Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Crime and punishment and nietzsche
Critique of nietzsche guilt
Crime and punishment nietzsche
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Crime and punishment and nietzsche
When we talked about Nietzsche in class we discussed how a lot about the second essay, which is about Guilt and Punishment. Here are two quick overviews of what Nietzsche describes punishment and guilt as. Guilt is being accountable and responsible for the action you have done. You have guilt because you could have done something in the right direction instead. Nietzsche says that if free will is attached to accountability and responsibility then it cannot be connect with guilt. It is based off a debt that you have acquired and needs to be paid back. Punishment is dependent on the offender’s decision to act the way that they do. The reason this person deserves a punishment is because they have the ability to act differently off the start, they chose to act in the wrong and they have to take the punishment they get. Nietzsche says that if someone is not acting freely (accident, insanity, etc.) then they are seen as being exempt from punishment. Below I attached two articles on the same story, the story is about a Medical Technician named David M. Kwiatkowski, who traveled to a few states and stole syringes of fentanyl. Then he would inject himself with the syringes and replace the fluid inside with saline and put them back to be used on patients. Kwiatkowski is infected by the Hepatitis C which made this one of the biggest outbreaks of the disease in recent decades. He was given a sentence of 39 years because of the impact of what he did and the many people it affected. Some facts from the article to know the extent of what happened are that 45 total people were infected by these syringes, and one of them has already died. Linda Ficken said in the trial to Mr. Kwiatkowski, “You handed down to us a potential death sente... ... middle of paper ... ...bligation. In this case Mr. Kwiatkowski was obligated to be punished for what he did even if it wasn’t in a malicious way to harm other and just to satisfy his drug addiction. Mr. Kwiatkowski said to an investigator while discussing his plea agreement, “I'm going to kill a lot of people out of this." This is a very serious case to show what Nietzsche’s punishment and guilt are. I am sure we have all had a situation when we were young or recently that we did something that we didn’t asses the consequences of what would happen. Then when more people go involved because of something you did and it affected them you start to feel yourself getting nervous and feeling guilty for what you did. Just the guilt can leave a memory in year head and make you not do that same thing twice. The punishment was a big statement to make sure the memory or message will stick.
Setting: Without the setting taking place after post-war Holocaust in Germany, the theme of guilt would most likely not have been possible since the characters feelings of guilt come from, in a sense, the Nazis and the Holocaust.
The Punishment Imperative, a book based on the transition from a time when punishment was thought to be necessarily harsh to a time where reform in the prion system is needed, explains the reasons why the grand social experiment of severe punishment did not work. The authors of the book, Todd R. Clear and Natasha A. Frost, strongly argue that the previous mindset of harsh punishment has been replaced due to political shifts, firsthand evidence, and spending issues within the government. Clear and Frost successfully assert their argument throughout the book using quantitative and qualitative information spanning from government policies to the reintegration of previous convicts into society.
On Evil, Guilt, and Power by Friedrich Nietzsche is one mind blowing story!! I have to say every sentence within the story has multiple meanings. I am extremely excited and terrified to analyze this story. First, because I like to go in depth in the meaning of the sentence and as I stated in my previous journal; I like to look at the back story, character mind set, and different points of view. In this story my opinions are endless. (I am going to have to walk away from this story multiple times before I go insane.) When reading the story in truth is not like a story; but more like the rambling of a politician, religious leader, or anyone trying to be an authority figure. I came across a few meanings for “master morality” and “slave morality”.
The system of justice that Nietzsche employs although somewhat cynical has a substantial amount of merit as a form of justice, which is present in our society. This is demonstrated through the depiction of the creditor/debtor relationship that exists in our democratic societies, and the equalization process that occurs, and furthermore that Nietzsche is correct to assess justice as such a principle. The issue is most obvious in the penal system; however it is also prevalent in personal day-to-day relationships as well as political structures.
What is guilt and what major impact does it have in the play Macbeth by William
This piece of work will try to find the answer to the question ‘In Nietzsche’s first essay in the Genealogy of Morals, does he give a clear idea of what good and bad truly are, what they are based on and what his opinion of those ideas is’. It will give a more simplistic overview of his first essay, it will also go into greater detail of what he claims good and bad truly are, and finally look at what he is trying to prove with this argument.
