Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Depiction of women in movies
Feminism theory and movies
Feminism theory and movies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Westerns have been around for many years. Some would consider westerns to be American classics because they describe early life in a mostly undiscovered America. In class two western films were watched and discussed. These two westerns were High Noon and Shane. On the surface, these movies are categorized as the same genre and look very similar but after further inspection it can be determined that the movies have a lot of differences. Of course, both movies share the same central theme of law versus social order, but the way each movie portrays this central theme is very different. This universal theme between the two movies can be investigated through, setting, violence, view of family, how women perceive guns/violence, and the choice of …show more content…
leaving or staying. Overall, these differences stated above add to the western genre and create two totally different movies with a similar central theme. Perhaps the most noticable difference between the two movies is the fact that Shane is in technicolor, but High Noon is not.
High Noon was released only about a year before Shane and could have been produced in color as well. This choice to keep High Noon in black and white as opposed to color leads back to the two fundamental purposes of film: documentation versus dazzle. High Noon was left in black and white to portray a sense of reality, as if the movie were a true documentation of something that had occured. Shane, being entirely in color, is meant to dazzle the audience. The opening scene of Shane says it all with the beautiful blue sky and the gorgeous mountainous background all displayed in technicolor for the audience’s enjoyment. Besides the fact of color, the settings of boths movies are quite …show more content…
different. Although High Noon and Shane both have a similar rugged terrain as their setting, there are still a few differences between them. High Noon primarily takes place in a small town. In fact, in High Noon, there are hardly any scenes that take place out of the city. High Noon takes place in a once prosperous town with a hotel, saloon, train station, and marshals office. For the majority of High Noon the town is very peaceful and people can roam the streets without fear. However, characters in the movie allude to a time when it wasn’t safe for women and children to roam the town as they pleased.On the other hand, Shane takes place on a large plot of ranching land with not a town in many miles. The only “town” present in Shane consists of a saloon connected to a supply store. Most of the characters in Shane live in fear of Rufus Ryker and his men. The people in Shane tend to stay home and don’t venture out to the saloon/supply store because they do not want to be harassed by Ryker and his men . Another glaring difference between the two movies is the way the theme of violence is portrayed. Of course, both High Noon and Shane lead up to one main act of violence, but the way these movies work up to this final act of violence is different. In High Noon there is only one major fight scene in the entire movie. It should be noted that there is a small fight scene when Will Kane punches a man in the saloon but this violence ends almost as quick as it started. The main act of violence takes place in one of the last few scenes of the movie. The scene begins with Frank Miller and his men riding into town. This scene unfolds as Will Kane fights to the death with the help of his wife. Although Shane also ends with a huge battle, the movie is sprinkled with violence throughout. Some of the violence includes: Frank ‘Stonewall’ Torrey being shot by Jack Willson, Fred Lewis’s house being burnt down by Ryker’s men, and a saloon fight of Shane and Joe Starrett versus Rufus Ryker’s men . All of these violent actions lead up to one final scene where Shane rides into town to kill Jack Willson and Ryker’s other men. This last act of violence is of course the climax of the movie. The movie ends shortly after this scene with Shane riding away from little Joey Starrett. There is also a major difference in who performs all of these violent actions. In High Noon the central characters partake in the violent shootout at the end. In this final scene Will Kane and his wife, Amy Kane, kill Frank Miller and the other three men he rides to town with. In the movie Shane most of the violence is not done by a central character. In the movie Shane the violence is performed by Shane and Jack Willson. Shane fights on behalf of Joe Starrett and his family whereas Jack Willson fights on behalf of Rufus Ryker. Another major difference between the two movies is the role of family. In High Noon Will and Amy Kane are freshly married. Will defies his wife and fights against Frank Miller and his men. Kane fights for selfish reasons. Although Amy is opposed to armed conflict, she does end up saving Will at the end of the movie. In Shane, Joe Starrett is married and has one child. Even though Joe doesn’t actually do any gun fighting in the movie, he would have fought to protect his family. The family unit plays a more important role in the movie Shane as opposed to the movie High Noon. This can also be observed just by looking at the movie posters for both films. On the movie poster for High Noon it shows Will Kaine by himself on the side of the road. On the movie poster for Shane it shows most of the central characters and has the Starrett family standing together. This togetherness of the Starrett family shows unity and togetherness, something that appears to be missing from the High Noon movie poster. Both movies have female characters present in them.
