Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Sectionalism versus nationalism dbq
Sectionalism versus nationalism dbq
Sectionalism versus nationalism dbq
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The period in american history between the war of 1812 and the civil war saw growth in nationalism then in sectionalism. Nationalism shows pride in our county or nation, while sectionalism shows pride and loyalty to our region of the country. The major difference between the north and the south was that the North had larger factories and relied on immigrants, while on the other hand the South had more farms and relied on slave labor. The north had lots of factories that were steam powered instead of water powered. The factories were located near railroads, they were very dirty and dangerous towards the workers. In the summer the factories where extremely hot and in the winners it was extremely cold, and there was very poor ventilation. …show more content…
The workers were treated like machines they didn't get any breaks and had to work 12-14 hour shifts will little pay. Most of the workers were very poor, Families signed contracts so if one of the family members loses his/her job the whole family would lose their job. In the factories there was two groups the skilled and the unskilled workers, The skilled workers were very hard to replace so the employees had to listen to their demands or they would do on strike. The skilled workers had less hours and better pay. The unskilled workers were very easy to replace so the employees paid little to no attention to their demands. Most unskilled workers were from Germany and Ireland they came to america as immigrants because there potatoe farms were doing poorly and there was a famine. While the north relied on factories the south relied on agriculture and slavery.
The south was known as the cotton kingdom because cotton was the major crop grown there. Cotton became a lot more populated after a man named Eli Whitney invented the cotton gin. The cotton gin was a machine that that separated the seeds and dirt from the fibers of the cotton. The significance of the cotton gin was that it allowed one person to do the work of 1,000 people. The cotton gin made slavery expand. In 1860 only one white southerner in 30 belonged to a planer family, and less than 1% of planters owned only one or two slaves. 75% where small farmers might own one or two slaves, most didn't own their land they rented it and lived in a small house. Poor whites were very low on the social ladder and had a hard life but were happy they were free. In 1860 over 200,000 free blacks lived in the south, they had special laws and weren't able to travel. Many free blacks were forced to move to the north. Slave life depended on the plantation, some slaves were treated very good and there owners made sure they had good warm food a warm place to sleep and nice clothes, while others were treated very poorly and there owners spent little to no time on
them. In conclusion the major difference between the north and the south was that the north was more industrial and relied on immigrant labor, while the south was more relied on slave labor and farms. The south began to resent the north because they said the north treated him like kids. The difference between the two regions was that the south felt like the north was controlling them which caused anger. Those differences eventually lead to the Civil War.
After the war of 1812, there was a strong sense of nationalism since the young United States had won a war against the powerful British Army. However, the loss of thousands of southern slaves and the British embargo led both the north and the south to lament over the cost of the war. The time period from 1815 – 1825 that some historians call the era of good feelings was not as positive a time period as the title implies; factions ran rampant on the verge of causing an implosion for our country’s political system.
The “Era of Good Feelings,” beginning after the war of 1812 and lasting into the 1820s, is typically represented as a positive time in American history full of nationalism. However, in considering this time period, one remember to examine both the positive nationalistic perspective and the negative sectionalist perspective. Socially, after the war of 1812, the American morale was strengthened and nationalism grew. Politically, the collapse of the Federalist party after the Hartford convention lead to a more united voting population, having only one viable party to vote for. Economically, the national bank expanded its power and protective tariffs were issued, which were looked upon negatively in the south, causing division
oth had a high code of honour. The people in the South were more respectable and had higher status if they had a lot of slaves. The North also had a high code of honour and this depended on their education and careers. Both the North and the South were also very religious and practiced their religion. Overall, I feel that the differences were very substantial between the North and the South as these differences played a part to the Civil War.
During the era of 1789-1850, the South was an agricultural society. This is where tobacco, rice, sugar, cotton, and wheat were grown for economic resources. Because of labor shortage and the upkeeps of the farm to maintain the sale of merchandise property-owners purchased black people as slaves to work their agricultural estate, also low- key sharecroppers often used slave work as their resources as well. As the South developed, profits and businesses grew too, especially those expected to build up the local crops or remove natural resources. Conversely, these trades regularly hire non-landowning whites as well as slaves either claimed or chartered. With that being said, the African culture played a significant role as slaves in the south
Sectionalism can be described as loyalty specifically to one’s section or region. In terms of the United States, sectionalism refers to two major regions, the North and the South. It became a rising issue in the colonies in the 1800’s and undoubtedly aided in the start of the civil war. If one was to ask Northerners, they would blame the South and vice-versa. To be brutally honest, it was a combination of both regions and their extreme sectionalism that inevitably led to an American’s nightmare, a Civil War within the Union.
