Northern Advantages Of The American Civil War

974 Words2 Pages

Northern Advantages of the Civil War
Some people thought that the winner of the Civil War was determined by the side with the most guns, but the North's victory involved much more. The Civil War produced new technological advances and Lincoln used them to his advantage. One example is how he used trains and the telegraph to help him win the war. During the American Civil War the Union had a number of advantages against the South. Abraham took advantage of his knowledge of the railroad system to help him win the war. The invention of the telegraph allowed lincoln to communicate directly to the generals giving Lincon yet another advantage during the war. Also the size of the North's population instantly boosted the Norths odds of winning …show more content…

The amount of track in the North completely overpowered the Souths length of track. At the beginning of the war the North had already built about 22,000 miles of track while the South had only built about 9,000 miles. Not only did the North have more track but it had been more strategically placed, so this meant that most of the Northern railroads were connected with other track systems. This meant that if the South took out part of the Norths track the North could still quickly get to their destination. Lincoln also had private railroad companies allow him access to their track and to the trains they were manufacturing to help with the war. As a result of this Lincoln took control of railroad systems to help him win the war. Baldwin Locomotive Works also built 500 engines for Lincoln to use in the war. With the railroad Lincoln sent troops longer distances in a fraction of the time that it would take to march. The troops didn't have to march to their destination and the could easily transfer food and medical supplies without wasting time, supplies and energy. Instead of taking days to get troops and supplies to a camp or battle it would only take a couple hours. (Railroads and the Civil …show more content…

The North had nearly 3 times as many citizens as the South. With a population of this size the North had an extremely large amount of people that could work in factories. This meant that the North could make 3 times as many mini balls and supplies to help the war effort.(Northern Advantages) With this large amount of people the North's army was also quite large. The North's army consisted of about 2 times as many people as the South. The North had about 2,129,000 soldiers while the South only has about 1,082,000 soldiers in their army. This means that in almost every battle in the civil war the South was being overpowered by the Norths numbers alone. The North's economy was much stronger than the Souths. The North's economy got so powerful because of their large amount of small farms and large factories. The North's production value was about $1.5 billion meanwhile the Souths was only about $155 million. (Northern

Show More
Related

  • Summary: Why The North Won The Civil War

    999 Words  | 2 Pages

    The North entered the Civil War with many distinct assets that rendered them more competent than the Southern states. Those assets consisted of having more men, more financial stability, economic strength, and far reaching transportation systems. According to the book: Why the North Won the Civil War by Donald, David Herbert, and Richard Nelson the primary cause to the North’s success was given by, “the vast superiority of the North in men and materials, in instruments of production, in communication facilities, in business organization and skill – and assuming for the sake of the argument no more than rough quality in statecraft and generalship – the final outcome seems all but inevitable.” In many ways the north, during the Civil, was more economically dominant than the South

    Read More

  • Was Northern Victory in the Civil War Inevitable?

    615 Words  | 2 Pages

    Several factors played in to the American Civil War that made it have the outcome that it did. Although the South had better trained officials due to their military school, the North was far more advanced than they. The North had the advantage over the South in several ways. However, the outcome of the Civil War was not inevitable: it was determined as much by human decisions and human willpower as by physical resources, although the North’s resources gave them an edge over the South.

    Read More

  • Did the North Win the Civil War before it Began?

    1097 Words  | 3 Pages

    I agree with the idea that the North had won the Civil War before it began to the extent of Lincoln’s conservative political stands. Trying to receive the favor of the South while winning in the North would require Lincoln to take neutral stands in heated political issues like slavery. It wasn’t really wan by the North until he broke away from these stands to enact the Emancipation Proclamation and turn the tides of war in favor of the North. “This Lincoln always publicly condemned the abolitionists who fought slavery by extra constitutional means – and condemned also the mobs who deprived them of their right of free speech and free press.” (Holfstadter, Lincoln and the Self-Made Myth) Other than that, the North had the upper hand in nearly all aspects that really mattered in times of war. With this information it is clear that without Lincoln’s conservative political stands a “Quick War” would have been much more realistic. Either way, the North had won the Civil War before it began. While the North thought about attacking and invading, the South thought about defending and causing attrition.

    Read More

  • Battle of Fort Sumter

    1165 Words  | 3 Pages

    McPherson, James M.; The Atlas of the Civil War. Macmillan: 15 Columbus Circle New York, NY. 1994.

    Read More

  • Why the South Could Not Win the Civil War

    518 Words  | 2 Pages

    Another reason the South well fell short of a victory was the obvious difference in population between the South and the North. The North at the time had twenty-two million men while the South had a meager nine-and-a-half million, of whom three-and-a-half million were slaves. While the slaves could be used to support the war effort through work on the plantations, in industries and as teamsters and pioneers with the army, they were not used as a combat arm in the war to any extent. This cuts the South's manpower by a third, leaving a fifteen-and-a-half million difference in the population of the two areas. Give the South fifteen-and-a-half million more possible soldiers, and the outcome would have been different.