These two main female characters, Amy Kane and Marian Starrett both have the same view on guns. In both movies the women dislike the idea of guns and gunfighting. Both Marian and Amy beg and plead their husbands not to get involved with gun fighting. Although they both have a similar view on guns, they have different reasons for not liking them. Amy Kane is a quaker and typically quakers are pacifists that do not particularly like fighting/violence. Amy Kane also had a bad experience with guns. She lets the audience know that she lost both her brother and father to guns. Marian shares a similar view and believes there should be no guns in the valley. Marian dislikes guns because she believe they put her family in
jeopardy. Finally, the question of whether to stay or to go arises. This question is pressing in most westerns. The two westerns discussed in class are no exception. Both central characters, Will and Joe felt the weight of this question pressing on them throughout the whole movie. In High Noon everyone tells Will to get out of town. The townspeople believe that if Will was to get out of town he would be much safer than if he stayed. Wills wife also begs him to leave town with her. Kane eventually gives in to others demands and actually leaves town. He returns almost immediately after leaving. In the movie Shane, Joe feels the same question pressing upon him. Most of the townspeople in the movie Shane get fed up with the trouble Ryker and his men are causing. The townspeople try to persuade Joe to leave with them. The townspeople of Shane feel as if they leave, all of their problems will be gone. In both movies the men decide to not run from their problems. Both Will and Joe decide to stay and fight. When looking at all of the similarities and differences between these two movies it becomes apparent that although both movies are the same genre and have a same central them they are very different movies. The central theme of law versus social order is apparent in both movies discussed in class. Exploring the topics of setting, violence, view of family, how women perceive guns/violence, and the choice of leaving or staying can lead the audience to clearly see that these movies are very dissimilar. The term ‘western’ is a blanket statement that groups many different movie together. Genre films filled with cliche and stereotypes must be delve into more intensely to really understand the similarities and differences.
For a long time she wanted to deny any existence of 'evils ' (a term she made for killers). When her husband died as an American sniper, she felt the need to own a gun. Her views on guns are mixed, but she is a firm believer in the second amendment (Kyle ¶1-3). "A mere 27 words in the Second Amendment of the Bill of Rights somehow manage to incite some of the most heated and occasionally violent debates over two centuries after its drafting ("Right" ¶1). Gun owners cherish their freedom to guns. It is a sense of protection that the government has allowed us to have. Gun control, in no way, takes away that freedom; it simply limits certain rights for everyone 's safety ("Urbanism"
In her younger ages, she used a gun for entertainment, she loved to hunt with her father. The author was educated and taught about guns, by her father because of the unsaddling event of her grandmother and mother on highway 66 when the three men that were trying to run them off the road for the large cash amount that was used for cashing payroll checks for the miners. As she got older her gun was there for protection and security. She was more assured with it that she would be able to protect herself.
In “The Thematic Paradigm,” University of Florida professor of film studies, Robert Ray, defines two types of heroes pervading American films, the outlaw hero and the official hero. Often the two types are merged in a reconciliatory pattern, he argues. In fact, this
In the article “The Thematic Paradigm” exerted from his book, A Certain Tendency of the Hollywood Cinema, Robert Ray provides a description of the two types of heroes depicted in American film: the outlaw hero and the official hero. Although the outlaw hero is more risky and lonely, he cherishes liberty and sovereignty. The official hero on the other hand, generally poses the role of an average ordinary person, claiming an image of a “civilized person.” While the outlaw hero creates an image of a rough-cut person likely to commit a crime, the official hero has a legend perception. In this essay, I will reflect on Ray’s work, along with demonstrating where I observe ideologies and themes.
Many westerns contain some of the same elements. For instance, almost every western ever made involves a sheriff. He is usually the peace-keeper of a small town overrun by outlaws and cowboys, which he eventually chases out of town or kills. Another element of westerns is a gunslinger. A gunslinger is usually a young man who makes his living shooting other men in showdowns, a classic example is Billy the Kid. Railroads are also a recurring image in westerns. Since the railroad was the major mode of transportation in the old west, it is always present in westerns. Finally, westerns always have a villain. The villain, usually a man, dresses very slick and will stop at nothing in his quest for power. In addition, the villain usually has a gang to carry out his dastardly deeds. The gang is usually full of incompetent, but loyal thugs, who would love to destroy a small town just for the pleasure of wanton destruction. The elements of a western are very simple, but easily manipulated into a very interesting plot.
The excerpt of “A Peaceful Woman Explains Why She Carries A Gun” is a personal account from Linda Hasselstrom on why she feels the need to carry a gun as well as, why other women should feel the need to own a gun. Hasselstrom uses rhetorical appeals in order to justify her means of security, however she fails due to her inability to provide a substantial amount of background knowledge.
In “The Thematic Paradigm,” Robert Ray explains how there are two vastly different heroes: the outlaw hero and the official hero. The official hero has common values and traditional beliefs. The outlaw hero has a clear view of right and wrong but unlike the official hero, works above the law. Ray explains how the role of an outlaw hero has many traits. The morals of these heroes can be compared clearly. Films that contain official heroes and outlaw heroes are effective because they promise viewer’s strength, power, intelligence, and authority whether you are above the law or below it.
There Will be Blood (2007) is an entertaining movie that delineates in various forms that will be discussed from other western genres. It is a story that is formed from a novel by Upton Sinclair’s book, Oil! (1927) (Belton, 2009, p.401). Many westerns were based on dime novels that were written in the mid and late 1800s (Belton, 2009, p.246). American society was going through a transitional period from an agrarian society to an industrial society in the 1800s and early 1900s (Wright 2001; Desk Encyclopedia, 1989, pp. 27-28, 630-631). The change in revolutions could explain the difference in most western genres and the movie There Will be Blood. In fact, one important different aspect is the contrasts between There Will be Blood and other westerns is that most westerns are based on novels that were written earlier than Upton Sinclair’s OIL!. The United States had become more industrial and had started to change their morals, interactions, rationality, autonomy, and self-interests. These differences will compared by showing how There Will be Blood uses an anti-hero, industrialism, deceit, greed, and what is to be considered a more eastern way of life.
