Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Consequences of natural disasters essay
Consequences of natural disasters essay
Disaster recovery management summary
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Consequences of natural disasters essay
CHAPTER 6: CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION 6.1 Conclusion Recovery is normally the last stage in the Disaster Management Cycle where persons are able to return their lives to normal after a major disaster. ODPEM operates at different levels when addressing disaster management in the country as the state resources are used to rehabilitate affected areas and bring the country and the citizen’s lives back to normal as soon as possible. When a recovery process takes place on a national level it’s normally transfer on a local level where communities are able to benefit and the relevant agencies assist to improve the recovery process. The researchers had sought to accomplish the aim of the study which is to assess the strategies and approaches employed by ODPEM in the recovery effort in the aftermath of hurricane Dean in 2007. The research gave an overview of the ODPEM and the role it played in responding to the devastating phenomena that severely impacted the livelihood of the residents causing injuries and property lost. Although the disaster had occurred a few years ago, problems due to its impact along with other crippling issues still affects the residents. Throughout the study there were evidences that persons that were living on the flood prone areas were relocated to higher grounds which bring across the development of Top Hill scheme by the Food for the Poor which result in most residents affected by the lack of tap water in their homes. As a result in the frequent distribution of water trucks in the community which show that even though persons are relocated they are still experiencing difficulties. To accomplish our aim as well as to portray a better understanding of the aim of this study to the reader, t... ... middle of paper ... ...lan (1997) especially as it relates to the appointment of a recovery coordinator to oversee the restoration of the country after response has been completed. The National Disaster Action Plan is intended to provide a legal framework upon which disaster preparedness operations are based. It includes detailed administrative and operational information to provide guidance and ensure accountability among government officers. It is not meant to address specific recovery needs, which is what is needed to directly tackle the challenges that come up in the event of a disaster. The development of a comprehensive cross- sectional and integrated recovery plan for affected areas with the emphasis on gender sensitivity, restoration of livelihoods, and climate change adaptation. The Plan must be updated to designed and build the resilience of the affected areas to future events.
The National response plan outlines four key actions the disaster coordinator should take. They are gaining and maintaining situational awareness, activate and deploy key resources and capabilities, coordinating response actions and demobilizing. Throughout the response it is essential that responders have access to critical information. During the initial response effort the situation is will change rapidly. Situational awareness starts at the incident site. For this reason it is essential that decision makers have access to the right information at the right time. By establishing an Emergency Operations Center (EOC) all key responders are brought ...
Governments, the private sector, Non Governmental Organizations and Community Organizations play vital roles in recovery. The essence of a recovery effort is the resources captures to assist, the capability of assistance and other best practices for recovering from a disaster. Rubin and Popkin, (1990) in their report entitled Disaster Recovery after hurricane Hugo in South Carolina thoroughly outline many challenges to which organization and other bodies had face in Hurricane Hugo’s recovery effort. These inefficiencies cause a spiral of increase lost of life, property and livelihood for hundreds of people to which the hurricane affected.
Regina:The Early Years. (2014). Cyclone of 1912. Regina: The Early Years 1880 -1950. Retrieved March 7, 2014, from http://scaa.usask.ca/gallery/regina/central/cyclone.html
Both man-made and natural disasters are often devastating, resource draining and disruptive. Having a basic plan ready for these types of disaster events is key to the success of executing and implementing, as well as assessing the aftermath. There are many different ways to create an emergency operations plan (EOP) to encompass a natural and/or man-made disaster, including following the six stage planning process, collection of information, and identification of threats and hazards. The most important aspect of the US emergency management system in preparing for, mitigating, and responding to man-made and natural disasters is the creation, implementation and assessment of a community’s EOP.
The goal of 2011 of the National Preparedness Goal, and a month later by the National Preparedness System (NPS). ‘Prepare’, or ‘preparedness’ is a key term here, as is ‘risk’. In order to properly examine the National Preparedness System these terms… (2011 National Preparedness Goal). The National Preparedness Goal can only work in risk management planning with prudency coupled with dispensation of resources at the local levels. Depending on the budgetary issues the financial appropriation might not be enough to sustain a carefully planned risk management. The forefront for the local authorities to mitigate against risk is funding. Of the pro at the community level are the loyalties of its employees of the local government and local community, and on hand resources that amplifies its footprint with the community in making sure that there is an uninterrupted continuation of life. The local government can device a well thought out plan to activate most of its resources when the alarms are sounded of a pending
After a disaster hits, it takes a long time for the local and state government to regain its basic functions and to draft redevelopment plans (Olshansky et al., 2008). With malfunctioning government, it is hard to start the recovery process promptly and citizens who are in need of immense amount of economic and social support suffer from lack of resources and public services.
