Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparative Literary Analysis / Edgar Allan Poe
Comparative Literary Analysis / Edgar Allan Poe
Character development of king lear
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Comparative Literary Analysis / Edgar Allan Poe
Experiences of journeys provide insights into the lives of individuals and the world around them Shakespeare’s King Lear and Edgar Allen Poe’s Eldorado both present varying ideas of journeys, as characters in both texts come to realisations about their true natures, reflect on their past choices and gain a deeper understanding into personal relationships. This enables protagonists in both texts to change their perspectives as a result of their journeys. A journey often sparks an individual’s self-realisation. In King Lear, when Edmund is close to death, he is finally aware of his despicable nature and attempts to redeem himself by revealing Cordelia and Lear’s location. When Edmund states “I pant for life. Some good I mean to do, Despite of …show more content…
In King Lear, Lear regrets his decision to banish Cordelia after her refusal to exaggerate her love for her father. Cordelia offends Lear when she states “I love you as a child should love her father, no more, no less.” However, later in the play when Lear has been ill-treated by both Goneril and Reagan, he begins to reflect on the consequences of his impulsive actions, realising that Cordelia’s honest words showed her true love. As a responder, we begin to empathise with Lear and can relate to similar situations. He expresses his forgiveness and love for Cordelia “I’ll kneel down and ask of thee forgiveness, So we’ll live, and pray, and sing and tell old tales…” Contrast is utilised to compare the implied strength of the love between Lear and Cordelia with the inconsistency of human life, as Cordelia dies soon after this scene. In Eldorado, The knight’s ultimate goal of his journey, spanning over his entire life, is to achieve great wealth and prosperity, however with each stanza the knight is closer to futility and death. Upon reflection, he comes to regret his thoughtless ambition. As shown in ‘And o 'er his heart a shadow, Fell as he found, No spot of ground, That looked like Eldorado.’ As the knight nears death, he is slowly losing faith, coming to realise that his single-minded plans of discovering Eldorado and living a prosperous life may come to nothing, that he has wasted all his efforts. Poe …show more content…
Both texts present varying ideas of journeys, as characters in both texts come to realisations about their true natures, reflect on their past choices and gain a deeper understanding into personal relationships. In both texts characters come to realisations in their journeys that create a deep understanding of many aspects of their
Throughout all texts discussed, there is a pervasive and unmistakable sense of journey in its unmeasurable and intangible form. The journeys undertaken, are not physically transformative ones but are journeys which usher in an emotional and spiritual alteration. They are all life changing anomaly’s that alter the course and outlook each individual has on their life. Indeed, through the exploitation of knowledge in both a positive and negative context, the canvassed texts accommodate the notion that journeys bear the greatest magnitude when they change your life in some fashion.
These timeless tales relate a message that readers throughout the ages can understand and relate to. While each of these tales is not exactly alike, they do share a common core of events. Some event and or character flaw necessitates a journey of some kind, whether it is an actual physical journey or a metaphorical one. The hardships and obstacles encountered on said journey lead to spiritual growth and build character. Rarely does a person find himself unchanged once the journey is over.
Both Shakespeare’s King Lear and Dante’s Inferno explore the reasons for, and results of, human suffering. Each work postulates that human suffering comes as a result of choices that are made: A statement that is not only applicable to the characters in each of the works, but also to the readers. The Inferno and King Lear speak universal truths about the human condition: that suffering is inevitable and unavoidable. While both King Lear and the Inferno concentrate on admonitions and lamentations of human suffering, one of the key differences between the works is that Inferno conveys an aspect of hope that is not nearly as prevalent in King Lear.
“The Hero’s Journey.” Ariane Publications, 1997. Course handout. AS English I. Dept. of English, Woodside High School. 26 October 2013.
While the Fool disrupts Lear’s mental state, Cordelia steadies him with compassion, understanding, and truth. When Cordelia has rescued the King, she says that “Mine enemy’s dog, / though he had bit me, should have stood that night / Against my fire” (4.7.42-44). Cordelia is amazed at her sisters’ treatment of Lear because she cannot comprehend the actions of such uncaring people. Cordelia’s considerate nature soothes the King’s overwrought mind. Because the King seems rash and even irrational at times, those who understand him are few. His youngest daughter knows what Lear goes through with her sisters, and wishes that she could “Repair those violent harms that my two sisters / Have in thy reverence made.
