Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Masculinity film
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Dirty Harry(1971) is the movie my arguments are based around along with these Westerns that portray white male power, traditional values, and vigilantism such as McLintock! (1963) and A Fistful of Dollars (1964). Clint Eastwood the star in Dirty Harry and A Fistful of Dollars shows the white, masculine male as the strength and the man who brings justice, law, and order to the city where a lot of change has taken place recently with the hippie counter culture movement.. John Wayne the star of McLintock! brings the same values to the table as Clint Eastwood and shows the values of a Western through his McLintock character.. Both of their careers have been made through portraying characters that are conservative and this does not change with Clint …show more content…
Eastwood even when his character is portrayed in San Francisco. The Civil Rights Movement and the hippie counter culture movement in the 60’s had caused a lot of strife between differing ideologies as the 70’s approached. Just like always through time, cities were a hot bed for progressive values in the 60’s while the rural areas held conservative values and traditions. The anti-war sentiment that came with the hippie movement were largely based in cities and mainly the east and west coasts, while the rural areas were largely against such things as the hippies. There was a conflict between ideologies and values people held and thus the counter culture movement was spawned. The Western movie with its conservative minded main characters were soon going to be introduced into the city to clean it up where progressives would fail in the movies. Dirty Harry is the movie that would present a progressive minded mayor that would fail to bring law and order to Scorpio, a serial killer, and Harry was there to pick up the pieces and carry out his vigilante justice. Characters in Western’s are largely if not only very conservative minded. In Dirty Harry Clint Eastwood is the character that is bringing back law, justice, and order to the progressive minded city. San Francisco is a very liberal minded city and was back in the 1960’s and 1970’s as well. Harry Callahan is there to establish the order and law the progressive minded mayor will not establish. The mayor is willing to pay off Scorpio to prevent more bloodshed while Harry becomes the vigilante to kill Scorpio where the mayor has failed. Harry knows Scorpio deserves to have justice served to him through Harry’s .44 Magnum. Dirty Harry is a movie which is born from a changing social climate that spawned out of the 1960’s and the movie shows a battle between conservative and progressive minded values.
Harry Callahan sees the government as being inept and he must become a vigilante to deliver the justice he knows needs to be served. Clint Eastwood’s character from A Fistful of Dollars, a spaghetti western, also played a vigilante role after he witnessed the killing of a family who was supposedly protecting him. This character who has no name then takes the role of the vigilante. This persona that is portrayed in A Fistful of Dollars is almost copied and pasted to Dirty Harry. Harry Callahan of course is changed a bit along with the different setting of San Francisco. Dirty Harry is a response to the civil rights movement and counter culture hippie movement, that the white male was still in power and would restore law and order. It shows the white male masculinity being introduced from the Western genre into the city scene and how it brings law, justice, and order. The conservative values and vigilante justice traditionally found in the Western are introduced into more progressive minded areas such as the cities to combat or show an opposing view to the differing philosophies that have been riled up by the 1960’s
movements. To understand Clint Eastwood’s character, Dirty Harry, it is important to keep in mind what the Western character as a whole is. The Western character is someone who lives without the aid of the government. John Wayne in his many different roles always presented traditional values in his Westerns. The most important value he portrays is the importance of a strong masculinity behind each of his characters. In an article by Carl Freedman, in an issue of Film International, he states, “John Wayne has proved to be as the supreme American representation of manly toughness, courage and competence.”(18) There is not a role that John Wayne ever took that did not have him represented with manly toughness. John Wayne’s character G.W. Mclintock in 1963’s McLintock! values how he sets up his cattle empire, and how he did this without the governments help. The Western character takes this route with him being self-reliant and does not see the government as a source of help. G.W. McLintock says, “I don’t give jobs, I hire men.” an obvious jab to how the character viewed the government and it’s role in society. How he looked at it is that the government gave jobs which were not earned. Mclintock also brings into the front light the obvious showing of dominance of male power. He publicly spanks his and chances his wife over town to bring her under control while the whole town follows and laughs. Obviously this is a movie made before feminism could protest against this movie. Clint Eastwood was also a character that portrayed male dominance. Conservative and traditional values that are attached to Westerns made it’s way into the Dirty Harry series. This quote from Deborah Allison’s editorial in Film International, “Courting The Critics/Assuring The Audiences: The Modulation Of Dirty Harry In A Changing Cultural Climate” shows how Dirty Harry is a character to combat the progressive views of the city, “ Indeed, a large proportion of commentators, from newspaper journalists to academic pundits, were brutal in their condemnation of the film’s perceived political message. Dirty Harry’s narrative centres on the dogged attempts of maverick cop Harry Callahan (Clint Eastwood) to bring a killer to justice, while hampered by a bureaucratic legal system that is represented as privileging the suspect’s rights over those of the victim. Many critics were especially uncomfortable with what they saw as an advocation of vigilante justice and an inflammatory attack on constitutionally enshrined civil rights.”