Morality In Today's Society

864 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Criminal behaviour genetic or learned

In today’s society it’s very common to hear people debate about whether someone’s action was “moral” or not. The concept of morality is discussed like there’s a set definition of it, when the reality is far from it. There are so many definitions for morality that it makes the word itself unclear. To have a better understanding of morality it 's best to look at the word’s root word: moral. Having morals is defined as having good character and how that person interacts with others. Having morals is to have morality. Morals are usually based on a person’s social values, either good or bad. Society “correctly” defines having morals as “being in accordance with what is just, good, or proper and conforming to accepted standards of behavior”. I think the whole concept of morality is off. This version of morality is like a lost child unable to find their parents. How are you supposed to know what’s moral; when you’re unsure of what exactly society considers “good or proper”? And who these standards of behaviors are accepted by? Thus, leaving us with a bit of a problem of being unable to interpret morality in a different way. Think about this. If a mother kills her son …show more content…

For example, why do almost all people that have existed believe that murder is immoral? It seems human genetics possessive a strong distaste to murder (especially of family members). Predominantly, what we believe to be morally wrong seems to tie in with what we feel and things that we like or dislike are determined by our genetics. When people share a moral feeling, they most likely share a gene in common. This clarifies why many people believe murder is immoral. Our genetics aren’t the only reason people normally agree on moral principles, such as, murder. Although most people agree that murder is immoral, people will disagree as to why it’s

Show More
Related

  • Moral Beliefs Discussed in Sophocles' Antigone and Western Philosophy by David Papineau

    2077 Words  | 5 Pages

    So what exactly is morality and why does it pose such a complicated question? In the book Western Philosophy by David Papineau, it discusses the many different approaches to moral beliefs. Illustrious philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle’s take on morality are one’s personal behavior and set of inner values. Morals can also derive from a social standpoint, where the popular belief rules over all others; if most believe it to be true, then it must present itself as being true. But as stated in the book, even these interpretations can be “very narrow view[s]” (134). Morality also stems from a religious standpoint. Religion has perhaps had the biggest impact on people’s lives and the way ...

    Read More

  • Joan Didion's On Morality

    677 Words  | 2 Pages

    To begin, “On Morality'; is an essay of a woman who travels to Death Valley on an assignment arranged by The American Scholar. “I have been trying to think, because The American Scholar asked me to, in some abstract way about ‘morality,’ a word I distrust more every day….'; Her task is to generate a piece of work on morality, with which she succeeds notably. She is placed in an area where morality and stories run rampant. Several reports are about; each carried by a beer toting chitchat. More importantly, the region that she is in gains her mind; it allows her to see issues of morality as a certain mindset. The idea she provides says, as human beings, we cannot distinguish “what is ‘good’ and what is ‘evil’';. Morality has been so distorted by television and press that the definition within the human conscience is lost. This being the case, the only way to distinguish between good or bad is: all actions are sound as long as they do not hurt another person or persons. This is similar to a widely known essay called “Utilitarianism'; [Morality and the Good Life] by J.S. Mills with which he quotes “… actions are right in the proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness.';

    Read More

  • John Ludwig Mackie And Moral Objectivity

    1018 Words  | 3 Pages

    Morality is not something that should be easy to comprehend, and philosophers such as Mackie and McDowell are taking the wrong approach when trying to describe morality in natural terms. People need to understand that morality is something supernatural that we don’t have the capacity to comprehend. However, this does not mean that all moral judgments are false. There is a right choice in every scenario, however the variety of scenarios in this world is so grand that one cannot judge it by one code of

    Read More

  • Martin Luther King's A Letter From Birmingham Jail

    1260 Words  | 3 Pages

    Morality derives from the Latin moralitas meaning, “manner, character, or proper behavior.” In light of this translation, the definition invites the question of what composes “proper behavior” and who defines morality through these behaviors, whether that be God, humanity, or Martin Luther King in “A Letter from Birmingham Jail.” Socrates confronted the moral dilemma in his discourses millennia ago, Plato refined his concepts in his Republic, and leaders such as Mahatma Gandhi would commit their life work to defining and applying the term to political reform. Finally, after so many years, King reaches a consensus on the definition of morality, one that weighs the concepts of justice and injustice to describe morality

    Read More

  • Military Persuasive Essay

    1088 Words  | 3 Pages

    What is morality? Merriam-Webster dictionary states that morality is/are the beliefs about what right behavior is and what wrong behavior is

    Read More

  • A Morally Confused Society

    654 Words  | 2 Pages

    Throughout The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, Mark Twain tells the story of Huck Finn who constantly finds himself surrounded by morally strong people and others who go without morals.After Living with widow Douglas and then leaving with Jim, he feels that superstition provides proof where as christianity does not. Living on the river with Jim influences him. He looks up to Jim and feels that he is his true friend. Cohen Ralph said, “… in their relationship, a love and respect for persons regardless of color or knowledge or beliefs.” In The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, Twain illuminates the shortcomings of organized religion.

