Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literary comparison essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Sticky Fingers and White Lies in My Eyes The short, “White Lies”, written by Erin Murphy has its likeness to “Sticky Fingers” by Patti Smith; portraying a young girl going through a life molding experience. They only differ because of situation and how they are handled. In “White Lies”, you see a mother that doesn’t address her daughter’s issue and works around it to decrease the severity of the problem. In “Sticky fingers” Smith writes of a girl who struggles but deals with her situation. Both essays leave the audience with the choice of how to not only judge the little girls’ decisions but also a look at how their mother’s nurturing styles helped in the development of the girls’ morals. I find that by giving the audience a look at the situations …show more content…
in the perspective of children they simplified right and wrong making it easier to assess the situation. With that said, Smith’s Patricia character is more agreeable. She knows there’s a fault in her behavior and knows that had her mother been in her shoes she wouldn’t agree with her choice of action. It would be best to look, first, at the difference in how their interactions are described.
“When I was ten years old, I lived with my family in a small ranch house in rural South Jersey” (Smith 258). Patricia speaks of her situation with a maturity but in her childlike nature she does not understand all that well how money is handled. Smith acknowledges that by including “I did not understand my mother’s mounting anxiety” (258). Despite that, there is sense that she knows her mom cannot buy her everything she wants. Even knowing this, she still feels she can still ask her mother for things rather than just stealing them first. Though she ultimately steals in the end, it is easy to see that it is not in her nature to do such …show more content…
things. When she struggles in going home after making a promise to the store security, who asks her about church the situation becomes clear to the reader. They think of how much ethical training she must go through. She not only learns right and wrong at home but also in her community which is not afraid to talk about religion. Mostly though, it is the pressure of her mother’s “sentencing that always seemed to outweigh the crime” (Smith 259) that made her sick and deters her from acting out regularly. This shows that in the end, her mother’s word is the most impactful. Moving onto “White Lies”, the same cannot be said about Connie’s situation. Her mother cares for her daughter. This much is revealed when Murphy includes that “Her mother was filling a cardboard box. And Connie, bathed in unflinching fluorescence, was curved over her notebook making small, careful check marks” (1). No, the difference lies in how her community and her mother turns the blind eye. Whether it’s the teacher reading her magazine or her mother ignoring the things the children have done and buying them candy. In this short there’s a lacking in a sense of accepting community. Religion brought Patricia’s together, whereas likeness in feature and name brought this one together. Even Arpi, who doesn’t have albinism or any ailment, is made to feel ousted because of her name and her heritage. When Murphy is quick to compare her differences to Connie’s, the nature of their school’s dynamic is shown. Whoever is most different, is the subject of their insults or rejection. We like to think we would do the right thing but if given the chance we will not take the road less traveled and take the beaten path because it is easier to handle. Whether more effective or just less harmful then doing the right thing, understandably it is easier. That’s how I look at Connie’s mother who chose to turn the other cheek rather than move her daughter again and face a new charge of kids calling her daughter “Casper, Chalk Face, Q-Tip” (1). All that said, I would still rather take the tongue lashing from my mom than watch her pay for candy for unsavory kids who don’t think carefully of others. At that point, the audience can excuse her for being tired but when the reader compares her to Patricia’s mother from “Sticky Finger” who’s tired of poverty and not being able to give her kids what she wants, there’s a telling difference. It is easy to see that though Patricia’s mother still gives her the encyclopedia she recognized a maturity in the girl’s behavior which she learned from her surroundings.
While in comparison the audience sees Connie, who doesn’t have a good surrounding in the first place. From what she learns, she accepts her situation and even lets the people who tormented her, rather than welcomed her, into her life. The greatest disconnect with this way of thinking, is that once she’s older as she sees that someone doesn’t agree with her she will do whatever it takes to fit into whatever they think is right. When she might be right it will not matter because the people plucking at her are always right. Even in the essay there is nothing wrong with Connie except that she does not fit the “something was either perfect or not” (Murphy 1) philosophy that the so “dedicated” teacher instilled in the
children. For example, when I was a child my elementary school was really close to my house; so I participated in an after school program. I would walk home but on occasion my mother would tell me that she would pick me up. My mother is someone who takes care of everything before she takes care of one thing, something I understood to take account for her lateness. Though I knew she had a reasonable explanation, as a child I wanted to get home as fast as I could to watch whatever cartoon was on after school- like the kids whose parents came on time. So I would walk home and she would be upset but thankful that I was okay. On one particular day, it rained on and off, during the morning bus ride to school. When we had Physical Education, forcing us to stay inside, and even during the after school program. Once the program came to end I realized, as I feared my mom was late. As I watched the other kids pile into their respective cars, I felt the pity-filled eyes of the teachers bore into my back; again I was one of the kids last to be picked up. I could feel the tears welling, but as quickly as they dropped my mom pulled up in her loud van that could be heard from the street over. I quickly wiped my tears and hopped into her van because as much as she is late she at least makes it all the time. For the most part if I were a parent, I would hope I could give a good enough example like my mom. For however much she is late I still trust in her to deliver on her promises. From those experiences I learned to trust in people and see the good in people. So when people tried to bully me on my appearance, they couldn’t really. It only hurt for a second before I kept it moving because just as much as it hurt me that they said mean things, something was bothering them that they felt they should say it. I did not feel helpless because of bullies, I felt better about myself because I knew it did not affect me like they wanted it to. Altogether, the examples in the story and my own story drives my point that relationships make a person. Though both mothers had their daughters’ intention in mind only one, no matter how embarrassed, refused their daughter. From what I’ve gathered from the essays Patricia will learn from her mistake and have help from those around her. Connie will try to find a way to fix her problems because she has been taught to have a wavering resolve and to conform to others. What the mothers imparted on their children is what will show through the most in the end.
