Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparing code of ethics
Society and morals
Morality in society today
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Comparing code of ethics
In today’s society, there is little agreement about what is moral. Even the most egregious abuses of others illicit little condemnation because of our reluctance to espouse a universal morality. Instead, we view morality as an unintelligible tangle of competing sets of rights and wrongs. In contrast, both “Viva La Vida” and “A Season In Hell” offer opposing moralities and both are willing to prescribe their morality as superior to all others. “Viva La Vida” by Coldplay suggests the traditional Judeo-Christian western morality and “A Season in Hell” by Rimbaud espouses the Nihilistic moral subjectivism of believing there is no universal right and wrong.
On the one hand, Coldplay’s “Viva La Vida” suggests the traditional Judeo-Christian Western
Ring, Ring, Ring! People begin to celebrate the spirit of Christmas. I walk through town seeing everyone celebrating Christmas and having a good time with their family. Around these times you can tell how generous people become and people begin to change due to the holiday spirit. People don't always change due to the holiday spirits. In the stories of “Dante’s Inferno” and “A Christmas Carol” both show many similarities and differences through them. Some similarities consist both have guides, both have chapters that represent different places or times, and they both have consequences on their actions. Then the differences consist that they have different places they go through, the age differences, and Scrooge changes his lifestyle while Dante
However, due to its stark and chaos-ensued exploration of human nature, it’s been quite controversial with it’s central theme of putting yourself before the common good. Other themes include conflict between civilization, the human impulse to control others, and living by the rules peacefully and in harmony. The book has thus made it’s home at number eight on the American Library Association’s list of frequently banned classic...
The objection says that Singer’s analyses of moral duty conflicts with society’s current outlook on charity, which views it as not an obligation but a personal choice, where those who choose to give are praised for their philanthropy but those who choose not to give are not condemned (236). Singer retorts this objection by saying that we as a society need to essentially change our perspective of charity (236). What Singer means by this is that we need to drastically revise our ideas of what a moral duty is because, in agreement with Singer’s premise that we are morally obligated to help those who are suffering if it is within our power to do so without causing something equally as bad as the suffering to happen (231), charity should be considered as our moral responsibility and a mandatory duty for society
Le Guin’s The Lathe of Heaven castigate utilitarianism’s ostracizing of those who do not conform to society and encourage human centric beliefs in a pursuit of a “perfect world”. The utilitarian
It is a striking project; comprised of three essays- each with the aim of stripping the reader’s pre-conceptions of morality, and instead offering the reader an account of the true nature of morality. In this essay I will particularly focus upon the first essay of Nietzsche’s On The Genealogy of Morals that, through the use of metaphoric and dramatic language, cites ‘ressentiment’ as the catalyst of our modern day morals. I will primarily outline Nietzsche’s argument (with particular focus upon his metaphor of the workshop in section 12), secondly identify some internal inconsistencies in his argument (looking in particular at his slightly confusing portrayal of ‘masters’ and ‘slaves), and finally attempt to salvage Nietzsche’s argument through a re-evaluation of how to interpret his writing (appealing to Christopher Janaway’s interpretation of the Genealogy of Morals).
In analyzing this gradient of morality, it is useful first to examine a work from early literature whose strong purity of morality is unwavering; for the purposes of this discussion, Dante’s Inferno provides this model. It is fairly straightforward to discover Dante’s dualistic construction of morality in his winding caverns of Hell; each stern, finite circle of Hell is associated with a clear sin that is both definable and directly punishable. As Dante moves downwards in this moral machination, he notes that
To begin, “On Morality'; is an essay of a woman who travels to Death Valley on an assignment arranged by The American Scholar. “I have been trying to think, because The American Scholar asked me to, in some abstract way about ‘morality,’ a word I distrust more every day….'; Her task is to generate a piece of work on morality, with which she succeeds notably. She is placed in an area where morality and stories run rampant. Several reports are about; each carried by a beer toting chitchat. More importantly, the region that she is in gains her mind; it allows her to see issues of morality as a certain mindset. The idea she provides says, as human beings, we cannot distinguish “what is ‘good’ and what is ‘evil’';. Morality has been so distorted by television and press that the definition within the human conscience is lost. This being the case, the only way to distinguish between good or bad is: all actions are sound as long as they do not hurt another person or persons. This is similar to a widely known essay called “Utilitarianism'; [Morality and the Good Life] by J.S. Mills with which he quotes “… actions are right in the proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness.';
Although these literary works have a bleak perspective that societal values are insuperable, the characters in “The Garden Party” and “Shooting an Elephant” feel guilty for ignoring their personal moral obligations. In contrast, the main characters in “A Cup of Tea” and “July’s People” remain blissfully unaware of their blatant disregard of an ethical code; they cannot even recognize the immoral nature of their actions as it has become second nature.
In spite of the “pleasing human traits” of some of the sinners, Hollander argues that “we are never authorized by the poem” to truly sympathise with the sinners, because Dante insists on God’s justice (106,107). Indeed, inscribed over the gates of hell is “Giustizia mosse il mio alto fattore” (Sacred justice moved my architect, III,4).
exclusivity of the term "moral." But at the heart of the comparison lies the .sim• arity in the
Sentiments such as beauty, revenge, pleasure, pain, create moral motivation, and action, and are immune to falsity and truth. They are the foundation for which morals are built, and exist apart from any reasoning. Thesis: In moral motivation, the role of sentiment is to drive an intrinsically instilled presence within us to examine what we would deem a moral act or an immoral act, and act accordingly, and accurately upon the sentiments that apply. These sentiments may be assisted by reasons, but the reason alone does not drive us to do what we feel is necessary.
This essay will discuss whether the BBC’s decision to broadcast the scandalous musical ‘Jerry Springer: The Opera’ came from a beneficial moral standpoint. It will inform basic information about the show itself, reveal complaint numbers, discuss the issue of freedom of expression again causing offence and then apply Kantianism and Utilitarianism theories to the situation. and discuss which theory provided the most helpful guidance in making that decision.
The relationship between morality and law has always been a subject of contention in jurisprudence. Consequently, many legal theories have attempted to define the appropriate limit and scope of morality’s influence on the law. Legal moralism, as proposed by Patrick Devlin, is the belief that society has “the right to pass judgement at all on matters of morals” (375), as well as “the right to use the weapon of the law to enforce it” (376). In this essay, I argue that Devlin’s legal moralism is unacceptable on the basis of committing cultural relativism, and that its application is problematic due to its inconsistent, arbitrary and biased nature. This essay will: 1) explain Devlin’s reasoning for legal moralism; 2) object to Devlin’s legal moralism with consideration to Devlin’s possible response.
Arthur, John, and Scalet, Steven, eds. Morality and Moral Controversies: Readings in Moral, Social, and Political Philosophy. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall. Eighth Edition, 2009.
When considering morality, worthy to note first is that similar to Christian ethics, morality also embodies a specifically Christian distinction. Studying a master theologian such as St. Thomas Aquinas and gathering modern perspectives from James Keenan, S. J. and David Cloutier serve to build a foundation of the high goal of Christian morality. Morality is a primary goal of the faith community, because it is the vehicle for reaching human fulfillment and happiness. Therefore, great value can be placed on foundations of Christian morality such as the breakdown of law from Aquinas, the cultivation of virtues, the role of conscience in achieving morality, and the subject of sin described by Keenan.