(18) The vigilante of Harry Callahan picked up where the government failed to. Dirty Harry sees the mayor is timid about bringing justice to Scorpio over fears of a greater body count so he takes action. This is a central theme to the ungoverned and lawless Western. Now it is presented in the realm of the action movie with Dirty Harry who is there to restore law and order with his .44 magnum. Dirty Harry, “draws on the persona Eastwood crafted in his Westerns--- particularly Sergio Leone’s ‘Man with No Name’ trilogy of spaghetti Westerns.” (Lichtenfeld, 23) With this Clint Eastwood is similar enough to conclude he is here because the city is where the lawless is with all the movements that spawned out of the 1960’s. Eric Lichtenfeld continues in his book, Action Speaks Louder: Violence, Spectacle, and the American Action Movie, says “Urban warfare was about to receive the Western gunfighter, who, to bring the law to the lawless… Mythologically, the filmmakers align urban vigilantism with Western heroism and individuality.” As the quote from Eric Lichtenfeld states the Western character is transplanted into the urban vigilante role. Dirty Harry portryaed the same tough, masculine, gun slinging character from A Fistful of Dollars. Eric Lichtenfeld goes on and and later in his book states, “...it is still easy to see in his (Clint Eastwood) Inspector Harry Callahan traits of the western hero:solitude, his laconic speech, the suggestion that he is a man with a past, and the suggestion that he is a man of the past, that his methods cannot be condoned by a progressive civilization.”(23) The city at the time, specifically San Francisco well known for being a liberal minded city, had been sent a “man of the past” to restore order where it was lost from the counter culture movement. The city could not rely on the police for that. Once the mayor told the police to back off so they could give Scorpio his money to stop killing, Dirty Harry took action, and no one else. He had the Western mindset that he was going to deliver justice to Scorpio and that his reign of terror over San Francisco would come to an end through the use of his .44 Magnum. As with most Westerns and vigilante justice it is often difficult to tell if the vigilante is a good guy bringing justice or a killer who is there to murder. Clint Eastwood is quoted of saying in John Tibbets analysis, Clint Eastwood And The Machinery Of Violence, “Violence has been glamorized since literature began. People have always tried to make the west heroic. But it was not very heroic at all. Little Bill was a sheriff, but he really was just a killer who happened to have the law on his side.” In both Clint Eastwood movies, A Fistful of Dollars and Dirty Harry, we are left wondering is he overstepping the boundaries of what is lawful. In Dirty Harry he disregards the mayors order for him to stop going after the serial killer Scorpio. After he kills Scorpio did he overstep Scopio’s civil rights. Well yes he did, but is it justified since Scorpio had murdered the people he had. These questions are what you are left pondering after seeing both of these movies. These are the questions you are left with after seeing the vigilante movie and for most the killings are deemed to be justified. After Harry had brought San Francisco back to being orderly had the more traditional and conservative philosophy won? Well no, after Callahan shoots Scorpio, “Harry’s final gesture is to throw away his badge(into the lake), a show of disgust with the system that has hampered his efforts.”(Lichtenfeld, 25) He knows the mayor will have consequences for Harry and Harry is done trying to fight against more progressive ideologies in San Francisco that prevent him from doing what he believes is his job. Harry Callahan is a figure put into a changed San Francisco that has been largely affected by the counter culture movement along with the civil rights movement. Through his actions white, male power prevails and he kills Scorpio returning San Francisco to a law abiding state. The vigilante of Harry Callahan was a white male. The one least affected by the movements of the 1960’s. The women had their feminist movement and the African Americans had their civil rights movement.Harry Callahan is a character forced into a progressive city to watch Harry as a symbol of conservative and traditional values struggle working within the new system.
Howard Hawkes' 1948 Red River will serve as our example of the western model.The opening credits rise literally out of the landscape, and we're told in the opening narration that this is a story of the landscape, in that it recounts the first major cattle drive along the Chisholm trail from Texas to Abeline, Kansas.In the 1st scene we see a vastly open prairie with a small wagon train almost lost in its expanse.We discover immediately that Dunson (John Wayne) is leaving the wagon train to strike out on his own.The signature trait of Dunson is the first of the western hero's trademarks: once he's made up his mind, "nothing anyone says or does can change it"; despite the entreaties of the wagon master and his putative girlfriend, Dunson sets out south with only his friend, Tom Groot (played by Walter Brennan).
