this paper have proven. Hamlet, who character in particular is extremely intelligent and also extremely prideful, has been designed to be dynamic, with conflicting feelings of cowardice and vengeance, of love and mistrust, and of pride and pity. This dynamic character was driven to his own downfall by his own excessive pride and need for revenge.
In Shakespeare’s Macbeth, the theme of guilt and conscience is one of many explored throughout the play. Macbeth, is a well respected Scottish noble who in the beginning of the play is a man everyone looks up to; however as the play progresses he makes a number of bad decisions. Eventually, as a result of his actions he suffers guilt and this plays heavily upon his character until his personality is completely destroyed. Shakespeare uses a range of techniques in order to develop this theme such as, characters, imagery.
Shakespeare’s “Macbeth” explores a fundamental struggle of the human conscience. The reader is transported into the journey of a man who recognizes and acknowledges evil but still succumbs to its destructive powers. The character of Macbeth is shrouded in ambiguity that scholars have claimed as both being a tyrant and tragic hero. Macbeth’s inner turmoil and anxieties that burden him throughout the entire play evoke sympathy and pity in the reader. Though he has the characteristics of an irredeemable tyrant, Macbeth realizes his mistakes and knows there is no redemption for his sins. And that is indeed tragic.
Meron, Theodor. “Crimes and Accountability in Shakespeare.” The American Journal of International Law. 92.1 (Jan.,1998): 1-40. JSTOR. Web. 24 Nov. 2013.
In history, there have been multiple different types of evil people or characters in literature that never seem to learn from their bad deeds or mistakes. Lady Macbeth for example, happens to be one of the most malice literature characters there are. She is willing to get whatever she wants and nothing will get in her way of receiving it. However, everything that she does, comes right back to haunt her. In the dramatic tragedy Macbeth, William Shakespeare develops guilt using characterization and motifs through the character Lady Macbeth.
Shakespeare’s Macbeth showcases the effects that guilt can have on a person. One can see both outcomes through Macbeth as he slowly degrades from the person he had been to the monster he became as a result of his sin and lack of confession as well as through Lady Macbeth as the guilt takes over her life, filling her with depression and eventually leading her to her end in the form of suicide.
Man has struggled eternally with the human condition and its omnipotence. To declare MacBeth free from any mental illness, only some aspects of the human condition require attention. These aspects are guilt, shame, and pride. By comparing the human condition’s effect on MacBeth with any diagnosis of mental illness, it will be seen that the human condition is responsible for many of MacBeth’s actions throughout the tragedy. MacBeth’s subconscious is just as significant a factor. In order to bring himself to commit his atrocities throughout the tragedy, MacBeth’s id, the part of his subconscious focused purely on animal-like drives and pleasures, suppresses his superego, the “voice of reason” of the subconscious which prevents one from acting purely on the pleasure principle of the id. For as long as the superego is silenced by the id, MacBeth can commit ghastly murders necessary to gain and maintain power, only feeling the routine guilt and shame when the superego’s morality has