Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of creative critical thinking
Significance of critical thinking in daily life
The importantance of critical thinking inlife
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of creative critical thinking
There is much debate regarding whether or not teachers should address controversial topics in schools. Many individuals attempt to provide principles that argue against teaching controversial issues. However, these individuals do not take into account the varying beneficial qualities that arise from addressing these topics. I argue that teachers should address controversial topics in schools, as it will serve to benefit the quality of education students receive. Pupils will develop into skilled thinkers, informed citizens, and tolerant human beings. Furthermore, it fosters an understanding and respect for the equal rights of others. I believe that addressing controversial topics will benefit students in schools and out in society.
Teachers
…show more content…
frequently stress to their students the importance of developing and refining critical thinking skills. Using controversial material challenges students into discussing emotive issues which then encourages them to develop higher thinking skills (“Oxfam”, 2006). For example, when teachers address controversial topics such as racism, it encourages students to ask questions and thus extend their learning experience. Questions such as “does white supremacy exist, and how can we get rid of it?” (Bolgatz, 2006). Controversial issues allow students to understand why events occurred and the various perspectives that people held throughout history (Thomas & Smoot, 1994). With such discussions, students can learn to make connections between events and ideas, which is a very useful and complex skill. Additionally, placing students in settings that enable them to argue both sides of an issue allows students to transition from their advocacy position to a position that synthesizes all perspectives (Johnson & Johnson, 1999). Avoiding controversial topics like race will prevent students from developing these critical and inquiry based thinking skills. Opposing arguments state that addressing controversial issues will not create critical thinkers, as teachers will impose their biases thus altering students’ mindsets.
However, research has shown that specific training of teachers is effective in increasing confidence and competence in addressing controversial issues within the classroom. (Gilligan, Handley & Lynagh, 2010). Often times, to help students think critically about issues, teachers will establish a discussion amongst the students. They will do this by simply stating the facts about an issue and leaving the students to analyze and deconstruct it. In these discussions, teachers will create an environment in which students will be open to multiple perspectives and everyone will get the chance to argue their point respectfully (Warren, 2000). Through this strategy, students will develop critical thinking skills, as they will be able to hear their classmates’ perspectives, as well as being able to express their own in a safe school environment. In order to develop critical thinking skills, pupils must be able to objectively analyze all sides of an issue in order to form a judgement (Gilligan, Handley & Lynagh, 2010). From hearing their classmates’ perspectives, students will learn to build their own conclusions by analyzing all the various viewpoints of an
issue. The second beneficial outcome that arises from addressing controversial issues is that students are informed of concerns within society and thus become active citizens. Promoting discussion amongst students is a key strategy that teachers use to address controversial topics. Students who regularly take part in classroom discussions regarding controversial issues are more likely to take part in political discussions, follow political news in the media, and vote (Barton & McCully, 2007). The absence of discussing controversy in classrooms is denying students the ability to participate as citizens in a democracy (Hess, 2004). Teachers strongly believe that discussing controversial issues broadens the mental capabilities of students, makes them aware of the issues surrounding them, and creates knowledgeable global citizens (Abu-Hamdan & Khader, 2014). When controversial topics are addressed, students gain the skills needed to become active contributors within their societies. Pupils will learn to influence change through discussion, negotiation and compromise, which ultimately develops a sense of social responsibility. People against the teaching on controversial topics within school often argue that students should not be put under the burden of learning about society’s troubles. This phenomenon is known as “educationalization,” a term “used to indicate that a government (in particular) inappropriately [imposes] on educational institutions responsibility for providing the solution to some social or economic problem” (Bridges, 2008, p. 461). However, this argument undermines the student’s choice to be taught what invokes his or her interest. When students are taught material that they are interested in, they are more likely to engage in their work. MORI conducted a poll of 3500 young people aged 11-16 to discover areas of interest for students. In the study, 79 percent wanted to know more about what is happening in developing countries, 54 percent thought they should learn about these issues in school, and 65 percent were concerned or very concerned about poverty in developing countries (“Oxfam”, 2006). For example, when students are taught about the mistreatment of Jews in Word War II, they are able to gain new perspectives on the atrocities that occurred in the past. Pupils will be able to think about the abuse of power as well as the roles and responsibilities of nations when confronted with civil rights violations (Hollingsworth, Didelot & Smith, 2003). Students come to understand that it is the responsibility of citizens to identify danger signals and to know when to react (Russell, 2005). Overall, if students are given the opportunity to analyze controversial world disputes, they will be able to analyze current and future issues as well. By addressing controversial