Upper South Vs Lower South Essay

During the era of 1789-1850, the South was an agricultural society. This is where tobacco, rice, sugar, cotton, and wheat were grown for economic resources. Because of labor shortage and the upkeeps of the farm to maintain the sale of merchandise property-owners purchased black people as slaves to work their agricultural estate, also low- key sharecroppers often used slave work as their resources as well. As the South developed, profits and businesses grew too, especially those expected to build up the local crops or remove natural resources. Conversely, these trades regularly hire non-landowning whites as well as slaves either claimed or chartered. With that being said, the African culture played a significant role as slaves in the south

on the grounds that there was a lack of works through the southern states.
However, the use of the slave diminished in the north over time because manufacturing works were available, therefore, it increased the continuation of the slaves in the southern states because the south primary focus was agricultural. Observably, this was beneficial for the landowners to utilize slaves as opposed to employing white free workers who may cost more, strike, or leave. It is believed that the economic impact of Slavery in the South existed for extended periods of time in the era of 1789 thru 1850 because of their plantations depended on increased production of export crops on increasingly tired soil and agricultural resources such as cotton, wheat, and sugar.
According to Post (2003), argues main ideas as to why the economic development arose in the Antebellum South. The primary economic development focus of the South was to own slaves for agricultural needs. I believe that the large estates that partake in slavery and other inequality-perpetuating organizations may have hampered the ensuing financial growth. The reason being is that the estimated costs have an influence of slavery and their current performance relating to the US economy as well as how slave use is adversely associated with the ensuing trade and industrial growth. However, this approach is not driven by a vast scale agricultural estate of repression, but a more precise measure of production abilities.
Secondly, Post (2003) discovers “The markets created by the African slave trade and the plantation economies of British-manufactured goods as diverse as iron, textiles, glass and China were important stimuli for the growth of industrial capitalism in Britain (Post, 2003). Interpretatively, this means that the legacy of slavery has had a dynamic and persistent effect on production on a local and national level. Perspective, The author of this article, explores the controversial issues, identifying the impact of slavery, the plantations a slave resides, and the influence on economic development throughout the regions. Lastly, the author mentions the enslavement of Africans and how they were legally a form of property owned by their masters. Each person was collectively and individually used as collateral in all kinds of sales and trades for business transactions relating to other types of goods and services.
Pargas (2003) reading provides historical research as it relates to awareness of the political and economic aspects that transpired throughout the antebellum period. This article provides a comprehensive outlook communicating how the domestic slave trade was. Also, Pargas (2003) explains what the slaves had to go through residing in the Upper South on the plantations. The author argues, “Most established cotton planters, like Bennett Barrow, have fewer patients and erroneously assumed that the slaves from the Upper South would produce at full capacity in their first season.” “During the decades before the Civil War, slave-grown cotton accounted for over half the value of all United States exports and provided virtually all the cotton used in the northern textile industry and 70 percent of the cotton used in British mills”(Mintz). At this time the cotton was not being transported to Europe from the South, it was sent to New York, and then it was sent to England because of the different focuses on the cotton that was being manufactured in the United States and Europe. Interpretatively, during the antebellum period, the capital improvement in the economic status of blacks can’t be questioned because economic and transportation activities were reliant on the cotton that was yielded by slaves and so was the British fabric industry.
Conversely, the planters were expecting high expectations from their slave's profit from whatever they could produce. Pargas (2003) communicates the kind of work slaves was required to do in the Upper South, and how the slaves adapted to their new work as well as the demands residing on the plantation during the antebellum period. “Upper South slaves’ fear of death in the Deep South was real. To many, thought performing the presumed backbreaking labor of the cotton cultivation was bad enough, but working under the merciless sun and in the suffocating humidity of the southern interior was also believed to reduce their life expectancy significantly”(Pargas,2003, p. 564). The economy in the South started to move from the Upper South to the Lower South since it was an equivalent movement of enslaved workers to the South and West. The development of slavery in was a residential slave occupation of the Upper South. The subjugated Africans laboring in gardening in the United States was employed on cotton estates.
The reason for these matters is because of cotton. Cotton was a major cash crop in the South; therefore, the planters demanded a worldwide spread in their crops. Additionally, the planters had no limits on their demands, especially when the cotton gin was invented. When the cotton gin was invented, this made it easier for the seeds to be removed from the cotton. As more cotton was produced and sold nationally, the demands for the corps never ceased because southerners started looking for other means and crops boosting their economy. It has been known that cotton was the most gifted prospect, but it was geographically limited and labor-intensive.
In the South, the plantation was a part of a national, local and global political economy. The cotton market continues to be one of the biggest economic developments since it is seen with regards to the national economy of the Upper South. Conversely, when the economy started to develop, cotton cost began to rise, thus did the expansions of slaves living on plantations. All things considered, the southern economy was overpowered with cultivating and south grower, be that as it may, this drove business to put their cash on cotton as opposed to land or industrial facilities.
Douglas Egerton article contains information as it relates to the Old South and as to how the slaveholders were the business person that embraced the free enterprise, the demands of capitalism, and the poverty of slaves. The issue that was raised in the article was capitalism that produces a market with unpaid laborers owned by other people. Douglas Egerton main arguments were that you can’t have free labor without a market. The author states in his article, “One should not, however, interpret the devastating poverty of the slaves to mean that slavery itself was unprofitable.” In other words, southern planters only looked at slaves as an economic profit, but if they weren’t making any profits from their goods, the planters had to use the slaves. Even some of the richest planters could make any profit from their grains as well as generate a healthy economy. Slavery, as capitalism, has shown markets that they have no revolution or profits. In agreement with Egerton’s article, I believe that the economy was impacted by the South because of agriculture needs. The slaves helped southern planters develop crops while the farmers keep the money. Despite the fact that slavery was vital in the North, Northern businesses were interested in the maintainability of slavery in the South. The northern materials industry depending on the south turned out to be more exceptional because of the innovation of the cotton gin. The South relied on upon slaves, whether it was in the budget, people, or their own one of a kind need. Southern sharecroppers who did not depend upon slaves still relied upon them just on the way that they were underneath them or made them feel like they had a place in public. The economy in the south relied upon the slaves for the development of cotton around some regions and slave exchange.
Ransom and Sutch (2004), argue that the “adverse economic effects were the direct consequence of the successful accumulation of wealth in the form of slave value”. Slavery played an essential role in the antebellum South; it influenced the South both positively and negatively. For example, the yeoman was negatively affected by slavery because they could only produce small amounts of crops; on the other hand, slaves who were owned by wealthy planters could produce as much crops as they could, otherwise they only allow the yeoman small crop profits.
With everything expanding in the South, the number of slaves was increasing vastly because of cotton productions in the lower south.

