More handpicked essays just for you.
Communication apprehension (ca) is described as “an individual's level of fear or anxiety associated with either real or anticipated communication wit...
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
To function effectively in today’s society people must communicate with one another. Yet for some individuals communication experiences are so unrewarding that they either consciously or unconsciously avoid situations where communication is required. (McCroskey & Richmond, 1979) The term ‘communication apprehension’ was coined by James McCroskey (1976a) and is defined as “an individual’s level of fear or anxiety associated with either real or anticipated communication with another person or persons” (McCroskey, 1984). In the last two decades communication apprehension and related constructs, such as reticence and unwillingness to communicate, have received extensive research and theoretical attention by scholars in communication and psychology. In 1984, Payne and Richmond listed over 1000 entries in a bibliography of publications and papers in this area (Payne & Richmond, 1984). Overwhelmingly the underlying theme of the articles has been the negative effects that these constructs can have on academic and social success. It has been forwarded that two out of ten people suffer some form of communication apprehension (CA). The focus of this paper is on communication apprehension as a construct and on how it affects the behavior and lifestyle of an individual.
Although constructs such as CA, communication reticence, and unwillingness-to-communicate have often been treated in literature as interchangeable, (McCroskey, 1982) particularly in earlier work, some researchers have found the need to distinguish between them. Reticence was originally thought of in relation to CA, particularly in connection with stage fright, and anxiety was identified as the causative agent that produced the characteristic behavior patterns. (McCroskey, 1977b; McCroskey, 1982) However during the 1970’s the constructs of reticence and CA evolved and changed to become quite disparate. According to McCroskey (1982) the contemporary view is that reticent people are those who do not communicate competently. Phillips (1984) further states that reticent people “avoid communication because they believe they will lose more by talking than remaining silent” (p.52). So while the construct of reticence was initially the same as CA, reticence is now perceived as a concept that represents a broad range of communicative incompetence while CA relates to communicative incompetence that stems fr...
... middle of paper ...
...eported Communication Competence: Finnish and American Comparisons. Communication research reports, Vol. 8, June, 55-64.
McCroskey, J.C. & Sheahan, M.E. (1978). Communication apprehension, social preference, and social behavior in a college environment. Communication quarterly, 26, 41 45.
Payne, S.K. & Richmond, V.P. (1984). A bibliography of related research and theory. In J.C. McCroskey & J.A. Daly (Eds.). Avoiding communication: shyness, reticence, and communication apprehension. (pp. 247-294). London: Sage Publications Inc.
Phillips, G.M. (1984). A Perspective on Social Withdrawal. In J.C. McCroskey & J.A. Daly (Eds.). Avoiding communication: shyness, reticence, and communication apprehension. (pp. 51-66). London: Sage Publications Inc.
Richmond, V.P. (1984). Implication of Quietness: Some Facts and Speculations. In J.C. McCroskey & J.A. Daly (Eds.). Avoiding communication: shyness, reticence, and communication apprehension. (pp. 145-155). London: Sage Publications Inc.
Scott, C.R. & Rockwell, S.C. (1997). The effect of communication, writing, and technology apprehension on likelihood to use new communication technologies. Communication education, 46, 44-62.
Communication apprehension is a nervousness, an unwillingness to communicate. It refers to anxiety about communication interaction. People who develop negative feelings and predict negative results as function of engaging in communication interactions suffer from this. John exhibits the afore described apprehension when he communicates with his parents. A specific example from the film would be when he speaks with them on the telephone and tells them about Joanna and his plans to marry her. He chooses to omit the fact that Joanna is white. He avoids telling his parents this because he fears their reaction to the information. He mentions he will write to them on the way to Geneva about the details; however, his plans are foiled when Joanna invites them over to dinner and he is forced to face it head on when they pick them up from the airport.
On January 20, 1961, President John F. Kennedy delivered his inaugural address to millions of hopeful Americans. In the midst of the Cold War and Civil Rights Movement, recently elected JFK is present with the task of handling a disgruntled and divided America. His speech is marked with a commanding tone that uses rhetorical devices to emphasize his ideals for the country. In his inaugural address, John F. Kennedy uses a variety of rhetorical devices to establish credibility, calls people to action, and unify America.