topics in schools, students will develop empathy for others and become tolerant human beings (“Oxfam”, 2006). Providing a safe environment where students can discuss controversial topics will help students develop non-violent strategies for dealing with conflict. Students will learn to listen to one another and handle their anger and frustrations without resorting to violence (Reitano, Kivunja, Porter, 2008). When controversial topics are addressed, students will become aware of the complexity of these types of issues and the necessity of discussion in order to learn to co-exist and negotiate with people who have differing views (Fournier-Sylvester, 2013). For example, the discussion of gay rights in classrooms can educate students on the different oppressed groups in society. Furthermore, it can promote self-acceptance in LGBT students and model respect and fairness for others. Another example of a controversial topic that can create tolerance among students is the discussion of religion. Teaching students about religion in schools as a means to improve students’ knowledge about differing worldviews increases tolerant attitudes and behaviours. Research in California found that increasing students’ knowledge about other religions increases tolerance for religious diversity (Lester & Roberts, 2011). The more these controversial topics are discussed, the more likelihood that students will appreciate the diversity around them. Furthermore, they will learn to embrace and respect people who are different from them. (Hollingsworth, Didelot & Smith, 2003) After all, education is all about creating a safe environment for students where they are able to express themselves without fearing the mistreatment of others. Although there is much debate surrounding this topic, it is evident through the research that addressing controversial topics in schools is greatly beneficial for a student’s education, and thus the benefits outweigh any counter arguments. A student that is a skilled thinker in his or her studies will be more likely to prosper. A well- informed student will become an active and informed citizen that will contribute to society. Additionally, educating students on controversial issues will create a more tolerant and respectful individual, and hence society. When controversial topics are addressed pupils will benefit as students in a classroom and as citizens in society. Therefore, the positive outcomes that arise from addressing controversial issues in the classrooms greatly outweigh any counter arguments.
The article, “Critical Thinking? You Need Knowledge” by Diane Ravitch, discusses how in the past people have been deprived from the thinking process and abstract thinking skills. Students need to be given more retainable knowledge by their teachers to improve their critical thinking skills. (Ravitch).
Chris’ article is considered a normative argument due to the fact that it is primarily focused around political as well as ethical matters. Because his argument is considered normative, it must have a warrant. According to Richard A. Quantz, “a warrant is a rule or principle that connects the rest of the premises to the claim” (Quantz, 2012, p.4). The warrant present in this article is that teachers should teach students information that prepares them for the future. While the claim supports the political aspect of a normative argument, the warrant supports the ethical aspect of a normative argument. The claim can be seen as political because it addresses the struggle for power. Likewise, the warrant can be seen as ethical because it addresses what is morally right. To be fair to children, teachers need to provide them with knowledge that will allow them prosper. Although his argument is labeled as normative, Chris Hedges uses a couple of kinds of other premises in order to strengthen and better support his argument. He includes empirical, and conceptual premises.
Delpit, Lisa. “The Silenced Dialogue: Power and Pedagogy in Educating Other People’s Children.” Other People’s Children: Cultural Conflicts in the Classroom. New York: The New Press, 1995.
During the 60’s and 70’s, people have thrashed out with their words and each other. This caused some awareness in schools due to the offensiveness of the matter. During the 80’s schools began on focusing on preventing this kind of speech on their campuses. Since then, students have become more and more sensitive in a negative way. The authors used an example of a kid shouting “Shut up, you water buffalo” at an Israeli born student. That incident made national news, just for calling another kid a “water buffalo.” Another example is when a university found a student guilty of racial harassment for reading a book honoring student opposition to the Ku Klux Clan. The picture on the cover of the book offended one of the student’s co-workers. Just because the student was reading a book, minding his own business, the student was punished from the university. Never said anything or hurt anyone physically, and his education was ruined by someone taking offense to a book he was reading. The authors used this extreme example to prove that accepting the fact that student are fragile and letting them be fragile is not the right way to go and the past can prove
A student and teacher should be able to openly communicate or discuss the content and/or topic in class. To begin the educating process, one must set the correct tone and setting for it. Education is supposed to be an “experience”. An experience is supposed to engage all that are involved in it. “That every reader, everyone engaged in any teaching or learning practice, explicitly wonders about his or her work as teacher or pupil, in mathematics, history, biology, or grammar classes, is of little importance. That as teacher or pupil in the experience of the critical instruction in content that all explicitly engage a “reading of the world” that would be of a political nature, is not of the highest necessity” (Freire 49). ...
Sex. Politics. Religion. The big three: a work of literature is often considered controversial because of its statement about or use of these topics. What makes these and other areas so touchy in the classroom? Why do some parents and concerned community members want controversial materials out of the classroom?
