Comparing Cats And The Lion King

A musical is a form of living art that should successfully combine a dramatic plot with a correlating music component. Typically, a live performance can be an exciting but difficult production to execute because there are no time-outs or redoes. Nevertheless, two particular live musicals have topped charts in the Broadway theaters. Known as the fourth longest-running show in Broadway history, Cats is a live musical, composed by Andrew Lloyd Webber, that tells the story about a tribe of cats who journey through the night. During their journey, the cats, also known as the Jellicles, are aiming to decide who will ascend to a new place and come back to life. Likewise, The Lion King classifies as the third longest-running show in Broadway history. This musical is based upon the

The musical brings every Safari animal to life with the vivid costumes and special effects. The animatronic costumes are the most fascinating visual aspect in this musical. Unlike the cast members in Cats, the characters in The Lion King are acrobatic. They swing from ropes and vines to create a dynamic, visual effect that strongly appeals to their audience. The smooth transitions from one scene to another are another compelling element. The characters move from place to place in a split second. These majestic and cultural features portrayed in this musical make The Lion King better than Cats in this category. Unlike the cast members in The Lion King, the characters in Cats are extremely stagnant. There are merely two sets in Cats—the cityscape and the alley. The costumes are elegant, but very simple. They only consist of body suits and face paints. The visual elements between the two musicals are easy to differentiate. The Lion King is obviously more creative and majestic with their costumes and characters while Cats continues to takes the safe route with their