From the journal, “The Effects of Communication Apprehension on Nonverbal Behavior,” McCroskey described that CA has “handicapped” those who were affect by it. (paragraph 7). The problems were that it discouraged many individuals such as students with high CA to avoid involvement in group discussion, the lack of social skills, and less participation. Also, CA makes the students to interacted less than those who is with a low CA. For example, in a classroom, high CA would prefer to sit in the back of the room or on the side. In “Communication Apprehension and Shyness,” by Berger, McCroskey, and Richmond stated that those who have “substandard communication skills” or “ethnically or culturally divergent” also have a high CA that discourage them for communicating. (p.134,
This theory has been subject to many articles and studies in the communication and social departments. Indeed, studying this theory can help us understanding human relations in interpersonal communication. Each of us has been one day confronted to uncertainty, whereas in initial encounters, or moving to a new a new place, or beginning a new work.
Throughout the semester, we have studied numerous communication theories. Their purpose is to help understand exactly what happens when we interact with others. We might not necessarily agree with all of the theories, but the idea is to develop tools to evaluate situations we may encounter. Often, when the theories are explained in the readings or lecture, it is beneficial to apply the concepts to a "real life" situation. Using this approach, I will use a situation that many of us have faced, or will face, and analyze it according to a particular communication theory.
Communication is an interesting field of study because we learn so much about it in our everyday lives. While in class we took the Personal Report of Communication Apprehension created by Jim McCroskey in the 1970’s. Communication apprehension consists of four parts: group, meeting, dyadic, and public apprehension. Each part relates to how well one does when in a social situation and how comfortable one may be during certain scenarios of social interaction. Through testing one can see how comfortable they feel in different settings.
Communication affects self-concept and self concept affects how one communicates. If one has poor self-concept and sees oneself as unworthy then they will present themselves this way, which will result in a negative response from people. If one feels good about oneself, they will present themselves as worthy, which will result in a more pos...
Floyd, Kory. Interpersonal Communication: The Whole Story. 1st ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2009. 140. Print.
If you remember wearing an uniform to school, then congratulations- you once belonged to a scattering of public schools that implemented such a rule. Although it is not as popular now as it was in the 1950’s, there is still yet an ongoing debate about whether or not schools should conform back to a mandatory uniform policy. School uniforms actually has many benefits. These gains intertwines with the educational process, which ultimately affects how students act and their performance beyond a school setting. Children, especially those in elementary school and middle school, could prevent problems later in life by wearing uniforms because it teaches them about respect as well as equality, the importance of academics, and school safety.
My professional attitude is similar. I find that I try to communicate well with others and express my interest through body language such as smiling, eye contact, nodding of my head, etc. I do to show that I can be personable and hope to build good relationships on that. Based on my scores, I also show higher scores for Conventional, Dependant, and/or Avoidance. This is true in the sense that sometimes, if I find myself too comfortable in a situation; I tend to become withdrawn in order to protect my well being. I don’t want people to take advantage of me, so I become distant after a certain point. This does cause conflict for me both at work and in my personal affairs.
School uniforms are a boiling conversation point these days. There are so many well-built points of view about what route parents, students, and superintendents wish to go in. It has been disputed that school uniforms have the potential to make a school safer, that uniforms reduce harassment or self-esteem issues, and that uniforms return the focus to the students' learning. I disagree. I, in fact think that school uniforms do not help make our schools a more secure place, I think that they do not revisit the center of attention to student's education - they just shifted where the attention was previous, and that they won’t help cut down on harassment or self- esteem issues in school.
Verderber, S. K., & Verderber, F. R. (1976). Interact; Interpersonal Communication Skills. California: Wadsworth Publishing Co.
Uncertainty is defined as “a cognitive response and refers to the inability to predict or explain the behavior of others.” [J2] Personality of team members like degree of empathy, emotional reaction and interest towards other cultures influence how they manage uncertainty. The level of uncertainty avoidance varies between different cultures. American culture is low on uncertainty avoidance compared to Russian culture. According to [J1], when people have a high level of uncertainty, their ability to understand another person’s message is decreased and they face a hindrance to predict the other person’s behavior perfectly. Increasing anxiety follows this high level of uncertainty. [J4] To understand effective communication
Mr Price Group must help build up local suppliers and factories so that they can receive the latest trends and fashion before their competitors at the best price without having to deal with import tax. Mr Price will also therefore be able to get clothes in the correct sizing which will increase customer
One of the benefits of having students wear uniforms is a sudden, noticeable decrease in student behavioral problems. It is proven that after schools decided to enforce a uniform for their students, they started to see positive disciplinary effects. For one school in particular, “compared to the year prior to