The exploration of space is a common occurrence in science fiction. Two of Samuel R. Delany’s short stories, Star Pit and aye, and gomorrah, take that standard story line and complicates it, adding the caveat that only certain types of people are granted full access. In both Star Pit and aye, and gomorrah, Delany establishes story-worlds that contain a select group of individuals who are chosen to venture into space in a capacity the rest of their society is unable to do. In Star Pit, they are “golden”, a small group of “psychological freaks” able to survive going light-years past the galactic rim, a feat that destroys most (Delany 13). In aye, and gomorrah, “Spacers” are the chosen ones, forced to undergo physical alterations to qualify them for the work they are singled out to do. The result of being one of the special few, in both stories, is to be considered separate from the rest of society, and hated, ignored, or shunned. This division comes from the imposition of boundaries on what the golden …show more content…
and Spacers can be. In addition to the physical and psychological limits they are unable to rid themselves of, they are categorized by those who fail to understand or sympathize with the conditions they have been pushed into. For the majority of Star Pit, the only descriptions of the golden come from Vyme’s narration, and his conversations with other characters. The first in depth explanation of the golden is from Vyme’s memory of the announcement made when they were first discovered, “’Some few of us whose sense of reality has been shattered by infantile, childhood, or prenatal trauma, whose physiological orientation makes life in our interstellar society painful or impossible – not all, but a few of these golden…can make the crossing and return’” (Delany 14). As the story progresses, more details surrounding the golden emerge. Comments from Vyme and Ratlit are representative of the public sentiment towards the golden. Ratlit, who is incredibly jealous of the freedom the golden appear to have, contributes the “standard line” about the golden, “There are only two types of golden…Mean ones and stupid ones” (Delany 31). When Ratlit wants to steal a golden belt, their identifier, Vyme cautions against being mistaken for golden, saying, “I’d be nasty to whoever stole the belt and wore it. Nobody but a golden deserves to be hated that much” (Delany 24). Even Allegra, who discovers she is golden, still shares the collective view that golden are “mean or stupid”. The reader is constantly reminded how resented the golden are and are given justifications for that resentment. In the eyes of the non-golden, they are violent and aggressive, unpunishable due to their rarity and necessity, and free to escape the “interstellar society”. The role the golden have been cast in is finally challenged with the introduction of the character An, a young golden. During a conversation with Vyme, An rejects Vyme’s perception of the golden: “…I try to get used to you, behaving like something that isn’t even savage. But, boy-kid, your kind really mess with a guy’s picture of the universe.” “And what the hell do you expect us to act like?” An shot back. Spittle glittered on his lips again. “What would you do if you were trapped like us?” “Huh?” I said questioningly. “You, trapped?” “Look.” A spasm passed over his shoulders. “The psycho-technician who made sure I was properly psychotic wasn’t a golden, brother! You pay us to bring back the weapons, dad! We don’t fight your damn wars, grampa! You’re the ones who take us away from our groups, say we’re too valuable to submit to your laws, then deny us our heredity because we don’t breed true, no-relative-of-mine!” (Delany 54-55) This exchange is crucial because it’s the first time the reader gets a glimpse at the golden perspective. Up until this point, it’s been well established that the golden are psychologically damaged, however they appear to possess power and freedom in the eyes of those not golden. They are seemingly above the law, their actions having no consequences, and they get to explore the recesses of the galaxy. With An’s outburst, something else becomes clear. The golden are being exploited. They are chosen based on characteristics outside their control, their mental health, taken from their families, and subjected to treatments to further their psychotic state. They don’t choose to be golden, but once they have been identified, they are subject to the hatred of others. While this doesn’t excuse their behavior, they are certainly a product of their environment. Vyme struggles with the thought of the golden being trapped, later saying to An, “to be trapped, there has to be somewhere you can’t go. For it to bug you, there has to be something else around that can,” (Delany 67). This prompts An to explain that there are parallel universes that the golden are unable to access, but what stands out is how Vyme defines being trapped. For Vyme, it’s very literal, where someone can and can’t go. Knowing this, it’s understandable that Vyme doesn’t accept that the golden could be trapped, he is not considering social boundaries or the struggle of being mentally unstable. Though An clarifies that he wasn’t saying that the non-golden were trapping him in his outburst, it still stands that society has a rigid, narrow view of the golden that they have no choice but to live with. An disrupts the narrative of the golden, and even if his contribution does little to change the characters judgements, it’s a reminder of the importance of perspective. In aye, and gomorrah, the entire story from the viewpoint of a Spacer, one of the chosen space-goers. Similar to the golden, the Spacers are identified by a factor they have no agency over, the state of their sexuality. The search for the sexually stunted is depicted as multipurpose. The work the Spacers are need for exposes them to extreme radiation that damages genitals. Instead of finding away to protect against the radiation, a different approach in taken, as the Spacer explains, ‘"Population Explosion time," I said. "No, they were hunting for any excuse to cut down kids back then—especially deformed ones"’ (Delany 97). The “they” the Spacer refers to elected to essentially neuter those they didn’t want to procreate and pass on their “deformities”. Interestingly, the Spacer doesn’t outwardly appear to resent the changes that have been made to their body, calling it a “fine solution” and saying that they are “happy with it” (Delany 97).
