Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Tuesdays with morrie and king lear comparisons
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Tuesdays with morrie and king lear comparisons
Wisdom is the soundness of an action or decision with regard to the application of experience, knowledge, and good judgment. Wisdom, a very valued and respected trait in our society, is often associated with the elderly. In both King Lear by William Shakespeare and Tuesdays with Morrie by Mitch Albom, the protagonists are able to acquire wisdom by undergoing trials and tribulations. However, both these men began their quest as complete opposites. Morrie emphasizes the values of family and love, while Lear cannot even recognize love when it presents itself in the form of his daughter’s speech. Morrie is disappointed by the culture in his society while Lear is narrow-minded and only sees the world through the eyes of social order. Finally, Morrie …show more content…
Morrie believed that death should be accepted and by accepting that this world is temporary we can recognize what really matters in life: love. When Mitch asks Morrie how facing death has affected him, Morrie answers, “…you focus on the essentials. When you realize you are going to die, you see everything much differently. …Learn how to die, and you learn how to live.” (Albom, 83). Morrie believes that even though he has little time left to live, he can still share his message and have an impact on the world. He believes that if more people lived as if they were going to die at any moment then the world would be a more positive place. Conversely, Lear decides to give away his title of king and to split up his land even before he dies because he feels that his life no longer has meaning. For instance, when Lear announces that he desires to give away his land and kingship, he says, “…’tis our fast intent / To shake all cares and business from our age, / Conferring them on younger strengths while we / Unburdened crawl toward death.” (I, i, 39-42). Lear feels like he has nothing left to contribute to his country and instead gives away his sense of responsibility as if he is already dead. Morrie and Lear both have opposite views but through suffering they receive enlightenment and begin to realize that people should live as though each day is one’s
Morrie’s criticisms of Mitch were never harsh or inaccurate. I believe impending death dims one’s filter of projecting their opinion. If Morrie was tougher on Mitch he may have weakened their relationship. If he was easier the reality of mortality would have never have been accepted by Mitch. The balance of being caring and concerned allowed for Morrie to reach Mitch deeply.
For anger, in the mornings he will say to himself, “what in the hell did I do to deserve this!” He also becomes depressed and cries throughout the nights and into the mornings, but tells himself to stop. Morrie also accepts his death, and says many things such as “fear of death means life without meaning” and that he wants to be a living textbook.
A journey often sparks an individual’s self-realisation. In King Lear, when Edmund is close to death, he is finally aware of his despicable nature and attempts to redeem himself by revealing Cordelia and Lear’s location. When Edmund states “I pant for life. Some good I mean to do, Despite of
This paragraph has Morrie teaching on how to accept death and how it’s as important as living. Morrie is afraid of his inevitable death but he knows he has to accept it because it will come and there is also something about death that makes Morrie feel bad for other people like the when he is watching the news and sees people that are across
Morrie teaches that accepting death is okay and one should not fight it. Morrie’s opinion on the topic is that once one fully realizes that one is going to die one fully appreciates life and everything they have. One is fully alive. Morrie gives a lesson about death in this quote “ Once you learn how to die, you learn how to live” (Albom 82). i agree with it because if I knew I was going to die, I would be very appreciative of life and not material things, Death is a topic that i question about a lot. Why does it happen to good people more than
Death is a permanent fixture in the minds of human beings. People are faced with this on an almost daily basis. Watching natural disasters kill thousands of people, or watching soldiers come home to be buried, gives humans a humble understanding that life is short and death is near. Will people ever come to accept death the way Morrie had? It is not clear what the correct way to live life is.
The play of "King Lear" is about a search for personal identity. In the historical period in which this play is set, the social structure was set in order of things closest to Heaven. Therefore, on Earth, the king was at the top, followed by his noblemen and going all the way down to the basest of objects such as rocks and dirt. This structure was set up by the people, and by going by the premise that anything that is man made is imperfect, this system cannot exist for long without conflict.