“The contrast in the relative prominence of slavery between the Upper South and the Lower South reflects the adverse health conditions and arduous labor requirements of lowland rice cultivation, whereas tobacco farming continued to be attractive to free family farmers as well as to slave owners”(Engerman, Sutch, & Wright, 2004). The lower South depended on their slaves more than the Upper because they were in the process of cropping tobacco. The Upper South had to keep up with the lower south, because they had to focus on their slave trade that would build and expand their plantations. During this era, the diverse between these two regions were more concerned with the values of slaves. The values of slave price can increase because of high demands between the upper and the lower South. As the upper South was coming up short, the slave profession took off. The slave profession helped the Upper South, yet there were numerous deformities. The slave percentage was at the end of its usefulness of significance “in the Upper South” significance it had a weaker understanding of community reliability than in the cotton areas. This made the upper south separate on what the future may hold. It was not clear on whether if the future was based on the Deep South’s financial growth between the North and the

South.
As a result, cotton was an economic impact of slavery that played an important role in the South. Because in the 1789-1850 era, when the cotton gin was invented, the south did depend on the slaves to handpick cotton, and this impact slavery in the south, the more the price increased the work did too, meaning more slaves. Nowadays, with the invention of machinery to control, pick, and harvest the growth of cotton, slaves no longer partake in agriculture. Because of this new way of harvesting cotton, it is considered to be one man operation doing what eight to ten people previously did in the south. The epitome of changes in the US incorporated several ways to plant and harvest cotton on farms. These ways could be a cotton picker machine or a cotton stripper machine.