The Spacer has no bitterness towards the physical limits they are forced to live with, the inability to have and act on sexual desires. Instead, they are more occupied by the social barrier being a Spacer create, because, also like the golden, the general public would prefer the Spacers to keep their distance. This becomes extremely clear almost immediately from the interactions the Spacers have with non-Spacers while on Earth. One of the comments made by a woman is particularly revealing, with her first saying, “Spacer, do you not think you . . . people should leave?" And continuing with when asked if she is a frelk, "Sorry. But you have nothing that . . . would be useful to me. It is too bad, for you look like you were once a woman, no? And I like women, too. . . ." (Delany
92). The pause before calling Spacers people paired with the insinuation that the Spacers lacking genitals makes them useless speaks volumes to the social boundaries imposed on the Spacers. The physical alteration and lack of sexuality may not be a concern of the Spacers, but it dehumanizes them to the rest of society, making them outcasts. Frelks, an almost equally ostracized group, are the opposite side of the spectrum, shunned for what are seen as deviant sexual desires, the sexual interest in Spacers, however, the frelks have the ability to hide what they are while the Spacers can’t avoid recognition. The unique relationship between frelks and spacers is complicated further when the narrator is propositioned by a frelk woman. Because the reader is privy to the Spacers thoughts, the complexness of their feeling towards the frelks can be explored. Due to the position the Spacers have been chosen for and their placement in society as a result, they are incredibly lonely, and, overall, the only people they can look to for any kind of company is the frelks. Because the frelks desire them for sexual purposes, the Spacers grapple with prostituting themselves in exchange for being temporarily accepted. The frelks are inescapably obsessed with the Spacers out of a need to escape their own restrictions, something that they find through the Spacers. As the frelk the narrator goes home with explains, “We have our dull, circled lives, bound to gravity, worshipping you!” This is seen further in the large collection of space and Spacer paraphernalia the frelk has in her home. The frelk hints that she, and other frelks, are trapped by their “perversions,” how she can’t change what she is, and furthermore, envies the Spacers for the freedom of being essentially sexless. “You don’t change your perversions. You have no perversions at all. You’re free of the whole business.” In the frelk’s eyes, the physical alterations the Spacers undergo frees them from facing the ostracization from an unaccepted sexual desire. The frelk thinks she understands the Spacer, calling herself and other frelks “experts”, and that she is entitled to something from them because of that (Delany 96). In her eyes, she’s not buying the Spacer, but expressing her love for them. She struggles to understand when the Spacer wants something important of hers in lieu of money. She doesn’t comprehend that the Spacer needs to feel that there is more to their transaction than sex, needs something to ease the loneliness, which is the reason the Spacer went home with her saying, "What will you give me? I want something," I said. "That's why I came. I'm lonely. Maybe I want to find out how far it goes. I don't know yet" (Delany 100). Shortly after the Spacer has explained their position, they a met with the same line they here from everyone else, “Don’t you think you should leave?” (Delany 101). Despite what the frelk asserts, that she loves the Spacers, ultimately, they are an object, and when the object doesn’t fit in the space that’s been made for it, it is rejected. Somewhat similarly, Vyme struggled to accept that the golden could possibly feel trapped. The idea didn’t fit with the picture he had of the golden, and was therefore ignored. This speaks to one of the results of creating boundaries within a society, the simplification of the “other”. By establishing strict categories based on arbitrary or perceived limits, and then ignoring new information that could potentially upset the borders leads to the perception of people as one-dimensional characters. It becomes much easier to rationalize the mistreatment and exploitation on an “other” if that “other” can be dehumanized, stripped of intricate emotions or thoughts. For the golden, they are psychologically broken, mean, and stupid, so why shouldn’t they be used for the good of society even if doing so further deteriorates their mental state. The Spacers “sexual responses are hopelessly retarded at puberty,” so it is only logical to rid them of all sexual capabilities so they can be repurposed into something more useful. Even for the frelks, they are a means to an end, a temporary escape from a culture that doesn’t accept them.
Tom Wolfe writes in the book “The Right Stuff” about early jet pilots that demonstrated extreme bravery, and behaviorisms that enabled them to be part of a furtive group of individuals. It has been said that these men usually assemble in groups among themselves in a way that solicited the men to be a part of a privileged membership. It is these pilots with proven courage, and abilities that will go forward testing the next barrier; space.
The intended audience for this text are those who hold some sort of privilege, but don’t acknowledge or accept it. In the excerpt, Gay states that “at some point, you have to surrender to the kinds of privileges you hold. Nearly everyone, particularly in
Some people call Space “The Final Frontier” but at one point all land west of the Mississippi was considered the frontier. Humans are curious people, sometimes too curious for our own good, but when we find something new we always explore and why would it be any different with space. When we explore the out reaches of space will no longer seem so small or insignificant. The idea of one day unlocking all of the Universe’s secrets, solely through our own advancements as a people, is what gives me that sense of
There are many people who see space as the last and greatest frontier for humankind. There are many groups who are leading the way and NASA is one of them. But should our tax dollars be invested in such an idea? No, according to British history professor Jerry DeGroot. His thesis, in the article “is that United States should, a sensually, defund NASA. From what I can tell, he uses mainly pathos to try to sway his argument, leaving very little appeals to ethos and practically none to logos. I’m going to explore these three appeals, as well as many of the fallacies he uses within the piece.