Summary of “The Money” by Junot Diaz In this essay, the author recounts a life event from his childhood. The story begins with Junot describing his family's financial status and living arrangement. Diaz and his four siblings lived with their two parents in a catchpenny apartment in a rough urban borough. Not steadily employed, his mother and father were in a constant struggle to keep the family afloat monetarily; to the point where decent, alimental food was not a likely sight in the household. Despite their meager inhabitance his mother was stowing $200 to $300 monthly and sending it to her parents in the Dominican Republic.
The mother and daughter have a very distant relationship because her mother is ill and not capable to be there, the mother wishes she could be but is physically unable. “I only remember my mother walking one time. She walked me to kindergarten." (Fein). The daughter’s point of view of her mother changes by having a child herself. In the short story the son has a mother that is willing to be helpful and there for him, but he does not take the time to care and listen to his mother, and the mother begins to get fed up with how Alfred behaves. "Be quiet don't speak to me, you've disgraced me again and again."(Callaghan). Another difference is the maturity level the son is a teenager that left school and is a trouble maker. The daughter is an adult who is reflecting back on her childhood by the feeling of being cheated in life, but sees in the end her mother was the one who was truly being cheated. “I may never understand why some of us are cheated in life. I only know, from this perspective, that I am not the one who was.” (Fein). The differences in the essay and short story show how the children do not realize how much their mothers care and love
As she sat at her work table she, “was drawn away,” by the screeching sirens outside her window. In this example, the author uses the word “was” as an indicator of her recollection of the events of that evening. The way they quickly grasped her attention reveals how focused she was on these specific occurrences surrounding her. We also notice how she is reflecting on the bad things that happen in society, yet we find ways to overcome them in order to continue to live our lives. In the following paragraphs, we see the judgment she has towards people who fail to consume themselves within the events happening around them. More specifically, we see her judgment towards the young man across the street who is so dedicatedly working on his table and in fact she wonders why he takes, “all those pains to make it beautiful?” She fails to understand his outlook on life by presenting us with a rhetorical question that she herself could not answer in the very moment. She fails to understand why and how a person can cherish life so deeply when his surroundings consist of nothing but chaos. As we continue to read through her essay we come across a moment that changes her perspective on the idea that people can quite possibly live a life that is consumed in something they love rather than the fear of
Connie is only concerned about her physical appearance. She can be described as being narcissistic because "she had a quick, nervous giggling habit of craning her neck to glance into mirror or checking other people's faces to make sure her own was all right" (Oates 148). Connie wants her life to be different from everyone else's in her family. She thinks because she is prettier, she is entitled to much more. She wants to live the "perfect life" in which she finds the right boy, marries him, and lives happily ever after. This expectation is nothing less than impossible because she has not experienced love or anything like it. She has only been subjected to a fantasy world where everything is seemingly perfect. This is illustrated in the story when Connie is thinking about her previous encounters with boys: "Connie sat with her eyes closed in the sun, dreaming and dazed with the warmth about her as if this were a kind of love, the caresses of love, and her mind slipped over onto thoughts of the boy she had been with the night before and how nice he had been, how gentle, the way it was in movies and promised in songs" (151).
Connie has the need to be viewed as older and as more mature than she really is, all the while still displaying childlike behavior. She shows this childlike behavior by “craning her neck to glance in mirrors [and] checking other people’s faces to make sure her own was all right” (Oates 323). This shows that Connie is very insecure and needs other people’s approval. Although on one side she is very childish, on the other side she has a strong desire to be treated like an adult. This longing for adulthood is part of her coming of age, and is demonstrated by her going out to “bright-lit, fly-infested restaurant[s]” and meeting boys, staying out with those boys for three hours at a time, and lying to her parents about where she has been and who she has been with (Oates 325, 326). “Everything about her ha[s] two sides to it, one for home and one for anywhere that was not home” (Oates 324). Even her physical movements represent her two-sided nature: “her walk that could be childlike and bobbing, or languid enough to make anyone think she was hearin...
