Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literature review of comparative benefits of conventional and organic farming
Effect of organic farming
Social, environmental and economic impacts of organic farming
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Even though organic agriculture is seen to be safer and healthier for people and the environment, conventional agriculture is more efficient than organic because fertilizers and pesticides reduce the risk of crops failing, however, they may also be detrimental to the nutritional value of the crop. On the other hand, producing organic goods is said to be more expensive and requires more land to produce the same amount of crop yield. With the world’s ever expanding population, rates of starvation are increasing and it is crucial that we understand the consequences of trying to feed the world potentially healthier food rather than just feeding it in general.
Introduction
Since the development of agriculture some 12,000 years ago the world has greatly expanded its knowledge of techniques and methods to producing the highest amount of crop yield with the least amount of effort. This endless quest for greater agricultural yields is brought on by a necessity to feed the ever growing human population. A population that has boomed from nearly 5 million people 10,000 years ago to 7 billion people today and by 2050 could reach an estimated 10 billion (Badgley et al. 2006). However, arguments are being made as to which form of agriculture, conventional vs. organic, is more beneficial and economically sound to sustain a constant healthy food supply to feed the worlds people.
Conventional agriculture is the mainstream method utilized by most serious farmers these days to produce high crop yields. It requires the use of pesticides and herbicides to protect the crop from failure and increases the likelihood of survivability to harvest time. Farmers also use nitrogen. More nitrogen than the plants could obtain from the atmosphere itself. It is ...
... middle of paper ...
... organically grown produce yet there is no conclusive evidence that conventionally grown items utilizing fertilizers and pesticides is harmful to consumers. However, it is found that growing conventionally is more harmful to the environment but trying to grow mainly organically requires the use of more land, resulting in a stalemate between the two methods since it requires about the same amount of expenses for both. Those growing organically are reaping the benefits of a misunderstood subject driven by fear and social media projections of a better, healthier lifestyle. On the other hand if one were truly organic it would mean that if they got sick and needed medicinal help they wouldn’t accept it either but rather let nature take its course. It might sound a bit absurd but so is the increased hype over organic farming without substantial evidence of the benefits.
In recent years, it is not even necessary to turn on the news to hear about the bad reputation farming has been getting in recent years. With the media focusing on things like drugs in animals and Pink Slime, or Lean Finely Textured Beef, it is a wonder that people are eating “non-organic” foods. However, many pro-farming organizations have been trying to fight back against these slanders. Still, the battle is not without heavy competition, and a good portion of it comes from Chipotle, a fast food Mexican restaurant that claims to only use completely organic ingredients in their food. Chipotle is constantly introducing advertisements claiming to have the natural ingredients, while slandering the names of farmers everywhere.
Steven Shapin is an expert when it comes to telling people the reality of the situation. In his, article “What Are You Buying When You Buy Organic?” Shapin exposes and explains the truth behind the word organic. He explains that our view on organic is not a reality. The small farms that we picture in our heads are really just big business in disguise and these big businesses are trying to do good by supposedly not using harmful pesticides. Which are supposed to not damage the environment but in reality they are probably not making any sort of difference. Some people care about the environment, while others are buying taste when it comes to organic food but using different pesticides are going to help the taste, only freshness tastes the best.
Have you ever wondered if organic foods are actually better for you? What if organic foods are not actually healthy and are just an immense scam from food companies to take your money away from you? In the documentary, In Organic We Trust, the narrator Kip Pastor attempts to persuade the viewers that, although the food system may be flawed, organic foods are actually better to consume. Pastor’s use of pathos and logos in this documentary are extremely credible and well structured, but the ethos Pastor provided in this documentary are not as well structured as the pathos and logos. Pastor does an excellent job in structuring the film In Organic We Trust, in an attempt to send his message across to the viewers. In the documentary in order to prove that organic foods are better than regular industrialized foods, Pastor uses the three different types of arguments pathos, ethos and logos. The film starts off by Pastor introducing himself and stating why he believes organic food are better showing his pathos and ethos. Then, Pastor goes on to explain numerous misconceptions about farming and how foods are grown, therefore showing his logos. Throughout the whole film Pastor explains the truth about farming and not sugar coating anything in order to prove his message.
Muthyam’s article states, “conventional farming’s dependency on chemical fertilizers destroys topsoil,” (Muthyam 4) and without healthy topsoil we can never produce more antioxidants or carbon. The increased production of these elements could alleviate climate change. The human beings who feel strongly about the climate change issue would be challenged on their “Bt gene” eating habits. Muthyam makes the reader think twice about buying conventional farming products because they are contributing to the problem presented. No one likes to hear about others starving which strikes the reader when they read organic farming can feed masses. The article states “we could feed our entire population through urban agriculture alone” (Muthyam 6). She also refers to the chemicals and synthetic fertilizers as being poison, which gets people double-taking their decisions to consume these conventional products. Consumers of conventional produce wouldn’t consider eating a product if it was directly labeled as
The organic food market tipped during the early 1980s, before Whole Foods Market ever existed. However, the organic farming concept occurred in England 40 years before it tipped in the United States. After years of agricultural research’s experiences and observations, Sir Albert Howard gradually evolved a philosophy and a concept of organic farming (Heckman, 2006). Organic farming was about recycling crops and livestock back to the soil in order to escalate soil fertility. This method quickly spread in Europe; however, it was not until USDA published Report and Recommendation on Organic Farming then brought significant appreciation to the United States. In 1980’s, several policies such as the Organic Foods Producti...