INTRODUCTION Attention-getter: “Space travel benefits us here on Earth. And we ain’t stopped yet. There’s more exploration to come.” (Nichelle Nichols from Star Trek) Credibility: Throughout our childhood as we study space, solar systems, planets we all come to a point of having the dream of exploring the space or learn more about it in the future.
All-men men were concluded to be the “least supportive, responsive, or humane.” (paragraph 10) While on the other hand, androgynous men passed with flying colors. He not only knows about the feminine culture, but takes it to the next level and become a part of it. He is one who “cuddles kittens, and bounces babies, and has a sympathetic ear for someone in distress. For a sexual partner, Gross concedes that women would prefer the jock over the friend of an androgynous man. However, the masculine man would seem to portray a person resembling your opponent, having to try to “win you over.” The androgynous man would not be an “opponent” per say, but rather your teammate. Rather than a race to finish first, to the androgynous man, sensuality is a pleasure to
Dubner, Stephen. "Is Space Exploration Worth the Cost?." Freakonomics: The Hidden Side of Everything. New York Times, 11/1/2010. Web. 18 Jul 2010. .
Women experienced a great deal of conflict to be seen as equals to men in the workplace. Homosexuals have stepped out of society’s gender expectations, producing their own controversies and disagreements. The traditional gender roles of “Shiloh” and “Boys and Girls” are from the past, and many steps have been made past them, but society still holds on tight to portions of those established ways. Still, conflict will always occur where ideas diverge.
Tom Wolfe’s book, “The Right Stuff,” is a 1979 fascinating non-fiction account of the early days of the U.S. space program. It also describes the men who aided in launching the first manned flights. It is a novel about the people who had “the right stuff” a combination of talent, heroism, athleticism and the bravery who started as test pilots and those who became the famous mercury astronauts. Legendary test pilot Chuck Yeager is one of the primary characters, whose bravery in the space became the epitome of the risky missions done by the pilots. Chuck Yeager continually set the new airspeed as well as altitude records while flying the experimental planes. Wolfe places the events in a precise political
Stereotypes have become a socially accepted phenomena in today’s society. So socially acceptable, in fact, they have made it onto advertising billboards and into our daily language. We do not think twice as they pass our tongues, and we do tilt our heads in concern or questioning as they pass into our ears. In Judith Butler’s essay “Besides Oneself: On the Limits of Sexual Autonomy”, stereotypes are exposed and explored. Especially stereotypes pertaining to sexual orientation. Butler explains how stereotypes are unacceptable. She does this in a way which allows her to concurrently explore what it means to be human, and also what humans do or need to make Earth a livable place for ourselves. When examining Butler’s essay, one could say, and
Humans have dreamed of leaving the earth and traveling space for many years, and up to this day they have taken many steps in the right direction. Yet, with every new frontier they approach, new problems loom over the horizon. All problems involved with space exploration may not directly involve space itself. Many of those problems surface right here on Earth. Some of the easier issues have been resolved, such as escaping the forces of gravity to reach outer space. More of these problems are far more arduous and the solutions need more time to be worked out properly. In “The Coming Schism” by James E. and Alcestis R. Oberg, humans have already begun colonizing space, yet there are still new problems arising. Major problems such as financing, communication and culture conflicts are important in the journey to space, because they all have the potential to disrupt progress.
Since the beginning of time, mankind has sought after learning about and exploring the universe. This yearning drove us to achieve such great things as the journey to the moon and the discovery of water on mars. Nowadays, several people argue as to whether or not space exploration is worth the effort. I believe that it is humanity’s instinctual nature to pursue a better understanding of ourselves, and our universe. Further understanding of our universe will lead to the discovery of new technologies and ways to secure humanity’s survivability. As such, this essay will argue that space exploration is a necessity to our kind and that NASA should be progressively more financed.
* The personal space may be larger than normal for a man and a woman
An Astronomy topic that has always been intriguing is space travel. The ability to rocket into space, look down on Earth, and “…explore strange new worlds, to seek out new life and new civilizations, to boldly go where no man has gone before” (IMDB) is an adventure that people dream of experiencing. On July 20, 1969, an estimated six million people watched Neil Armstrong become the first man to walk on the Moon (Nixon Library). Presently, people are paying Virgin Galactic $250,000 to reserve a seat on a spaceship that is expected to tour suborbital space in the near future (Virgin Galactic). Although space travel continues to be of interest, there is also some controversy. Controversies include: the allocation of government resources for space exploration, government verses commercial spacecrafts, and the need to colonize other planets for the survival of humanity. The intrigue and the controversy of space travel are the reasons for this Astronomy conversation.
Anderson, E., Piven, J. & Tito, D. (2005), The Space Tourist's Handbook: Where to Go, What