However, as I continued to read the story I began to wonder if maybe Connie’s life was not in any way parallel to my own. I have a younger sister where she has an older sister, but that is where the similarities end. Her mother is always telling her that she should be more like June, her older sister. It seemed to me that June living with her parents at her age was unusual, but the fact that she seemed to enjoy this and was always doing things to h...
...tomy between reality and dreams quite well throughout her piece. She provides the reader with two ways to experience the story: either as reality or as reality that turns into a nightmare. This dichotomy that Oates creates “allows the reader to escape this story, and allows this story to end” (Hurley 374). The end of the story shows Connie entering the new world of experience, and Oates wants the reader to sense her fear. Oates intricately provides the reader with clues that help see why Connie’s experience with Arnold is just a nightmare. She also allows the reader to see how this nightmare is meant to scare Connie into making the realization that her decisions have consequences. I hope that anyone reading this learns from Connie that not everything we do is good for us, and we have to think about the consequences of our actions, whether good or bad, before we act.
Connie's character plays a big role in what ultimately happens to her. Connie is a vain girl that thinks the way you look is everything. She plays the stereotypical part for girls in today's society. She thinks that as long as you are pretty and dress a certain way then you are everything. This comes across when Oates writes "Connie thought that her mother preferred her to June because she was prettier" (980). By flaunting her looks she could easily give a guy like Arnold Friend perverted ideas about her. It could make them see her as easy, which he did.
Her exposition is painstaking. She sets the scene by making the main character and protagonist, Connie, parallel to an average girl in the sixties. Oates' narrator introduces Connie using elements of description which puts emphasis on the vanity of the main character. Connie's mother is quickly introduced and is used by the narrator to reveal how much disdain her mother has for her vanity. The narrator uses the main character's mother to introduce her sister, June.
Being sexualized by the boys around her, Connie is self-conscious and finds her worth in beauty. The story even states, “She knew she was pretty and that was everything” (Oates 422). She is concerned about her appearance and what others think of her because she has been taught that she lacks any value outside of physical beauty norms. Arnold Friend, even tells Connie, “...be sweet like you can because what else is there for a girl like you but to be sweet and pretty and give in?” (Oates 432). Between this coaxing and the consistent message about the importance of beauty, Connie is nearly forced to conform to this mentality, which displays the lack of respect for young females as human beings. This in turn leads women to self-degradation as they are consistently viewed as sexual
In “Calling Home”, by Jean Brandt and “An American Childhood” by Annie Dillard, both girls are confronted with their sense of conscience and of right and wrong. In the process, both girls experience memorable lessons as a consequence of the decisions they make. In “Calling Home”, thirteen year old Jean realizes that her actions not only affect her but more importantly, her loved ones, when she is caught shoplifting and arrested during a Christmas shopping trip with her siblings and grandmother. In “An American Childhood”, seven year old Annie realizes that adults and their feelings are valid and that they can be just as vulnerable and full of tenacity as a child after she and her friend find themselves being chased by a man who is none too amused at being a target of their snowball throwing antics. In both stories, Annie and Jean are smug in their sense of power and control. Both girls exhibit a general lack of respect for authority by justifying their actions and displaying a false sense of entitlement to pursue and attain whatever they wish, as if ordinary rules do not apply to them.
Oates takes us to a journey of rebellion as the protagonist sorts through self-created illusion in order to come to terms with her own sexual inexperience. Connie’s desires for attention from the opposite sex, her vanity and immaturity blind her to think of the real intentions of guys, in this case Arnold Friend. A character that many critics argue is real, yet, others argue it was created by Connie’s mind.
Connie’s clothes and infatuation with her own beauty symbolize her lack of maturity or knowing her true self, which in the end enables her to be manipulated by Arnold Friend. Connie was enamored with her own beauty; in the beginning of the story Oates states that Connie “knew
Both books are told in the first person; both narrators are young girls, living in destitute neighborhoods, who witness the harsh realities of life for those who are poor, abused, and hopeless, although the narrators themselves manage to survive their tough environments with their wits and strength intact. Books are more than simple literary exercises, written merely to amuse or delight their audiences. Both authors attempt to provoke their readers to think about the social issues their novels present.... ... middle of paper ...
due to her family leaving to attend a barbeque. Like Chet, Connie also has to rely on herself to overcome her obstacles, such as the threatening Arnold Friend. Stegner and Oates both use this plot point in order to establish that their characters cannot rely on their family for help or protection, which emphasizes their transition to adulthood. In Stegner’s depiction, the purpose seems to be the successful overcoming of obstacles that a child, specifically a boy, has to go through in order to become a man.