To start, guns and violence have a strong impact on Manny’s life, which basically begins with his father. In one instance, Manny is babysitting his younger sister, Pedi. She proves hard to entertain once she realizes their sister, Magda, has mysteriously disappeared, and the rest of the family is elsewhere. While Pedi sleeps, Manny becomes curious as to why his father loves his gun so much, since he has lied to keep the illegal weapon and had gotten arrested for it. As Manny examines the rifle, Pedi wakes up and searches the house for her brother. When Manny sees her, the gun fires accidently, and Manny thinks, “Pedi was dead, I knew it. The way she fell back on the floor, she could only be dead...thinking I’d see a gory dash where the bullet hit her head” (Page 100). Suddenly, Pedi starts crying, and Manny places the gun where it originally has sat and soothes his startled sister. Later, Manny cannot get the incident out of his head and finds the bullet in the cooler. His curiosity about the gun probably comes from the fact that his father, who has a lea...
Beginning the mid 1920s, Hollywood’s ostensibly all-powerful film studios controlled the American film industry, creating a period of film history now recognized as “Classical Hollywood”. Distinguished by a practical, workmanlike, “invisible” method of filmmaking- whose purpose was to demand as little attention to the camera as possible, Classical Hollywood cinema supported undeviating storylines (with the occasional flashback being an exception), an observance of a the three act structure, frontality, and visibly identified goals for the “hero” to work toward and well-defined conflict/story resolution, most commonly illustrated with the employment of the “happy ending”. Studios understood precisely what an audience desired, and accommodated their wants and needs, resulting in films that were generally all the same, starring similar (sometimes the same) actors, crafted in a similar manner. It became the principal style throughout the western world against which all other styles were judged. While there have been some deviations and experiments with the format in the past 50 plus ye...
When the average modern American thinks of the Old West, they often think of cattle drives, outlaws and lawmen, and John Wayne; things they see in western movies. Another staple in western movies is the range war, it is important for modern Americans to know which parts of the west were true and which were false. The range wars of the late 1800’s were important to rights and responsibilities because they changed the way many people lived in the west and midwest, finally stating the concept of private and public property.
Over the years some of the reasons to own guns have changed. As Americans moved west fulfilling Manifest Destiny, making new towns along the way which were far away from any established law. These people made laws through the barrel of a gun. Of course crime still happened, but not nearly as often, when the townspeople simply hunted down and shot the criminal. Eventually, police forces arose in the Midwest, and fewer people carried guns with them on the street but they were still there, visible or not.
Westerns are split down into sub genres for example classical westerns like "The Great Train Robbery" but there are also other western genres like revisionist westerns. Revisionist westerns occurred after the early 1960's, American film-makers began to change many traditional elements of Westerns. One major change was the increasingly positive representation of Native Americans who had been treated as "savages" in earlier films. Another example is Spaghetti westerns, Spaghetti westerns first came during the 1960's and 1970's, The changes were a new European, larger-than-life visual style, a harsher, more violent depiction of frontier life, choreographed gunfights and wide-screen close-ups.
The story of the American West is still being told today even though most of historic events of the Wild West happened over more than a century ago. In movies, novels, television, and more ways stories of the old west are still being retold, reenacted, and replayed to relive the events of the once so wild and untamed land of the west that so many now fantasize about. After reading about the old west and watching early westerns it is amazing how much Hollywood still glorifies the history and myth of the old west. It may not be directly obvious to every one, but if you look closely there is always a hint of the Western mentality such as honor, justice, romance, drama, and violence. The most interesting thing about the Old West is the fact that history and myth have a very close relationship together in telling the story of the West.
Few Hollywood film makers have captured America’s Wild West history as depicted in the movies, Rio Bravo and El Dorado. Most Western movies had fairly simple but very similar plots, including personal conflicts, land rights, crimes and of course, failed romances that typically led to drinking more alcoholic beverages than could respectfully be consumed by any one person, as they attempted to drown their sorrows away. The 1958 Rio Bravo and 1967 El Dorado Western movies directed by Howard Hawks, and starring John Wayne have a similar theme and plot. They tell the story of a sheriff and three of his deputies, as they stand alone against adversity in the name of the law. Western movies like these two have forever left a memorable and lasting impressions in the memory of every viewer, with its gunfighters, action filled saloons and sardonic showdowns all in the name of masculinity, revenge and unlawful aggressive behavior. Featuring some of the most famous backdrops in the world ranging from the rustic Red Rock Mountains of Monument Valley in Utah, to the jagged snow capped Mountain tops of the Teton Range in Wyoming, gun-slinging cowboys out in search of mischief and most often at their own misfortune traveled far and wide, seeking one dangerous encounter after another, and unfortunately, ending in their own demise.