Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Chapter 9 history of psychology
Features of behaviour in conformity
Discuss atleast two factors that have been shown to affect conformity
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Chapter 9 history of psychology
Psychology Report
Introduction
Conformity denotes, acting in a manner which is accepted by a social group. It can also denote, a change in an individual or minorities behaviour to suit a majority. Conformity is part of social psychology, which investigates into how people behave, think and feel when communicating, interacting or simply in the presence of people, and how these behaviours, thoughts and feeling have an effect on the individual or minority group.
Throughout the years of study social psychology, there have been many studies carried out, and many have been experiments, which tests the level of conformity participants have towards a majority. One of these studies was by Asche in the 1950’s. Asche’s study was unambiguous, which
…show more content…
Jenness’ experiment was ambiguous, which means that there was no right or wrong answer. The study focused on the participant’s estimates on the total number of beans in a bottle. Jenness asked each participant, individually, an estimate on how much beans were in the bottle. Jenness then grouped the participants together, and asked the participants to provide him with just one estimate. The researcher once again asked individual participants for an estimate and found that nearly all participants changed their original estimate, which was changed to a closer estimate to the group estimate. Therefore this showed a level of conformity.
Jenness’ study closely relates to the experiment of conformity which was carried out was to measure the level of conformity and the influence others’ have when estimating the number of sweets in a jar. The aim of the experiment was to discover whether having made up estimates in front of participants - which was the independent variable (IV) - participants would conform to a group norm which is the dependent variable - when estimating the number of sweets in a
…show more content…
The type of design used was the independent measures design. This design was used as it was suited to the investigation as it contained one experimental group and one control group. Therefore, the design used had to be fitting for the investigation. Participants were asked whether or not they would like to participate, thus making it the sampling method opportunity. This meant that the participants were readily available for the
Asch and Milgram’s experiment was unethical in their methods of not informing the participant of the details surrounding the experiment and the unwarranted stress; their experiment portrayed the circumstances of real life situation surrounding the issues of obedience to authority and social influence. In life, we are not given the courtesy of knowledge when we are being manipulated or influenced to act or think a certain way, let us be honest here because if we did know people were watching and judging us most of us would do exactly as society sees moral, while that may sound good in ensuring that we always do the right thing that would not be true to the ways of our reality. Therefore, by not telling the participants the details of the experiment and inflicting unwarranted stress, Asch and Milgram’s replicated the reality of life. In “Options and Social Pressure” Solomon E. Asch conducts an experiment to show the power of social influence, by using the lengths of sticks that the participants had to match up with the best fit, Asch then developed different scenarios to see how great the power of influence is, but what he discovered is that people always conformed to the majority regardless of how big or small the error was the individual always gave in to the power of the majority.
The most basic concept in social psychology is conformity. Conformity is the idea that behaviour or a belief is changed in order to follow, or conform, to what is considered the “norm.” One of the oldest experiments to support this notion was conducted in 1935 by Muzafer Sherif (Song, Ma, Wu, Li, 2012 p. 1366). There are two different types of
Asch, Solomon E. "Studies of Independence and Conformity: I. A Minority of One against a Unanimous Majority." Psychological Monographs: General and Applied 70.9 (1956): 1. Print.
The definition of conformity is the compliance with social standards and laws in a particular culture, environment, society and time. If this occurs the individual changes their attitudes, beliefs or actions to align more holistically with those in the surrounding groups and environment, as a result of real or perceived group pressure. This is ultimately a direct result of the power which a group has over the individual. There are two types of conformity, normative conformity, and informational conformity. The motivation behind normative conformity is the desire to be liked and accepted in society. This is most widely known as peer pressure. For example, a student begins smoking because their peers
Solomon Asch developed and ran an experiment regarding the power of conformity that affects most populations. Psychologists have been attempting to fully understand the mental workings behind why people are so easily pressured into following others for the longest time. The main focus of psychologists, is to figure and understand what the causes are behind social conformity. Numerous terms are brought up when studying conformity. The “unspoken rules or guidelines for behavior in a group” (Hock 293) are labeled as social norms. When individuals are placed in large groups, the tendency is to lean with whatever the majority of the group thinks. The regular behavior of the individual tends to readjust to appease the superior crowd.
