Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Narrative essay of love and hate
An essay about metaphor
An essay about metaphor
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
“I hate him. Except for all the places where I love him half to death” (Charlotte Stein). Love can be confusing, and both of these works show a unique way of love and hate. The “Hate Poem” by Julie Sheehan and “Bitch” by Carolyn Kizer are similar in their characterization and tone of authors, yet different in their metaphors, and point of view. Both poems show that intensity and passion is needed, regardless if one loves or hates. Although love can be deceiving, is better to have love than never have love at all.
First, similarity between both works is characterization. Julie Sheehan expresses herself with love and hate towards the person who she’s writhing about, “You know how when I’m sleepy I nuzzle my head under your arm? Hate” (704, 17). The quotation shows that she’s upset, but loves the warmth of his arms. At the same time Carolyn Kizer demonstrate similar characteristics by showing rage of hate, but then softens up with the memory of her past lover. “At a kind word from him, a look like the old days,
…show more content…
The bitch changes her tone; she begins to whimper.
She wants to snuggle up to him, to cringe” (939, 10-12).
The author expresses how devoted she feels about her past lover, and one touch could change everything. The second similarity is the authors tone. “Hate Poem” by Julie Sheehan,
“My lungs, duplicitous twins, expand with the utter validity
of my hate, which can never have enough of you,
Breathlessly, like two idealists in a broken submarine” (704, 20-22).
At the end of the poem Sheehan shows how much she desires and loves him. In the other poem Kizer shows a similarity in her tone, towards the past lover. After all, I am her mistress. She is basically loyal.
It’s just that she remembers how she came
running Each evening, when she heard his step; How she lay at his feet and looked up adoringly Though he was absorbed in his paper; Or, bored with her devotion, ordered her to the kitchen Until he was ready to play (16-23). Kizer describes her devotion to him by waiting on hand and foot for his affection. Next, both authors use metaphors, but show different aspects to describe their hate. Sheehan paints a picture of the hate towards the boyfriend, as an annoying lint digging on her. The blue-green jewel of sock lint I’m digging from under my third toenail, left foot, hates you.(8), the hate is so strong that even the smallest part of her body hates him. In contrast Kizer describes the bitch as a female dog. Now, when he and I meet, after all these years, I say to the bitch inside me, don’t start growling. He isn’t a trespasser anymore, Just an old acquaintance tipping his hat. My voice says, “Nice to see you,” As the bitch starts to bark hysterically. Kizer uses the female doge as the inner voice to express her rage towards the ex lover. The second difference is point of view of both authors. Sheehan expresses her obsession through layers of hatred, “The history of this keychain hates you. My sigh in the background as you explain relational databases hates you”(Sheehan 9-10). Sheehan point of view shows the frustration she has with her boyfriend, and how she filled with hatred and love. On the other hand, Kizer’s point of view is between a rocky relationship between a past lover. “It’s nice to know you are doing so well,” I say. He couldn’t have taken you with him; You were too demonstrative, too clumsy, Not like the well-groomed pets of his new friends. “Give my regards to your wife,” I say”(28-32). Kizer describes the struggles with her ex lover, conveying the experience of her inner Bitch. To conclude, love can feel wonderful or bring out the worst in a person. There’s a thin line between love and hate; in both of these poems they struggle with their inner self, between love and hate. “No one can hate you more than someone who used to love you” (Rick Riordan).
Both poems are set in the past, and both fathers are manual labourers, which the poets admired as a child. Both poems indicate intense change in their fathers lives, that affected the poet in a drastic way. Role reversal between father and son is evident, and a change of emotion is present. These are some of the re-occurring themes in both poems. Both poems in effect deal with the loss of a loved one; whether it be physically or mentally.
Initially, Kizer uses a unique format to add a layer of depth to her poem. Her poem consists of one stanza and thirty-four lines. Kizer uses the one stanza to symbolize this is her first meeting with her former lover. In fact, line 1 says “Now, when he and I meet, after all these years,”, this displays that this encounter was the first in many
The speaker’s rocky encounter with her ex-lover is captured through personification, diction, and tone. Overall, the poem recaps the inner conflicts that the speak endures while speaking to her ex-lover. She ponders through stages of the past and present. Memories of how they were together and the present and how she feels about him. Never once did she broadcast her emotions towards him, demonstrating the strong facade on the outside, but the crumbling structure on the inside.
In all poems the theme of Disappointment in love is seen throughout. Duffy focuses on the pain, despair and acrimony that love can bring, whereas Larkin focuses on the dissatisfaction before, during, and after a romantic relationship. Both Duffy and Larkin differ in tone. Duffy takes a more aggressive and dark stance to portray what love can do to a person after a disappointing love life. Duffy also uses this sinister and aggressive stance to try and convey sympathy for the persona from the audience in ‘Never Go Back’ and ‘Havisham’ Whereas Larkin conveys his discontent in love through his nonchalant and dismissive tone, but still concealing the pain that has been brought by love in ‘Wild Oats’ and ‘Talking in bed’.
