Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of nationalism
The importance of nationalism
The effect of globalization on communities
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of nationalism
Italian novelist and philosopher Umberto Eco asserted that “National identity is the last bastion of the dispossessed. But the meaning of identity is now based on hatred, on hatred for those who are not the same.”. Globalism and nationalism has been the debate of the 21st century, were both ideologies will shape the upcoming era as right-wing and left-wing shaped the last (Ip,2007, p6) However, liberals and conservatives may agree partially on ideas such as multiculturalism, legal immigration or democracy and disagree on climate change and energy while nationalism and globalism mostly disagree on everything, which creates an identity crisis. Nationalism is blamed for the identity crises because it isolates societies from the globe and creates …show more content…
Two scholars at the London School of Economics found that rising amounts of unemployment didn’t make British regions likely to vote to leave the EU but a growing migrant population did. These voters were bothered less by competition from immigrants than their perceived effect on the country’s linguistic, religious and cultural norms. (Ip, 2007, p25). The ideology of nationalism led the national society to be isolated from the outside world and not welcome foreigners, in return it has some numerous negative consequences on a society. A Nationalist society could not compete in the Information Age and has slow economic growth because of not embracing diversity and having closed borders, where there is clearly low innovation, creativity, and talent in addition to not sharing ideas, skills, and goods with the globe has resulted in nationalist societies failure to adopt changes in the rapidly changing global environment and having delayed market development has resulted in having unstable economic system. The Soviet Union in the twentieth century fell because they could not compete in the Information Age, in contrast, Dubai the leading entrepot of Middle East, is a hub in the global network of business centers in which the lives of the elites are virtually identical. Business leaders in all around the world have adopted same behaviors, While the people of their countries remain divided by culture, they have realized that to compete in the global marketplace they must conform to the culture of that marketplace. (Rothkopf, 1997,
1. The three components of the American System were establishing a new protective tariff, starting a new transportation system and restoring the national bank. Henry Clay thought that each of these components would strengthen and unify the nation because he thought the American system would unite the nation’s economic resources because the south would grow food and raise animals that the north would eat and in return the south would by the manufactured goods the north made. A new transportation system would allow trade between the north and the south. Now America could finally become independent economically. And the tariff would help because during the War of 1812 British merchants brought a great deal of products to the United States and sold them at much lower prices than American made goods, so the tariff would raise the prices of the British goods so the American merchants could sell their products at a lower price.
Q6. Nationalism was both known as a unifying and a disunifying force, your opinion depended on your perspective and background knowledge of the topic. Nationalism could be seen as a uniting force by bringing those together who believed in a single "nationality," or ancestors. Those who believed that nationalism was a unifying force also refused to be loyal to a king or queen, but they did remain loyal to those whom shared a common bond. Naturally, there were other who had different beliefs towards the topic. There were people who believed of nationalism as a disunifying force die to the fact that it would disrupt their wants to restore the old order before the French Revolution.
Communities throughout history have always sought to define who they are as a collective whole. Over the course of time, it was this that helped bind nations together through a collective sense of national identity and belonging. Although there are some set definitions that people use to define who collectively are, such as their own language and national history, this is not the only explanation of how groups of people have conceived who they are. In reality, communities have primarily conceived who they are by comparing themselves to an ‘other’ who they are not. As the historian Peter Sahlins put it, national identity over the course of time has been constructed “by the social or territorial boundaries drawn to distinguish the collective self and its implicit negation, the other.” As this argument suggests, throughout history, definitions of ‘us’ have been dependent on the contrasting definitions of ‘them’. I propose that communities have used this concept of the ‘other’ in order to elevate their own perceived superiority over groups that they deemed inferior. This essay will explore how these definitions have shaped history, from the time of the Romans all the way up to the twenty-first century. It will also be necessary to look at the varying ways in which groups are differentiated from each other, such as in terms of religion, nationality, race, and political beliefs. It is only through this exploration that we can fully understand the ways in which people have defined themselves and interacted with others over the course of time.
Prior to and after WWI the world saw a rise in nationalistic sentiments. The Middle East was not immune to this new ideology. Although Arab Nationalism had a start in the Ottoman Empire, its rise among the masses did not begin until after WWI. While a total rise in Arab Nationalism became apparent on the Arabian Peninsula, a separate nationalist movement began in Palestine as a way to combat a unique and repressive situation. In Palestine the British mandate, along with British support, and the world's support for Zionist immigration into Palestine, caused a number of European Zionists to move into the country. These factors created an agitated atmosphere among Palestinians. Although there was more than one factor in creating a Palestinian-centered Arab Nationalism, the mounting Zionist immigration was among the most prevalent of forces.