Lear is estranged from his kingdom and friends, causing his loss of sanity. In the midst of Lear's self-pity he is discovered by the fool. Fittingly enough the fool is the one able to lead Lear back to the normal world. He is made to appreciate the people who truly cared about him from the beginning. He sees that they were right all along, and repents from his foolish decision, though it's too late to do him any good.
...he same needs as others. He is learning about the physical and moral needs of all mankind. Lear strips himself naked, and starts to see his status as a king in a new way; “thou art the thing itself; unaccommodated man is no more but such a poor, bare, forked animal…” . He now realises that as a King he is responsible for the social welfare of the state, that his actions have political effect.
Tragedies are dominated by contrasts and conflicts between various entities such as, good and evil, legitimate and illegitimate, appearance and reality and so on. Another contrast is between wisdom and foolishness. If one associates foolishness with madmen and fools one will be surprised to find that in a tragedy such as King Lear this is not the case. Shakespeare portrays, the sane characters such as Kent and Cordelia as fools by virtue of loyalty, love and their willingness to speak the truth. On the otherhand, the Madman, Tom o’Bedlam and the fool are depicted as the true figures of wisdom. Moreover mirroring all this is King Lear’s transition from foolish behaviour through madness achieving wisdom.
During a section of the book, Morrie states, “only once a person knows how to die that he can then know how to live” (Page 82). Morrie understands that death will soon take him away but he is prepared. He changes his perspective of death which creates a more positive view of death although many people view death as inevitable and evil. Morrie always believed that he would go when his time came yet Morrie did not dread the thought of dying. While it is easy to believe death is bad, if death is accepted
No tragedy of Shakespeare moves us more deeply that we can hardly look upon the bitter ending than King Lear. Though, in reality, Lear is far from like us. He himself is not an everyday man but a powerful king. Could it be that recognize in Lear the matter of dying? Each of us is, in some sense, a king who must eventually give up his kingdom. To illustrate the process of dying, Shakespeare has given Lear a picture of old age in great detail. Lear’s habit to slip out of a conversation (Shakespeare I. v. 19-33), his brash banishment of his most beloved and honest daughter, and his bitter resentment towards his own loss of function and control, highlighted as he ironically curses Goneril specifically on her functions of youth and prays that her
King Lear, the protagonist of the play, is a truly tragic figure. He is driven by greed and arrogance and is known for his stubbornness and imperious temper, he often acts upon emotions and whims. He values appearances above reality. He wants to be treated as a king and to enjoy the title, but he doesn’t want to fulfill a king’s obligations of governing for the good of his subjects.
The wisdom that comes with suffering: Comparative essay Aristotle once said “Knowing yourself is the beginning of all wisdom” (“Quotes About Wisdom” 2016). Shakespeare succeeds proving that when a character achieves self-awareness that is when they become wise. Normally, by the time an individual reaches old age, the virtue of wisdom is strong. However, Gloucester and King Lear clearly show they do not have much wisdom due to the foolish decisions they make throughout the play; even though they had already reached old age. The suffering both of these characters went through proves that wisdom is not always synonymous with age but rather with the self-awareness gained through suffering and realization of their tragic flaw.
It introduces us to his thoughts on humanity and the need to keep changing for the better so as to create a sound society. The idea of humanness or the notion of being a sensible human being is at the heart of his philosophy of life. We are living in a time and an age when these very notions of humanness and humanity have become problematic. Whether it is political, social, technological or nuclear warfare, men in our society are living under its shadow. Therefore, the boundaries separating altruism and animalism, good and evil, life and death have blurred. It is a life-in-death scenario.Thus, Bond in his preface to “Lear” opines,In the modern nation states, these threats have undoubtedly attained mammoth proportions. Advanced scientific and technical knowledge has rendered them all the more powerful. Every nation state istrying to attain a ‘superpower’ status. All they are after is more territorial, political and military power. They are implementing elaborate strategies to obtain optimum services from its people, thus rendering man’s existence as living, breathing human beings perilous. These are some of the issues that are relevant to Bond’s play. He dexterously situates Lear into his modern narrative as a dictator like figure