The persona begins to think about how he cannot take both paths and be the same “traveler”
After Kent delightfully brings the two together and Lear realizes who he is talking to, he begs for forgiveness: “Pray, do not mock me. / I am a very foolish fond old man, / Fourscore and upward, not an hour more nor less /....Do not laugh at me, / For as I am a man, I think this lady / To be my child Cordelia.“ (IV.vii.68-79). Lear has finally achieved self-awareness regarding his mistaken banishment of Cordelia, and proclaims to her in a surprising display of humility that he is just a “foolish fond old man.” Shocking the audience, Lear does not hold back his newfound sense of shame. He goes on: “Be your tears wet? Yes, faith. I pray, weep not. If you have poison for me, I will drink it. I know you do not love me, for your sisters Have, as I do remember, done me wrong. You have some cause; they have not.” (IV.vii.81-85). In another case of both humility and misjudgment, Lear believes that Cordelia no longer loves him due to his mistakes. Lear could not be more wrong because Cordelia 's love for her father is unconditional and still lives. Cordelia virtuously accepts his apology and assures him “No, sir, you must not kneel,” (IV.vii.67). Although the two do not live much longer, Lear intends to live out the rest of their lives being the best a father can
...pray you now forget and forgive, I am old and foolish” (4.7.83-84). This represents that Lear is trying to show Cordelia that he knows his actions were rash, which shows that he is regaining his moral sanity. He finally feels remorseful of his actions and wants to redeem himself. Furthermore, when Cordelia is captured and hung, Lear feels that he missed out on a chance to fix what he had done to Cordelia. When checking to see if she is alive, Lear says: “If it be so, it is a chance which does redeem all sorrows that ever have I felt” (5.3.265-267). The fact that Lear wants to redeem himself shows that he is a completely sane man in terms of his feelings and awareness, and even though he might be mentally unstable he is still able to feel emotional pain and the consequences of his actions. Overall, King Lear’s sanity is visible throughout the progression of the play.
Now, banished Kent,/ If thou canst serve where thou dost stand condemned,/ So may it come thy master, whom thou lov'st,/ Shall find thee full of labors.”( Act 1, Sc. 4 Ln. 1-8). This quote demonstrates that Kent is willing to demote himself in order to aid the king that he loves so dearly. Kent is cognizant that Lear is not acting properly when he sends Cordelia away and Kent is banished for protesting the command. Despite the unseemly action, Kent decides to return to the king’s side and help him along his journey. Shakespeare uses Lear’s descent into madness to show the devastating effects flattery and lies can have on what a person believes as truth. Kent continues the lie that Lear still has power through his devotion only fit for a king. In Kent’s well intentioned yet misguided quest to hold true to his king, he accentuates the effect of Lear’s inaccurate perception of what has transpired. “Your servant Kent. Where is your servant Caius?/ He's a good fellow, I can tell you that./ He'll strike, and quickly too.”(Act 5, Scn. 3, Ln. 342-345). Kent continues his devoted loyalty and attempts to withhold his
In Shakespeare's “King Lear”, the tragic hero is brought down, like all tragic heroes, by one fatal flaw; in this case it is pride, as well as foolishness. It is the King's arrogant demand for absolute love and, what's more, protestations of such from the daughter who truly loves him the most, that sets the stage for his downfall. Cordelia, can be seen as Lear’s one true love, and her love and loyalty go not only beyond that of her sisters but beyond words, thus enraging the proud King Lear whose response is: "Let pride, which she calls plainness, marry her". Here, Lear's pride is emphasized as he indulges in the common trend of despising in others what one is most embarrassed of oneself.
A physical journey occurs as a direct result of travelling from one place to another over land, sea or even space. The physical journey can occur individually or collectively, but always involves more than mere movement. Instead physical journeys are accompanied by inner growth and development, catalysed by the experiences and the decisions that impact the outcome of the journey. These journey concepts and the interrelationship between physical and emotional journeys is exemplified in the text; The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain, The Road Not Taken by Robert Frost, the children’s book Lost and Found by Oliver Jeffers and the film Stand By Me directed by Rob Reiner.
Mastery of the material an author writes about is not merely enough to get one’s point across, yet Butor uses his mastery of how to travel wherever you are in life and, in addition, uses language that presents the picture in such a manner that one does not have to delve deep into the meaning behind the words to retain the full idea portrayed in them. The higher arching purpose to his work, though, turns out to be the overall connection of ties between the book and travel ultimately depends on the book’s “literariness” to determine what journey one might have while reading (83). All in all, the tone of voice and writing style that Butor uses in this piece are second to none in their ability to influence a reader of following his procedure of travel transformation, and a rhetorical analysis essay on his work only reassured the authenticity of the section about how Butor chose to entertain the reader as the main purpose behind his essay. His attitude toward the audience was strong enough to elicit advice that originated straight from the heart, and in doing that, he empowered readers with the ability to look at books and reading differently for the rest of their
...n Lear we see a flawed figure who, through misjudgment, misfortune and loss, eventually comes to revelation and personal transformation. In that sense, these characters are perfect tragic figures, perhaps not necessarily realistic but powerful and moving nonetheless.
King Lear’s ego plays a big role in this play as his anger is fueled when cordelia says to him “I love you majesty no more nor less” Lear is angered by this comment and banishes her and lear responds by saying “ let it be so! Thy truth then be thy dower!” after this happens Lear is driven insane and knows that he has gone mad “Oh, let me not be mad, not be, sweet heavens! Keep me in temper…” Lear dies because of the shock the cordelia’s hanging.
“The Road Not Taken” examines the struggles people run into when they come to a place in their life where a life altering decisions has to be made. The man who is described in this poem is traveling when he comes upon “two roads diverged” (1). He then has to choose which path he will take to continue on his journey. After standing at the diversion for a while, he knows he has to make a final decision. One path was worn down and “bent in the undergrowth” (5), so he took the other path, which was described as “perhaps the better claim/ Because it was grassy and wanted wear” (6-7). The man of the poem begins to ponder about a time when he will be telling his story of the path he took. Although we are not sure if the man regrets his decision or is relieved, he lets us know taking the road less traveled “has made all the difference” (20).