Although Asch conducted many variations on his test of conformity, and he has been criticized as being too simplistic to accurately represent true conformist behaviour his experiment has stood the test of time and examination
Asch (1951) did an experiment to test people's conformity skills with a simple task. The task was to compare a line with three others, one of which was the same size as the comparable line. This task was chosen because of its simplicity and anyone being tested (privately) was likely to give the correct answer. But when tested in a group of 3 or more, conformity of the person being tested rose to match the answers of the other peoples when the group had to give their judgment verbally. Asch set up the experiment so that he had at least one confederate and a participant, with the participant to sit on the second to last of the row so they gave their answer penultimate. When the group had to verbally give their answer, the research participant was more likely to conform with the majority even though the confederates were told to deliberately give the wrong answer. This conformity was noticeable when there were 3 or more confederates. There were 75% of the research participants that went along with the majority at least once. When the research participant was interv...
Solomon Asch’s experiment in “Opinions and Social Pressure” studied a subject’s ability to yield to social pressure when placed within a group of strangers. His research helped illustrate how groups encourage conformity. During a typical experiment, members of the group were asked by the experimenter to claim two obvious mismatched lines were identical. The single individual who was not privy to this information was the focal point of the experiment. Twelve out of eighteen times the unsuspecting individual went along with the majority, dispelling his beliefs in favor of the opinions of the group.
Elliot Aronson (2012) provides a definition of conformity, two social psychological processes that underlie a conformity and cited examples of reasons why people conform in the book, The Social Animal. Aronson (2012) defines a conformity as “a change in a person’s behavior or opinion as a result of real or imagined pressure from a person or group of people” (p.19). In accordance with Aronson’s (2012) definition of conformity, people do conform owing to the social influence, which are two main social psychological processes: belonging and getting information.
One psychological process underlying majority influence is through direct public compliance. The dual-process dependency model which was postulated by Deutsch and Gerard, (1955 in Hogg and Vaughan 2007) proposes two important motives for conformity: normative social influence and informational social influence. Normative social influence refers to the need to be accepted and approved by society. This involves individuals to modify their behaviours and to adopt new/current ones that are associated with the particular social group so that they are not rejected (in Hogg & Vaughan 2007). An example of this situation can be reflected in Asch’s (1956 in Baron et al. 2008) study of conformity in which participants conformed to the majority group but at the same time maintained their own private opinions and disagreed. This process is known as compliance (in Bailey, J.et al. 2008).
Asch’s Conformity Procedure was where participants were presented with a set of lines. In one case a single line and the other a trio of lines. The participant’s task was simply to find which line in the trio of lines matches the single line in length. When looking at the lines, there is only one line of the trio lines that obviously matches the single line. What Asch did was put participants in groups of collaborators, the actors, to turn in a specific answer. He did this so that the collaborators would give their answers first and then the participant who thinks he’s just one of the participants like the rest gives their answer. What concluded through this experimented was that if you have collaborators systematically giving the wrong answer, then majority of the people will give the wrong answer. (Meyers 158) The peer pressures created by a large group are such that the individual comes to decision radically different from the decision ...
As stated above, conformity changes an individual 's belief and behaviour to match the groups, and while obedience often requires punishment and reward other studies suggest that "an individual...confronted with an authority recognized as legitimate, will behave in the direction of the expectations of this authority" (Pascual et al., 2013) without long-term effect on behaviour or beliefs. Sherif (as cited by Myers, 2014) found in his studies on norm formation that the group norm lasted even a year after the initial experiments, while Milgram (as cited by Myers, 2014) found physical proximity of the authority figure was a predictor of obedience in that obedience went down the further the authority figure physically was. Though conformity and obedience are not completely different, conformity obedience can be interchangeable when the hierarchy is seen as a group with which individuals can identify. Reicher, Haslam and Smith (2012) argue that Milgram 's (1965, 1974) famous obedience experiment isn 't simply blind obedience but individuals identifying with the figure of authority and conforming to expected norms. In some cases when individuals felt the authority figure 's beliefs were dissimilar to their own they immediately withdrew from
Conformity is defined as the compliance with social standards and laws in a particular culture, environment, society and time. If this occurs the individual changes their attitudes, beliefs or actions to align more holistically with those in the surrounding groups and environment, as a result of real or perceived group pressure. This is ultimately a direct result of the power which a group has over the individual. There are two types of conformity, normative conformity, and informational conformity. Normative conformity is motivated by the desire to be liked and accepted in society. This is most widely known as peer pressure. For example, a student begins smoking because their peers are smoking,
Psychology, which includes how people think and feel, is described as the scientific study of behavior and mental process. Social psychology also studies behavior and mental process but incorporates how society influences our thoughts, feelings and behaviors. According to Song’s article, “The Psychological Explanation of Conformity”, conformity, which is a form of social influence, is the change of actions or attitudes caused by the pressure from some real or notional groups. In other words, changing one’s behavior to more closely match the
Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). SOCIAL INFLUENCE: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591-621. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/205845016?accountid=458