In the 1850's the North was more populous and urban, due to all the Irish and German immigrants that traveled to the states. By1860, 9 out of the 10 biggest cities were in the North. The North also had 70% of the railroads, and more telegraph lines to send messages instantly. The North had a lot more industry also, with its 10,000 factories that brought in $1.5 billion dollars in goods compared to the South's 20,000 that brought in $155 million.(Source 1) The
The North had nearly 3 times as many citizens as the South. With a population of this size the North had an extremely large amount of people that could work in factories. This meant that the North could make 3 times as many mini balls and supplies to help the war effort.(Northern Advantages) With this large amount of people the North's army was also quite large. The North's army consisted of about 2 times as many people as the South.
1. The three components of the American System were establishing a new protective tariff, starting a new transportation system and restoring the national bank. Henry Clay thought that each of these components would strengthen and unify the nation because he thought the American system would unite the nation’s economic resources because the south would grow food and raise animals that the north would eat and in return the south would by the manufactured goods the north made. A new transportation system would allow trade between the north and the south. Now America could finally become independent economically. And the tariff would help because during the War of 1812 British merchants brought a great deal of products to the United States and sold them at much lower prices than American made goods, so the tariff would raise the prices of the British goods so the American merchants could sell their products at a lower price.
The Union economy was based on manufacturing, and even the minorities in the North were better off than those in the South most of the time. The Northern politicians wanted tariffs, and a large army. The Southern plantation owners wanted the exact opposite.
In the south, cotton was becoming a huge success for the southern farmer. Cotton, being a very laborious crop, required the ownership of many slaves per plantation. Unlike the immigrants of the north, slaves were property. Slaves were also much less of a profit. When a slave became ill he could not simply be replaced, he needed to be cared for, after all, this was the plantation owners property. On the other hand in the north if a worker became to ill to work, there were several immigrants waiting for the job.
The most important difference between the north and south was the issue of slavery. The South was primarily agricultural, and the southern economy was based upon the existence of large family farms known as plantations. The plantation economy relied on cheap labor in the form of slaves to produce tobacco and cotton. Farmers on the plantation did not do the work themselves; they needed slaves in order to make the largest amount of money possible. The North, however, was primarily industrial in nature. The North believed that all men should be able to work and support themselves and their families, regardless of color. They also felt that if a man were happy doing his job, then he would be more productive. Therefore, both he and the business would make more money.
There are three types of nationalism movements; for example, unification, separation, and state-building. The first nationalism movement is known as the unification. The unification is when the mergers of politically divided but culturally similar lands, they were building new nations. Nationalism destroyed all empire, and in the process created new nations. A couple of examples of unification being used in the world would be during the 19th century in Italy, and the 19th century in
Nationalism has a long history although most scholarly research on Nationalism only began in the mid-twentieth century. Some scholars point to the French Revolution of 1789 as the birth of Nationalism. The French Revolution is seen...
Nationalism is a way of thinking both politically and socially to create a community united by history, ethnicity, religions, common culture, and language. Numerous effects occurred while establishing a Nationalist community, some effects were a long term impact on Nationalism, and other were short term impacts on Nationalism. Bloody Sunday was a big impact of Nationalism, what started out as a peaceful march of Petersburg workers marching to the Winter Palace led by Father Gapon turned out to be a nightmare. The marchers wanted to establish an eight hour work day, establish minimum wage, and assemble a constitution, while the marchers marched they were fired upon by Russian troops and several hundred marchers were killed.
The rise of nationalism and its mark on the history of Europe was quite profound. The unification of major powers and the civil unrest on the journey to unification created a large chapter of history in the nineteenth century. By the 1900s the mark of nationalism had been left on Italy, Germany, France and Great Britain. The major European powers had come through great trials to set the stage for the twentieth century and the conflicts that will erupt. Nationalism will be remembered as a great period of change and growth.