Imagine trying to rebuild after a natural disaster with no charity’s or government to help. Red Cross and government play an essential role in reacting and rebuilding after a natural disaster. The government has given 100,000 family food packs to quake zones (Doc. C). Red cross has provided the affected individuals with blankets, water containers, personal hygiene items, mosquito nets, and tarpaulins (Doc. A). Red Cross is helping rebuild the victim’s homes (Doc. A). Red Cross is giving household supplies and rebuilding homes while the government is giving food. With the total amount of funding from charities and government, they can help people’s basic needs. Charities and governments working together will get these cities running well again.
The book, There is No Such Thing as a Natural Disaster, edited by Chester Hartman and Gregory D. Squires, is a compilation of essays that discuss various elements of the Hurricane Katrina disaster that relate to class and race. While each essay focuses on a different topic within the scope of the disaster, they all embody a singular set of ethics that encompass a belief in equality among all citizens regardless of race and class. The majority of the authors assign the persistent and systemic income and racial inequality as the root cause of the suffering dealt to the citizens of the Gulf coast region in the wake of the hurricane. They further charge the local, state and federal governments with a range of culpability ranging from mere inefficiency
Howitt, A. M., & Leonard, H. B. (2006). Katrina and the core challenges of disaster response. The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs, 30:1 winter 2006.
In the aftermath of the devastation, preparation and response recommendations have been developed and incorporated into procedures aid in the hope that they will prevent
Disaster Recovery Planning is the critical factor that can prevent headaches or nightmares experienced by an organization in times of disaster. Having a disaster recovery plan marks the difference between organizations that can successfully manage crises with minimal cost, effort and with maximum speed, and those organizations that cannot. By having back-up plans, not only for equipment and network recovery, but also detailed disaster recovery plans that precisely outline what steps each person involved in recovery efforts should undertake, an organization can improve their recovery time and minimize the disrupted time for their normal business functions. Thus it is essential that disaster recovery plans are carefully laid out and carefully updated regularly. Part of the plan should include a system where regular training occurs for network engineers and managers. In the disaster recovery process extra attention should also be paid to training any new employees who will have a critical role in this function. Also, the plan should require having the appropriate people actually practice what they would do to help recover business function should a disaster occur. Some organizations find it helpful to do this on a quarterly or semi-annual basis so that the plan stays current with the organization’s needs.
Most health care providers currently utilize electronic health records (EHRs), or will in the coming future. Network collapses, glitches, power outages and flaws within the system all have the possibility of occurring. Due to the plethora of sensitive information contained within the health care field, health care providers need to form backup plans. These backup plans will serve as preventative measures in order to keep the integrity of the health care data intact. Therefore, contingency plans are a clear necessity within the field.
Over the years the volatile community has been plague with natural disaster, with the intrusion of large surges invading their community and disrupting their social, physical, economical livelihood. Due to the active hurricane season Jamaica has, the constant recovery of Portland Cottage has cause economic strain on a continuous basis. The need to evaluate the settlement pattern and means of relocation is necessary to protect the vulnerable, prevent loss of life and property as well as to provide a sustainable livelihood that not susceptible to phenomena causing multiple effects relating to disaster. ODPEM plays a crucial role in creating a resilient community through the strategies and approaches it employ.
Natural Disasters can occur anywhere at anytime. Some are more predictable than others, but they all bring hardship to everyone’s life. Examples of natural disasters are Earthquakes (Haiti 2010), Tornadoes, Tsunami, Hurricanes, Wild Fires, Winter Storms, Heat waves, Mudslides and Floods. Regardless of what kind of disaster occurs, bottom line, everyone needs to be prepared mentally and physically to deal with the aftermath. Education is the first step to prepare you to deal with any major disaster. Three of the major disasters that can potentially disrupt normal day to day operations in our lives, are Hurricanes, Tsunamis and Tornadoes.
The increase in unpredictable natural disasters events for a decade has led to put the disaster preparedness as a central issue in disaster management. Disaster preparedness reduces the risk of loss lives and injuries and increases a capacity for coping when hazard occurs. Considering the value of the preparatory behavior, governments, local, national and international institutions and non-government organizations made some efforts in promoting disaster preparedness. However, although a number of resources have been expended in an effort to promote behavioural preparedness, a common finding in research on natural disaster is that people fail to take preparation for such disaster events (Paton, 2005; Shaw 2004; Spittal, et.al, 2005; Tierney, 1993; Kenny, 2009; Kapucu, 2008; Coppola and Maloney, 2009). For example, the fact that nearly 91% of Americans live in a moderate to high risk of natural disasters, only 16% take a preparation for natural disaster (Ripley, 2006).