    Read More

  • Key Factors That Led to Union Victory in the Civil War

    2114 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Civil War that took place in the United States from 1861 to 1865 could have easily swung either way at several points during the conflict. There is however several reasons that the North would emerge victorious from this bloody war that pit brother against brother. Some of the main contributing factors are superior industrial capabilities, more efficient logistical support, greater naval power, and a largely lopsided population in favor of the Union. Also one of the advantages the Union had was that of an experienced government, an advantage that very well might have been one of the greatest contributing factors to their success. There are many reasons factors that lead to the North's victory, and each of these elements in and amongst themselves was extremely vital to the effectiveness of the Northern military forces. Had any one of these factors not been in place the outcome of the war could have been significantly different, and the United States as we know it today could be quite a different place to live.

    Read More

  • Why The North Won the Civil War

    1524 Words  | 4 Pages

    The North was just simply better at maintaining the two most important elements to win a war: men and weapons. They did not have better tactics or leadership, they just had more men. Therefore, the North won the American Civil War due to their possession of greater manpower and resources although the South maintained more stable and efficient military leaders and strategies.

    Read More

  • Differences Between the North and South that Led to the Civil War

    1460 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Southern and Northern states varied on many issues, which eventually led them to the Civil War. There were deep economic, social, and political differences between the North and the South. These differences stemmed from the interpretation of the United States Constitution on both sides. In the end, all of these disagreements about the rights of states led to the Civil War. There were reasons other than slavery for the South?s secession. The manifestations of division in America were many: utopian communities, conflicts over public space, backlash against immigrants, urban riots, black protest, and Indian resistance (Norton 234). America was a divided land in need reform with the South in the most need. The South relied heavily on agriculture, as opposed to the North, which was highly populated and an industrialized society. The South grew cotton, which was its main cash crop and many Southerners knew that heavy reliance on slave labor would hurt the South eventually, but their warnings were not heeded. The South was based on a totalitarian system.

    Read More

  • Civil War and The South's Loss

    1824 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...iled to gain the recognition of the European nations, North's superior resources made the outcome inevitable, and moral of the South towards the end of the war. The Civil War was a trying time for both the North and the South alike, but the question of its outcome was obvious from the start. The North was guaranteed a decisive victory over the ill-equipped South. Northerners, prepared to endure the deficit of war, were startled to find that they were experiencing an enormous industrial boom even after the first year of war. To the South, however, the war was a draining and debilitating leech, sucking the land dry of any appearance of economical formidability. The debate continues whether or not the South could have won the Civil war. It’s always going to be a bunch of “what ifs?”

    Read More

  • The Navy Of The Civil War

    1156 Words  | 3 Pages

    The South was at a disadvantage to the North throughout the war. The South was at a lack for manpower during the war, since most of the seamen in the US Navy were from the North and therefore stayed with the Union when the southern states seceded. The South was also found disadvantaged for iron plates for ship armor, since there was only one establishment in the South capable of producing them.

    Read More

  • Expansion Of Government Power

    754 Words  | 2 Pages

    The power of the federal government can also be seen during Lincoln’s presidency at the time of the Civil War. He swayed the entire purpose of the war to something far off from what had been the initial purpose. From fighting for the preservation of the Union, Northerners readily began to accept that the abolition of slavery was the cause of the war for them, not the Union. Lincoln and his power made this happen.

    Read More

  • Discuss The Advantages And Disadvantages Of The South In The Civil War

    486 Words  | 1 Pages

    How did the north and the south had advantages and disadvatages in the Civil War. Well the North had an advatage because they had more railroads more than the south the north had 20,000 railroad miles and the south had 10,000 another advatage that the north had is that they had a bigger population than the south the north had 350,000 people that surved and then 200,000 so north had a bigger advantage. Another advantage that the north had is that they had a navy and the south didnt have a navy so the north took over the missisippi river and the rivers where important to the union and the confederancey because the confederates didnt have much railroads so they had to relay on rivers so then the union took over all the rivers in the seige of vicksburg in july 4th 1863.

    Read More

  • Reasons Why North To Defeat The South

    168 Words  | 1 Pages

    The reasons why it took four long years for the North to defeat the South is because they were both fighting for a cause. Americans fighting Americans. Brothers fighting against brothers. The North retained a larger population, a standing army, naval power, and advanced military leadership. The Northerners strategy was the Anaconda Plan. Their tactic was to blockade all the Southern ports to eliminate their food and supplies. Another benefit of the North was a large transportation system that ran north and south. In addition an immense manufacturing industry. This produced better weapons, faster delivery of cannon balls, clothing, and food.

    Read More

  • Advantages Of The North In The Civil War

    371 Words  | 1 Pages

    Indeed, on paper, the North had many advantages over the South at the onset of the Civil War. The advantages that the North had nearly tripled the advantages of the South. Despite the many advantages of the North, they suffered countless defeats during the first two years of the Civil War. In the end, however, the North was able to defeat the South for various reasons.

    Read More

  • Technology Impact On Civil War

    3321 Words  | 7 Pages

    The basis for my research paper is to illuminate the ways in which new (for the time period) technologies changed the way the American Civil war was fought. Similar to technology used in any other field, war technology is constantly being processed and innovated towards a more advanced ,and or effective way of operating the proposed task. Some innovations at this time were from the north and another portion were from the south yet, they all played a part for either side to the way in which the battle was fought and ultimately won. These technologies were in the fields of weaponry, transportation, communication and health each one of these categories impacted the way America fought it’s Civil War.

    Read More

More about Northern Advantages Of The American Civil War

Open Document