Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effect of the industrial revolution in America
Effect of the industrial revolution in America
Effect of the industrial revolution in America
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effect of the industrial revolution in America
1. The three components of the American System were establishing a new protective tariff, starting a new transportation system and restoring the national bank. Henry Clay thought that each of these components would strengthen and unify the nation because he thought the American system would unite the nation’s economic resources because the south would grow food and raise animals that the north would eat and in return the south would by the manufactured goods the north made. A new transportation system would allow trade between the north and the south. Now America could finally become independent economically. And the tariff would help because during the War of 1812 British merchants brought a great deal of products to the United States and sold them at much lower prices than American made goods, so the tariff would raise the prices of the British goods so the American merchants could sell their products at a lower price.
2. Female workers in Lowell, MA can be compared to slaves in the south in many ways but they are also very different. The conditions that the women in Lowell and slaves had to live in were very unsanitary and unbearable. The woman even felt like slaves. They were constantly watched as were slaves and they were also forced to go to church. Unlike slaves they were paid, even though they were paid very little because they could do the work of a man but get paid less, they still got paid. They had choices of what jobs to do where slaves were assigned to certain jobs. The women got some free time and even a 30 minute lunch break while slaves had very little or no brakes at all.
3. While John Marshall was chief justice the Supreme Court promoted the idea of nationalism. In the Supreme Court case Gibbons vs. Ogden help make certain that the federal government had power on pretty much everything crossing any state lines. Another case also supported the national government over the state government, it was McCulloch vs. Maryland.
4. America’s foreign policy followed and promoted the idea of nationalism between 1825 and 1825 by making a treaty with Great Britain to trim down the number of military fleets at the Great Lakes. Also the Rush-Bagot Treaty made America and Canada remove all their troops from their shared border. John Adams also held the convention of 1818, which made a compromise with Britain to share the Oregon territory.
As the Reconstruction Era ended, the United States became the up and coming world power. The Spanish-American war was in full swing, and the First World War was well on its way. As a result of the open-door policy, England, Germany, France, Russia, and eventually Japan experienced rapid industrial growth; the United States decided to pursue a foreign policy because of both self- interest and idealism. According to the documents, Economic self- interest, rather than idealism was more significant in driving American foreign policy from 1895 to 1920 because the United States wanted to protect their foreign trade, property and their access to recourses. While the documents also show that Nationalistic thought (idealism) was also crucial in driving American foreign policy, economic Self- interest prevailed.
After the war of 1812, there was a strong sense of nationalism since the young United States had won a war against the powerful British Army. However, the loss of thousands of southern slaves and the British embargo led both the north and the south to lament over the cost of the war. The time period from 1815 – 1825 that some historians call the era of good feelings was not as positive a time period as the title implies; factions ran rampant on the verge of causing an implosion for our country’s political system.
During the 19th century, America had an expanding idea of Manifest Destiny, where they would claim land all the way to the east coast. While the government and the citizens were focused on exploring new land, they were able to acquire much of the new land, introducing new people and ideas. Many of these people and ideas were vastly different than the original in the thirteen colonies, which frustrated many people. When these different people and beliefs collided, many disputes and disagreements were born, which intensified the results of sectionalism, unfortunately leading up the Civil War, having a huge impact on the country.
Clays American system was an economic plan consisting of the establishment of protective tariffs, to establish a national bank, and to improve the country’s infrastructure. Protective tariffs protected americans from cheap imports. America Needed a strong national bank to help regulate money and to get funding for internal improvement projects such as roads. Among the most important internal improvements created under the American System were the Erie Canal and the Cumberland Road. He wanted to unify the country by integrating the industrail with the agricultural and have a strengthened infrastructure and economic nationalism to allow for self sufficiency.
Q6. Nationalism was both known as a unifying and a disunifying force, your opinion depended on your perspective and background knowledge of the topic. Nationalism could be seen as a uniting force by bringing those together who believed in a single "nationality," or ancestors. Those who believed that nationalism was a unifying force also refused to be loyal to a king or queen, but they did remain loyal to those whom shared a common bond. Naturally, there were other who had different beliefs towards the topic. There were people who believed of nationalism as a disunifying force die to the fact that it would disrupt their wants to restore the old order before the French Revolution.
John Marshal’s role as chief justice of the Supreme Court had a profound impact on our government. He is considered to be one of the most influential leaders of our nations. His legacy is carried on through the decisions made by various court cases presented to the Supreme Court. Marshall’s rulings in the cases strengthened our nation. These decisions defined the role of the American government, recognized the Indian Natives as a nation, and promoted economic growth.