Overall I do agree with Freire that students should have a hand in the discussion to help them learn to think more critically about what they are learning. I think every teacher or professor should try and incorporate the problem-posing model in their classrooms. But, the problem-posing model will not always work for every subject. All students should be able to think critically about what they are learning, express their opinions, concerns, and thoughts especially in the
Education is defined as the “discipline that is concerned with methods of teaching and learning in school or school-like environments as opposed to various non-formal and informal means of socialization.”(Encyclopedia Britannica, 2008). If one really looks at education, he or she will realize how broad it actually is. Education extends beyond the notion that it is merely for knowledge alone. It is imperative that one view education in an analytical perspective. Mr. Smith suggests that “we must also ensure that students develop critical thinking skills.” Critical thinking is a definite must ...
It is a source of education and a powerful resource in the life of every individual and in social life. Despite the fact that the identification and analysis of critical thinking skills are beyond the boundaries of a single discipline or subject, the learning and application of these skills require possession of certain knowledge. The value of critical thinking is lost if it is treated as a list of logical operations, and the possession of certain knowledge is regarded simply as a collection of information. The investigation of the relationship of a value judgment and the actual use may lead to a new assessment of the need for common concepts of critical thinking and the possession of certain knowledge in education (Paul,
Censorship is “the restriction or removal of information, or the prevention of free expression” (Taylor 8). There are many things that can be censored such as books, movies, TV shows, newspapers, and the way people dress. People censor things for a number of reasons- they do not agree with it, find it offensive, or think that it is just inappropriate in general. Different people consider different things inappropriate, so the content of what is censored varies. Anyone can censor, including parents, teachers, school officials, and board members (Taylor 8-10) Many things are censored in schools and places where children are present because parents do not want their kids to be exposed to inappropriate content (Taylor 10). Students are entitled to their First Amendment rights just as much as adults are, but schools still censor things like newspapers, books, and clothing.
Step one is focusing more on students critically thinking or thinking on their own. A great phrase of putting this idea to the test is, “focusing more on the question than the answer.” (Schlesinger 34). In The Power of “Why?” Schlesinger expresses her feeling towards what the bigger impact can be on students when focusing more on the depth of the question than how “quickly” and “correctly” students answer the question (34). She mentions that teachers are evaluated on how students test scores are rather than how critically they think. Schlesinger says that educators can help students think critically by, “letting the students speak their minds”, or teaching students that answers to our history has/will change as well as previous information that we once obtained from the past (34). Oftentimes teachers are afraid to let students open their minds and really think about the question because they think the books answer is the only right one. Teachers also may be more focused on making sure that the students know the right answer so they can do well on future test that the administration uses to evaluate the teachers. Students can significantly gain and profit from this tiny step in our education system. El...
A significant problem of practice in education is teacher bias. Teacher bias has implications around race, ethnicity, gender, sexuality and socioeconomic status. Teachers must be willing to examine their beliefs, acknowledge and overcome their biases. Teachers need to evaluate their practices in relation to their ideals as well as recognize and assess the position of power they hold in their classrooms in order to be true Social Justice Educators (Cooper, 2003).
As an educator, we need to ensure that children develop strong sense of critical thinking as this would help to ‘interrupt the tabloid culture’. When we look at the media-driven society, we see that children are constantly being bombarded with messages about how to live as part of the socially acceptable herd. They are being initiated into ‘herd thinking’ and ‘groupthink’ (Janis 1972) at a very early stage. Groupthink describes how individuals feel pressured into agreeing with the consensus of the group, often against their own better judgement. The group can make bad judgement due to lack of consideration of alternative viewpoints. I believe that children need to be able to think critically so as to make informed choices. They need to be able to think for themselves so as to resist ‘herd thinking’ and
Sides: Clashing Views on Educational Issues. 14th ed. Ed. Dennis L. Evans. Dubuque: McGraw-Hill Contemporary Learning Series, 2008. Print.
When analyzing contemporary issues in education, it is very important to ask why and how the issues arise. Some of these problems are obvious to the mass public, and some require a more in-depth analysis. One of the less obvious issues in education is the current philosophy in the classrooms. One may ask the questions, “Why is the philosophy of education important? And, why does it matter to me?” To put it simply, the philosophy imbedded in the goals of education and teaching methods in a classroom affects the students’ futures. This topic was chosen because the philosophy in schools is often overlooked as the absolute core of educational issues. Many students understandably struggle with sitting in a classroom, uninterested. In addition to the constant stress and pressure of having good grades, students often ask why the given curriculum must be learned.