Herbert Morris and Jean Hampton both view punishment as important to a healthy society. However, their views on what kind of role does punishment plays in a healthy society are vastly different. Morris believes that when one commits a crime they “owe a debt to the society and the person they wronged” and, therefore the punishment of that person is retributive, and a right for those who committed this wrong (270). Hampton, on the other hand, believes that punishment is a good for those who have strayed in the path of being morally right. Out of the two views presented, I believe that Hampton view is more plausible, and rightly places punishment as a constructive good that is better suited for society than Morris’s view.
In his book On the Genealogy of Morality, Friedrich Nietzsche talks about a revolution that changed the original meaning of the word good. He says that good was a term used to refer to the aristocrats, the powerful, the warriors, the strong people. However, because of the resentment of the powerful by the weak, there was a revolt of slaves that inverted the meaning of the term good. Nietzsche blames first the Jews, who were oppressed by noble warriors, the Romans, and Jesus, who brought about the victory of Christianity, which is the ultimate revenge of the weak over the strong, the slave over the noble, the priest over the warrior. Part of Nietzsche’s theory is present in today’s parable.
The Shakespearean tragedy Macbeth underscores the important and usually unforeseen effect of sin, that of guilt. The guilt is so deep that Lady Macbeth is pushed to suicide, and Macbeth fares only slightly better.
“Please, stop! I dare to do only what is proper for a man to do. He who dares to do more is not a man at all” (Act 2, Sc, 1). William Shakespeare has been known to be one of the best and unique English writers since the 17th century. Many of his work was anything but for the faint of heart. His written pieces were about jealousy, despair, murder, and revenge, just to name a few. For example, in one of Shakespeare’s most famous plays, the writer depicts a tragic hero, Macbeth, who embarks on a chain of events after murdering the beloved King of Scotland that’ll ultimately lead to his demise. The theme in Macbeth approaches the effect of guilt on the human mind through the literary devices of explicit detail and connotative diction.
In philosophy “Nihilism” is a position of radical skepticism. It is the belief that all values are baseless and nothing is known. The word “Nihilism” itself conveys a sense of abolishing or destroying (IEP). Nietzsche’s work and writings are mostly associated with nihilism in general, and moral nihilism especially. Moral nihilism questions the reality and the foundation of moral values. Nietzsche supported his view on morality by many arguments and discussions on the true nature of our inner self. Through my paper on Moral Nihilism, I will explain 5 major arguments and then try to construct a deductive argument for each, relying on Nietzsche’s book II “Daybreak”.
Shakespeare’s Macbeth showcases the effects that guilt can have on a person. One can see both outcomes through Macbeth as he slowly degrades from the person he had been to the monster he became as a result of his sin and lack of confession as well as through Lady Macbeth as the guilt takes over her life, filling her with depression and eventually leading her to her end in the form of suicide.
Friedrich Nietzsche’s quote, “Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the abyss, the abyss gazes also into you,” describes the void and fear we humans often times feel. That sometimes the human mind cannot fully comprehend with explanation and reason what is happening before it. Thus, causing a transformation of man into an animal at the precipice of a great cliff. That any confidence and reason at the time is stripped away, until the only question that seems reasonable is, “why not jump?” We often times believe we are afraid of the dark, but in reality what we really are afraid of is what’s in it, and the uncertainty of the unknown.
In his Geneology of Morals, Nietzsche presents his view of how morality (and through that, punishment) has developed over the course of history. Retributivists assert that the essential essence of punishment is contained in the fair and equitable deserts it presents the guilty offenders with. To this, Nietzsche claims that this punishment did not come from the thought that the crimes of the guilty must be punished—in fact, he claims that this judgement is a rather late form of human observation and condemnation. Punishment, in Nietzsche’s mind, came about as the will of the masters over the slaves, to enable them to experience and revel in the feeling of condemning someone and being able to abuse someone beneath them. In other words, punishing
The art of blame has plagued all societies since humans have had the ability to process the rightness and wrongness of a situation. Even the most notable and praised philosophers of all time have taken notice to the illness known as blame and blame's companion, guilt. These two feelings occur in people and can be affected by any difficult circumstance a person may come across. As Plato gracefully informed society, “[i]n their misfortunes, people tend to blame fate, gods and everything else, but not themselves” (qtd. in “Status Minds” n.pag.). The acknowledgment Plato makes to blame and how people accuse others is important to the understanding of guilt; similarly, the understanding of how acting this way is a problem