Counseling Program Evaluation

682 Words2 Pages

Introduction Program evaluation is a systematic means in collecting data and evaluating information for improving programs (Houser, 2015). It further explores the goals and rationale for a program improvement acquired through a needs assessment. Data collected in program evaluations are presented to stockholders, through research designs, measurement tools, and data to solidify the necessity of funding, change, and improvement in various programs in mental health counseling (Astramovich, & Coker, 2007).
Purpose of Program Evaluation
As, a result in ongoing changes in human services professions in this field, are now compelled to the pressuring counselors to show the effects of counseling programs and services (Astramovich, & Coker, 2007). …show more content…

The initiation of program evaluation using evidence based practice research allows the stake holders (Government county, state, and local officials, and insurance companies), to review the necessity for continued funding in counseling. Consequently, competency in research by must be proven by counselors as a need for continuation of such services. Therefore, as a professional clinician, I would like to conduct a program evaluation on the efficacy of Dialectical Behavior therapy for women who experienced domestic violence. A qualitative interview of women, would examine how they feel about psychoeducational therapy by applying Dialectical behavior therapy approach. The collection of quantitative data utilized for this study would view reports of domestic violence survivors, who interacted in therapy and the outcomes of therapy based on sample groups and size through random selection. This data would further help to support the need for ongoing services provided by as the statical data indicated women who found improvement in therapy …show more content…

In this data collection process this allows comparison of more than one group or sample to be evaluated at one time (Astramovich, & Coker, 2007). While performing a program evaluation, a longitudinal study would be most appropriate for this type of population group. Nonetheless research of this type may be considered a quasi-experimental research design., due to the length of time invested with this research. This research design is a longer observation of time when research involves people (Shadish, Cook, Campbell, 2002). In order evaluate the accurate efficacy of any psychoeducational therapy, comparisons of the same group and groups types would need time to prove the evidence as valid, therefore this design would be most effective in evaluating this

Open Document