Although some have said that "nationalism is measles of humankind", in my opinion, it is not. Nationalism has led to the growth of identities, and innovations. These reasons influence us in so many good ways that we should embrace nationalism to a great extent. Although at the same time I believe that we shouldn't embrace it to the extent of where we hurt others.
Nationalism can also lead to the loss of cultural nations through the process of expansion and assimilation. Nationalism can also become very extreme, leading to ultranationalism and racism as responsibility and commitment to one’s own nation transforms to opinions of antagonism and hostility towards other nations that may be perceived to be a threat to your own. The events in the 20th century indicate that acts of nationalism have led to massive death tolls and loss of different cultural groups; and it is through these acts as evidence that the idea of nationalism should not be embraced and should be considered with care. As stated by Professor Vincent Barbarino, a balance between the positive and the negative aspects of nationalism must be found. However, if the present trend of events involving nationalism occurring in the world has indicated, this balance will be difficult to achieve and
The thematic overtones of fulfilling one’s responsibilities permeate the entirety of Virgil’s The Aeneid. Civic duty serves as the pivotal attribute directing the discourse taken by many, regardless of allegiance. At the time, this grand epic, at the surface, seemed to celebrate unwavering servitude to Rome and its mighty Caesar. This apparent celebration, however, also critiques such strict obedience. By closely examining Aeneas’s persistent adherence to the founding of Rome, along with his unquestionable concern for his Trojan brethren, it becomes apparent that the actions of this hero foreshadow the Roman concept of responsibility inherent in Virgil’s time.
Views on how globalization affects our identity range from, good to bad. Globalization is described as the process by which businesses or other organizations develop international influence or start operating on an international scale. To elaborate, globalization results from the removal of barriers between national economies to encourage the flow of goods, services, capital, and labor. Globalization has both a positive and a negative impact on identity. It can either promote aspects of identity, but it can also diminish them. Language can either be encouraged and promoted, or it can be stopped and destroyed by globalization. The central theme illustrated in sources I, II, and III, is how globalization affects everyone
Nation is a large aggregate of people united by common descent, history, culture, language, customs, ethnicity, or tradition, inhabiting a particular country or territory. It may have a claim to self-rule. However, it does not necessarily enjoy a state of its own. There are many nations around the world in which they have different national identities. National identity make a person feel that he is belonged to some groups. In addition, it provides the sense of security which gives an opportunity to build a strong relationship within the nation. However, excessive national identity and nationalism would affect the relationship of one nation with another nation negatively. “Nationalism is a modern movement. Throughout history people have been
Benedict Anderson’s Imagined Communities has definitely provided much food for thought. His arguments are well supported and make sense even now, when attempting to draw parallels between what nationalism meant in the past, what it means now and what it will mean in the future. From the advent of the printing press to the rise of the internet, imagined communities have expanded exponentially and if the past is any indicator of the future, they will continue to do so well into the
Salazar, J.M., 1998, ‘Social identity and national identity’, in Worchel, S., Morales, J.F., Páez, D., Deschamps, J.-C. (Eds.), Social Identity, International Perspectives. Sage, London.
With the dawning of the information age there has been a shrinking of relative distances between people and places all over the world. With an increase in international communication comes an increase in cultural sharing. Cultures all over the planet reflect influences of neighboring cultures and other international trading partners. As these and many other factors work towards creating a global village many people are baffled by the increase in nationalism. Nationalism is a highly emotional phenomenon and as such is very unpredictable. Nationalism is far beyond its peak and the current rise is likely only an indicator of the transitional stage of globalization.
In today’s global society, national identity could be constructed according to various points. Fearson (1999) explained national identity is a definition, which demonstrates the membership, expected behaviours of the particular group, brings a special pride in a person, and they are changeless but socially resulting. Again, national identity is not only about citizenship, but also about parentage, birthplace, race and whether the person has accents to speak the dialectal language or not (McCrone & Bechhofer, 2010). For example, during one survey about the national identities that practiced in countries where there are many immigrants, respondents placed great importance on the accent, their origins and bloodline to accept other newcomers if
The European Identity is an abstract concept that needs the support of many other definitions to help describe it. Blaming the idea of an identity with what is new, old, with the present and finally with what the future holds is what makes it more difficult to prove the existence of the same. Many of these concepts of structure builds an identity in a person which is reflected in the family, community, city and so for. The European Identity can be said that is a transformation that comes from the National Identity.
Globalization refers to the process of the intensification of economic, political, social and cultural relations across international boundaries. It can be argued that, in the contemporary world, the process of globalization is challenging the traditional ways in which migration and ethnic relations have been conceptualized. Globalization `denotes the processes through which sovereign national states are criss-crossed and undermined by transnational actors’. Globalization has three major pillars: 1) the emergence of global markets and post-national knowledge-intensive economies; 2) new information and communication technologies; and 3) unprecedented levels of immigration and displacement. The three formations suggest that globalization in