Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Diversity of classroom
Different types of diversity in classrooms
Diversity of classroom
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Diversity of classroom
Based on my experience, there are few topics that can initiate a heated debate like whether or not controversial issues should be addressed in public school. This sentiment is shared by Sleeter and Stillman (2013), “For over a century, curriculum in the United States has periodically surfaced as a lightning rod for debate about what schools should do, and more broadly, about basic values and beliefs about how young people should view society, and what adults expect of them as they enter the adult world.” (p. 253) Most school administrators and staff are apprehensive about how to address or even if they should include politically charged topics in their district curriculum. There is an overwhelming fear of criticism and backlash from parents, the school board and community. Additionally, there is uncertainty about when to make time to teach hot issue topics, how to ensure that adequate time is spent discussing them and how to ensure consistency of information. The null curriculum as explained by Eisner (1985) describes what students miss by not addressing certain topics in the classroom, “the options students are not afforded, the perspectives they may never know about, much less be able to use, the concepts and skills that are not part of their intellectual repertoire.” (p. 107) There are many factors that contribute to why local districts choose not to address curricular topics that are political, religious or sexual in nature. An unsupportive administration, parental pushback, a primary focus on assessment results, lack of resources and time are all considered contributing factors and as long as these barriers exist, districts will continue to be wary of addressing these issues in the classroom. Most educators would agree ... ... middle of paper ... ...do not adequately prepare pre-service teachers to promote diversity, differences and acceptance in the classroom. Unless future and new teachers are provided with additional preparation and guidance as well as support from their administration to address political, racial and gender issues, there will remain a fear of doing so and students will continue to miss those learning opportunities related to controversial issues. Counts (2013) “ If the schools are to be really effective, they must become centers for the building, and not merely for the contemplation, or our civilization. This does not mean that we should endeavor to promote particular reforms through the educational system. We should, however, give to our children a vision of the possibilities which lie ahead and endeavor to enlist their loyalties and enthusiasms in the realization of the vision.” (p. 48)
...Teaching acceptance and diversity of different ethnicity is one of the key components that can be taught in our school systems today. Here in America we have many different ethnic groups and races, we are one big melting pot. During school these differences should be embraced in a positive manner and a proper learning experience. Diversity is often mistaken for the word division, and sometimes people teach that diversity is division. Diversity should be taught in a way that brings people together, not divide people into groups. Like Konig said, “I hadn’t really given much thought to the ethnic and national backgrounds of Sarah’s classmates. I can guarantee that Sarah, being two and a half gave the subject absolutely no thought.” (51) We can take a few lessons from Konigs daughter and learn to not give the subject any thought, and just accept people for who they are.
The Ocean Hill Brownsville school controversy was a case study of race relations during the 1960’s. This predominantly black area wished to have jurisdiction over their schools’ operations and curricula. In 1967, the superintendent of schools granted Ocean Hill Brownsville “community control” of their district. The Board of Education’s action was part of a new decentralization policy that wanted to disperse New York City’s political powers locally. Once in place, the Unit Administrator, Rhody McCoy, fired several teachers inciting one of the most profound racial standoffs in the city’s history. The evolution of the national civil rights movement parallels the changing attitudes of blacks involved in Ocean Hill Brownsville. In addition, evidence of differing theories concerning assimilation to the American ethnicity is portrayed through the actions of the participants.
The second is the concern over segregation and the effect it has on society. Mr. Kozol provides his own socially conscious and very informative view of the issues facing the children and educators in this poverty ravaged neighborhood. Those forces controlling public schools, Kozol points out, are the same ones perpetuating inequity and suffering elsewhere; pedagogic styles and shapes may change, but the basic parameters and purposes remain the same: desensitization, selective information, predetermined "options," indoctrination. In theory, the decision should have meant the end of school segregation, but in fact its legacy has proven far more muddled. While the principle of affirmative action under the trendy code word ''diversity'' has brought unparalleled integration into higher education, the military and corporate America, the sort of local school districts that Brown supposedly addressed have rarely become meaningfully integrated. In some respects, the black poor are more hopelessly concentrated in failing urban schools than ever, cut off not only from whites but from the flourishing black middle class. Kozol describes schools run almost like factories or prisons in grim detail. According to Kozol, US Schools are quite quickly becoming functionally segregated. Kozol lists the demographics of a slew of public schools in the states, named after prominent civil rights activists, whose classrooms are upwards of 97% black and Hispanic — in some cases despite being in neighborhoods that are predominantly white. It has been over 50 years since Brown vs. Board of Education. It is sad to read about the state of things today.
Courageous Conversations About Race: Chapter 5. Authors Glenn E. Singleton and Curtis Linton in Chapter Five of Courageous Conversations About Race broach the topic of race, by asking the reader to evaluate his or her own consciousness of race. According to the authors, in order to address the achievement gaps between African American students and White students, educators should shift their energy towards focusing on the factors that they have direct control of inside the classroom rather than on the factors that influence this achievement disparity between races outside the classroom. The first step towards addressing the racial achievement gap begins with educators addressing their individual racial attitudes for, as the authors purport, “As we become personally aware of our own racialized existence, we can more deeply understand the racial experiences of others” (Singleton, Linton, 2006). In all honesty, I think Singleton and Linton hit the bull’s eye by suggesting that the first step towards initiating culturally relevant teaching is for the teacher to really examine his or her attitudes, values, and principles.