    Read More

  • Differences Of Cultural Relativism: Personality, And Morality

    1104 Words  | 3 Pages

    Over many years people have seemed to develop their thinking concerning morality based on resulting in interactions with individuals and social institutions. Different societies have their own cultures that have different ideas about how humans are to behave. Societies

    Read More

  • Immorality as Humans

    686 Words  | 2 Pages

    Evil is constantly talked about on the news, in history class, and by people in society. But who causes this evil that society is so intrigued by? Author William Golding’s idea of evil in “the darkness of man’s heart” is present in his novel, Lord of the Flies, and in the present world.

    Read More

  • Morality And Morality Analysis

    867 Words  | 2 Pages

    Immanuel Kant addresses a question often asked in political theory: the relationship between practical political behavior and morality -- how people do behave in politics and how they ought to behave. Observers of political action recognize that political action is often a morally questionable business. Yet many of us, whether involved heavily in political action or not, have a sense that political behavior could and should be better than this. In Appendix 1 of Perpetual Peace, Kant explicates that conflict does not exist between politics and morality, because politics is an application of morality. Objectively, he argues that morality and politics are reconcilable. In this essay, I will argue two potential problems with Kant’s position on the compatibility of moral and politics: his denial of moral importance in emotion and particular situations when an action seems both politically legitimate and yet almost immoral; if by ‘politics’, regarded as a set of principles of political prudence, and ‘morals’, as a system of laws that bind us unconditionally.

    Read More

  • Morality And Morality

    3173 Words  | 7 Pages

    In every civilized society you will always find many varying forms of morality and values, especially in the United States of America. In Societies such as these you find a mosaic of differing religions, cultures, political alignments, and socio economic backgrounds which suggests that morality and values are no different. In Friedrich Nietzsche’s book, Beyond Good and Evil, Nietzsche discusses morality and the two categories that you will find at the very basis of all varieties of morality. One category of morality focuses on the “Higher Man” and his superiority to all those under him and his caste. The second system is derived from those of a lower caste that may be used by those in higher castes to further themselves and society. These categories as described by Nietzsche are known as Master Morality and Slave Morality. In this modern time in our culture, morality is becoming a more polarizing topic than ever before. Morality is often times held synonymous with religious practice and faith, although morality is an important part of religion and faith, everyone has some variation of morality no matter their religious affiliation or lack thereof. Friedrich Nietzsche’s theories on morality, Master and Slave Morality, describe to categories of morality which can be found at the very basis of most variations of morality. Master and Slave morality differ completely from each other it is not uncommon to find blends of both categories from one person to another. I believe the Master Morality and Slave Morality theories explain not only religious affiliations but also political alignments and stances on certain social issues in American society. By studying the origins and meanings of Nietzsche’s theories, comparing these theories to c...

    Read More

  • Morality In Brave New World

    837 Words  | 2 Pages

    Mustapha Mond is the most powerful character in Brave New World by Aldous Huxley. Mond keeps scientific and historic documents from reaching the people. Mond believes that science, religion, and art threaten Brave New World if let out, but religion would be bane of Brave New World.

    Read More

  • Declining Morality: A Societal Examination

    1080 Words  | 3 Pages

    “Decreased moral standards and ethics related to ignorance to accepted social behavior standards”. Morality is defined as an understanding and distinguishing right and wrong and behaving according to socially accepted standards (The Definition of Morality, 2002). People can be inconsiderate and conflictful. From the assessment, it was evident that some people have lack of respect to other’s personal properties and even their own. Abandoned houses and trash on properties suggest social and moral degradations. Some of the contributing factors might be poverty, unemployment, and mental illnesses. Lack of morality might be a problem that affects other states and even countries. However, in some areas of Spokane, it is evident that people

    Read More

  • Morality is Relative

    634 Words  | 2 Pages

    James Rachels' article, "Morality is Not Relative," is incorrect, he provides arguments that cannot logically be applied or have no bearing on the statement of contention. His argument, seems to favor some of the ideas set forth in cultural relativism, but he has issues with other parts that make cultural relativism what it is.

    Read More

  • Philosophy: Ethics and Morality

    2484 Words  | 5 Pages

    Whether put simply or scrutinized, morality cannot be defined simply by looking at it from one or two perspectives. One must acknowledge the fact that there are several different factors that affect judgment between “right” and “wrong”. Only after taking into account everything that could possibly change the definition of righteousness can one begin to define morality. Harriet Baber, a professor at San Diego State University, defines morality as “the system through which we determine right and wrong conduct”. Baber refers to morality as a process or method when she calls it a “system”. In saying “we” she then means to say that this concept does not only apply to her but also to everyone else. Through morality, according to her, one can look at an action, idea, or situation and determine its righteousness and its consequences.

    Read More

  • The Relationship Between Religion and Ethics

    958 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...alues, judging other people’s actions, and questioning the righteousness of our own morals. Though depending on our religion or background we may all have different feelings and opinions about what is right and wrong, it is virtually impossible to go throughout one’s life without taking part in some sort of exploration into one’s own morals. Even though many of us may inherit our morals from our families or cultures, it is important that we explore why we believe what we feel is morally right or wrong, morally good or bad. Are the morals we get from our families truly our own? Have we been through enough life experiences to distinguish our own morals from those that have been pushed on us by our culture and society? Through exploring these feelings, we are able to make the best possible decisions for ourselves that will in turn determine the standards of our lives.

    Read More

More about Morality In Today's Society

Open Document