The Most Dangerous Game Vs. The Hunger Games

583 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Analysis the most dangerous game

When Rainsford falls off of the boat, he has to try his best to stay afloat until he can find something to latch on to. He swims vigorously until he reaches Ship-Trap Island. "Jagged crags appeared to jut up into the opaqueness... dense jungle came down to the very edge of the cliffs." It is midday and he is just searching for a place to rest when he runs into Ivan, the astonishingly large guard of the island. Zaroff, the owner of the island, joins in on their conversation about hunting. The conversation is interesting to say the least. Zaroff says, "You'll find this game worth playing…your brain against mine. Your woodcraft against mine. Your strength and stamina against mine. Outdoor chess! And the stake is not without value, eh?" Zaroff is trying to point out that he finds interest in hunting humans, and he wants to know if Rainsford will rise to the challenge. Rainsford is left with a choice to make; will he fight Zaroff, or will he decline and get killed by Ivan. The choice in this situation is pretty self- evident. Every year in Panem, there is two tributes, a boy and a girl,...

Show More
Related

  • Comparing Odysseus Journey Illustrated In Homer's The Most Dangerous Game

    498 Words  | 1 Pages

    After falling off his ship and forced to swim to a mysterious island, Rainsford is faced with a challenge. General Zaroff traps him in a “game” that requires Rainsford to use his skills to survive. He is hunted for three days; where he was chased, tracked down, and shot at. General Zaroff led the hunt to try to kill Rainsford. General was equipped with more firepower and help from his henchman and dogs. But even with his much greater opponent, he was able to survive. Rainsford used his many skills to defeat and kill his enemy. He used quick wit to make traps that would slow Zaroff and kill his dogs and henchman. Then he used his intelligence to escape Zaroff by swimming away, but sneaking back into his own mansion.

    Read More

  • Are Characters from The Most Dangerous Game Civilized?

    683 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...ue that this is not something a civilized person would do under normal circumstances, Rainsford did not have a choice. He killed Ivan, Zaroff, and the dog all in self-defense. Zaroff told Rainsford that he could leave the island if he survived the hunt, but this was a lie. If Rainsford was allowed to go, he would tell someone what Zaroff was doing.

    Read More

  • Thesis Statement For The Most Dangerous Game

    741 Words  | 2 Pages

    Rainsford was forced to choose between life and death by Zaroff. Zaroff tells Rainsford that he hunts people as a type of wild game and takes them hunting first then gives them a few survival things and have to survive for three days in order to win.

    Read More

  • Hunger Game Vs The Hunger Games

    852 Words  | 2 Pages

    Which is better, the ‘Classic’ or the ‘Modern’ novel? After reading the classic novel, ‘Lord of the flies’ and the Modern novel, The Hunger Games, it is clear that the classic novel won the battle between old and new. Lord of the Flies, written by William Goulding is a novel about a young group of school boys who’s plane was shot down over a deserted island and they must try to survive. The boys are free from the rules of society and the instinct to work toward civilisation and order slowly defends into savagery, violence and chaos. The Novel, The Hunger Games by Susanne Collins is an action packed story of Katniss Everdeen who is forced to take police in the violent Hunger Games. Katniss must endure many deadly situations, learn to control how she is perceived and manage complex relationships in order to survive in the games. The major theme of innocence and the main characters of these novels where compared in order to justify which novel was better.

    Read More

  • Hunger Games vs Red Scare

    1280 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the book The Hunger Games, Suzanne Collins displays a variety of topics that most readers neglect to consider. One of key aspects she displays is the restriction against individuality. This is a similar theme that dominated the 1920s in America during the Red Scare. During this era many Americans were fearful of expressing views that were not in sync with the government’s perspective; likewise the capitol creates methods that inhibit the citizens ability to voice any opposing views. Most of the time, when controversial opinions were spoken, the punishments put in place were not worthy of the crime, such as the Sacco Vanzetti case in the 1921 and the imprisoning of the Avox girl. In order to keep this power as many people were imprisoned as possible during the Palmer efforts, similarly the reaping is held every year to show the citizens of Panem that they have no power whatsoever. Consequently, when a government provides strict standards, it hinders a person’s ability to be an individual.

    Read More

  • Comparing The Hunger Games 'And Animal Farm'

    700 Words  | 2 Pages

    The hunger games and Animal farm sharing a lot of the same qualities including betrayal, propaganda and dictatorship, make the two similar and comparable. Both films/books show how abuse of power can change the whole configuration of a community. The distinction between the higher and lower class is also underlined.

    Read More

  • Zaroff Character Analysis

    813 Words  | 2 Pages

    "As you wish, my friend," he said. "The choice rests entirely with you. But may I not venture to suggest that you will find my idea of sport more diverting than Ivan's?" ”(13)”. Zaroff made it seem to Rainsford like they were going hunting together as in both being the hunters, but when Rainsford refuse Zaroff made it clear that he had no choice and was going to to be the huntee. This reveals that Zaroff has a cruel personality because he created a human killing game to keep him busy and gives the person no choice to live.When Zaroff decided to add Rainsford to his game he thought of the excitement it would be to play against a well known hunter who has experience and knowledge like Zaroff does. He took Rainsford skill as a challenge and didn't want the chance to slip away. "You'll find this game worth playing," the general said enthusiastically." Your brain against mine. Your woodcraft against mine. Your strength and stamina against mine. Outdoor chess!” “(13)”. By adding Rainsford to his game Zaroff is not thinking about Rainsford’s opinion but of the challenge he will be for his skills and the curiosity of seeing Rainsford fight for his life. This quote from the text show that Zaroff is not only cruel but also smart because he see the challenge as to equal minds against each other and he tricked Rainsford intro staying at his house in the first place. The reader discovered that Zaroff is not the person