Jonathon Kozol writes, "Public schools in the U.S. do not exist to educate an ethical human being…Schools do exist to educate defeated, unprovocative, well-balanced human beings…". This statement is certainly true, but should public schools be required to teach students ethics and morality? I would argue that an education devoid of ethics and morals is detrimental to our society. Scholar Joao Coutinho writes in the Harvard Educational Review, "Education is either for domestication or for freedom…There is no neutral education."
In Henry Lewis Gates’ article, The Debate Has Been Miscast from the Start, he reveals the advantages to having multiculturalism in the curriculum of America’s schools. He would argue that in order to create true diversity and understanding of cultural differences, the nation must provide its students with a wide array of opportunities to understand other cultures besides their own. Peggy McIntosh takes on a similar situation when she takes into consideration how she was taught diversity in schools as a child. She claims that dominance of the white race is unconsciously supported. She also describes how she did not receive the right kind of education that would teach her how to be aware of racism and how to be aware of her privileges as a white person. McIntosh desires change in the way that students are taught racism and the best way to accomplish this is for schools to incorporate multiculturalism into curriculum. If this is accomplished, future generations have the ability to be aware of cultural differences and they would be less likely to be perpetrators of color blind racism.
...'s Children, is an important tool in the education of teachers to help them to see teaching is not a politic-free practice that has little to do with social justice. Through reading multicultural theorists like Delpit, teachers are better prepared to deal with the issues like injustice and "remove the blinders built of stereotypes, mono-cultural instructional methodologies, ignorance, social distance biased research and racism" in the classrooms (Delpit, 1995, pg.69).
...er how hard teachers try to make students learn, if the students don’t want to, then they won’t. The only sure fire way to decrease the so-called discrimination is to make students dedicated to learning and thus make it one of their top priorities. If not, then there will continue to be many problems and an increasing number of cases concerning discrimination within the education system.
Importantly, if individuals, especially school officials, took this article into consideration, schools would become a more welcoming and assimilating environment for multiracial adolescents. Contradictory to that, if individuals don’t take this writing seriously, society will continue on a one sided path to viewing multiracial individuals and racism in societies will not make that one step closer to being
Sex. Politics. Religion. The big three: a work of literature is often considered controversial because of its statement about or use of these topics. What makes these and other areas so touchy in the classroom? Why do some parents and concerned community members want controversial materials out of the classroom?
Diversity in the classrooms will give students access to experience other cultures and learn about one another. The different races effect how varied their backgrounds might be, and it will help the teacher engage a variety of ways to manage course material (Packard, 2017). According to Packard, it is up to the teacher to help spread the learning of diversity and use it to their advantage in their classroom. Throughout the years, diversity have grown in the classrooms, but the struggle of segregation continues.
students are not able to have classroom debates without the concern of emotionally disturbing or offending a peer. In the online article Trigger Warnings and the Novelist’s Mind the author discusses the intent of trigger warnings, “ these warnings are meant to protect from public traumatic flashbacks” (). Although these trigger warnings may prevent few students from a hurtful memory they also stifle the intellectual development of the majority of the students.The students are not just being limited in terms of their freedom of speech but also in terms of the content they are able to learn; because in case that a book or article is deemed by students as inappropriate or offensive, than the book can be removed from the curriculum. The authors of The Coddling of the American Mind, “ There’s a saying common in educational circles: don’t teach students what to think; teach them how to think”(Lukianoff and Haidt 45) .Students are not able to expand their intellect as broadly confined by the trigger warnings. Students are deprived of the necessary skill development of speech and debate because they are not able to discuss argumentative topics that may cause the students
There is much debate regarding whether or not teachers should address controversial topics in schools. Many individuals attempt to provide principles that argue against teaching controversial issues. However, these individuals do not take into account the varying beneficial qualities that arise from addressing these topics. I argue that teachers should address controversial topics in schools, as it will serve to benefit the quality of education students receive. Pupils will develop into skilled thinkers, informed citizens, and tolerant human beings. Furthermore, it fosters an understanding and respect for the equal rights of others. I believe that addressing controversial topics will benefit students in schools and out in society.
A significant problem of practice in education is teacher bias. Teacher bias has implications around race, ethnicity, gender, sexuality and socioeconomic status. Teachers must be willing to examine their beliefs, acknowledge and overcome their biases. Teachers need to evaluate their practices in relation to their ideals as well as recognize and assess the position of power they hold in their classrooms in order to be true Social Justice Educators (Cooper, 2003).
Academic freedom should be a liberty granted to students and teachers of all ages. “Research in cognitive, developmental and educational psychology shows that learning and development are active self-regulated processes that require the freedom to seek information, to formulate and express your own ideas, and to engage in discussion. Intellectual freedom is crucial to intellectual development from kindergarten to college” (Moshman). Many teachers that are tenured into a university of school district can say and do just about anything they want, whereas a teacher that has been apart of an institution for five years will be removed from the school for something the tenured colleague would not even be questioned about. In high schools the administration is so worried about parents complaints and how it will effect their reputation as a school that they let it affect the education that their students are receiving. Allowing grade school students the ability to be apart of the process building their schedule and education would be a step in the right direction. At this age students want to be more independent and are willing to experience all types of classes and learning types. When a student gets to college they are expected to have some kind of a major picked out. If the