In this period, the U.S. was struggling with defining what exact ideals it was going to have due to the effects of having a rapid territorial and economic changes. There was a conflict with Great Britain because they repeatedly took control of how the U.S. interacted with other states, there was a risk that America was going to lose its independence. This conflict resolved from the War of 1812. After the War of 1812, the United States of America had finally gotten complete independence from the United Kingdom’s control. However, this was not the only thing that America was remembered for during this period. After getting out of Great Britain’s control, the U.S. was able to expand its territory as much as they could. This was the idea of Manifest Destiny, the idea that America was
The Louisiana Purchase, War of 1812, and the Monroe Doctrine helped to establish American nationalism by working together to bring us all together as a nation.
Our world today is becoming increasingly nationalised, boiling each nation into distict individuals. Wiping out variety and diversity in a country. This is shown in the source as the speaker has a standpoint, by which a country should spread its beliefs upon all of its civilians forming them into one. They describe this from a crisis standpoint as they plead for uniformity of their nations spirit, even going as far to say that, if unchanged it could be the destruction of their entire race. It is evident that this standpoint is false, for the events in history miror the opposition of this statement. Nationalism has brought terror among civilizations, to the point of destruction. This statement supported by the genocide that Stalin and Hitler brought upon their people, furthermore nationalism is what started WW1 that lead into WW2. Yes nationalism can bring great pride and joy to a nation but on the back hand it can also lead to destruction and death.
Prior to and after WWI the world saw a rise in nationalistic sentiments. The Middle East was not immune to this new ideology. Although Arab Nationalism had a start in the Ottoman Empire, its rise among the masses did not begin until after WWI. While a total rise in Arab Nationalism became apparent on the Arabian Peninsula, a separate nationalist movement began in Palestine as a way to combat a unique and repressive situation. In Palestine the British mandate, along with British support, and the world's support for Zionist immigration into Palestine, caused a number of European Zionists to move into the country. These factors created an agitated atmosphere among Palestinians. Although there was more than one factor in creating a Palestinian-centered Arab Nationalism, the mounting Zionist immigration was among the most prevalent of forces.
Anything an empire or country expands passed its borders it may have to face new culture. During expansions, two contrasting culture often meet and is forced to combined into the other. When this happens countries not only the lose of a significant amount of culture but the lose of the ability to have their own leader. Being forced to lose some on its identify, oppressed, or generally weakened are among the greatest causes for the European nationalism seen from the 15th to the 20th century.
Nationalism and imperialism played a big role in Pre World War One, with every country priding themselves domestically. This caused controversy within countries, and it also created alliances, eventually leading up to WW1.
For this discussion I chose to write about the second question which was about weather slavery was worse for women then it was for men. Personally I feel that slavery was a very awful thing that no one should have ever had to endure but slavery was defiantly way worse for women! Having to do just as much as the men, raise and take care of the children and suffer from all the sexual abuse from their owners, on top of that they had all this emotion turmoil from losing family to other slave owners. African American women were one of the most mistreated people during this time period.
Anderson notes that the emergence of nationalism was made possible by “a half-fortuitous, but explosive, interaction between a system of production…, a technology…., and the fatality of human linguistic diversity” (p. 43). The “system of production” refers to capitalism, a “technology” refers to the invention and use of the printing press, and the “fatality of linguistic diversity” refers to the eventual adoption of certain languages to dominate certain geographic areas. Print-capitalism made it possible for rapidly growing numbers of people to think about themselves and to relate themselves to others in new ways (p. 36). The spread of capitalism was aided by three extraneous factors, two of which contributed directly to the rise of national consciousness. The first was a change in the character of Latin itself. Early pre-Christian literature was spreading through the print-market. Second was the impact of the Reformation, which owed much of its success to print-capitalism. Before the age of print, Rome easily won every war in Western Europe because it always had better internal lines of communication than its challengers, but when in 1517 when Martin Luther nailed his theses to the chapel-door it was seen in every part of the country within fifteen days. Third was the slow, geographically uneven, spread of particular dialects as instruments of administrative centralization. Here it is useful to remember that the universality of Latin in mediaeval Western Europe never corresponded to a universal political system (p. 39-40).
Italian novelist and philosopher Umberto Eco asserted that “National identity is the last bastion of the dispossessed. But the meaning of identity is now based on hatred, on hatred for those who are not the same.”. Globalism and nationalism has been the debate of the 21st century, were both ideologies will shape the upcoming era as right-wing and left-wing shaped the last (Ip,2007, p6) However, liberals and conservatives may agree partially on ideas such as multiculturalism, legal immigration or democracy and disagree on climate change and energy while nationalism and globalism mostly disagree on everything, which creates an identity crisis. Nationalism is blamed for the identity crises because it isolates societies from the globe and creates