Comparing a Tabloid and a Broadsheet

1419 Words3 Pages

Comparing a Tabloid and a Broadsheet In this piece of coursework I will be looking at the differences and similarities in two particular subjects of the news. The two different articles are in both tabloids and broadsheets. One very noticeable comparison you can easily make between the broadsheet and the tabloid newspapers is which story they have given priority to, either the Catherine Zeta-Jones privacy trail which is no more then popular news, or the Iraq conflict which has affected people world wide and is very serious news. One of the stories, which is the one on the war in Iraq, has many more has many more articles in the paper than the story covering the Catherine Zeta Jones and Mickael Douglas court case against Hello! Magazine, who violated the couple's image rites at there wedding. I will be looking at the Times, which is a broadsheet, and the Daily Mail which is a tabloid. These two newspapers were brought out on the 12th of April 2003. These two articles are both very different from each other. To find out about each article I shall concentrate on the following points: * The priority each story is given * The amount of coverage for each * The use made of photos * The extent to which each is objective or biased * The language used * The predominant message implicit in each * The balance of fact and opinion * The purpose of the articles-to inform, entertain, appeal to emotions etc? The broadsheet has 4pages of reporting on the trial which is quite a large amount of space of a newspaper. The Jones and Douglas Trial against Hello! The priority of each story ========================== The first article that I shall be writing about concentrates on the couples trial. It is published in the Times and has the title of 'Court castigates tainted wedding scoop by Hello! Magazine.' It is placed in the centre pages of the broadsheet , which suggests that it

Open Document