Many westerns contain some of the same elements. For instance, almost every western ever made involves a sheriff. He is usually the peace-keeper of a small town overrun by outlaws and cowboys, which he eventually chases out of town or kills. Another element of westerns is a gunslinger. A gunslinger is usually a young man who makes his living shooting other men in showdowns, a classic example is Billy the Kid. Railroads are also a recurring image in westerns. Since the railroad was the major mode of transportation in the old west, it is always present in westerns. Finally, westerns always have a villain. The villain, usually a man, dresses very slick and will stop at nothing in his quest for power. In addition, the villain usually has a gang to carry out his dastardly deeds. The gang is usually full of incompetent, but loyal thugs, who would love to destroy a small town just for the pleasure of wanton destruction. The elements of a western are very simple, but easily manipulated into a very interesting plot.
In “The Thematic Paradigm,” Robert Ray explains how there are two vastly different heroes: the outlaw hero and the official hero. The official hero has common values and traditional beliefs. The outlaw hero has a clear view of right and wrong but unlike the official hero, works above the law. Ray explains how the role of an outlaw hero has many traits. The morals of these heroes can be compared clearly. Films that contain official heroes and outlaw heroes are effective because they promise viewer’s strength, power, intelligence, and authority whether you are above the law or below it.
New Jack City, noted as ‘the crime film of the 90’s’,serves as an important episode for African-American people in America. Set in New York city, the film depicts the story of a success-driven antagonist Nino Brown (Wesley Snipes) who builds an empire powered by organized crime, drug trafficking, and Black delinquent young adults trapped in the cycle of crime. Ronald Reagan’s economic policy coupled with the popularity of crack-cocaine in the inner city creates inconsistencies and untapped markets in the poor community which Nino Brown brilliantly capitalizes on and exploits. His empire is able to successfully cut out the middle men in the drug trafficking market and centralize their operation in a single low-income housing complex inhabited
A Comparison of the Man with No Name in A Fistful of Dollars and William Munney's Unforgiven
Westerns have been around for many years. Some would consider westerns to be American classics because they describe early life in a mostly undiscovered America. In class two western films were watched and discussed. These two westerns were High Noon and Shane. On the surface, these movies are categorized as the same genre and look very similar but after further inspection it can be determined that the movies have a lot of differences. Of course, both movies share the same central theme of law versus social order, but the way each movie portrays this central theme is very different. This universal theme between the two movies can be investigated through, setting, violence, view of family, how women perceive guns/violence, and the choice of
Somewhere out in the Old West wind kicks up dust off a lone road through a lawless town, a road once dominated by men with gun belts attached at the hip, boots upon their feet and spurs that clanged as they traversed the dusty road. The gunslinger hero, a man with a violent past and present, a man who eventually would succumb to the progress of the frontier, he is the embodiment of the values of freedom and the land the he defends with his gun. Inseparable is the iconography of the West in the imagination of Americans, the figure of the gunslinger is part of this iconography, his law was through the gun and his boots with spurs signaled his arrival, commanding order by way of violent intentions. The Western also had other iconic figures that populated the Old West, the lawman, in contrast to the gunslinger, had a different weapon to yield, the law. In the frontier, his belief in law and order as well as knowledge and education, brought civility to the untamed frontier. The Western was and still is the “essential American film genre, the cornerstone of American identity.” (Holtz p. 111) There is a strong link between America’s past and the Western film genre, documenting and reflecting the nations changes through conflict in the construction of an expanding nation. Taking the genres classical conventions, such as the gunslinger, and interpret them into the ideology of America. Thus The Western’s classical gunslinger, the personification of America’s violent past to protect the freedoms of a nation, the Modernist takes the familiar convention and buries him to signify that societies attitude has change towards the use of diplomacy, by way of outmoding the gunslinger in favor of the lawman, taming the frontier with civility.