With the world’s population continuing to increase, the demand for food is higher than ever. This increase in food demand also calls for more efficient ways of growing and providing the food. Two methods that are very controversial are the organic and conventional method. While many people support the organic method because of its known benefits, others feel that it is an over inflated industry that cheats consumers out of their money. But recently many studies have disproved those critics. These studies prove that Organic food is a better choice than conventional because it is better for the environment, avoids the use of chemicals, and is generally more beneficial.
Thesis: Organic food is full of nutrients and when compared to conventional food is a much better choice
There is more than two-thirds of U.S. population who buy organic products at least occasionally, and twenty eight percent of consumers buy organic products weekly (Reganold et al., 2010). Organic produce is generally recognized as plant food produced without using growth hormones, antibiotics, or petroleum based, or sewage sludge based fertilizers (McWilliams, 2012). On the other hand conventionally grown produce uses synthetic fertilizers, hormones, and genetically modified Organism (GMO). Genetically Modified Organism referred to as plant or animal foods developed by genetic manipulation to alter nutrient levels or other characteristics such as increasing the antioxidant content in some vegetables or produce higher yield (McWilliams, 2012). The increasing popularity of consuming organic produce may be attributed to its perception of health related benefits, higher vitamins and nutrient levels, better quality, less pesticide residue, more environmental friendly, and concerns about the effects of conventional farming practices on the environment. (Uematsu, Mishra, 2012). The U.S. Department of Agriculture administeres the National Organic Prog...
In order for us to maintain our lives, we need to consume food to supply nutrient-needs for our bodies. As the global population increased, the demand for food also increased. Increased population led to mass production of foods. However, even with this mass production, in under-developed countries, people are still undernourished. On other hand, in developed and developing countries, people are overfed and suffering from obesity. In addition, the current methods of industrial farming destroy the environment. These problems raised a question to our global food system. Will it be able to sustain our increasing global population and the earth? With this question in my mind, I decided to investigate the sustainability of our current global food system.
The definition of conventional farming is “Intensive farming or intensive agriculture as an agricultural production system characterized by a low fallow ratio and the high use of inputs such as capital, labor, or heavy use of pesticides and chemical fertilizers relative to land area.” Conventional farming is the method that a majority of farmers use. Although they have to use a lot more chemicals and fertilizers, conventional farming is cheaper than organic farming. Conventional farming has significantly higher crop yields than organic thus, producing more money, making it much more farmer friendly. Conventional farmers also use genetically engineered seeds that are sometimes referred to as “miracle seeds” because of their ability to fight against certain diseases or produce higher yields. The technical term for these seeds is HYV’s or high yield varieties (Qaim). Conventional farming also incorporates the use...
As the global population continues to rise, the amount of food needed to feed the people will increase as well. Two types of agriculture systems have been the backbone for crop production for decades if not centuries: conventional and organic agriculture— both methods could not be any more different. Conventional agriculture, a method that uses synthetic chemical pesticides, technologies or additives, and practices that are unsustainable is the leading producer for our food. On the other side of spectrum, organic agriculture generally, performed in a much smaller scale, does not use synthetic chemicals and utilize methods that are environmentally sound. Most conventional
The source shows the reliability of biodiversity and soil quality that organic farming agriculture exploits, specifically when it has a tight grip of the economy and community that has directly affected livestock, farmers, people, and the global environment as a whole. Organic farms are sometimes difficult to maintain as the land can quite possibly lose its potential of being free from pesticides. As articulated in the source, the piece of land must also need precise qualifications which takes time and patience. This is one amongst many disadvantages a progressive movement such as organic farming must work on. The purpose is meant to enhance a genetically modified agriculture into an innately modified agriculture for a nutritious
No one likes to be lied to. Health in America today is one of the people’s biggest concerns. Organic food advocates claim that organic food has more nutrition, does not use pesticides, is better for the environment, benefits the small farmer, and over all just tastes better. Organic food is not as beneficial for you, or the environment, as the advocates today would have you believe.
There has been a cultural adjustment to organic farming and eating that is critical for future human and environmental benefits for three reasons. First reason is that a person’s health counts on good food being consumed into the body. Organic foods do not contain any artificial colors, preservatives, flavors, or pesticides making them healthier for Consumers. The EPA makes an educated guess that approximately 90% of all fungicides, 60% of all herbicides, and 30% of all pesticides are all chemicals found in conventionally grown agriculture, and these chemicals causes cancer, and organic food does not have these malicious substances. The bottom line is that these chemicals are toxic poisonous designed to kill living organisms and
People have depended on agriculture for years as the primary source of getting food. We have developed all kinds of ways to manipulate nature so what we can produce higher yield crops, more nutritious crops, bigger crops, crops that withstand cold, and farming equipment that allows us to manufacture these crops with relative ease. Why then are there five billion people being malnourished and forty thousand children dying each day from hunger? It seems as though world hunger is more a result of the lack of distributing the food properly than the lack of quantity. agriculture has turned into a high profit business and biotech companies like Monsanto are constantly trying to come up with better and more efficient ways of farming. Are they doing this to try to solve the world hunger crisis, or merely to make a profit?