Consistency Leads To Destruction in Sophocles

1014 Words3 Pages

In his well known essay, Self-Reliance, famous writer Ralph Waldo Emerson wrote, “A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines. With consistency a great soul has simply nothing to do.” Put simply, the thought that Emerson is conveying is that too much consistency is not necessarily a good thing. Being too consistent with something means that no real effort is made. Things are done as they always have been, without someone trusting their own beliefs or opinions. In fact, the overall themes of Emerson’s essay is a person should stick to what their conscience tells them to, and not fear what others will think. After consistency there will inevitably be negative consequences. Consistency is usually seen as a good thing, but it has been the downfall of many, for example political leaders, in the real world. In the play Antigone by Sophocles, it happens to be the downfall of two main characters, Creon and Antigone. Emerson’s thought that consistency is foolish relates to both Creon and Antigone, as both set their mind on something without ever changing it, which in turn caused terrible misfortune for themselves and others.

First, Creon and Antigone both were consistent by sticking to their beliefs throughout the entire play. For example, Creon kept a firm stance on Antigone’s brother, Polynices, not being buried because Creon felt betrayed by him. Creon states, “No, [Polynices] must be left unburied, his corpse carrion for the birds and dogs to tear, and obscenity for the citizens to behold!” (68). Creon was so adamant in punishing this young man that he was willing to defy the Greek tradition of burying bodies, which allowed a proper passage to the afterlife. In a wa...

... middle of paper ...

...one couldn’t get over their stubborn ways.

In conclusion, consistency proved to be the destruction of both Creon and Antigone. It almost seemed as though Creon and Antigone were always at opposite ends of the spectrum. While Creon stuck to the Greek law, Antigone stuck to the Greek morals, and, in turn, Creon was left without a family, and Antigone deserted what little family she had left. If somehow they had just found some common ground, things would have turned out incredibly better for everyone. It was all due to the fact they were unwilling to change their beliefs. People in the real, modern world should all take a leaf out of Emerson’s book. If people remain ignorant of other’s beliefs and traditions and always stick to their own, the world will never truly know peace, and will spiral towards a path of destruction, as was made a perfect example in Antigone.

Open Document