    Read More

  • The Most Dangerous Game And 'Hunters In The Snow'

    983 Words  | 2 Pages

    Rainsford faces conflicting situations both externally and internally. He is challenged by General Zaroff to a manhunt game under certain terms: If Rainsford wins, he is granted the wish to leave but if General Zaroff finds him during the three-day period, he perishes. Additionally, the Ship Trap Island’s menacing quicksand, swamp, and dense jungle presents as other natural obstacles for Rainsford. At the height of the manhunt, Rainsford assures himself that he must retain his equilibrium, “I will not lose my nerve. I will not”. His mental struggle is triggered when General Zaroff was coming through a bush and smiles, acknowledging his quarry’s presence under the leaves. Commercial fiction includes many bits of suspense in a story. For example, Connell initiates

    Read More

  • Most Dangerous Game Comparison

    481 Words  | 1 Pages

    The leaves crunch under your feet. Wind is blowing through the trees and through your hair.Your heart leaps every time you hear or see something move. You are hunting. This is something both Rainsford, from “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, and Travis, from “A Sound of Thunder” by Ray Bradbury, love to do. In “The Most Dangerous Game,” Rainsford gets stranded on an unkempt island and has to, as a game, try to outsmart the man who owns the island without getting killed. In “A Sound of Thunder,” Travis goes back in time with a group of people to kill a t-rex. Travis and Rainsford are both similar because hunting is a big part in both of their day-to-day lives, and it’s something they both love a lot. As I said earlier, Rainsford and

    Read More

  • High Noon And The Most Dangerous Game Comparison

    560 Words  | 2 Pages

    When I hear the word hunting I think of a man in the woods shooting animal, but I've never thought of a man hunting a man. In the story "The Most Dangerous Game", Rainsford is washed up on a mysterious island. He sees nothing but a dark house, so he goes up to the door and immediately is welcomed in by a man named Zaroff. They're having a good dinner until Zaroff explains that he's a hunter. He is not like most hunters though. He hunts humans. As soon as Rainsford realizes this, he wants to get out the island, but it won't be that easy. Zaroff makes Rainsford hide in the woods, if he can make it three days without being hunted he can leave. In the movie we watched, called "high Noon", a murder named Frank Miller is coming to town to get revenge. Frank Miller is back to kill the main character Will Kane. In both stories the men are alone and must fight for their life.

    Read More

  • The Most Dangerous Game Essay

    880 Words  | 2 Pages

    Moreover, with just khaki hunting clothes, a sack of food and a knife he must escape and recover his freedom. This can be seen when Connell states, “An apprehensive night crawled slowly by like a wounded snake and sleep did not visit Rainsford, although the silence of a dead world was on the jungle…Something was coming thought the bush, coming slowly, carefully, coming by the same winding way Rainsford had come. He flattened himself down on a limb and, through a screen of leaves almost thick as tapestry, he watched… that which was approaching was a man.” (pg. 12) This demonstrates that on the first night, Sanger Rainsford had to think quickly to survive despite not being rested and shows society that one must always be ready for anything, regardless of any obstacles that are in the way. In addition, General Zaroff becomes injured and leaves to recover and Sanger Rainsford must run and hide again. This can be seen when Connell states, “When the general, nursing his bruised shoulder, had gone, Rainsford took up his flight again. It was flight now, desperate, hopeless flight, that carried him on for hours…the vegetation grew ranker, denser; insects bit him savagely.” (pg. 13) This demonstrates how the competition is unfair because General Zaroff goes back to his home to recover whereas Sanger Rainsford is still struggling and the wanting to escape is only

    Read More

  • Comparative Essay: The Hunger Games

    194 Words  | 1 Pages

    In both books they share some traits, even though they may not look anything alike they are. both of these novels are dystopian novels and many characters share similarity’s.

    Read More

  • Sanger Rainsford: The Realist

    522 Words  | 2 Pages

    Rainsford is an intelligent man. Early in the story, “Rainsford remembered the shots. They had come from the right, and he doggedly swam in that direction” (34). Rainsford had just fallen in the water, swam fifty feet further out, but he kept his senses in the right direction. In total darkness, Rainsford used his intelligence and intellect to reach the land. Also, I don’t think that Rainsford knew he was being sized up when Zaroff was staring at him, but when “Rainsford’s bewilderment showed in his face” (100), he quickly understood what Zaroff was leading too. Rainsford wasn’t a murderer. Sure he liked to hunt game, but he wasn’t bored as Zaroff was. Rainsford never bought into all the old tales. ‘“One superstitious sailor can taint the whole ship’s company with fear”’ (20). He never got worked up or stressed out.

    Read More

  • The Most Dangerous Game: Comparison Of Book And Movie

    1806 Words  | 4 Pages

    “I hunt more dangerous game….” Similarities and differences can appear anywhere, especially in the short story and the movie called The Most Dangerous Game. They have similar, yet different expositions, characters, and plots with conflicts. Many people say that books or short stories are better than movies because of the similarities and differences that are found. Books or short stories are usually more descriptive, informative, and do not stray too far from the central idea or main theme, while movies only fall into one or two of these categories. Movies hardly ever fall into all three categories, however if they do the movies become better. This is not the case with The Most Dangerous Game. One place where movies and short stories have major similarities and differences is at the beginning of the story or the exposition.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Human Nature In The Book And Then There Were None

    1129 Words  | 3 Pages

    If Zaroff found him he would die and if he won he would be set free alive, but Rainsford didn’t trust him on that because he was a hunter of men. He knew no sailor had survived the game so far, so that showed the General was a murderer inside. “To date I have not lost. One almost did win. I eventually had to use the dogs.”

    Read More

More about The Most Dangerous Game Vs. The Hunger Games

Open Document