The way the points of views in each different poem creates a different theme for each poems using different points diction to convey meaning for each of the two poems. In the poem “Birthday” a humorous tone shows a newborn baby in a first person point of view. As opposed to the poem “The Secret Life of Books” which uses a third person point of view for a more serious tone. The two poems would change dramatically whiteout the different points of views because without the humor of the newborn baby being the narrator the poem might take a different spin on the meaning to create a more serious tone. As opposed to “The Secret Life of Books” where the poem is a big personification which if it was not in a third person point of view it might have a a humorous tome in the background. The two poems have many things that help contrast them with each other another one of these being the theme chosen to give each poem a separate identity, while “Birthday” has some background information in some of the diction it uses to World War II “The Secret Life of Books” has no need for the knowledge of background information just the curiosity of the brain
An important element that is displayed in both love and hate is motivation. An example of this is portrayed in “A Note on My Son’s Face,” as the author states, “I wanted that face to die, to be reborn in the face of a white child” (35,36). This line displays a level of prejudice towards what is hers. Derricotte battles intense feelings of wanting a white looking child amongst a world where not being grateful for what she has is seen as hatred towards her son. She looks at the face of her black child and is filled with animosity for what he looks like and what he will become. This is where the motivational factor comes into play, and where the lines of love and hate really become blurred. Does she hate her child because of how he looks? or Does she love her child because she wants him to become better than what he is destined for? She is motivated by love to want him to become better than what she believes is possible for him, yet she displays hate in the sense that she is hurting the child for what he is, and also for what he has no control over. According to Rempel this grandmother is displaying both intense feelings of love and hate. Loving what is hers, but hating what it will become. Therefore, this poem supports the theory that love and hate are
Love can come at unexpected times, through current situations or through memories, and they will always have that permanent effect on us, just like a tattoo. Because of strange stanza breaks, unusual imagery, and elongated punctuation, the reader can determine the deeper meaning of the poem. The two-lined stanzas signify short-lived loves, and the stanza breaks depict the break-ups and passing of loved ones. The imagery of skulls and the metaphor that love is a tattoo shows that love never deteriorates. And lastly, the poem is only two sentences long, so this shows the fluidity and never ending power of love. Too often people take advantage of love, but what they aren’t aware of is that their experiences with each and every person they have loved tattoo their mind to make them into who they are, much like a tattoo permanently inks one’s skin to commemorate a
However there is an unexpected twist where the poet just calms down and thinks he can find love again. This shows the poet’s structure of the poem and how ... ... middle of paper ... ... ion and repetition. Another comparison between the two poems is we are both hearing the viewpoint from the poet not from anybody else.
In the same way as love, hatred requires a certain intimacy between two people. A relationship cannot consist of either love or hate without there first being a close relationship between two individuals. Hawthorne explains that for these emotions to exist, “each, in its utmost development, requires a high degree of intimacy and heart-knowledge” (Hawthorne 246). In order for either of these emotions to be conceived within an individual, the person must first make an effort to acquire a deep understanding of the other person. It is necessary to have a familiarity with someone else’s character in order to either love or hate them, and it is impossible to become close to som...
Weekends were the best. Being able to lay down and take a load off from all of the heavy lifting.The thing is I’m sick of these little shits always being home.The only one who really cares about me are my buddies at work. They’re almost always busy on the weekends. So I tend to stay home if there’s nothing else to do. I hate being here when everyone’s home. They don’t pay attention to me and refuse to acknowledge me unless I yell. Especially the youngest one. She’s a fucking bitch.
In the first stanza, “one leaned on the other as if to throw her down” symbolism has been used to show the intensity of the embrace between the two. In stanza two, “and finally almost uprooted him” symbolism has been used to show how much the female dominates in this relationship. “He was thin, dry, insecure one” this symbolized that the male did not have much power nor say in the relationship.
The main line that directs the poems feelings is "The wraith of Love's sweet Rose is here, It haunts me everywhere! ". The ghost of "Love's sweet rose" is in my life and mind. The ghost of that rose is in my presents and is with her everywhere she goes.
“You know we are made up of love and hate but both of them are balanced on a razor blade.”-Ed Sheeran “What Do I Know?”. In the poem “Little”Sister, Vina Berger uses the rhythm of iambic pentameter and many metaphors to describe the fine line between love and hate. “Little”Sister paints a picture of Berger’s strong emotions at her younger sister in an articulate yet figurative manner. It shows that the line between love and hate is so fine that sometimes the people that we destest the most are also the people we adore the most. This point is particularly illustrated in line(s) 9 and 10 when Berger describes how she loves and hates her sister's sense of humor at the same time “It enrages me that your sense of humor; Smacks a reluctant smile
Aside from the conditions, which lead to the creation of these works, they share a number of other common threads. Symbolism aside these works are very similar on the surface. Both are a collection of seemingly disjointed images, which when put together by the reader or observer serve up a strong social message. That messages being that the wars and conflicts of the times have twisted the world. This is reinforced by the contorted and misshapen images in both works.
.... The other is a journey of self-exploration and learning about the challenges a woman must face just to live her life and help her grandchild. You can feel not only her struggles during her physical journey, but also the mental struggles she has faced in life and along her path. Through both styles of writing, you can emerge yourself into the theme of the story or poem and emotionally connect on some level with each character. As a reader, you can enjoy different styles of writing and allow your personal imagination to take away from it what you choose. Short stories and poems each have their own styles and differ in the way they are actually constructed, but ultimately, the reader is still taken into the life of the character that is depicted. The goal is to unite the reader and the characters and allow the reader to become one with the literary work on some level.