Conflict In The Most Dangerous Game, By Richard Connell

493 Words1 Page

Richard Connell spent his whole career as a journalist, but that is not what he is most famous for. His roots in journalism helped him to create his most famous story, “The Most Dangerous Game," which is full of adventure and conflict. Conflict is a problem or struggle between two opposing forces. In "The Most Dangerous Game,” conflict takes place in many different forms including versus: person, himself, society, and environment.
Rainsford versus Zaroff is the most obvious conflict in the story. Zaroff is trying to hunt Rainsford, acting as if Rainsford is an animal. Zaroff is just hunting people for the fun of it, but Rainsford chooses to hunt to escape and to try to survive. Rainsford cried out to Zaroff, “Hunting? Good God, General Zaroff, what you speak of is murder”(Connell 15). Rainsford does not agree with General Zaroff’s game. If Rainsford chooses not to play the game, he is left for Ivan. When Rainsford is left with these two undesirable choices, Rainsford chooses to try his luck in surviving against the General. Rainsford chooses to fight back by creating an intricate trail for Zaroff to follow, by making a Malay man-catcher …show more content…

Throughout the game, Rainsford is against himself trying to keep his nerve. Rainsford says to himself, “I will not lose my nerve. I will not”(Connell, 20). Rainsford is trying to think like an animal, but also keep his sanity and act humane. Another internal conflict amongst Rainsford is choosing the best ways to get away from Zaroff. He comes across many obstacles creating much internal conflict. Conflict occurs between General Zaroff and society. Zaroff claims he is civilized saying, “I have electricity. We try to be civilized here” (Connell 16). Zaroff goes on to say that he also gives his victims “plenty of good food and exercise”(Connell 16). The General thinks because he has given his quarry food and a jungle to navigate through makes his game

Open Document