I believe that the film does indeed conform to a certain type of narrative structure expected by other films of this style. This film, through and through, is a Western, even starring one of biggest names in Hollywood Westerns, John Wayne. We’re thrown into a world of sturdy, rugged men riding around on horses, decked out in cowboy hats and belt buckles. Wayne portrays the archetypal man, honorable, reliable and
“When the legend becomes fact, print the legend,” this single quote by the newspaper editor Maxwell Scott (Carlton Young), utters throughout the whole film on what Ford is trying to get across. The whole film tells of a lively era that is so deep in the roots of American history, but we seem to lose sight of that in the here and now. The standard critical approach to Liberty Valance has been to emphasize the contrasts between its two worlds, the old and the new, and to characterize it as celebrating the mythic western frontier and remember its passing by the industrialized times it had to give in to. John Ford brought back that view in his westerns, and although it was the last film with the duo of Ford and Wayne, it can now be referred to as a classical tale of fact and legend.
The movie “Scarface” is the story of one these immigrants who came to the United States seeking money and power but ended up with much more than he ever excepted. Al Pacino plays the main
Slow as it may be I think that you see how overtime a lot of things have changed in our culture the way they changed in film, from the start of the film from the hatred and unwillingness to allow the changes of African American students in their schools and allowing for the first African American Head football coach in their town, the town begins to relax and accept the changes and move on. The second film shows again the racial divide and the fight for equality in America. The film Men of Honor is based on Master Chief Carl Brashear who fought to become a Navy diver something that was not allowed in the Navy during that time period which was the 1950’s to 1960’s. You seem from the start the parallels of the time by not allowing Carl to even attend the diving school and sabotaging him in every way. You again see the similarities of what the culture was like then in America, and this is honestly the best example as this was based off of a man who went through these struggles. I chose these films because although they both deal with the same issue of racism I feel they do the best job of capturing the true nature of what our culture was like at the
Western films are the major defining genre of the American film industry, a eulogy to the early days of the expansive American frontier. They are one of the oldest, most enduring and flexible genres and one of the most characteristically American genres in their mythic origins - they focus on the West - in North America. Western films have also been called the horse opera, the oater (quickly-made, short western films which became as common place as oats for horses), or the cowboy picture. The western film genre has portrayed much about America's past, glorifying the past-fading values and aspirations of the mythical by-gone age of the West. Over time, westerns have been re-defined, re-invented and expanded, dismissed, re-discovered, and spoofed. But, most western movies ideas derived from characteristics known to the Native Americans and Mexicans way before the American culture knew about it. What you probably know as a good old western American movie originated from a culture knows as vaqueros (cowboys for Spanish). They are many misrepresentations of cultures and races shown throughout movies from as early as 1920's with silent films. Although one could argue that silent film era was more politically correct then now a day films, the movie industry should not have the right of misrepresenting cultures of Mexicans, Indians and there life styles in films known as western films.
In the 1999 film The Green Mile directed by Frank Darabont, Michael Clarke Duncan is portrayed as John Coffey a giant simple minded black man in 1934 who is accused of raping and killing two white girls. This is a stereotype that has been used in films about black men for over four decades. Black males have always been thought of as savages who will rape of kill a white woman when they get a chance. This stereotype was more prevalent in the 1940’s and 1950’s when segregation was still the law.
Westerns are split down into sub genres for example classical westerns like "The Great Train Robbery" but there are also other western genres like revisionist westerns. Revisionist westerns occurred after the early 1960's, American film-makers began to change many traditional elements of Westerns. One major change was the increasingly positive representation of Native Americans who had been treated as "savages" in earlier films. Another example is Spaghetti westerns, Spaghetti westerns first came during the 1960's and 1970's, The changes were a new European, larger-than-life visual style, a harsher, more violent depiction of frontier life, choreographed gunfights and wide-screen close-ups.
Few Hollywood film makers have captured America’s Wild West history as depicted in the movies, Rio Bravo and El Dorado. Most Western movies had fairly simple but very similar plots, including personal conflicts, land rights, crimes and of course, failed romances that typically led to drinking more alcoholic beverages than could respectfully be consumed by any one person, as they attempted to drown their sorrows away. The 1958 Rio Bravo and 1967 El Dorado Western movies directed by Howard Hawks, and starring John Wayne have a similar theme and plot. They tell the story of a sheriff and three of his deputies, as they stand alone against adversity in the name of the law. Western movies like these two have forever left a memorable and lasting impressions in the memory of every viewer, with its gunfighters, action filled saloons and sardonic showdowns all in the name of masculinity, revenge and unlawful aggressive behavior. Featuring some of the most famous backdrops in the world ranging from the rustic Red Rock Mountains of Monument Valley in Utah, to the jagged snow capped Mountain tops of the Teton Range in Wyoming, gun-slinging cowboys out in search of mischief and most often at their own misfortune traveled far and wide, seeking one dangerous encounter after another, and unfortunately, ending in their own demise.