Irony In Happy Ending By Margaret Atwood

984 Words2 Pages

In 1983, author Margaret Atwood published the short story Happy Ending. It is written in third person swapping from limited to omniscient, though ultimately being told directly toward the reader finishing off with second person and sentences talking directly to the reader mixed in along the way. The story consists of letters going from A to F, with every letter telling of some scenario that takes place involving the only five characters: John, Mary, Madge, James and Fred. Story A holds the typical boy meets girl, falls in love, marry and live happily ever after until death. With this familiar story, it is granted the title Happy Ending and becomes the symbol that the rest of the story will build off of. The following stories B through E all …show more content…

To show the level of basicness, the repeated phrase “stimulating and challenging” (95 Atwood) is used three times to describe the character’s John and Mary’s jobs, sex life and hobbies. A form of irony is used here with the repetition of the saying. Instead of going into much detail about what the hobbies are like, what exact jobs the couple had and how exactly they were challenging or just how exciting and stimulating their sex lives were, it is all left to the one saying. Its becomes irony since it is described as being stimulating and challenging, yet only reading the words is the complete opposite. No detail is purposefully put into these specific parts in life because it is unimportant to the overall picture. Everyone will have their own hobbies and jobs, but does it really define who that person is? This use if irony is to show how little of importance these parts of one’s life can be, and is why Story A gets left to be extremely short, followed by Story B which goes into greater detail and becomes the first example of an intruding …show more content…

Mary is still in deep love with John, conversely John only uses Mary for selfish pleasure. In here, Atwood breaks away from the telling of stories from third person to sentences of second. “He comes to her apartment twice a week and she cooks him dinner, you’ll notice that he doesn’t even consider her worth the price of a dinner out…” (96). This interruption is to revert back to the main idea of Atwood talking directly to the audience and informing them of how the character John treats and views Mary, which is complete turnaround from the previous Story A which went into no detail into either character’s thoughts or actions whatsoever. Another form of specific detail gets used through similes. When Mary is thinking about John, she describes her dedication to him as trying to break out the real John that only she sees in him. “This other John will emerge like a butterfly from a cocoon, a Jack from a box, a pit from a prune, if the first John is only squeeze enough” (96). The usage of like compares the situation she is currently facing with other implications in life such as butterflies emerging. This adds on to the level of depth that goes into this particular story B, which is not present in the previous story. This helps build the level of depth, and the reasons that people act in a particular way. These type of events define who

Open Document